Rupees Ten thousand only has been paid by Sri v. Venkata Subramanyam

Petition urider Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioner/defacto complainant(mother of victim) in the C.C. No. 4262 ot 2024 on the file of lll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, L.B.Nagar, KVRR District. t l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in C.C. No. 4262 ot 2024 on the file of lll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, L.B.Nagar, KVRR Dist, pending disposal of the present Criminal Petition l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: Yazir Sarika, wto.vazir Bharath Age 2QlE_occ: House wife, No 1_2_1s1, Maruthi Nagar, Kotahpet, Sirooina-gar, fAmn Oist. " AND ...RespondenuDefacto comprainant in r.A. Nos. 2 and 3 ot 2025

1. yazir Bharath, S/o.v.Vittar Babu, Age 34 yrs, occ: Advocate, A_1. 2' Yazir padma, wo.v.Vittar Babu, Age 52 yrs, occ: House wife, A-2 3. vazir vittar BAbu, s/o.v.Vittaraiah, Age 60 yrs, occ: Mirk Business, A_3 4- Vzir vineetha, D/o.V.vittarataih, Age 22yrs, occ: student. (All are Rto.1-2-151, Maruthi ttagir, a"i"h'G;-S.roorn"grr, t(/RR Dist). A_4 ..-Petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 4 in r.A. Nos. 2 and 3 of 202s 5. state of rerangana, Represente-d by pubric prosecutor, High court of Judicature at Hyierabad fiir tn" St"t"-ort T;;';;, ...Respondenucomprainant in r.A. Nos. 2 and 3 ot 20zS Petition under section 320(6) .3s9(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the tvtemoranoum it'Grounds of criminal petition, the High Court may be. pleased to permit the petitionerl'o"rr"to complainant and the Respondent 1 to 4/accuced herein are enter in to the compromise in connection with the proceedings c-c. No. 4262 0t 2024 0n in"}t" of llt Additionat Judicial Magistrate of Firs.t crr.?:,^ ! p Nrgri, KVnn oist aiising out of the comprainant from the court of the ilr Additionii.lroi.i"t nr"gi.tr.t" Jt ilibnJr,"ilil.*rn"r, KVRR Dist vide FrR No. 2g1 0f zozq or wps "s;rooLng", offences under sec. 498-4, 406, 506 tpc, 3 & 4 D.p.Act in tne interest of Justice. l.A. NO:3 OF 2025 Petition ,ng_1 Section- 320(2).359(2) qf BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the tvtemoranorm or'crounoi of criminal petition, the - to record the compromise in between High court may be preased petitioner/Defacto complatnant against the Responoent t to 4l accused herein c'c' No' 4262 of 2024 on the file 6i tll nooition"r'-lrotiai tvtagistrate of First class, L-B.Nagar, KVRR Dist arising out ot tn" ;_o;G;;;;i't olx the court of the ,r AdditionalJudicar Magistrte o#irstcrass, L B.Nag;r, rvnn Dist vide FrR No. 291 of 2024 of wPS saroorangar offences under Sic. ag8-A, 406, so6 lpc, 3 & 4 D.P.Act in the interest of Jultice. I This petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal, Petiti-on and upon hearing the arguments of sri V.Venkata -'- the pet'itioneri - subramanyam, Advocate for in crr.petition and Petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 4 in l.A. Nos. 2 anoS'ii zozs and sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla' the Additionat Public Frosecutor on oenatiot the Respondent No.1 in Crl.Petition and Respondent No.5 in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 and Sri B. Ravi Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner in Crl.Petition and Petitioner in l.A Nos. 2 and of 2025 The Gourt made the following: ORDER F: THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA in/and 1- This criminar petition is fired under section 52g of BNSs, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 4 in c.c.No.4 262 of 2o24,on the fire of rearned ilr Additionar Judiciar Magistrate of First crass, L.B.nagar, K'v.Ranga Reddy District, registered for the offences punishabre under sections 4gB-A, 506, 406 0f rpc and sections 3 & 4 0f Dowry Prohibition Act. 2' lt is submitted by tearned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos'1 to 4 as we, as respondent No.2 that during pendency of the present criminar petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingty, r.A.No.2 & 3 of 2o2shave been fired by respondent complainant seeking permission to enter into No.2/defacto compromise and to record compromise in the above said c.c i

3. The rearned Additionar pubric prosecutor has opposed the compromise petition. since the parties were wiring to enter into compromise, they _ ,st,\,= .u uerre tne matter by appearing atong with wele given a chance to setfle th 4' ) ) i I I1 l'l i Ii 2 ErD) l.A.Nos.z&3o12025 in/ond Crlp.No.10505 oI 2025 their respective counset before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vide orders dated 16.10-2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect. .,. \

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Tetangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 31.10.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercion, entered into compromise.

6. tn view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.42O2 of 2024, on the file of learned tll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, L.B.nagar, K.V.Ranga Reddy District, are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners paying an amount of & Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Bar Association, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the High court Legal services committee for the State of Tetangana, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 3 EfD) ,.A.Nos.2&3otm25 tn/ond Olp.No.l0SOS of 2025 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed- l u //TRUE COPY// ALI BAIG REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. The lll Additional Judical Magistrate of First Class, L.B.Nagar, KVRR District. Hyderabad.(OUT)

2. The Station House Officer, Saroornagar Police Station, Rachakonda 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at 4. One CC to SRI V Venkata Subramanyam, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri B. Ravi Kumar, Advocate IOPUC] 6. Two CD Copies (Enclosed a copy of Joint Memo) Note: TotalAmount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri V. Venkata Subramanyam, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 13.11.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Telangana High Court Bar Association, Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the High Court Legal Services Committe, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 135811 of 2025 dated 26.11.2025 -tLz t' I e It .F--.r!'ss{t -2.- .t "*? n r{ a8' w I ; fi'r.. 1....i rY'. .. T, HIGH COURT DATED:1311112025 a---.a-.,.,- THE S Ta \ Q 0 B Jflit ,ir2o )r''z t,t ,:. ORDER .2&3 D clit[rIINAL PETITIo NO : 10505 !.. t ALLOWING I.A. NOS. 2 & 3 OF 2025 NI D CRIMINAL PETITION Ss 5f 'f "a OF TELANGANA.AT , HYDERABAD ,, ] .,' ,CRL.P. No. Vazir ,:',,j . .i, : Vazir: Padma ffo.V.Vittal Babu, Age52yrs, Occ: House'wife, A12 '3 ; - Vazir Vit gl BAbu S/o.V.Vjttalaiah, , Age 60 yrs, Occ: Miik Bu5iners, i-3 4: Vazir Vineetha D/o,V.Vittalalaih, : ' .' Ag9 Z2 yrs, Occ: S_tudent. , , , Sllare.n/o, 11191;iMb.ruthi Nagar, Kotahpet, ' Saroornagar,l(/RR Dist). A-4 a,- I .Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 4, . ''State of And bad for the Vazir Sarika Wlo. yazir Bharath Age26 yrs, Occ: House wife, R/o. R/o., 1-2-151, Maruthi Nagar, Kotahpet, Saroornagar, l(/RR Dist. ... Respondent/Defacto Comptainant .. JOINT MEMO a complaint dated: 6:-7.2024 :before the Women's pol rce Station Saroornagar: against the petitioneis herein C.C, No. 4262 of 2024 on , L.B.Nagarr'KVRR Dist in connection wite crime No. No. 291' of 2024-bf wPs saroorangar offences under Sec. 498-At; 406,506 Ipc, 3 & 4 D.p.Act against the petitioners and shown them as Accued No.1 to 4. r, v,*6) <"^b :. :l,j j ':t ,. i . ..., . . I .. :t: .. itj. .-l:1. :li . ,: i:,, j i.'.i . ' ..' LJ' -issue and .it is,su'brnitted ':.';.'. that:the respondent No.2 'that after registering the,above case the respondent No.2 after .1 and their family me :. ." mbers in both sidei.'discussed N'o.2 and Petitioner No.1 presently lead happy marital fife along with their child;en's due to basing on assu mptions and both parties decided an amicably enter into the compromise, accordingly the respondent No.2' come to conclusion for withdraw the above case against the OetitionlVaccused No.1 to 4. ; - : 3: It is submjtled that due to intervention of elders of bother famllie, gfe{ers of lhe locality and well-wishers, th matter has been settfed amicabty between the parties, as such it is just and necessary to quash the above said cc and to record the compromise statement between the petitioners and respondent No.2 , .: -t.- -. Hence this loiiit Memd in between the parties . ,] / v, d3 6z Petitioner No.2 sel for R.2 ' ri.. ': . 'Bergela Ravi Kumar q l:- , Petitioner No.3 I -'[dl*{#c, r- Counsel for Petitioner/Accused V.Venakta Subramanyam i I f,. [:r €