J.Vishwanadh Rao v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No. 3 to 5 in non-considering the online application and representatrons of the petitioner and in non-initiating to grant the E-pattadar passbook to the petitioner, on his cultivating land to an extent of Ac.2-o9114 gts in sy. No 'l 7gl32, which is situated at Tallaveerappagudem of Damarcherla Mandal, Nalgonda District, which is illegal and arbitrary and violative of article 14, 1s,21 and 300-A of constitution of lndia and also violative of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents No. 3 to 5 to consider the online application and representations of the petitioner and to issue the E-pattadar passbooks on my cultivating land to an extent of Ac.2-O9114 gts rn Sy.No 178132, which is situated at Tallaveerappagudem Revenue vilage shivar of Damarcherrrr Mandar, Nargonda District lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 15i cpc praying that in the circ t nrstances stated rn the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court nay be preased to direct the Respondents. No. 3 to 5 to consider my onr r e appricatron and representations and to issue the E-pattadar passbooks on nr, cultivating land to an extent of Ac.2-09'r4 gts in Sy.No 1zgr32, whir; is situated at Tallaveerappagudem Revenue viflage shivar of Damarcherrir Mandar, Nargonda District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RApOLU BHASKAR !9yryet for the Respondents No 1 To 5: SRt L. RAVTNDER /\ ;p FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.26L2L of 2o23 DATE OF
ORDER:
OL.12.2O25 Between: J.Vishwanadha Rao AND ...Petitioner The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad and four others ...Respondents ORDER: Aggrieved by the inaction of respondent Nos.3 to 5 in considering the petitioner's online application and representations of the petitioners ald in issuing e-patta passbook in respect of the petitioner's lald, the present writ petition is filed. A consequential prayer is sought to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's online application and representation and to issue e-patta passbook. "--- .\ , I t
Heard iearned counsel for the petitioner anrl Mr. L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Reven r- e appea-ring for respondent Nos.l to 5
After arguing at length, learned counsel for th<: petitioner sought liberty of this Court to lile a fresh application under lule 7(2) of Rules made under Bhu Bharathi Act,2025 for issuance o: e-patta passbook in respect of the property claimed by him.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Fr venue submitted that upon filing the application under Rule 7(2) o the Rules made under Bhu Bharathi Act, 2025, the petitioner's case would be considered and appropriate orders would be passec in due course of trme.
This Court having heard learned counsel for he petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Rr:'cnue, deems it appropriate to grant Iiberty to the. petitioner as prayr d for.
With the above directions, this writ petition is tisposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applicati,r rs if any pending, I in this petition, shall stald closed. SD/- I,I JAWAHAR REDDY ASSiI ;TANT REGISTRAR /. (<a SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1 The Princioal Secretary. Revenue Department' State o' lelangana' Secretariat Buildings. Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner' CCLA, Telangana' Hyderabad' 3. The District Collector, Nalgonda' Nalgonda District' Telangana' 4. The Revenue Divisional officer, Miryalaguda Division, Nalgonda District' 5. TheTahsildar, DamarcherlaMandal, NalgondaDistirct. Telangana. 6. One CC to SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR Advocate [OPUC]
Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE 'High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI
Two CD CoPies DAN PVL BT \ i I I t I : HIGH COURT DATED:01 11212025 ORDER WP.No.26121 of 2023 :-HES 14 o'( 1/raJ J t r ri 'r? 2[)26 z * ,.i:) I I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS i) (P \ a'
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.