High Court · 2025

6. Mr. Sharvan guplq, g/o. Not Known, Chairman ervrnnniudir{,iito-trnilinoo,"",r'eilili'i,it'lKi"1fl*nrPjfr G u rgaon Road, S ika nderpu ; Ch;;[: -s-".t j i':]'a,"b-u rgron - 1 2n02, Ha rya na, i,9,!rH{ril r __ _i,v!r.\, 4e, \7( vvvav. lndia. . 7 lndia. ila,'- i,,r,i[!::?fji3 xff:Sitsfl i]si,ffi "?gg s:H,,,,trnfi Gurgaon Road, sikandeipri cr,oilL, 5;f6; _'i'a]'e.irgaon _ 122oo2,Haryana, 8' Mr. Nalini Kanth, S/o.J.,rot Known, Liaison officer of- l/{s. EMAAR MGF Land !19., ffice Addiess emaai MGF eus-inesi"pl"irl' sik;rJ;fir iTr"*r, s?.ff: i8:bursaon - 122oo2,H:[:H:, ?;fif"" noio, r_. _.rv!!rY Ev, vu vvvrvr ' Uiirtlilit; f,{ll?! 3,ffi:'lH" ;qfl:;; Vn ; Frs ltc r i.irl.,!,].,;Bili". cer No nnrrri€r|.ittaoe' . !q lo Ltd, Bo u rd e r H i us Gachibowti AvoEil'oi'o"I'booosz, :, ,:l i. i' ;l I ,j .-'.ii.:1r..,. ' :,.., 1..,r i i I : :. j I : ; ,i I I I i '(:, i,=.- . .' ..' I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI ORDER: This Wnt Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitr'rtion India ,of seeking the folklwing reliefls:- " ...to issue an appropriate l{rit, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, dgctaring the itlegal action of the respondent authorities, particularly 4't' and tt' respondents herein, interfering in the civil cases, ana' ihreatening the petitioners, by way of registering the false cas4s, and not allowing and entering petitioners, in their registered plots, in-respect of plot Nts.9 aid 17, admeasuring of 384 Sq.yards, and 475 sq.yards, both plott or" situated in Sy. Nos- 27/3, and 28/3, at Nanakramgtula Village, -GHMC, Sr,-rilingampalli circle, serilingampalli Mandal, R.R. District, TS, by colluding and-managing with the uno.ffieial respondens, 4s been illegal, arbitrarJ,, unjust, onirilotton of Article 19 and 300-A Constittrtion.of India., ancl consrrqientty direct the respondents herein, particularly 3'd and 4't' respondenti heriin, not interfere in the civil cases, and not to threatened the priition"rr,, by way of registering of false cases, and forthwith to allow and enter the Ttetitioners, in their register plots, Nos, 9 and 17, admeasuring of 384 sq.yards, and 475 sq.yarcls, both plots are situated in sy. Nos- 27/3, and 28/3, Nanakramguda Village, GHMC, Serilinga.mpalli Circle, Serilingampalli Mandal, Ii.R. Distict, TS, by directing the 2"d respondent herein, to conduct the cletailed enquiry, in-respect the above subject land / plots, and take the stringent action against the 5't' respondent, including removal of his olficial po*irr, having colluded and taken the huge bribe from the unolficial 'respondents, fir protecting their illegal actions, and to grant such other order or-orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case...." -

2. I have heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Panuganti, learned counsel representing Mr. Nageswar Rao Palle, learned counsel for thq petitioners and Mr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Horne appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondents were !.nterfering in civil disputes between the petitioners and respondent Nos.6 to 9. - 2 Accordingly, this writ petition has been f,rled seeking a specific direction against respondent Nos. I to 4.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Horne submitted that Crirne No.320 of 2016 was registered against the petitioners, and after due investigation, a charge sheet was filed. The rnatter is now pendrng as Calendar Case No.9 49 of 2022on the fite of the X Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kukatpally, and is listed on 27.t0.2025 for appearance and service-of sulnlnons. He further contended that the respondents never interfered with any civil disputes as alleged, that the petitioners' allegations are baseless, and therefore prayed that this writ petition be disrnissed.

5. I have perused the material available on record.

6. Having regard to the pleadings, the pendency of crirninal proceedings, the assertions in this petition, and the lirnitations of the jurisdiction of the respondent police, this Court directs that the respondent police authorities shall not interfere in civil disputes between the petitioners and respondent Nos.6 to 9, even under the guise of the registered crime or pending crirninal proceedings, save and except in strict accordance with law.

7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. -- J Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD'.G. JYOTHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Pdncipal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. T:S. 2. The Director General of Police, TS, Lakidikapool, Hyderabad, TS. 3. The Commissioner of Cornmissionerate, Mumbai Hyderabad, TS. ii, ' Police Pine Valley, Gachibowli, r+.

4. The Station House Officer, Gachibowli, Police Station, Cyberabad Police Commissionerate, Hyderabad City, TS. ; .i rj,i:.r

5. One CC to SRI PALLE NAGESWAR RAO, Advocate. [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUTI Z. Two CD Copies. i: . - ,ij ",,ir i,t,. I ,. , i'i ,,1 ;,:,j: l..i BSK GJP NT ,. ); ,!: : .. :il ": :, i' I , ; HIGH COURT ' .: DATED i2510812025 ORDER WP.No.9 20 17 ING OF THE : . i. 5 3I t * PETITIO WITHOTIT COSTS ( .'i,'-.i: :,.. .rl :::. i.r :r + {ijt r*; }. 1 l Ulli 'i:i; ; r !"1. :.. : t"':-4. r: I :, ' ,',; ::". .t al.r::rrl-. i: :', ! i.,i . r; : ; @ h$ ,iI?6 ,: .: :.:i ,,.. l:!. .i" .!. ;l !i t ri;. a: ';: -: l:1 ;