Sunki Sudharani v. 1. The State of Telangana
Case Details
Acts & Sections
Petition under Article 226 of the ConJstitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed ltherewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Ordef of direction, preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and to declare th[ in action of the rbspondents are not passing final orders on the application dt. 1 2-06- 2O24 and same'was received on 18-07 -2025 which is pending before the 2nd respondent in respect of re-allotment of the petitioner frbm Jagitial District to Karimnagar District, under spouse category, the said action of the respondents is as highly illegal arbitrary, unreasonable, discriminatory and also in viglation of principles of natural justice and also in violation of Art. 1{, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and declare the same as bad-jn-law and consequently diiect the respondents to consider and pass final orders on the application dt. 12-q6-2024 which is pending before the 2nd respondent under spouse category in any of the existing vacancies in Karimnagar District. i l I t1 IA NO: 1 0F 2025 Petition under Section 15i cpc praying that in the ci.cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court rnay be preased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass finar orders on the apprication dt. 12-06- 2024 the same was received on 1g-Ol -2025 which is p,errding before the 2nd respondent under spouse category in any of the existing vacancies in Karimnagar District, pending disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Secfion 151 cpc praying that in the r:ir:umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to amend the paras 1o & 11 of the affidzrvit fired in support of main w.P. by substituting as foilows . para 10 : "rt is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble court may be preased to issue an appropriate v,/rit, order of direction preferably one in the nature of writ of Mandamus and to crer;rare the in action of the respondents are not passing frnar orders on the Appear cn. 14-o}-202swhich is pending before the 2nd respondent in respect of re-aflotmert ,f the petitioner from Jagitial District to Karimnagar District, under spouse categ,crT, the said action of the respondents is as highry iflegar arbitrary, unreasonabre, discriminatory and also in violation of principres of naturar justice and arso in vi,ration of Art. .r4, 16 & 21 of the constitution of rndia and decrare the samer ,.1 .,b"d-in-rr* ,nd consequently direct the respondents to consider and pass final orders on the Appeal dt. 14-08-202s which is pending before the 2nd resFro.dent under spouse category to re-arrocate the petitioner in Karimnagar District in any of the existing vacancies and pass such other order or orders may deem fi: and proper in the circumstances of the case. para 11 : rt is arso just and necessary that this Hon'bre court may be preased to direct'lhe respondents to consrder ard pass finar orders on the Appeal dt. 14-,08-202s which is pending before the 2ncr respondent under spouse category to re-aflocate the petitioner in Karimnagar District in any of the existing vacancies, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C.RAJA SEKHAR REODY Counsel forthe Respondents: Gp FOR SERVICES I r ne court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTiCE PULLA I{ARTHIK W.P.No.24Ol of 2o25 ORDER: With the consent of the parties, this Writ petition is taken up lor disposal ar the admission stage itlelf.
2. Heard Sri C.Rajashekar Refldy, learned counsel for the petrttoner and the learned Gove ment Pieader for Services-l appearing for the respondents and pef,used the record.
3. Learned counser for the petitiorier submits that the petitioner u'as appointed as Grade-r rerugu parrdit on 3.3.2003 and posted to Government High School, Adilabad {istrict and in 2O09, she was transferred to Karimnagar district under. spouse grounds. Thereafter, she was promoted as Scfool Assistant (Telugu) in the year 2024 and allotted to Jagtial distlict. Learned copnsel contends that the case of the petitioner was no considered for ieallocation on 1 I I s per G.O.Ms.No.3l7, General spouse ground to Karimnagar district Administration (SpF.1) Department I dated 6. 12.2021. Therefore, petitioner made fresh appeal to the respondent No. I on 14.g.2O2S for reallocation to Karimnagar district on spouse ground, but so far no action has ber:n taken on the said ftppeal. Therefore, petitioner I \ seeks indulgence of this Court to direct the rer;pondent No.l to consider the said appeal submitted by the petitioner on 14.8.2025 and pass appropriate orders, rvithin a stipulated period of time.
4. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents submits thal since tfre appeal of t.h,: petitioner dated
14.8.2025 is pending u,rth respondent No. 1, the res;pondent No.1 will consider and pass appropriate orders, in accordatrce with law.
5. Having regard to the subm issions made by the respective parties and without going into merits of the matt'er. this writ petition is disposed of, directing the respc,ndent No.1 to pass appropriate orders on the appeal submitted by the petitioner on 14.8.2025, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditior.rsly as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from tht date of receipt of a copy of this order. Miscellaneours petitions pt:nCing, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no orcler as to costs' l - -- .3?iftt#'t#H AS //TRUE COPY'/ * sEcr,ot't oFFlcER To ry, School Education .""1*l Dep artment, Secretariat BuildingS, HYderabad-500 022
1. The State of Telang ana, ReP. bY its PrinciPal 2. The Commissioner.a nd Director of Sch ool Ed ucation, S)aifabad, HYderabad 3. The District Educatio nal Officer' Jagitial District 4. The D istrict Educatio nal Officer' Karimnag ar District 5 One CC to SRI C.RAJA SEKHA R REDDY, Advocat e f3PUCl SERVICES. l, High Court for th e State of Telangana, at 6. Two CCs to GP FOR Hyderabad. [our] Two CD CoPies 7 PSK, PSK w I i HIGH COURT DATED:0210912025 CC TODAY ORDER WP.No.24016 of 2025 ' :.-.. . - ---- --\ .,- .\\. -- . |;'i,: \, r,:i-'-.\'::\ ''' - - '-r';'i' r'- h'.r tl :ii i. ir -^'!l/ 'o'r{ .rt. i 4 sFP 206 J I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I . -. -. . i,.-i -,. .. ,i - j