Karanam Chinna Pitchaiah naidu v. Gandra Narasimhulu Naidu
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 23 Aug 2004
- Bench
- T SURYA RAO
Provisions considered
Judgment
THURSDAY THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR : PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: T.CH.SURYA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2245 of 2004 (Petition under Section 115 of CPC to revise the order of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Rajampet, made in CMA. No.9 of 2004 dated. 26-03-2004 preferred against the order of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Nandalur, made in IA.No. 522 of 2000 in OS.No. 143 of 2000 dt. 26-09-2001) Between: Karanam Chinna Pitchaiah naidu. AND ..Petitioner
Gandra Narasimhulu Naidu, S/o. Polaiah Naidu.
Karanam Sreenivasulu Naidu, S/o. Chinna Venkata Naidu. (Both are R/o. Diguva Siddavaram (V), Penagalur Mandal, Cuddapah District). Respondents The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and Grounds filed in herein and the orders of the High Court dated. 29-04-2004, 28-06-2004, 05-07-2004, 02-08-2004, 03-08-2004 & 12-08-2004 and made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. Satyanarayana Nimmagadda, Advocate for the Petitioner. The Court made the following ORDER: “ Post on 23-08-2004. Interim stay granted earlier is extended till then.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
1. The Senior Civil Judge, Rajampet, Cuddapah District. 2. The Junior Civil Judge, Nandalur, Cuddapah District.
Gandra Narasimhulu Naidu, S/o. Polaiah Naidu.
Karanam Sreenivasulu Naidu, S/o. Chinna Venkata Naidu. ( 3 & 4 are R/o. Diguva Siddavaram (V), Penagalur Mandal, Cuddapah District).
One spare copy. SAH
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 115.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 23 Aug 2004. The bench was T SURYA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.