The High Court · 2025

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad 2 G. Ganesh, S/o M L Gopal, Aged about 51 years. Occ Business R/o. H No.76/03, RGK Colony. Keesta (M), Medchal (D). Telangana ... RESPO N DENTS/COM PLAI NANT Petition under Section 528 OF BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash Crime No. 730 of 2025 on the file of Jawaharnagar Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate for the offences under Sections 79,351(2) r/w 3 (5) BNS, 3(lXrXsXc) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Petitioners. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 OF BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in Crime No. 730 of 2O25 on the file of Jawaharnagar Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate for the offences // / under Sectons 79, 351(2) r/w 3 (5) BNS, 3(1X0(s)(c) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) A.ct against the Petitioner. CRIMINAL PE NO: 10262 OF 2025 Between: '1. B. Sunil Singh, S/o B. Krishna Jai Singh, Aged about 46, Occ. Business, Rl/o. Plot l{o. 13-'l/57, Snehapuri Colony, Dammaiguda, Keesara (M), Medchal (D), Telargana

2. B. Virnala Rai, Wo B. Sunil Singh, Aged about 36, Occ. Business, Ri/o. Plot No. '3-1157, Snehapuri Colony, Dammaiguda, Keesara (M), Medchal (D), Telangana ...PEflfloNERS/ACCUSED NOS. 1 & 3 AND 1 . The S;tate of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad

2. G. Ganesh, S/o M L Gopal, Aged about 51 years, Occ Business, Rt/o H.No 76/03, RGK Colony, Keesara (M), Medchal (D), Telangana ...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT Petiti':n under Section 528 OF BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in thr: Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to c uash Crime No. 730 of 2025 on the file of Jawaharnagar Police Station for the offences under Sections 79, 351(2) r/w 3 (5) BNS, 3(lXrXsXc) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Petitioners. l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 OF BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in tht: Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to rttay of all further in Crime No. 730 of 2025 on the file of Jawaharnagar Police Stati,ln, Rachakonda Comissionerate for the offences under Sections 79, 351(2) r/w 3 (5) BNS, r(t)(rXsXc) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the Petitioner. Thesr: Petitions coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitions and upon hearing the arguments of Sri CHALLA KIRANMAYI=E, Advocate for the Petitioners in both the CRLPs and SRI JITHENDEFI. RAO VEERAMALLA, the Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondenl No.'l in both the CRLPs and none appeared for the Respondent No.2 in both the ORLPS. The Court nrade the following: COMMON ORDER l{* THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION NOS.10250 and 10262 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: These petitions are filed seeking quashment of the Crime No.730 of 2025 on the file of Jawaharnagar Police Station, Rachakonda District, against the petitioners.

2. Heard Ms.Challa Kiranmayee, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there are civil disputes pending between the petitioners and respondent No.2. The complaint has been lodged only to harass the petitioners by implicating them in a criminal case. There is no truth in the allegations, and hence, prayed to quash the same.

4. On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that a notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik \ Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS'), has already been ibsued to the petitioners and that the intervention of this Court at this juncture is not essential. 2

5. Perused the record. The afiegations pertain to offences under s;ections 79, 3s1 (2) rlw.3 (5) of Bharatiya Nyaya sanhita, 2023 (lbr short 'BNS) and section 3 (1) (r) (s) (c) of rhe scheduled castes and rhe scheduled rribes (prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'poA Act'). The copies of notice under $ection 35(3) of BNSS are enclosed in the case file. Therefore, it is not proper to intervene in the investigation process at this juncture.

6. Arlcordingly, criminar petitions are disposed of directing the lnvestigating officer to foilow the guidelines formulated by the Hon'ble Supreme court of lndia in Amesh Kumar y. sfafe of Biha/ r;crupulously However, the petitioners shalt submit their defense and co-operate with the lnvestigating officer as and when required by furnishing information and produce all relevant documerrts/material required for the purpose of the investigation and the lnvestigating officer shall consider the same and complete the investigation stricfly in accordance with law. \ \ ' lzolry 8 5r;6 273 : i : : : : ; i : I I I i I i I I I /i J Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand ,/TRUE COPY// Sd/- SRI MOHD ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER I I closed To,

1. The X Additional Junior Civit Judge cum X Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal Malkajgiri District at Medchal.

2. The Station House Officer, Jawaharnagar Police Station, Rachakonda' 3. One CC to SRI CHALLA KIRANMAYEE Advocate IOPUC] 4. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High court for the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5. Two CD CoPies GR b HIGH L'OURT DATET):1310812025 COMMON ORDER CRLP.Nos.10250 AND 10262 of 'tHE STA C 2 2 JAt{ 202t o ..\ -t' DISPOSING OF BOTH THE CRIMINAL PETTTIONS ( 6 \1/ $