The High Court · 2025

...PETITIONER/DEFENDANT No. 1 AND

1. Vijender Kedia, S/o Gulzarilal Kedia, aged about 60 years, Occupation. Business, Rlo 5-9-30111413, Basheerbagh Palace Colony, Hyderabad, Telangana. ...RESPONDENT/PLAINTI FF 2. Gulzarilal Kedia, ( Died), LR's being the Plaintiffs and Defendants are already on record

3. Premalatha, W/o R.P.Agarwal, aged about 69 years, Occupation. Business, R/o 5-9-30/1/17lD, Road No.4, Basheerbagh Palace Colony, Hyderabad- 500063,

4. Shakuntala Agarwal, Wo M.P. Agarwal, aged about 66 years, Occupation. Business, R/O Flat No.303, R.R. Kuteer, Street No.20, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad-500029. Telangana.

5. Santosh Agarwal, Wo S.P. Agarwal, aged about 62 years, Occupation. -R/o 5-9-30/17lD/1, Road No.4. Basheerbagh Palace Colony' Business. Hyderabad-500063, Telangana

6. Usha Aqarwal, Wo Satish Agarwal, aged about 60 years, Occupation. Business, Rl/o H.No.7, Villa Glande, Opp. Archean Marble, Toli Chcwki, Hyderabad, Telangana.

7. Umesh Kedia, S/o Gulzarilal Kedia, aged about 52 years, Occ. Business, R/o 5-9-3Ol 1 1413, Basheerbagh Palace Colony, Hyderabad-500063, Telangana. 8. Anita Goel, Wo M.K. Goel, aged about 55 years, Occupation. Business, R/o H.No.14, Road No.4, East Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi-l00026

9. Jitender Kedia, Sio Gulzarilal Kedia, aged about 48 years, Occupation. Business, f\lo 5-9-3011 1413, Basheerbagh Palace Colony, Hyderabad-500063, Telangana. ...RESPON DENTS/DEFENDANTS CIVIL REVISION PETITIO N NO: 2844 OF 2025 Petition under Article 227 ol the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order in O.S.No. 709 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the XIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Between: Dr.Mahesh Kumar Kedia. Occupation.Business, R/o Hyderabad-500063, S/o Gulzarilal 5-9-30t1t4t3, Kedia, aged aboutT0 years, Basheerbagh Palace Colony, Presently residing at. H. No. 8-24651304, Road No. 4, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana State - 500034 ...PETITIONER/DEFENDANT No. 4 ANO '1. Vijender Kedia, S/o Gulzarilal Kedia, aged about 60 years, Occupation. Business, Rio 5-9-30/1/4/3, Basheerbagh Palace Colony, Hyderabad, Telangana.

2. Gulzarilal Kedia (since died), Plaintiff, and Defendants who are LRs are already on record.

3. Premalatha, Wo R.P.Agarwal, R/o 5-9-30/1/17lD, Road No.4 500063, aged about 69 years, Occupation. Business, , Basheerbagh Palace Colony, Hyderabad-

4. Shakuntala Agarwal, Wo M.P. Aganaral, aged about 66 years, Occupation. Business, R/OFlat No.303, R.R. Kuteer, Street No.20, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad-500029, Telangana.

5. Santosh Agarwal, Wo S.P. Agarwal, aged about 62 years, Occupation. Business, R/o 5-9-30/17lD/1 , Road No.4, Basheerbagh Palace Colony, Hyderabad-500063, Telangana.

6. Usha Agarwal, Wo Satish Agarwal, aged about 60 years, Occupation. Business, R/o H.No.7, Villa Grande, Opp. Archean Marble, Toli Chowki, Hyderabad, Telangana.

7. !/mqsh Kedia, S/o Gulzarilal Kedia, aged about 52 years, Occ. Business, Fl,/o 5-9-3011 1413, Basheerbagh Palace Colony, Hyderabad-500063, Telangana B. Anita Goel, Wo M.K. Goel, aged about 55 years, Occupation. Business, R/o H.No.14, Road No.4, East Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi-100026

9. Jitender Kedia, S/o Gulzarilal Kedia, aged about 48 years, Occupation. Business, R/o 5-9-30 l1t4l3, Basheerbagh Palace Colony, Hyderabad-500063, Telangana.

10.Smt. Krishna Bai Kedia, Wo. Guzarial Kedia (died per LRs the Plaintiff, Defendant No. 2 to 9)

11.Sri Kapish Kedia, S/o Dr. Mahesh Kumar Kedia, Aged. 38 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Flat No.304, 8-2-465, Studio Sycamore Apartment, Road No.4, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.

12.Sri Ankit Kedia, S/o Sri Vijender Kedia, Aged. 35 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Flat No.305, Ground Floor, Royal One Apartment, Road No.8, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad

13.Sri Tanay Kedia, S/o Sri Umesh Kedia, Aged.32 years, Occ. Business, Flat No.34, Casa lndira Apartment, Dwarkapuri Colony, Punjagutta, Hyderabad. (Defendants Nos. 11 to 13, added as per orders pass 2025, dt.29-04-2025) ...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K. Mahit Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE TIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY C.R.P.N os.2799 & 2844 oF 2025 COMMON OIIDER: Hearcl Mr. K. Mahit Reddy, Ieamed coLrnsel for the petitioner. Perused the record.

2. These are two civil revision petitions which have been filed between the same parties for an innocuous relief of speedy disposal of the two srrits for partition filed by the plaintiff way back in the year 2016.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the two suits viz:., O.S.No.840 &. 709 of 2016 involved in the two civil revision petitions are pending trial before the learned XIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and both of which are being proceeded by rvay of joint trial is getting adjourned only for the evidence of the plaintiff for the last more than 7 to 8 years with no progress whatsoever during these 7 to 8 years. Thus, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for an appropriate direction for an early disposal of the suits. 'l'he leamed 2 counsel for the petitioner submits that there is also an interirn protection so far as the maintaining of the status quo granted in both the suits and that perhaps is also one of the reasons why the plaintiff does not show any interest in leading his evidence.

4. Having gone through the entire facts and circumstances of the case, more particularly the pleadings and the docket orders available, prima facie it appears that the two suits are pending consideration before the leamed xIV Additional Chief Judge, City civil court, I{yderabad and where the matters were fixed for evidence of the plaintiff for the last more than 7 to g years which is substantially long duration of time within which the evidence ought to had been got recorded.

5. without making any further comments, this court is of the considered opinion that the ends ofjustice would be met if the trial Court is directed to take up the matters with more seriousness and ensure that the trial is commenced and evidence is recorded by the parties at the earliest, rnore particularly considering the seniority of the matters which is more than 9 years old. Let the entire trial itself \ 3 be conclucled within an outer limit of one year from the next date of hearing

6. The civil revision petitions are, accordingll,, disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. I SD/. MOHD.ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// ,S OFFICER To,

1. The Xlv Additionar chief Judge, city civir court, Hyderabad 2. One CC to Sri K. Mahit Reddy, Advocate tOpUCl 3. Two CD Copies VH/PSLI HIGH COURT DATED: 2210812025 \, \ COMMON ORDER CRP.No.2799 & 2844 of 2025 'f' ")i (; n- f4SeH1 Inw6 z *t * HEO DISPOSING OF BOTH CRP's C $ 1\