Hussain H. Meghjani v. The Secretary, Regional Transport
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
In the result, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
In the result, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed not to collect compounding fee from the petitioners for the alleged violation of the provisions of Section 192(A) of the Act. No costs. _______________ 31.10.2007
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In the result, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA W.P No. 33961 of 1998).
← Search more judgments