leerioothula Pattabhi Ramaiah v. 1. The State of Telangana

6 Narsingh Srinu, S/o. N-Janaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ ; Agriculture' R/o. lndia K-otaiahgudem Village, Tripuraram Mandal, Nalgonda District -Siioutu,

7. Rathikindi Ramulu, S/o. {amaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ ; Agriculture' R/o Kamareddygudem Village, Tripuraram Mandal, Nalgonda Diskict' 8. Rathikindhl R/o Mukundapuram Village, Tripuraram Mandal, Nalgonda District--. 9. Venkanna, S/o. Not know'n, Aged about 55 years, Occ ; Business' C/o Swathi Travels, Srilatha Hotle, Miryalaguda, R/o. Miryalaguda Town, Nalgonda District. Slo. Ramaiah Aged about 53 years, Occ ; Agriculture' ^ '1 0. Smt. Rathikindi Sayamrha, Wo Late Ramaiah' Aged about 65 years' Occ ; Business, R/o. Mu[undapuram Village, Tripuraram Mandal, Nalgonda District'

11. Smt. tvladha Mangamma, Wo. Mangaiah, Aged about 56 years' Occ ; Business'R/o.ItlukundapuramVillage,TripuraramMandal'NalgondaDistrict. 12. Smt. Jerripothula Varalaxmi, Wo. Late Srinivas Aged about 49 years' Occ Employee, R/o. Ranganna Colony, Miryalaguda Town, Nalgonda District - 13. Jer;ipothuia Shiva Kumar, S/o. Lite Srirrivas, Aoed about 32 years' Occ ; Pvt ' R/o. Ranganna Colony, Miryalaguda Town, Nalgonda Districl "rpioy"., 14.Jer;ipothula Sharath Kumar, , S/o. Late Srinivas, Aged about 28 years'-Occ ; Pvt.,'Employee, R/o. Ranganna Colony, Ir/iryalaguda Town' Nalgonda District ' 15_Jerripothula Jikki alias Ganesh, S/o Late Srinivas Aged about 23 years, occ ; Pvt., Employee, R/o. Ranganna Colony, Miryalaguda Town, Nalgonda District' .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 ol the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of [Vlandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in non-following the provisions of the criminal Procedure code Section 154 (3) of cr.P.c. nor section 17 3(4) of B.N.S S. and non-initiating to take the necessary action non-initiating and non-initiating to register F.l.R. against the Respottdent Nos.6 to 15 who hatched a plan to kill the Petitioner by takrng the advantage of earlier disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos.6 to 15 is illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutrona I and violation of Articles 14, 15,21 and constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to follow the provisions of the criminal Procedure code Section 154 (3) of Cr.P C. or Section 173(4) of B.N.S.S Act and take the necessary action and register the F.l.R. against the Respondent Nos. 6 to 15 who are trying to kill the Petitioner. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to follow the provisions of the criminal Procedure Code Section 154 (3) of Cr.P.C or Section 173(4) of B N S.S. Act and take the necessary action and register the F.l.R. against the Respondent Nos. 6 to '15 who are trying to kill the Petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 15 : - The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.24471 of 2025 OI{DER l lcartl learncci counsel for thc pctitioncr and Sri.M.Srinivas, lcarnctl Assistant Govcrnment Plcader for Home aPpearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 With thcir consent, this writ pctition is bcing taken up for disposal at thc admission stage itsclf

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking the following prayer:- "lo declnre tlrc actiott oJ tlu' Rcspondent No.3 in non-follotoing the proaisiorts of tlLe Crininal Prot'edure Code Section 154 (3) of Cr.P.C nor Sectiotr 173(4) oJ Il.N.S.S trul rrcn-tnitinting to take the nacessanl nctiotr nott iniliatutg aul nortnrtirtttttg b register F.l.R against tlt Respottdenl Nos.6 fo 75 u,lut htlc)rd a pLrtn to kill the Petitioner by tnking tlrc ldz)ant Sc of earlu'v disltu'rcs behoeen the Petitioner and RespotdetLl Nos.6 Io 15 is iLiegal, nrbitrnry, unconstitutional and uiolntion of Articlcs "14, 15. 27 tttd Conslitution o.f Indin and aLso ttolntiort o[ Principles o.f NthLn,L ]us[itc and consequently direct lhe llasporLdcnt No.3 to .folloro the prot'tsions of tlrc CriminaL Proceclure Ctde Scctiott 1!j4 (3) of Cr.l'}.C or Scctiou 173 (4) of B.N.S.S Act nnd tnke the necessnnl ac.tion nnrl register tlv F.l.R against the Responrlent Nos.6 to 15 tuho nre trying to kiLL Llte Petil"torLer."

3. tsriel facts stated in this rn rit petition are that petitioner is alleging that rcsponde.nI Nos.6 to 15 killed l.ris brolhcr Sri.J.Srinivas filed complaint beforc respondent No.5 poiice station ;rntl tl'.c sarne is pending for investigation. Thcreafter, responclent Nob.6 to 15 attacked the petitioner on 21.04.2025 and the peIitioncr maLlc arroLl-lcr conrplairlt L'c[ort' respondent No.5. How'er.er, r,r,hen the responclent No.5 ditl not in itiate any action against respondent Nos.6 to 15, pctitioner madc rcpresentation datcd 10.05.2025 and requested resporrdet-rl No.3 to follow, Section l-.1 (l]) of Cr.P.C or Section 17j (4) of .- 2 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (l"rcrein aftcr rcferred as 'BNSS') and take appropriate action in the mattcr_

4. Learncd counsel for the potitioner submits ihat inspite of the I0.05.2025, responLlcnl authoritics ciicl not initiate anv representation datecl action aElainst respondent Nos.6 b .15. Aggrieved br,. the samc, this writ petition is filecl

5. Learnecl Assistant Government pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 submits that as per instructions issued by Sub- Inspector of police, pS Mirvalaguda_l fon,n, Nalgoncl.r District, respondent No.5 on petitioner's compraint, rnacrc cD cntr' on r r.05.2025 and startccl invcstigation and examined i.t,itncss i.e., MS.V.Sujatha, Superintendent of PDM Court, Mirvalaguda ancl Sri.Viclvasagar Reddv, Supcrjntenderlt of 1sr ADM Court, N4irvalagucla and rcc.rclccl rheir stater-.ents that neither J Varalaxmi nor lrer sors attacked thc petitioner. it is further submitted that after compretion of e.quirv, the petitioner cohrpraint rvas crosed as ,false, 77 '08 2025 and a ,otice rlatcrl 17.0g.2025 ,t,as arso scnt to thc petitioner by registered post.

6. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioncr prai,this Court to grant libcrty to petitione. to scek appropriatc remed,v as availabie urrder law.

7. Recorciinil the submissions maclc by the learrred cc.,unsel appearing on either side a,d si^ce the petitioner,s complaint is closecl as ,,false,,, this writ petition is clisposcil of granting Irberty to pctitioner to seek appropriarc remedy as availablc unc{cr law. 8 Accordinglv, tl-ris r.r,.ri t petitror-r 1S disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if anv penciing, sh:rll st.-rncl closed. No ordcr as to costs //TRUE COPY// SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secreta ry, Home Department, Se 2 a State of Telangana at Hyderabad The Director General of Police, Telan gana, Hyderabaci The Superintendent of Police, Nalgon da, Nalgonda District The Deputy Superintendent of Police, lvliryalguda Division, Nalgonda District The Station House Officer, I Town Police Station, Miryalguda Town, Nalgonda Diskict uilding, Secretariat, riat B 4 Hyderabad [OUTI

6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOI\ilE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Z 9r" CC to SRt RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate tOpUCl 8. Two CD Copies To SA BS HIGH COURT DATED:1 910812025 ORDER WP.No.24471 of 2025 '' Ytl o 1. ,I c i,. 26 MEIlJ \1 r) .; oal C rtEo I DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. \ ,.I vl \