Variyala Ashok Kumar Reddy alias Ashok Kumar v. Department Slecretariat, Hyderabad

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the actron of the 4th Respondent in not implementing the orders in Rc.No.C4l37312016, daled 21-12-2016 passed by 2nd Respondent and Orders in Rc.No- D1194412O16, dated 19-12-2016, 22-11-2017, 04-01-2018, l4-(li-2018, 25-07-2018 passed by 3nJ Respr ndent as illegal, arbitrary and s()t ,r slde the same anti further direct tre 4th F.espondent to act upon the Rc I'lo (14l373/2016 dated 21-12-2016 passe(j by 2nc Respondent and OrdersinRcl.lcr [t, 194412016dated19-12-2016,22-11-2017,01-01-2018,04-06- 2018,25-07 :10 l8 rassed by 3rd Respondent respectively as; per law. Counsel for the F)r:titioner: SRI V.ANIL KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the FI-.spondents: SRI D.V.CHALAPATHI RAO GP FOR ASSIGNMENT W.P.NO: 35955 OF 2018 Between: Variyala Anil Kumar Reddy alias Anii Kumar, s/o Biilaram, l,ge. 61 Yrs, Occu. Practic ng /1,c1'to6sfs R/o H.No. 10-2-36, Peerzadhiguda Uppal Hyderabad, AND ...PET|T|ONER 1 2 3 4 The Sta-e of 1 elangana, Represented by its Principal Se:crelary for Revenue Departrr enl. Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Drslrr :t O :llector, KothagudemTown, Bhadardri Kotragt dem District. The Revr:r'.rt: Division Officer (R.D O), Kothagudarr Div sion Kothagudem Town El'adr':r,iri Kothagudem District. The Tar,;rldar Sujathnagar [\4andal and Viilage, Bhadra<iri K:thagudem District. .. RESPONDENTS Petition -rnrlr:' Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia pr aying that in the circumstances :,t;rted in the affidavit filed therewith, the Higlr Court may be pleased to issur: a ,rcpropriate Writ, order or direction, more ;rarti :ularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declare the action of thr: 4th Rr,spon6"n, n no, implementing t-ro o (lers in Rc.No. C4137312016, dated 21-12-2Ol 6 passed by 2nd Respondent and [)r,lers in Rc No. Dl194412016, dated 19-r 2-2t116. 2Z-11-2017, 04-01-2018, C4-ll:-2018, and 25-07-2018 passed by 3rd R=sp< ndent as illegal, arbitrary and se il ;ide the same and further direct the 4tr Rcspondent to act upon the Rc Nr: (.;,1 37312016 dated 21-12-2016 passed by 2nd Respondenl and Orders in Rc lJ: [,tr'944/2016 dated 19-12-2016,22-11-|201 t 04.01-2OiB, 04-06- 2018, and 25.-0'1 .2,)18 passed by 3rd Respondent respec:ivelv as oer law. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.ANIL KUMAR REDDY (PARTY IN PERSON) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI D.V.CHALAPATHI RAO, GP FOR ASSIGNMENT W.P.NO: 43084 OF 2018 Between: Variyala Ashok Kumar Reddy alias Ashok Kumar, S/o Balaram, Age. 59 Yrs, Occu. Business R/o H.No.15-13-8(6-3-8), Opp Govt. Degree College, Yellandu Road, Khammam Town and District. ...PETITIONER AND Secretariat, Hycierabad.

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary for Revenue, 2. The Collector and Magistrate, Kothagudem, Kothagudem-Bhadradri District. 3. The Revenue Division Officer, Kothagudam Division, KothagudemBhadradri Dt

4. The Tahsildar, Sujathanagar firlandal, Kothagudem-Bhadradri Diskict ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly ore in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents are illegal, arbitrary and against the natural principle of justice, in continuing the fraudulent entries in the possession column of the pahani, once it was revealed as the entries in the possession column of the pahani were fraudulent in the absence of the Sada Binama or sale deed, in the conducted enquiry vide Rc.No. D/194412016, dated 19-12-2016 by the Respondent No.3(RDO) on the direction of the Respondent No.2 (District Collector), to the survey no. 1018 O/3, 1018 OO/3, 1018 AU/3, (335/3,5,6), situated rn the village of Sujathanagar, Sujathanagar Mandal, Badradri Kothagudem District, and also suggested to the Respondent No4 (Thasildar) to rectify the mistake of such fraudulent entries in the possession column of the-pahani by following the provision of the ROR Act. Consequently direct the Respondent No.4 (Tahsildar) to stop continuing such fraudulent entries in the revenue record from 19-12-2016 as the entries in the revenue record was conformed as fraudulent in the absence of Sada Binama or sale deed during the conducted enquiry vide Rc. No. D/'1 94412016 by the Respondent No.3 ( RDO) to the Survey No. '1018 a, /3, 1018 L 13,1018 8/3, (335/3,5,6), situated in the village of Sujathanagar, Sujathanagar [t/andal, Badradri Kothagudem District. * Counsel for the F'r:titioner: SRI V.ANIL KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Flespondents: SRI D.V.CHALAPATHI FIAO. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT W.P.NO: 43097 OF 2018 Between: Variyala P-err Kumar Reddy alias Prem Kumar, S/o Balerram, Age.62 Yrs, Occu Ex :ir:'vrce l/an R/o H. No.15-13-8(6-3-8), C)pp. Gov. Degree College, Yellanclu lo,r l. Khammam T and Dt. ...PETITIONER AND

1. The Stiate <:f -'elangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary for Flevenue, Secreta -iat ll yderabad.

2. The Ccllect:r and [\/agistrate, Kothagudem, Kothagudern-Bt adradri Diskict. 3. The Revenur: Division Officer, Kothagudam Division, Kctha!rudemBhadradri Dt,

4. The Tal-s ldar. Sujathanagar lt/andal, Kothagudem-Bhad rad i District ..RESPONDENTS Petitron t. n'i:r Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances r;t;r'erd in the affidavit filed therewith, the Hig r Court may be pleased to issue ; appropriate Writ, order or direction, rrore part cularly one in the nature of Wril cf Vlandamus to declare the action of the rer;por,dents are illegal, arbitrary and :rgarr s t the natural principle of justice, in con:inui rg the fraudulent entries in the cosr'e r,sion column of the pahani, once it was rr:vealed as the entries in the possesr;ior: column of the panani were. fraudulent in tht absence of the Sada Binama cr sale deed in the conducted enquiry vide Rc No.D/1944/2016, daled 19-12-2l1(i by the Respondent No.3(RDO) on the direction of the Respondent I'lo 2 r[)istrict Collector), to the survey no.'l01ti 0/',1018 00/1 ,1018 AU/1 ,(335/3.5,,:i). si.uated in the village of Sujathanagar, S,ujatranagar Mandal, Badradri Kothauce rn District, and also suggested to the Fespondent No.4 (Thasiidar) to rr:c:trfv the mistake of such fraudulent € ntri€rs ir the possession column of ther p a arri by following the provision of the ROR A:t. Consequently direct the Respcn,i:nt No.4 (Tahsilda0 to stop continuirg sr-rch lraudulent entries in the revenue r:,::ord from 19-12-2016 as the entries ir the rev lnue record was conformed as lTaLtc r lent in the absence of Sada Binamit or sale deed during the conducted enq .r'!,r,de Rc No.D/'1 94412016 by the Respc,ndert N >.3 ( RDO) to the survey No.1018 ?-' 11,1018 L 11,1o1Bt 11, (33st3,s,6), situated in the viilage of Sujathanagar, Sujathanagar Mandal, Badradri Kothagudem District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.ANIL KUMAR REDDy Counsel for the Respondents: SRI D.V.CHALAPATHI RAO, Gp FOR ASSIGNMENT W.P.NO: 17055 OF 2020 Between: 1 2 3 Variyal Prem Kumar Reddy alias V.Prem Kumar, S/o Balaram, Age.63 yrs, Occu. Ex-Service [Vlan. Variyala Anil .Kumar Reddy alias V.Anil Kumar, S/o Balaram, Age 62 yrs, Occu. Practicing Advocate. V.ariyala Ashok Kumar Reddy alias V. Ashok Kumar, S/o Balaram, Age.6l Yrs, Occu. Business firlan, ' All the above three are permanently residence of H.No_ 15-13-7, Opp Govt Degree College, Khanapuram Haveli Khammam Town, Khammam Diitrict. AND ...PETITIONERS Secretariat, Hyderabad. Road, Hyderabad - 1, Telangana.

1. The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary for Revenue, 2. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration (CCLA), Nampally Station 3. The Addl. Collector / Joint Collector, Kothagudem Town, Badradri, 4. The Revenue Divisional Office(RDO), Kothagudem Town, Badradri 5 The Tahsildar, Sujathnagar Village, Sujathnagar Mandal, Baradri Kothagudem Kothagudem District. Kothagudem District. District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus 1) to declare the inaction of the Respondents to on- line the Pahanies of the petitioner No,1 to 3 with correction of the Sur name as per the Aadhar Card in accordance to the issued 1B Farm under L.R.U.P. Land Records Updating Project ), towards the survey No. 1018&r/1 ,fu tl,ilt't 'tOlAUn, lotz,#tZ, rclA /3i.r0tA6ls, r^rB,d,3, each survey Number hotds to the extent of Ac.20.00 Gts, situated at Sujathnagar village of Sujathnagar Mandal, Badradri Kothagudem District, and also inaction of the Pesponpents to implement the G.O.Ms No 1t,:l ri:ted 0310O12016 and Circular 3.'1 Ref No.:l\r1RO134212017, dated 09/09/2C 17 - ttre illegal, arbitrary, against natural t,rinc ple rf lustice, against the Telangana St;t3 Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act 19i'1 and its Rules 1989 and against th:) t(- t:re Article 300 A, Consequently the Jirertion may be given to the Addl Collector - Respondent No.3 to issue ON LINE e-'1 t] Fo'm and e- pahani of the petitionr:r N c, 1 to 3 with correction of the sur name in a:cordance to the Aadhar Card to lhr: r;urvey 1018 11, 11, 11,1018 12, 12 101 J, 13,1O1B 13, _13, /3, eacr s -r. /ey Number holds to the extent of Ao.2O.OC Gts, situated at Sujathangar \/illager. Sujathnagar ltrlandal, Bad rad ril(oth ag ur em District, in accordance t,: lhe issued 1B form under L.R.U.P (Land R )cords Updating Programme) inr;tr r. r;tions, G.O.Ms.No.153, dated 03,'06/i1016 Circular No.1 Ref . N o. CM RC,/ t.\,+.. I 2 0 1 7 . d ated 09 I 09 120 1 7 . lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition rrrde r Section 151 CPC praying that in thr: cir,lum ;tances stated in the affidavit filed ir, support of the petrtion, the High Court may be pleased to pass lnterim Directicn tl) :he Addl. Collector-Respondent No.i] to on lre the pahani of the petitioner ro 1 o 3 with correction the sur name as per the Aadhar Card, co the Survey No. 1019 /1, 11, 11, 1018 12, !2, 12: 1015 13, 13, /3, each survey Number h: ds to the extent of Ac.20.00 Gts, situated at Sujathnagar Village. Sujathrragir lvlandal, Badradri Kothagudem Distri:t. Counsel for the petitioner: M/s VARIYALA CHUDAMANI REDDY Counsel for thr-' Rospondents: SRI D.V.CHALAPATHI RAO, GP l:OR ASSIGNMENT W.P.NO: 10909 OF 2021 Between: Variyala,\:;hcl Kumar Reddy alias V.Ashok Kumar S/o Bala.am, Age.61 Yrs, Occu. Busine ss, H.No. 15-13-7, Opp Govt Degree Colleg e, Khanapurson Haveli, Khanrrram Town, Khammam District. AND ...PET|T|ONER

1. The State of l e,langana, rep., by its Prrncipal Secretzrry fcrr Re venue, 2. The Coller::c,- (othagudem Town, Badradri Kothagulem Dist.ict. Secretarr,rt r1 7:lerabad

3. The Tahsildar, Sujathnagar Village, Sujathnagar Mandal, Baradri Kothagudem 4. Bhukya Chander, S/o Bhukya Sowmya, Hindu (ST), Aged about 58 years, Drstrict. Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 11-63/1, Marri Thanda, Sujatha Nagar, Kothagudem Colls, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District 507 '120.

5. lt/ood Chandu, S/o. Mood Sarku, Hindu (Sf, Aged about43 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o H.No. 11-7711 , Marri Thanda, Sujatha Nagar, Kothagudem Colls, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District 507 120. (RR 4 and 5 are impleaded as per Court Order dt. 18.O2.2025 in lA No, 1t2021 .) ...RE.P.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to rssue a appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction to do the Digital Signature to the issued Memo Vide Rc.No.B/551/2020 dated 01-12-2020, despite several representations to the Collector and Tahsildar, such inaction of the respondents resulted the computer not reflected in the Mee Seva so that the purpose is not yet not served, such inaction tantamount to be violated the provisions u/sec '10, 16(2) of the Telangna Right in Land and pattadar pass Books Act,2020 - are illegal, arbitrary and Consequently the direction may be given to the Collector- Respondent No.2 to facilitate the Digital Signature(DS), to obtain Pahani and 1B from Mee Seva as directed to the Land mentioned in the issued Memo Vide Rc. No. B/551/2020 dated 01-12-2020 under the provision of section '10 and 16(2) of the Act No.9 of 2020. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. VARIYALA CHUDAMANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 3: SRI D.V.CHALAPATHI RAO, GP FOR ASSIGNMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5: SRI T.P.ACHARYA W.P.NO: 12562 OF 2021 Between:

1. Variyal Prem Kumar Reddy, Jariyala Prem Kumar, S/o Balaram, Age.63 Yrs, 2. V ariyala Anil Kumar Reddy @ Jariyala Anil Kumar, S/o Balaram, Age 62 Yrs, Occu. Ex-Service Man. Occu. Practicing Advocate.

3. Varivala Alf-(,l. Kumar Reddy @ Jariyala Ashok Kurrar, s/o Balaram' Age 61 Yrs.'Ocr; , Bt s iness Man. All the ab tve three are permanently residence of H'No- 1 5-13-7,Opp Govt ij;d;"; C,lt,,r;u Khanapjram Haveli, Khammam Town, (har nmam District AND ...PETITIONERS KothagtrrJerrr District Secretar ;a:. -,vderabad. --elangana, rep , by its Principal Secretilry f()r R{)venue' 'Kothagudem Town, Badradri KothagLrderr Dis :rict'

1. The Stat:r cf Z ine Cotf ,:c tr. r 5. fne n",r.,i,r.ie Divisio"nal Office(RDO)' Kothagudem Town B'rdradri + fne Tiii,lilOs' Sujathnagar Village, Suiathnagar 1tilardal Baradri Kothagudem District. S Bhukva (-;lrareer. S/o. Bhukya Sowmya, Hindu (Sl Agerd at'out 58 years, - O;4. Aorrcultu'e R/o H.No i1-6311. l\ilarrr Thanda liuiatha Ilaoar' (Ji-t rgiiii;i r,lrts xogriguoem. Bhadradrr Kothagtrd6nr Distri;t 507 120' 6 IV6;d-C};;.rr , S/o Mood"Sakru. Hindu (ST) Aged 'rbott 43 years, Occ- Aoricultrre, a/). H.No. 11-7711. Nlarri Thanda, Sujatha Naga , Kothagudem C6lls. KcttragL dem. Bhadradri Kothagudem District (Resporrclt>nt Nos. 5 and 6 are impleaded as per Co.Lrt C'rder dt 10.02 '2025 in lA Nc, 2l:t(:'.1\ 17 18,o 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

7. Gululoth Ravi Kumar, Badradri Kothagudem District 8. Maloth Ramulu, Badradri Kothagudem District. 9. Maloth Hasli, Badradri Kothagudem District. '10. Maloth Ramesh, Badradri Kothagudem District. 1'1. Maloth Devi, Badradri Kothagudem Diskict. 12- Itlaloth Ravi, Badradri Kothagudem District. '13. Maloth irlarrga, Badradri Kothagudem District. 14. Maloth Ram Babu, Badradri Kothagudem District. 15 '16 . Malothu Bujji, Badradri Kothagudem District. . Maloth Laxman, Badradri Kothagudem District- . Maloth Kamali, Badradri Kothagudem District. - Banothu Padma, Badradri Kothagudem District. . Maloth Bheemu, Badradri Kothagudem District. . Maloth Soban, Badradri Kothagudem District. . lVlaloth Ramesh, Badradri Kothagudem District. . Maloth Jyothi, Badradri Kothagudem District. . Maloth Gangothri, Badradri Kothagudem District. . Banoth Ammi, Badradri Kothagudem District. . Bhukya Srinu, Badradri Kothagudem District. . Bhukya Sravani, Badradri Kothagudem District. . Tejavath Mangya, Badradri Kothagudem District. . Tejavath lvlaaji, Badradri Kothagudem District. 28 Tejavath Ramesh, Badradri Kothagudem District. 29 Tejavath Devi, Badradri Kothagudem District. JU .Guguloth Lal Singh. Badradri Kothagudem District. 31 Guguloth Pathli, Badradri Kothagudem District. 32 Bhukya Jaya Krishna, Badradri Kothagudem District. 33. Guguloth Janakamma, Badradri Kothagudem District. 34 Gugulo Heeramani, Badradri Kothagudem District. 35 Guguloth Jyothi, Badradri Kothagudem District. 36 Badavath Mathru, Badradri Kothagudem District. 37. Badavath Devi, Badradri Kothagudem District. 38. Badavath Rangeth Kumar, Badradri Kothagudem District 39 Badavath Leela, Badradri Kothagudem Diskict. 40 Badavath Bodi, Badradri Kothagudem District. 41. Bhukya lr/angamma, Badradri Kothagudem District. 42. 43. Lavudya Leela, Badradri Kothagudem District. 44. Banothu Chander, Badradri Kothagudem District. 45. Banoth Thulasi, Badradri Kothagudem District. 46. Bhukya Vengal Rao, Badradri Kothagudem District. 47. Bhukya Cliinna, Badradri Kothagudem District. 48. Ratcha Narendra Kumar, Badradri Kothagudem District 49. Ratcha Anvesh, Badradri Kothagudem District. 50. Gariga Rahul, Badradri Kothagudem District. 5'1 - Thalari Purna Chander, Badradri Kothagudem Dlstrict. 52,Veligati Rajya Laxmi, Badradri Kothagudem District. 53. Ratcha Padmavathi, Badradri Kothagudem District. 54. Thalari Bharathi, Badradri Kothagudem District. 55 Bhukya Chinna, Badradri Kothagudem District. 56. Guguloth Anitha, Badradri Kothagudem District. 5T.Lavudya Ram Koti, Badradri Kothagudem District. 58. Banoth Ashok, Badradrr Kothagudem District. 59. Bhukya Hanuma, Badradri Kothagudem District. 60 Bhuky Mangi, Badradri Kothagudem District. 61. Maloth Laxman, Badradri Kothagudem District. 62. Maloth Kamily, Badradri Kothagudem District. 63. lvlaloth Bheemu, Badradrr Kothagudem District. 64. Sunarikani Ram I\/urthy, Khammam District

65. Muqithal.. R,r r nder Raj, Khammam District 6o.rrrlrdiihrt, Pr:,:;ada Ra6 Khammam District' 07. SJn"arika. I'rr aneyulu Khammam District Oe. Sunirif.an t.)lirna 6abu, Khammam District' og. Mrihi" nt, IJala Swami, Khammam District 70. SunarlXan l'lr-'kesh, Khammam District' Zi. fvf utfrimala l?ajeev Sagar, Khammam District' 72 Kolaoud t;Lrr,:ih. Khammam District' ;5 shri5h;- D.c, Joph Mogala, Khammam District za S.flSvO ,tr tlrdiadri Kothagudem District 75 S K.J6ht' lVl,r;ala, Khammam District' 76 S K Naoula lTeera. Khammam District' z7 S k Sr,rina l]eqam, Khammam District' ZS. S K N/'la-a ti,c't' Meya, Khammam District 79. S.K. Js1 lJlrl r , Khammam District 40. Maiotl" 'S;hotr'rr, Badradri Kothagudem District Ai Banotl, {jai t}adradri Kothagudem District 82. Banoth tr.s,h l< Badradri Kothagudem District 83. Banoth []r<r: . Badradri Kothagudem Distrrcl' 84. Banoth liarrtJa. Badradri Kothagudem Dlstrlct

85.Guguloth Bali S/o. Manthya, Age 28 yrs, Occ- Agriculture Coolie, R/o. Somlagudem Village, Palvancha Mandal, Badradri Kothagudem District. (Respondent Nos. 7 to 85 are impleaded as per Court Order dt. '10.02.2025 in lA No. l/2o23 ...RESP.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the Collector-R2 to attest the Digital Signature(D.S) to our Land in Sy.No. 1018 11, 11, 11, 1018 12' 12. 12' '10'18 t3, 13, /3, each survey Number Number holds to the extent of Ac-20.00 Gts, mentioned in the DHARANI PORTER by the Govt. under L.R-U.P. (Land Records Updating Project )to on-line our Pattedar Pass Books(PPBs), Pahanies, '18 in the ambit of Section 2(9) and 10 of the ROR Act.g, 2020, though no Civil Court Cases are pending - is illegal, arbitrary, against the natural principle of justice and against the to the Article 300 A. Consequently the direction may be given to the Collector - R2, to attest the Digital Signature (D,S) as no Civil Court Cases are pending in order to issue on-line our Pattedar Pass Eooks(PPB), pahanies, '1B to our Land under section 2(9) and Sec. 10 of the ROR Act No.9, 2020 to the Survey Number 1018 /1 , 11, 11, 1018 12, 12. 12, 1O1B 13, 13, i3, each survey Number holds to the extent of Ac.20.00 Gts, in accordance to the available information rn the DHARANI PORTER which was made entry under L.R.U.P (Land Record updating Project) conducted by the Government. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to pass interim Direction to the collector-R2 to attest the Digital signature (D.S) in order to obtain Pahani and 1B from fvlee seva as rnstructed by the Tahsildar-R4 while issuing Memo vide Rc.No. Bl551t2O2O, dated 01-12-2020 (material Page No 25) to facilitate the Surveyor to survey the petitioner's Land and fix the Boundaries with the correction of the sur names as per the Aadha cards (material Page No. 64 Counsel for the Petitic'ner: M/s' VARIYALA CH!?ryANl REDDY Counsel for the Re:;pc'no"ii'fl"".1 TO 4: GP-F-ORREVENUE Counsel for the Re:;pono"ni ltos'S & 6: SRI T'P'ACHARYA il;;;i W.P.NO: 12597 oF 21t21 ior tne Rer;Pondent Nos'7 ro 85: - Between: Variyala A',l r"'urtar Reddv alias J-arivala otl' 1'.131.r:1"5'llKI fun?t9'1 V'".:"d;J,j i'i'i' iiinq Advocate' Permanentlv opp Govt -'eg,< ,, uoYtetE]"xL?i;';';;;Haveii' Kham nan' Totrn Khammam Disirict. . .PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Tt: angana, rep ' by its Principal Secretary'for Revcnue' , if; :'[:11 1 :, i; ! rii,i1fle,s;. S',,i t ff J :i:i RJ";i::,| X igl"I5,?9 1; ; Neootiatror, ()onlrnittee t( 'il;i#iili;'.'-ii''vn -aloraori Petition L nce circumstances state pleased to issur: a i' nature of Writ or [Vla notice for negc:l tate 10'181 a.,, L. * \t possession ho|ie's sadabainama, rry ith <- Kothagudem ''ttt't' ..*rrpoNt)ENr No.1 & 2 ' /\rticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia rray ng that in the c in the affidavit filed therewith' th'? H gh Jourt may be ,trrnropriate writ, order or direction morr: pa'ticu arly one in the nclamus 1) to declare the inaction of the Re:spo rdents to issue the Railway compensation to the patterlars to the Sy No' Vhereas ignoring the pattedars and intimatinrl uncontructive rvhich were entered by the VRO with ulterior notive with out tlltheknowledgeofthePattedars-isillega|,a-bitrary,against : :f iustice and against the Article 300 A C( Insequently the r,;r to the Addl. collector who is acting as irchz rge to the RDO lttedars are deserve to receive the oompens ltion' but none s . whose name is found in the Dhraranr po 1er and in the the natural Prln:rlllr direction maY be 3i' to consider onlv P' else. The Patt€)d ar Revenue RecroCr; Lrrsec 2(9) of ROR Act No 9' 2020 Counsel for the Pe'titioner: SRI VARIYALA CHUDAMANI REDDY il;;;l io, it,., t<,,,upondents: GP FoR LAND ACQUlsll'loN W.P.NO: 26153 OF 2021 Between: 1 2 3 Variyal Prem Kuroar Reddy alias Jariyal prem Kumar, S/o Balaram, Age.64 Yrs, Occu. Ex-Service Man. Ylivili^1"I-I!1lrl t"9ov a.tias Jariyata Anit Kumar, S/o Bararam, Ase 63 Y rs., uccu. practtctnq Advocate. Variyala Ashok Kum5r Reddy @ Jariyala Ashok Kumar, S/o Balaram, Age.62 Yrs-, Occu. Business Man, All the alove three are permanenfly residence of H.No. 15_13_1 , Opp Govt Degree Cottege, Khanapuram tareii rnimin;;i";;: Khammam District, AND ...pETtTtONER No.1 TO 3 becretafl at, Hvderabad. 1 It-ipj:^:l Je]gnqang Rep by its principat Secrerary for Revenue, 2 The Collector,- Badradri Kothagudem District. 3. The Tahsildar, Sujathnagar Viiiage. Sujaihnagar Mandal, Baradri_ Kothagudem Distiict. ...RESPONDENT No.1 TO 3 Petition under Articre 226 of rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a appropriate writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of'Mandamus to decrare the inaction of the Respondents to issue PPB-cum Title Deeds in pending cases due to any reasons u/sec 10 RoR Act 2020 to the pattadars finding in the Gharani u/sec 2(9) of the RoR Act,2020 - are illegal, arbitrary, and against the Articre 300 A consequenfly the direction may be given to the corrector - R2 to instruct to the Tahsirdar-R3 to issue pending Pattadar Pass Books cum Tifle Deeds to the petitioner no. .r to 3 without further delay u/sec'10 of the RoR Act No.9,2020 to the sy.Nos. 1o1B ur1 ,1018 Lt1 , 1018 A11, 1018 ?"t2, 1O1B Lt2, lOtB gtL, 1O1B a,t3, 1O1B Lt3, 1O1g *B respectively, each Survey Number holds Ac.20.00 Gts, situated at sujathnagar village, Sujathnagar [Vlandal, Badradri Kothagudem District. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VARIYALA CHUDAMANI REDDy Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE * WRIT PETITION NO: '15088 OF 2022 Between Variyal t)errr Kumar Reddy, jariyal Prem Kumar, S/o Balirram,-Age. 65 Yrs, Occu E. <-.Service Man, R/6 Fi No 15-13-7, Opp. Gov- Deryree College, Bank Colone,T llh,rnapuram Haveli, Khammam Town and Dtstric. ...pETlTlONER AND Hyderz bail 1 The Princ r;l Secretary for Revenue, State of Telangarra. S ecretariat, 2. The Coll:r:t:r, Badi'adri Kothagudem District. 3. The Tahsildar, Sujathnagar Village, Sujathnagar [Vlandi:1, B rdradri Kothag u Je rr. District. . .RESPONDENT No.1 TO 3 Petition urr ler Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia I raying that in the circumstances; stired in the affidavit filed therewith, the Hirlh Court may be pleased to is;r;l e ir appropriate writ, order or direction rlore par icularly one in the nature of Wrif ol llandamus to declare the issued Noti<;e V de llc.No. 8'158512020 daled 29111,1'.1C21 s rmpugned as the similar nature of Noticer were issued and conducted erq rirl' earlier in fou(4) occasion to establisr ther rel;rtionship as Grand sons to the Ei>:-ilervice Man, during the cultivating the La td from Mutation onwards(19[r(]) ur i'rterruptedly by engaging the worken; to worl in the survey No. 1018 ul1, 1l)18 a" 1, 1018 El1, 1018 ul2, 1018 Ll2, 10-8 Z'12 and 1018 a,/3, 1018 2-13. 1O1t 813, each Survey Number holds Ac.20.0C Gts. situated at Su.jathnagar \/r rnd Mandal) Badradri Kothagudem District , such Land was awarded in t'-re y:ar of 1942 for the rendered meritc riou ; se rvice during the I World War. -'t e, ltate can not exercise the power o' issuing Notice as stated above at its l','l'rirrs and fancies in order to deprive the right of he petitioners - is illegal. arbitra15' arlainst the natural principle of justice anc agrtinst to the Article 300 A of the r c r stitution of lndia - Such impugned N otict: is liable to be set a sided. Conse,rtuon'ily the Lord ship may be pleased to set- r-side the issued impugn Noti:e \rirJ: Rc.No- Bl5B5l202O dated 2911112021 and further direct the Collector-R2 tc ( () correction to the error uploaded in the LAN D STATUS of the Dharani Porlrrl a r I do necessary arrangements to obtain e'-PP l, e-18, e-Pahani t() the Sy.No. 1018 u|1,1018 Ll1, 1018 *11,1018 ul2, 1018 from Mee s€,\/a, Ll2, 1018 *,'.7 trrl 1018 ul3, 1018 Ll3, 1018a13, each Sun,ey Number holds Ac.20.00 Gts, as pe:r the information available in the Dh;rran Po, tal under sections t 2(9) and 10 of Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Book Act No.g of 2020 lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass Interim Orders to issue Pahani Electronically in accordance to the Memo Rc.No. B.155112020 dated 01-12-2020 issued by the Tahsildar to facilitate the Surveyor to do survey the Land and fix the boundaries in order to avoid the Boundary dispute to the survey No. 1018 ?"11,1018 Ll1, 1018 *t1, 1018 ul2, 1018 Ll2, 1018 AUl2 and 1018 ul3, 1018 Ll3, 1018 #13, each Survey Number holds Ac.20.00 Gts, situated at Suiathnagar (Vill and tvlandal) Badradri Kothagudem District, in according to the available information in the Dharani Portal under sections 2(9) and 10 of Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Book Act No.9 of 2020, failing which the Surveyor is denying to do Survey in the absence of the e-Pahani. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VARIYALA CHUDAMANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE W.P.NO: 1360 OF 2023 Between:

1. Variyal Prem Kumar Reddy, Pedda Reddy, Jariyala Prem Kumar, S/o Balaram, .Age.66 Yrs, Occu. Ex-Serice Man R/o. H.No.'15-13-7, Bank Coloney, Khammam Town and Khammam District.507002. 2. Variyala Anil Kumar Reddy @ Jariyala Anil Kumar, S/o Balaram, Age.64 Yrs, Occu. Practrcing Advocate, permanent residence. H-No.'15-13-7, Bank Coloney, Khammam Town and Khammam District.507002.

3. Variyala Ashok Kumar Reddy @Jariyala Ashok Kumar, S/o Balaram, Age.63 Yrs. Occu. Business, Prmanaqnt Residence H.No.H-No- 15-13-7, Bank Coloney, Khammam Town and Khammam Districl507002. AND ...PETITIONER No.1 TO 3 Secretariat, Hyderabad- '1 . The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary for Revenue, 2. The Chief Commissioner Land Administration, Nampally, Hyderabad 3. The Collector, Badradri Kothagudem Distrrct. 4. The Tahsildar, Sujathnaga Mandal, Sujathnagar Village, Kotharder-, Badradri District ...RESP.NDENT No.1 To 4 Petiti:': t- r rrer Articre 226 of the constitution r>f rndia rraying that in the circumstance's r;1ated rn the affidavit fired therewith tht: Hi3h court may be pleased to issrc a appropriate writ, order or direction rnore , particurarry one in the nature of w.r or r\4andamus to decrare the inaction of the col:ctor-R3 to uproad the up-to-dare ri,lhtfur information in the LAND DE-A|LS cF THE DHARANT PORTAL, .qhl f -o'n inception, despite the severar repres€.ntat ons towards (i) to upload the r\adr'a r for e-Kyc status (ii) to uproad the Digrtar siignature (D S) for Land status .'v f : crrection of the uproaded wrongf ur inforrr atro r from Not signed- civil court :a:;r;s pending a No crVrl couRT cA{iES pE.{D|NG right from inception anc rii) to uproad the ppB Numbers in the Trarsaction status of the Land details n f re dharani portal as particular Survev Numbe rs belongs to the petitioners-P:tt:rr:r's are not incruded in the pRoHIBE.TED Ll{ir of the Dharani Portal right {rrrn rrrreption, in spite of forowed the giver insrruct ons by submittrng applicatrons thrl.r(,rr online from Meeseva center daterl io/121lozz, 01togl2o21 , 1910812021 , 11,0t '',)-022 respectivery, - is ilegar, arbitra.y a.d a;ainst the naturar principal of jrr;t ct: and consequenfly the direction may be g rven to the colector _ R3 to upload r ) thr: {2fr[s; for e-Kyc status, (ii) Digitar signature for Land status as No civil c.l r': r ases pending and (iii) the ppB Nurnbers fo. the Transaction situated surve'nr^rbers such as 10iB Ll1,1O1Bt Ll1,1C1B iti 11,1O1g L t2, 1018 t t2, 1018 * D 1018 L t3, 1018 L /3, 1018/ g r3 in the sujathnagar Mandal, sujathnarl;r' Village, Badradi Kothagudem Distriot, are n )t included in the PROHIBITED IJS'- ()F DHRAI PORTAL Counsel for the p -,titioners: SRI V.ANIL KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE W.P. NO: 3684 ?: gJ: _?024 Between 1 Variyal r''r]nr (umar Reclrly, @^Jariyal prem Kumar.@, peJda Reddy, S/o Pglgrql,pg,r {;7 yrs, occu. eiservite n,li^'iriiXli"Lrtur:,t, R/o H No i5_ 1 3-7. op,;, (,r' 1 pgq,.. c.rrege -ieliani; R;;" ii;ii C;t"; ;y' k;;;.p;r;;; Haveli fl -.rn,rr am City. Kham-mam Dt. varyara ,r,''r-' )r Kumar Reddy @ Jariyara Ashok kurrar. s/o /. Bararam. Aoe 65 Yrs. r_,,. : iusiness c,,m AgicuttuiJ, nl" H iv" r,,_"i: 7 c i;iElrilii;lr%Z Cotteqe /:r i,rrdu Road a";t -Coloiby.'-(nrn""piir* frrr"fi Khamriam Town Kh;rrnrra m District 2 ,..pETtTtONER No.1 & 2 AND '1. The State of Teiangana, rep., by its principal Secretary for Revenue, 2. The Collector.-Badradri Kothagudem District. Secretariat, Hvderaibad. ...RESPONDENT No.1 & 2 Petition under Articre 22.6 of rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a appropriate writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to decrare the inaction of the respondents to update the Dharani Portar with uproaded information through Mee seva as per the instructions given by the coflector-R2 regarding the Kyc status with the Aadhar card Number, Land status with Digitar signatures(D.) and rransaction status with e-PPB Numbers to faciritate to do the registration which were sord to the extent of Ac 4'00 Gts from each survey Number of the petitioners are iregar, arbitrary, against the natural principre of justice. consequenfly the direction may be given to the collector- R2, to update the Dharani portar with uproaded information through Mee seva on the given instructions of the colector-R2 regarding the updation of i) the Aadhar card Numbers for Kyc status. ii) the Digitar signature as no civir court cases pending, for Land status. iii) the e-ppB Numbers for Transaction status to facilitate to do the registration which were sord to the extent of Ac,4.00 Gts from each survey Number i.e. 1o1}r a 11,1o1}r L r 1,1o18t g t1,1o1}r ?, 13, 10181 L t3, 1O1Bl I /3 located at Sujathnagar Village, Sujathnagar Mandat, Badradri Kothaggudem District. IANO:1OF2 024 Petition under section'151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to pass the interim order:, direction to the coilector-R2 to update the e-ppB Numbers for transaction status in the Dharani portar to faciritate to do Registration to the sold Land to the extent of Ac.4.00 Gts to the Vendee from each survey Number i.e '1018 & t1, 1018 L t1, 1018 r.t1, 1018 a t3, 1018 L t3. 10188 /3, tocated at Sujathnagar Village, Sujathnagar Mandal, Badradri Kothaqgudem District. t i q Counsel for the [,etitioner: SRI V.ANIL KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Flespondents: Gp FOR REVENUE W.P.NO:3006 oF 2025 Between: Variyala r:,rr I Kumar .Reddy @ Jariyal Anil Kumar Age. 66 yrs. Occu. Practr:; ,r: I (lvocate at_Hrgh'coirt ai fiyOeraOaO ,,r, ngiir-rft,;[, ou-irXn"nt R/o p r\6 t5 13.7. gpp". Cori beg'rEE'tolrer;e. yeli ndu Rdad. Bank Colonr_.., ti,rrnapuram Ha'veli Xnammiln-Citv, Xf.l;irrri.,l Ij;" ' ...pETtTtoNER/prr\RTytNpERSON AND 1 . The Ste :e . :,r lelano"ana. rep., by it s principal Secr(]tary tor ievenue, 2. The Co rrctrr Kothagudem District. Secret:rur -vderJbad -Badradri ..RESPONDENTS Petitiorr LrrrJer Articre 226 0r rhe constitution of rnd a praying that in the circumstances ;t,r'r)d in the affrdavit fired therewith, the Hig,r iourt may be pleased to iss;,er :r appropriate writ, order or direction r,ncre 1:arti ;ularly one in the nature of wril ,',andamus to decrare the inaction of the rr:spordents to update the Dharanr F)c rt a' with uploaded information through Mr:e s eva as per the instructions grv':n t,'' the colector-R2 regarding the Kyl status with the Aadhar card Number La. i status with Digitar signatures(D.sl anri rr rnsaction status with e-PPB Nrnrbers to facrritate to do the registration wh,ch rvere sord to the extent of Ac'4 l0 r;ts from each survey Number of the pr:titic ners are ifiegar, arbitrary, agailrir ih€ naturar principre of justice. consecuen.try flre direction may be given to tfrr: c llrector-R2, to update the Dhararri portar with uproaded information th.:rLrgh Mee seva on the given instructions of tre coflector-R2 regarding the irg of i) the Aadhar Card Numbers for Kyrl status, ii) the Digitar signatur? arj ro civir court cases pending for Lard Statu;, iii) the e-ppB Numbers for lransur:'ion status to faciritate to do the registration wrich were which were sold to th,:, e < e rnt of Ac.4.00 Gts from each survev Numbe r i.e 1018 ut2, 1018 L /2, jt)1,3 :Il /2 tocated at Sujathnagar Village, Sujail nagar Mandal. Badradri Kotharjqitr; e rn Djstrict. 'pd;r lA NO:1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to pass the interim order, direction to the colector-R2 to update the e-ppB Numbers for transaction status in the Dharani portar to faciritate to do Registration to the sord Land to the extent of Ac 4 00 Gts to the Vendee for each survey Number i.e. 101g e' 12' 1018 L /2' 1o1B t t2, rocated at Sujathnagar virage, Sujathnagar ,vrandar, Badradri Kothaqgudem District. counsel for the Petitioner: SRr vARTyALA ANrL KUMAR REDDY (pARTy rN counset ror rhe Respono"ro, J"=F33tLrr"r= The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON',BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDD} WRIT PETITIOI\I Nos.22483. 25514. 34265,35955, 4308,+ 43097 of 20ta 17055 ,cI 2O2O 10909 L2562 L2597 26t53 of 2()21 15048 of 2O2Z tlt60 of 2o23 35843 of 2o24 and 13006 of. 2025 COMMON ORDT)FI The rsr;r.u jnvolved in all these writ petiti tns is intrinsically interconnected :rr rl therefore, they are taken up and hee rd trgether and are being dispc sr:,1 of by this common order.

2. Thesr' r,rrir peti[ions came to be filed questionirLg t]re action of the responrle n t il.lLhorities for not issuing the I)att€rdar passbooks under the pr o ri s on s of the Telangana Rights in Lan,l ar rd pattadar Passbooks A( t 2t 20 (for short "the Act 9 of 2O2(t"l r-t la rour of the petitioners ltu t 'r: Iands admeasuring Acs.60.O{) guntz s each in Sy.Nos.10i8 /t-) 1 tOtSlOOl2; 1018/OO7 3; 1 O L -. 1Ow/ 1, 10 18/Ow/ 2 and tOtS lOWl3. situated ar IOtBl02; 1018/03; 1018/O(l/ I Sujathnagar Vr 1,,t1i: anci Mandal, Bhadradr.i-Kothaguderr Dis trict.

3. It is s- rterl hat the pctitioners'ancestors are Ex-fler-v cemen and taking into c(ri.rs L(l rration their contribution in the World War-2, the State has assiErr:: the land to an extent of Acs.60 OO gun_as each in the aforesairl ;,.rr',,:r numbers to lhe Ex-servicemen. It is fu; ther stated that the narr'.('s r)r rhr: Ex-serviccmen (grandfathers of the lretitioners), were mutak:,-[ :r all the revenue records uiae ltroc:edings in Rc.No.C/ 161rl r Stl <1aLed 22.12.19a9. It is further stzrrec_1 that, even 2 CVBR. J Wp 22483 20 t8 aod batch after mutation of their names and recording the entries in the revenue records, when the pattadar passbooks have not been issued, they were constrained to make various representations before the revenue authorities and acting on the said representations, the Tahsildar uide Letter in Rc.No.B/3366 /2014, dated 16.09.2015, submitted a report before the Revenue Divisional Offlrcer stating that on verification of the records, the total extent of iand in Sy.No.1018 is Acs.180.00 guntas, and out of the same, an extent of Acs. 108.00 guntas is in occupation being cultivated by the ST and SC ryots since more than four decades and their names were recorded in the enjoyer column of the pahanies ol Sujathnagar village. It is also stated in the said report that from 1990- 9 1 onwards the names of Mr. Premkunar Jariyeli, Mr. Anil Kumar Jariyeli and Mr. Ashok Kumar Jariyeli are recorded as pattadars in the place of Mr. J.N.Jacob and Mr. Alexander Jacob. It is stated that in the field enquiry, it is revealed that the above .said persons were not found to be in possession of the subject land. It is further stated that, aggrieved by the said report, the petitioners have made an application before the Revenue Divisional ofhcer and the Revenue Divisional officer uide proceedings in Rc.No.Dl1944l 2018, dated 04.01.2018 directed the Tahsildar to conduct a detailed enquiry and to take necessary action as per the provisions of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 7971. It is stated that, aggrieved by the non- \ I J CVBR, J Wp 12483 2018 and batch complian( e ,) ' the said proceedings and also se€ kiltll correction of entries irr te. revenue records, W.P.Nos.9246, 9','52 and 10OO4 of 2016 came to l:,e rl,rd on the file ol this Court. This Ct>urt uide common order, clirtr'i 7.O3.2O2I , while dismissing the said writ petitions, granted lib:rt., to the petitioners therein to approeLch lhe civil Court seeking r)rlrt:r:.ion of the en[ries in the revenlre r:corCs. It is also observed thrr, the said order does not preclude the unofhciai responder tri t I erein from availing all the grounrls and r lefences under the law, if an'i :ruit is filed against them by the petitionet-s therein.

4. It i:; fr,Lr ther stated that, pending instituticn of the suit, the State has introc L: cr:,1 the programme commonly callecl a s the Land Records Updation Plc,qrlmme (LRUP) in the year, 2017. li is; tht ir case that to avail the: bcre lits under the said Programme, instead tf availing the remedy. as ,-L r,::ted by this Court in the in the batch o u1-it petitions uide comlrtyr order dated 07.O3.2021, the petiti:ne; s have made representa t-ion s before the authorities, who have ut rdertaken the updation c,I t]Lr: land records.

5. Whil : tf e matter stood thus, W.P.No.24 11 of I 02 1 was filed before this ,lorrrt to consider the online application, dat:d 29.O8.2O21 seeking frtr c::rrection and to update the Iand staius as ,,signed, in Dharani I) .rrt:Ll rvherein it was wrongly stated ,Not S ignt d, Civil Court 4 CVBR. J Wp_22483 2018 and batch cases are pending". This Court, uide order, dated 3O'O9'2O21, disposed of the said writ petition as follows: " Heord the leamed counsel for the petitioner and the leamed Gouemment Pleader for Reuenue for the respondents. With thei consen| the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage

2. This urit petition s filed qtestroning the inqction oJ the respondents in conecting the Land Status as "signed" in DLwrani Portal, which tt'as ttronglg-uploaded. as "Not Signed Ciutl Court Cases pending", euen ajl'er makiig siuerat representations bg the petitioner stating thot ra ciuil court ca.ses-are pending ight from inception tn respect of the subject land sih'ated at Sujathinagar Vittoge anl Mandal, Bhadradi Kottnqtdem Di'strict' 3. Lectrned counseL for tle petitioner hc.s stated that the petitioner ho.s alreodg made on opplicatton uentilating his gieuonce through online on 29-08.2021. But, so far, no action h(1s been taken thereotL 4. Leqrned Gouernment Pleader, on instructbns' has stated thqt the respondent o thoities will consider tLrc opplication of the petitioner and poss necessary ord.ers thereon, in accordance uith l<ttu'

5. ln uielu of the aboue made submissiot't, without going into the m.eits or dements o7 ihe case, the Wit Petition is disposed of directing the respondent authoitiei to consider the online application of the petitioner' dated 29.08.2021, ond pass necessary orders thereon, stricttg in accordance uith law, as expeditioislg a-s possible, preferablg, within a peiod of eight ueeks oJ this order, dutg putting all the interested from the iate o7 ,eciipt oi o parties on notice." "opg

6. It is lurther stated that, in pursuance of the orders of this Court' anoticehasbeenissuedcallingforobjectionsfromthepetitionersaS well as the other persons interested by affixing the said notice on the offrce of Gram Panchayat, sujathanagar. It is alleged in the affidavit that though the revenue authorities are aware about the chequered history of the case, they have not sent any notice to the petitioners address, except affixing the notice at the offlce of Gram Panchayat' After coming to know about the said notice, it is stated that the petitioners 5 CVBR, J Wp I2483 2018 aqd batch have subrli ,tr:,l a reply to the said notice by enclcsinF, all lhe documents duly uploa,Cir g. in Dharani Portal.

7. Cc,r:,r;ii|: -ed the submissions made by the ean-rcd rounsel for the respectivc parti:s and perused the record

8. Lez r-rt cl counsel for the petitioners has subrnitt,:d that, acting on the leller addressed by the CCLA, the [)istrict Collector uide proceedin5rs rr: Rc.No.E3/2147 l2018, dated 13.1i.202) directed the Tahsildar rr r:rrrduct a field enquiry and take nlcessarl action as per Rules witl.ro-r1 :ny delay under intimation to the clficr of rhe CCLA. It is further stz t,rc t hat, acting on the said proceedinl3s is suc 1 by the CCLA and the D,ir;, rict Collector, the Tahsildar ha s ssued Memo Rc.No.B/ l5o I ,'l2r)20, dated 01 .12.2O2O informinp the pe titioners that lheir namcs 1 rL..e been incorporated in the revenrre recor,ls and advised the petiti,)r.r3:s Lo make an application for obtaining orrline pahanies and Form I'I;i through Mee-seva centres. It is further strrtecl that, even after issuencr: ,rf the said proceedings, when pattadar passbooks and pahanies L,avr: rrot been issued, the petitioners were clnsrrained to hle a complaint, d.rLrd 02.O9.2O21, in Prajavani prrgramrn3 and taking cognizance of the said compiaint, the Tahsildar u;.de Memo in Rc.No.B/iiilr5 rlt)2O, dated O8.O9.2021 instead of issuing the pahanies and 1-B rt'cor-ris, has erroneously rejected the claim of .he petitioners 6 CVB& J Wp-22483,20 I8 and batch for issuance of pattadar passbook on the ground that there are disputes pending over the subject lands before various Courts and earlier' this Court having adjudicated ttre inter se disputes and claim of rights over the subject lands, relegated the parties therein to approach the competent forum for correction of lhe entries lt is further stated that thereafter, the petitioners hled an application' dated 19'08'2021 irt Dharani Portal seeking issuance of pattadar passbooks' The petitioners also lrled petition No'6/Dharani Portall2O2l' dated O2'O9 '2021 and acting upon the said representation' the Distiict Collector directed the Tahsildar to examine the grievance of the petitioners' It is further stated that when the said orders have not been implemented' the petitioners were once again constrained to make an application seeking information relating to the records and the entries made in Dharali portal and also pending status of KYC uide RTA application' dated 13.06.2022. The office of the District Collector issued Memo Rc.No.E3/454 7 12022, dated nil'09 2o22 stating that IC/C updation will be done in Mee-seva centre and directed the petitioners to approach Meeseva center to enable them to take further steps in accordance with law. The grievance of the petitioners is that even after issuance of the the resPondent authorities proceedings in Memo No.8314547 12022, have not updated the KYC proceedings pattadar passbook for the subject land' and consequentlY issued 7 CVBR, J \r'p 2i 483 2018 and batch

9. On 'l-e o'her hand, Sri D.V.Chalapathi Rac', leitrne l Government Pleader fcr I.s ; ltnment has submitted that the docur-rcnl s, as required by the TaLr sill r r to comply with the orders pas sed by this Court in W-P.No.2,4 I '1 tt 2027, have not been submitted. [n vicv oI the same, the claims; c f t I e petitioners for issuance of pall.adar pz ssbooks were rejected. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners file<i a epresentation on the file ,:,i t:t CCLA and the CCLA vide procee<ling; in Lr.No. CCLA's ref.No.LU/12 .91'.lO2O, dated 14.08.2020 directed thc DisLr ct Collector to examine th,: :laims of the petitioners for issu:Lncc of pattadar passbooks ftrr i're subject lands. The learned Gover:tme :rL Pleader for Assignmerrr frr -.her submitted that no records are a\'. ilablc for the alleged asirir lrnr ent/allotment of lands in favo'-rr of t te petltioners ancestors tro.rt ng them as Ex-Servicemen and the er trie I made in File No.C/151t)/3,r. dated 22.12.1989 is not correlatinq r( the revenue records arli nt:re making entries in the revenue record t, / pahanies do not confer a-r'i nght on the petitioners- It is also submitred thal in the absence cf arr'.' entries in the Khasra Pahanies,/ pr:pzu ation of sub- division rr:r:c rr1 ; for the allotment of the Governntcnt lan ls, it shall be presumecl rl:.rL ro such allotment was made and more J artrcularly, in the absence r;f rny proceedings issued following the grri lelines issued by the Gor',: rr- rr,ent under its Assignment Policy uidet () O.Ms.No.743, dated 3O. (t{ 1,1 - 3 . When there is a dispute u,ith r egar-d tr the nature of i \ 8 CVB& J wp 22483 2018 and batch the land, its classification, extent and boundaries thereon and possession of the subject lands, writ petition is not a proper remedy to delve into the issues relating to the title and possession nor enter into the rights of either of the parties with regard to title and possession.

10. Learned Assistant Government Pleader further contended that initially when the petitioners hled W.P.Nos.9246, 9752 and 1O004 of 2016 before this Court, the same were dismissed with an observation relegating the petitioners to approach the competent civil Court and in the writ petition hled by the contesting parties also, this Court had passed the very similar order relega[ing them to approach the civil Court. When this Court has passed order after verihcation of the records, the subordinate Revenue Ofhcials are not having any right or authority to take an action contrary to the observations of this Court with regard to nature of the lands or right and entitlement of the parties over the subject 1ands. It is also stated that after disposal of W.P.Nos.9246 of 2016 and batch, the petitioners frled W.P.Nos. 10909 and 12562 of 2027 and on 23.06.2021, a learned Single Judge of this Court passed the following interim order:- " Heord. leanred. counsel for petitioners and learned Assislant Gouemment Plea.der. Hauing regard to the subsequent deuelopments, leqrned counsel for petitioners contend that iudgment of this Court in W.P.No.9246 oJ 2016 and batch do not come in the uaA of petitioners proseotting the present uit petitions. He furttrcr submits that afier disposal of the said batch of wit petitions, tte Reuenue Records are coffected qnd Dharani PortaL reJlect the \** L I 9 CVB& J Wp 22483 2018 and batch nart?:: o; t)etitioners, therefore, the gieuance oJ the pet tioners with reknz',t e 1. etties in the Reuenue Records are nour answered. Onlg gneul\ce r rnains rs in the Dhqrani Portal the dtgttaL sigr ature is not olLtlu,.tt;c;tt e d depiuing petitioners enjoAtng the propertA. Hau nq regard to the sul)n.:stort, the Ieanted Assist<tnt Gouernment PLea<ler i; directed to assrsf t/r€ (\'t l on the fottouing three aspects: Hout ..)ty)..o ti Porlal reflect the particulars of the lc nd? -Whe her Dharani PorlaL tntrts are based on the enties made in the F'euer ue, Records? Whetl et r=l:ction of names of the petitioners in the L'herani P(rtal cunounts to c{rnD elt( t of mutation exercise in lagour of petition zrs. Once ,u,Tttes are reJlected in the Dharani Porpl, can tt'te concen:ed euthoitg refuse to oLthenticate the digital signature and not to linol|;e tlrc issue. Euen (-ssr. r t ng that competent can do so, in uhat conkrt suclt o course can be o.<loy:tt4' Is it based on objections made bg anA( ther per.s )tL itierested in the ten4. . If so, tt hat is the mechanism to deal Luith those obj?ctio1.s?. 1s rf rL )t r,.rl|ss(1ry to communtcote to the partA in utl ose -'auot r et,.tries ere rnade rn t,t, Dharant Portal, the reasons for nol eull enLt(atirlg digitctt Sigttal ''c'

11. js {rrrther submitted by the learned Governme-rt Pleader that since the .rct. ti)ners have miserably failed to conrpl1. \\ritlr the directions issued br t.ri; Court in the interim order, dated 23.06.2021 in W.P.Nos. LOli)() and ),2562 of 2O21 satisfying thr re luirements for issuance ol 1:altadar pass books, the petitioners arc no1 entitled eilher for updati-,rr )a [he revenue records in Dharani Portal or for issuance of the pattzr,la r r. ssbooks under the provisions of the l\ct (, of 2020. It is further s; rn'i, ed that on the teeth of the orders i-r W.P.No.24i 11 of 2O2O anc ba-clr, there is no legal sanctity to thr: orrlers passed by the revenue zrll,llcrities and all these writ petitions hle<L ar I misconceived and pravr:ri fr;r smissal of the same. - - I & 10 CVBR, J Wp 22483_2018 and batch

12. It is the case of the petitioners that their grandfathers were assigned the land to an extent of Acs.60.00 guntas each in Sy.Nos.1o18/o1; 1ot8l02; 1018/o3; 1018/OO/1; rol9lOOl2; 1018/OO/3; 1Oi8/Ow/1; 1O18/OW/2 and rOtS/OW/3, situated at Sujathnagar Village and Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District' It is the further case of the petitioners that the names of the petitioners' grandfathers have been recorded by issuing mutation proceedings in Rc.No.C/|610lSg,dated22.12.lg8gandtheirnameswerealsoentered in Khasra Pahani 1954-55 and thereafter, in Sessala Pahani ie., 1955- 58 and as such, the Government has considercd for allotment of the lands. Whereas, it is the case of the respcndents as per the counter- afhdavit that there are serious disputes with regard to the nature of the land, its classihcation, the entries made in the revenue records and also possession over the subject property and Batch of writ petitions filed by the petitioners as well as the unofhcial respondents were disposed of relegating the parties therein to approach the competent civil Court vide commonorderdated|7.o3.2o2linW.P.Nos-9246,9752and10004of 2016 and 34463 of 2018. In the said common order, it was observed as follows " This C,ourt adjudicaiing und.er Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia cannot go itlto the disputed questions of fact a,s to who zras in possesstory whether the e&ties made in the possession coLu mn are proper or not, at this length of time. If the enties ore not properlg/ coftectlA mctde, it is for the Petitioner to pro ue the sqme before the ciuit Coutl by leading euidence to substontiate hts cloim ttnt the enties are uronglg made bg the quthoitrcs CVBR. J Wp i 2483 2018 and batch For the /i,..l.:ons recorded aboue, these turtt petitttrts sre iqble to be rlsrnr.s:,crl, 1td theA are accordinglg dismissed. Houte'uer, liben g is granted. to the 1)( tilt()\ers to approach the ciuiL Court seeking correc-ion ( f the enties tn thc r..t.ptrrc records. It is made clear that this order 4oes nat, in ana mcrnner, ]tr' 'lude the unofficiat respondents from auanlt.g al the legollg auailct.ble tltiences under the 1aw, if ang suit is filecl. against them by the petitict,e,s I t rein."

13. l t is r 1- t specific case of the petitioners tha t 1-t e (iovernment while erm,:nlirll the ROR Act, 1971 has introduced the Land Records UpdatiorL lrrr'5.r amme (LRUP) and as per the cbjectir,,:s of the said programnre. lli'r revenue records have to be corrected r ecognising the long poss,cssrcl) of the farmers / cultivators akir to the Rules framed under Sr::1ro:t L72 of Telangana Revenue Act, 131/ Ftrsli. commonly called as ''ltr.t16 5 ."*^.Oing grant of Pattadari Righ:s irr Non-Khalasa Villages" t;r recording the cultivators as rel3iste,rerl holders. The grievance,rl 1 i L,' petitioners is that since.the re!,/enue arrthorities, with the active i,' r'ur ivance and influence of the political trierz rchy, withheld their passb,).I,::;, they were constrained to subnrit a. rePresentation to the CCLA i: nrl ,rcting on the said representation, thc Di strict Collector has issur:: 1fr3 )roceedings, dated 13.1I.2O2O directirg t-re Tahsildar to conduct a liel I enquiry and basing on the said prrceedings, the Tahsildar rssu:d Memo, dated 01.12.2O2O directing tht petitioners to approach [- e I,/ eeseva centre for updating their s ignzrtur,:s in KYC form but even irlt e: , tat, no passbooks have been issur:d. t2 CVBR, J Wp 22483 2018 and batch

74. The chequered history relating to these cases reveals that there are serious inter se disputes between the petitioners and the persons' who are in possession of the property and an enquiry has been conducted by the Tahsildar and Revenue Divisional Of{icer and batch of writ petitions have been filed and disposed of directing the petitioners and the unofficial respondents therein to approach the competent civil Court. The District Collector, without taking into consideration of the 9752' 10004 of observations being made by this Court in W'P'Nos'9246 ' 2O16 and 24lll of 2O2l and aiso the interim orders passed by lhis Court in W.P.Nos.10909 arrd' 12562 of 2O2l' has entertained the representations submitted by the petitioners and seems to have issued memo for uPdating KYC forms' In view of the above, this Court, without expressing any oprnlon i5. on Lhe inter se disputes pending between the parties or- their entitlement lor issuance of pattadar passbooks and consequenlial correction or amendment of the revenue records, deems it appropriate to dispose of these writ petitions with the following directions: a) The District Collector, Kothagudem Bhadradri District' shall issue notices to the petitioners and respondents' call for the records the land in Sy.No. 10 18 and its sub-divisions' and pertaining to claims of both the petitioners and the unofficial exa4gine the If the petitioners procluces the necessary documents respondents. satisfying the requirements for amendment of the records' the 13 CVBR. J ',\ p 21483_2018 and batch Distrir: - (. r,llector shall pass appropriate orders , strictly in accor(lirr.r r,: v.'ith law, within a period of six (6) mor-rlhs from the date of reccrpt of ir copy of this order. b) [n tire: t vent, the District Collector is not sati ;fied that the petitionrls or the respondents are entitlecL to bi recordecl as registc.-:rl I L, rlclers / pattadars, he shall pass a r':asc ned order, in accord,rn:,. ,r,ith law, within the aforesaid pe:iod of ;Lx (6) months and conrrnrrr icate the decision to the parties concerner[. c) [f irny'cl the parties are aggrieved by the orders passed by the Distrir: ( )oL. ( ctor, it is left open to them to approach lhe competent Civil Cc,r- rt r rnd seek appropriate relief, in a<:cortlartr :e rvith law, if they are t;o rr lvised.

16. Wit"n t r( above observations, these Writ Petit.ionr; are disposed of. There s 5a,1 'rc no order as costs As r st,< rrel, the miscellareous petitions pentling, if any, shall stand closi'C //TRUE COPY// SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL qEPUTY REGIETflAR I SECTION OFFICER J \ \ To Dt =,

1. The Prrrc'ral Secretary for Revenue, Secretariat, l)leran'rd, State of Telanrqani: Z fn. i?iif t:r and lrlagistrate, Kothagudem, {othagudt:m-E'hadradri District. 5 fnu ni,""i, i: Division"Oiiicer, Kotha"gudam Divisicin, Kothagudem Bhadradri a. ihe -fahst car. Sujathanagar Mandal, Kothagudenr-Bhi:dra jri District 5. The D i:.t'r:.t ,;ollecior, Kotfiagudem Town, Bfladarc ri Kotha(ludem Dstrict 6. The Cl'irrf C.,rmmissioner of 7. The AclCi C r;llector / Joint C6llector, Kothagudem Town. Brtoradri, A ine aitlt (lrllector incharge of the Revenue Divisi,lnal Offir:e(RDO)' - Negotiratrc, r ,;ommittee foithe settlement of the Railwa'7 cornpensation, Kothagr.,lCerr Town, Badradri Kothagudem District. -Land Administration (OCLr\) Nampally statron ('r abad - 1 [elangana. Kothacr rCt:tr District. Road "l r/c

9. The Cirlle:t:r. Badradri Kothagudem District. 1 0. The Tahsildar, Suiathnagar Village' Sujathnagar Mandal' Batadri- ,1,1 ff,y3fls"3"R';tiJ:'1""", Land Ad min istration' Nampallv' Hvderabad ii iil" 6liii";, sioraoriKothaqudem District - l3 varivata Anir xrmur"d)'Jlf'6'"i;i#i'Inil Kumar, Ase 66 Yrs, occu' ' - 't't ti voe ra nao ir"iit :'Jr1ll P;3ft , "s 9g'i:X# il;"'iii'l'""i1-r-5-2, opi covt Desree .collt "t' "H"Jver iXr''i Aq-'"'" city K h 5 m m a m D ist' colonev, Kha n ap u ram "ffi H.gffi sdIi,tru][,r;1.-'lrs,ti",{'*Hii;,-^1i:ffi 3i"?eropuc] g ?*S $ j1i$., f AitAXn e*t"fi l3J?'"Yn" 1... th e s tate or r e r a n s a n a, XJ vocate *^ffi -cu m I at Hyderabad. [OUTI

18.Two CD Copies PSK. BS W HIGH COI..,1?T DATED:27'10312025 COMMON ORDER WRIT PETI-I|ON Nos.22483, 25514, 34265, 35955, 43084, 430f17 ot 2018, 17055 ot 2020. 10909, 12562, 12597,261153 of 2021, 15088 of2022,1360 of 2023, 36843 of 2024 and 3006 ot 2025 ) I ---:a (t'6t'€S (l' 0: JlJi. ?06 't Z c) C) a. \'7 ,, * \!,='+ AT DISPOSINIG OF THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT C;OSTS 4 s \") t.,