Sadia Begum v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under ArtiCle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the' affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate order or orders direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents as illegal and arbitrary and against the Provisions of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 in not issuing Pattadar Pssbooks and Ttitle deeds and NOC and consequently direct the respondents to issue pattadar Passbooks, Ttitle Deeds and NOC in respect of Sy.No.43 to the extent of Ac.1.05 gts Sy.No.45/04 ,7 to the extent of Ac.O.04 gts and in Sy.No.1026 to the extent of 2.26 gts Situated at Jawaharnagar Village Shameerpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. LA. NO: 'l OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 38063 oF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders thereby directing the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over Sy.No.43 to the extent of Ac..t.05 gts Sy.No.45/04 to the extent of Ac.0.04 gts and in Sy.No.1026 to the extent of 2.26 gls Situated at Jawaharnagar Village Shamerpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District., and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI NYAYAPATHI PRASHANT Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
ORDER -
Operative part
l THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR ORDER: W.P. No. 30752 of 2016 On the earlier occasion on 3O.OZ.2O2S, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption for dismissal. Accordingly, today, though the matter has been listed under the caption for dismissal, there is no representation for the petitioner either bv physical presence or by virtual mode in the forenoon session as well in the afternoon session. Hence, it appears lhat the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter alci this Court has no other option except to dismiss this writ petition for non prosecution. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution There shall be no order as to costs. r\s a sequel, shall stand closeC. miscellaneous applications, if any pending, /t I SD/- S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SI TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To,
One CC to SRI NYAYAPATHI PRASHANT, Advocate. IOPUCI 2. fwo CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana l "/
Two CD Copies. lY BSK PVL HIGH COURT DATED:3110712025 ORDER WP.No.30752 ot 2016 l' l',..r.\' t' ::: I::i ,, t.,'] 1E SEP '/025 \qi:___-, .-,- a ,./ "a-.' ".- I DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS E t cL\ ? \
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.