✦ High Court of India · 12 Nov 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 12 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
12 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,243 words

Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Rerspondents 6 to 8 not to make any construction activity in the petitioners patta land in Sy.No.4 1 to an extent of Ac.0-12gts., in Sy.No.42 to an extent of Ac.6-209ts., situated at Jedcherla Shivar and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. B. MOHAN Counsel for ttre Respondents: AGP FOR IRRIGATION AND COMM AREA DEVELOPMENT The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI WRIT PETITION No.3O216 oF 20L7 ORDER: This writ petition is filed with the following prayer: "... to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent Nos.6 to 8 in trying to constructing the check dam in the petitioners patta land in Sy.No.41 to an extent of Ac.O.12 gts., in Sy.No.42 to an extent of Ac.6.2O gts., situated at Jedcherla Shivar and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District and without issuing any notice to the petitioners is illegal, arbitrar5r and unconstitutional and violative of Article 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 6 to 8 not to make any construction activity in the petitioners patta land in Sy.No.41 to an extent of Ac.O.12 gts., in Sy.No.42 to an extent of Ac.6.2O gts., situated at Jedcherla Shivar and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

2. The specific case of petitioners is that respondent Nos.6 to 8 are trying to construct a check dam in the petitioners patta land in Survey No.41 to an extent of Ac.O.12 guntas and in Survey No.42 to an extent of Acs.6.2O guntas situated at Jedcherla Shivar and Mandal, Mahabubnagar Distri ct.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for lrrigation placed a copy of written instructions dated t2.O7.2O22 of 2 JAK, J tt'.P.No.30216 oJ20l7 the Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division No.4, Mahabubnagar, contents of written instructions afe aS follou's: "... It is submitted that the petitioner statement saying that a construction of Check Dam activity in their patta land Sy.No.4l and 42 is totally false and baseless as no Check Dam is either proposed or constructed in the above Survey Numbers. It is submitted that the Government of Telangana has sanctioned administrative approval for the work of "Restoration of Seir Kunta, Jadcherla Village & Mandal, Mahabubnagar District for Rs.21.87 Lakhs under Mission Kakatiya Phase-III vide G.O.Rt.No.248. Dt.16.03.2O17 of I&CAD Department (Copy enclosed). The work was awarded to Sri. P. Praneel Chander, Contractor of Jadcherla vide EE/IB Division, Mahabubnagar Agreement No -35612016-17 Dt.30.O3.2017 (Copy enclosed). The Tahsildar, Jadcherla was informed that as per village map of Jadcherla the Seri Kunta is tocated in Sy.No.42 of Jadcherta village and the Survey number is classified as land vide Letter No.B/ 1 I 141 l2OL8, Dt.2O.06.20 18 (Copy enclosed). In view of the above court case and as per the information of the Tahsildar the r,vork of Seri Kunta was recommended for cancellation by the department to the Government. The Government has given the instructions for the cancellation of the work of Seri Kunta vide Govt. Memo Nos.3575/MKlA212019-1, Dt.26.O9.2O19 to the Chief Engineer, Minor lrrigation, Hyderabad. The work was cancelled by the Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Hyderabad vide Proceeding Cancellation/Seri No.DCE- | lOT2l AEEl/MBNR I Kunta, Jadcherla (V&M)/2O19, Dt-27.12.2019. (Copy enclosed). The petitioner without having the knowledge of difference between construction of Check Dam and Restoration of Minor Irrigation tank, field a case in the Hon'ble High Court. Even though the department has not taken up any construction activity in the above said patta lands of the petitioner and cancelled the work of Seri Kunta. In view of the above, I request the Government Pleader for Irrigation & CAD Department for appearance i t I ' i : I r I I I i I I I t I It I J J,4K, J W.P.No.302l6 of 2017 on behalf of all the respondents and to apprise the above facts to the Hon'ble Court so as to dismiss the Writ petition at the admission stage itself."

4. On a perusal of the written instructions, it is observed that by G.O.Rt.No.248, dated 16.03.2017, restoration of Seri Kunta, Jedcherla Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District, was taken up under Mission Kakatiya Phase-III for an amount of Rs.21.87 lakhs. It is further observed that the said work was cancelled by the Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Hyderabad, vide proceedings dated 27 .12.2OL9

5. In view of the written instructions, wherein it is stated that the work is cancelled, cause in the writ petition does lltOt survive for' adjudication, writ petition is liable to be closed and is acoordinglv closed. There shall be no order as to co-sts. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. To, SD'. K.BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR t t //TRUE COPY" OFFICER l ?,}s 33J?"'3I F"H?HA'tA1b",tt1t"3u&r^4 $* DEVELoprr,rEr.rr',ilig'ti'dl,t toiin" stit" J iJlangana at Hvderabad [ouT]

3. Two CD CoPies PSKN BM J HIGH COURT DATEID i1211112025 ORDEFI WP.No.30216 of 2017 S l) i6?rARZM * * CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS *r,"

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments