The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly 4th and 5th respondents and their subordinates in calling the petitioners to the police station and interfering with their personal life and liberty, under influence of the 6th and 7th respondents, and further threatening to implicate them in false criminal cases regarding the matrimonial issue of Smt.Soughra Fathima, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and also in violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to call the petitioners to the police station or interfere with their personal life and liberty. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 17568 OF 2016) Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to interfere with personal life and liberty of the petitioners by way of calling them to the police station regarding the matrimonial issue of Smt. Soughra Fathima, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI MOHD MOIN AHMED QUADRI Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 5: SRI R.LAXMIKANTH REDDY, Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: - The Court made the following: ORDER AGP FOR HOME ':'j B k t'' THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.14083 OF 2016 ORDER: 'I'his Writ Petition is hlecl under Article 226 of Clonsritution of India secking thc following rc[ie[: "...to issue a wdt otdet ot &ection more particulzrly one in the nature of Writ o[ Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents parucularly 4th and 5th rcspondents and thcir subordinates in calling the petjtioners to the police starion and inretfedng with their personal life and liberty undcr influence oE the Oh and 7th respondents and further threatemng to implicate them in false criminal cascs regarding the matrimooial issue of Smt Soughra Fathima as illcgal arbitraq violative of principles of natural justice and also in violation of Articlcs 14 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and cooscquendy dircct thc respondcots 2 ro 5 not to call thc petitioners to thc policc station or ilterlcre with thcu personal lrte and liberty and to pass.."

2. I{eard Mr.Mohd Moin Ahmed (]uadri, learned counscl for thc pe tidoners arid Mr.R.Laxmikanth Re ddy, learned ,'\ssistant Government Pleader for Homc appearing on behalf of respondcnt Nos.l to 5.

3. 'l'hc learncd counsel for the petitioners submits that the present writ petition has been filed seeking appropriate dirccrions as thc pctitioners \\rerc allegcdly subjected to interfcrcncc by respondent Nos.4 and 5, who, under the influence of the unofficial respondents, called them to the pol-ice station and thereby infringed upon their personal life and libcrry. 2

4. -fhe learncd Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on the other hand, submits that the respondeflt-police authorities have never interfered with the personai l-ifc or liberty of the petitioners, as allcgcd, and that they have been and shail continuc to act stricdy in accordance with the procedure established by law

5. I havc pcrused the material placed on record.

6. Har.ing regard to the submissions advanced on either side, thc catcgoncel asscrrions made by the petitioners in the affidavit, and kccping in vieu, the fimited authority of the respondent police even in the course of crirne.related proceedings, this Court obser-vcs that ln interim order was eadier passed on 25.04.201,6 directing thc rcspondcnt-police authorities not to interferc with thc life and liberty of thc pctitioncrs. In the circumstances, this Court is of the considcred opinion that making the said interim order absolute rvould sufficiendy redress the grievance of the petitioncrs and serve the ends o[ justice.

7. Accordinglv, the respondent-police authorities are directed not to interferc with the personal life and liberry of thc pedd#ers, -/ it: l ttr! save and cxcept in strict conforrniry wlth law and by following duc process. 8 With this dirs6ti6n, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petirions, if any, pending in this Writ petition, shali stand closcd. SD/- S.MALLIKARJUNA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To SECTION OFFICER '1 . The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda District at Nalgonda. The Superintendent of Police, Khammam District at Khammam. The Station House Officer, P.S.Suryapet Town, Nalgonda District. The Station House Officer, P.S.Kothaguda, Khammam District. One CC to SRI MOHD MOIN AHMED QUADRI, Advocate IOPUCI Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies 1rl 2 4 6 7 B PSK. PSK l l HIGH COURT DATED:1 2t0912025 ORDER WP.No.14083 of 2016 lHE S ( (,;. Oo 0 2 rli' itlt !iArn'"t' -)a'' '(r t;:l ; '] . I ,*-. ii'*t..1; DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS L0l2l €J "il ot' 3ot\t'-o