✦ High Court of India · 01 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 01 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
01 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,203 words

3. Manqan Gopal, S/o' Late Lasmaiah' Age 40 years' Occ Labour' R/o H'No S- " oil'iriilr;;[,p'arrvvirragLinJ Mandal'-Sansareddv District 4. B Ramuru, s/o.Jharnappa'*%??tJf,iii;o?cr"#l:i''"e' R/o H No 1-28' 5. A. Laxma Reddy, S/o. Late Veer Reddy..Age 48^yeais' occ Agriculture' FUo' " illg;;;rp;ttv vitiase 'ni rr''tinoat' Sansareddv District' 7 Fasiuddin, s{o ry,3*,b:ff5 J:ru:,.s.&iy:i?i:r'e' MogudamPallY Village a 8. Quthbuddin, S/o. Nawabsab Age 47 ye^ars' Occ Agriculture' R/o H'No 7- " )1i), ffi;;;ailparrv virrJs";;nd i/andal' Sansareddv District Fl/o H No'7-21' 9. lssam, S/o. Basheers'u' ns" .3? Jears' -999. A,sligulture' " il6rll;artivVlttase anir ruinoat Sansareddv District 10.Amiad, S/o. Yousuf Khan Age pl Vears' i9c^fOlicuttur' ' " ilio'6liriliirrv Viriase "o tt'tu io't' S Jngareddv District ll K Aniaiah, S/o. Rangaiah, Asg ?l}/egls-'-gfcllsriculture' '' ii"6'ul?^iprirWiirus Junt i"ruio't sanga reddv District ,12.lsmail, S/o' Pasha Miya, Age 50 years' occ Agriculture, Fl/o. H.No.1.85' ' iiqi,'qgriqliv ylfi,s#;d M6ndal' Sangareddv District' 13. Nazeer, S/o. Mogbut, Aqe 60 years, occ Agriculture, R/o. H.No.3-1 ,1 " i!tl.g;,;;,";;ttv viLtige and"Manda t' sansa reddv District Fyo H No'9-23 Fl/o H No'5-34' ^Ao"%,.i ' AND .....PETITIONERS 1 Tha qlrtc of Telanoana. represented by its Principal' Secretary to the Home D;;r",fi;"t Secreiariat Buildings, Hvderabad The Deputy Superintendent of Police' Sangareddy Division' Sangareddy Proper and Distnct I

3. The Station House Officer, Chiragpally Police, Chirag6ra '. Sangareddy District.

4. Palthya Tukaram, S/o. Gangu, Age 36 years, Occ Agr c- .ure, R/o. Vittunaik Thanda, Mogudampally Village and lvlandal, Sangarecic i District. ....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of lh'e Constitution of lrrc praying that in the circumstances staled in the affidavit filed therewith, the ligh Court may be pleased to issue arr order or direction more particularly onc the nature of writ of certrorari call for .he records and to quash the F.l.R l.l'r 21 of 2017 of PS Chiragpally of Sanllareddy District, dated 25-3-20'1 7 as the: ', gtstratron of the said FIR is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, null and void and vrc I tive of principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19 and 2i f the Constitutron of lnd ia l.A.NO:'l OF 2017 (WVMP.NO:3265 oF 2017) Betw ee n: Palthya Tukaram, S/o. Gangu, Age 36 years, Occ Agriculturc. | /o. Vittunaik Thanda lVogudampally Villa ge and [\rlandal, Sangareddy District. PETITIONER/R-4 AND 1- Nimmala Krstaiah, S/o. Ramaiah, Age 39 years Occ Teacher, R/o. H.No.3-7, l\,4ogudampally Village and Mandal, Sang: eddy District.

2. Nimmala tVogulaiah (Mogulappa), S/o. Ramar:rt , Age 43 years, Occ Agriculture. R/o. H.No.3-7, [\4ogudampally '/ lage and [\/andal, Sangareddy District.

3. Mangan Gopal, S/o. Late Lasmaiah, Age 40 y€. s, Occ Labour, Fl/o. H.No.S-60. lr,4ogudampally Village and [Vlandal, Sar r areddy District

4. B. Ramulu, S/o. Jharnappa, Age 54 years, Occ A: iculture, R/o. H.No.1- 28, tt4ogrrdampally Village and lr,4andal, Sangaredrj,, )rstrict.

5. A. Laxma Reddy, Sio. Late Veer Reddy, Age 4{l } )ars, Occ Agriculture, R/o. H.No.4-1C0, [Vlogudampally Village and l\,4an(l: I Sangareddy District 6. Rafiuddin, S/o. Nawabsab , Age 44 years, Occ A I culture, R/o. H.No.7- 20i2, Mogudampally Village and Mandal, Sangare,Cc r District.

7. Fasiuddin, S/o. Nawabsab, Age 40 years, Occ A: culture, R/o. H.No.7-

2012. [/ogudampally Village and lVlandal, Sangare i i r District. B. Quthbudlin, S/o. Nawabsab, Age 47 years, Occ lc iculture, R/o. H.No.7- 2012, Mogudampally Village and Mandal, Sangare:cr r District.

9. lssam, S/o. Basheersab, Age 32 years, Occ Ag i,; lture, RJo H.No.7-2'1 , lVogudarnpally Village and Mandal, Sangareddy Dr; ict

10.Amjad, Si/o Yousuf Khan, Age 32 yeas, Occ Ag I ultur, R/o H.No.9-23, Mogudarnpally Village and [\rtandal, Sangareddy Di; 'ict. 1 'l . K. Anjaiah, S/o. Rangaiah, Age 55 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. H.No.5-34, l\.4ogudampally Village and Mandal, Sangareddy District.

12.lsmail, S/o. Pasha fvliya, Age 50 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. H.No.1-85, Arlogudampally Village and Mandal, Sangareddy District.

13.Nazeer, S/o. Mogbul, Age 60 years, Occ Agriculture, Fl/o. H.No.3-11, Mogudampally Village and Mandal, Sangareddy District. .....RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

14.The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal, Secretary to the Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

15.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sangareddy Division, Sangareddy Proper and District.

16. The Station House Officer, Chiragpally Police, Chiragpally, Sangareddy District Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders in WP No. 12902 of 2017 dated 12-4-2017 and dismiss .....RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS the writ petition with costs. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 16037 OF 20171 Petition Under Section 15'1 CPC prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of {he petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay'-- of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioners/accused nos- 1 to 13 in F.l.R No. 21 of 2017 of PS Chiragpally of Sangareddy District, dated 25-3-2017 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI K.VENUMADHAV, ADVOCATE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : SRI R.LAXMIKANTH REDDY, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI A.SAI CHAKRAVARTHY The Court made the following ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TII (ARAMJI @2! 17 t t ORDER: This Writ Petition is hled under I rticle 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following re I :f/s:- "...to issue an order or direction more particularly onc i; the natur(_, of writ of certiorari call for the records and to quash tlrt .l.R.No.21 of 2017 of PS Chiragpalty of Sangareddy District, dated ,i il2ol7 as the registration of the said FIR is nothing but arbitrary. I rgal, null and void and ..'iolative of principles o[ natural justice an(l a so violativ(] of Articles 1a, 19 and2l of the Constitution of India and t: >ass....,

2. Heard Mr.A.Sai Chakravarthy, Ie: .ned counsel petitioners ernd Mr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, ler :ned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearin€{ or respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners s_ tmits that the cause in this Writ petition does not survive : lr adjudication and seeks to dismiss this Writ petition as inf: lctuous.

4. Recording the submission of learned , ounsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed s infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 2 Miscellarreous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY' SD/. M. N ASSISTANT ANI GISTRAR I I SECTION OFFICER R HOME, High Court for the Stat of Telangana at ENUMADHAV, Advocate [OP Al CHAKRAVARTHY. Advocate PUC]

1. Two CCs to GP FO Hyderabad. [OUT] 2. One CC to SRI K.V 3. One CC to SRI A.S 4. Two CD Copies To SA GJP N-r HIGH COURT DATED:01 10912025 F"^ 'o o gRt 1l ]-.<:tit);.\ .4.\\ ',<a \\ tti n\ ..3 }) o7 .,t ,' .t ORDER WP.No.12902 of 2017 -:1 rr!1 DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS. r{l. -'$'r

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments