The High Court · 2025

1. The State olT9lgnga1q, rep.by public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, through SHO ll Town Nalgonda, Nalgonda District ...Respondent 2. Golr Stailala @ Nousheen, Wg Md Nazeeruddin, Age 36 years, Occ. House wife, R/o H.No. 8-2-79, Ansari Cotony, Opp. Govt. H[rs Hdsp,iJf', N;ig";;; Town and District.

3. Goh_Yashoda. Wo Mararah. Age about 60 years. Occ. Housewife, R/o H.No. 8-2-79, Ansari Cotony, Opp. Gbvt. Hqrs Uo'spitai Naigondii;*n';;J " ''" District. ... Respon den UCompla inant Petition under Section 52g of BNss praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal pltition, the High Corri .rV fr" pleased to quash the proceedings in sc No i 26 of zo2o in FIR No 1 1s of zo jg of - Nalgonda ll rown PS pending on the fire of the speciar s(lsisions Judge For Trial of scs /srs (PoA) Act cases-cum- il Additionar District a ro Sessioris Judge at Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, against the petitioners/ Accus,:ci Nos.1 to 5. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that rn the crrcumstances stated in the f,4emorandum of Grounds of criminar petitior- the High court may be pleased to stay arr further proceedings rncruding appear"ance of the petitioners/A1 to 5 rn sc No 126 of 2o2o in FIR No.1 t s oi zot g of Nalgonda ll Town PS pending o, the fire the speciar sessions Judge For Triar of Sc.rs r. (PoA) Act cases cum Il Additional Drstrict and sessions Judge at Nalgonda, Nalgonda Distrrct. pendrng disposal of the above Cnminal p,:trtion. l.A. NO: 2 OF 20 25 Between: Goli Siailaja @ Nousheen. W9 Md Nazeeruddin, Age i)6 years. Occ. House wife, R/o H No 8-2-79, Ansari Colony Opp Govt. HqL frdspiiar N;igo.;;- Town and District.

2. Goir Yashoda. Wro Marara 8-2-79 Ansari Colony, Op Distrct h, Age about 60 years, Occ. Fousewife, R/o H.No P. Govt. Hqrs Hospital, Nalgonda Town and ...Petitioners/Respondent in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 AND 1 The state of relangana, rep by p.ublic prosecutor, High oourt at Hyderabad, through SHO lt l-own Nalgond-a, Nalgonda Distrlci. ...RespondenURespondent in I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025

2. Syed Pasha, S/o Bhikkan, Age 3g years, Occ. private Enrployee. 3. Salma Begum @ Salma, Wo Syed pasha, Age 34 years Occ. House hold, Both are R/o H.No.8-2-79. Ramalayam Veedhi, Nidamanoor Village and Mandal. Nalgonoa District. Hold a ?.aheda Begum @ Akthar Begum W/o Kareem, age 5ti years, Occ House 5. Saleha Begum @ Ayesha S/o M A Kareem. age 32 year:;. Occ. House Hold, 6. Heena Begum,O Naziya. D/o M.A Kareem, age 32 years Occ. House Hold. All are r/o H.No 1-2-i 05, NearJame Masjre, Nargonda Town and District. . Respo ndents/Petitioner in LA.t,los.2 and 3 of 2025 -1€ Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS prayrng that in the crrcumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Crrminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to Permit the petrtioners for Compromise the proceedings in SC No 126 of 2020 tn FIR No.115 of 2019 of Nalgonda ll Town pS pending on the file the Special Sessions Judge For Trial of SCs/STs (pOA) Act Cases Cum_ll Addrtronal District and Sessions Judge at Nalgonda, Nalgonda District, in terms of the accompanied compromise memo. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition. the High court may be pleased to Compound the offences for quashing the proceedings in SC No.126 of 2020 in FIR No.115 of 2019 of Natgonda il Town pS pending on the file the Special Sessions Judge For Trial of scs/srs (poA) Act cases cum ll Additronal Drstrict and Sessions Judge at Nalgonda, Nalgonda Dtstrict, against the respondents /Accused No 1 to 5. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S Sudarshan, Advocate for the petitioner and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri G.Sundaresan, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.10534 of 2125 COMMON ORDER 1. This Criminal Petrtion is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceeciing:; against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 5 in S.C.NoJ26 of 2|2o, on the file of Nalgonda ll Town Police Station, Nalgonda District, rr:gistered for the offences punishable under Sections 448,323,504, 506 read with 34 IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SCs/STs (POA) Amendrnent Act, 2015

2. lt is subrnitted by learned counsel for the petilioners as well as respondent No.3/defacto complainant that during cendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have comprornised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have beern filed to record compromise between them and to compound the offences,

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the compromise petition

4. Since the parties were willing to enter into c,trnpromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court L,egal Services w 2 ETD,I Crl.P.No 10531 2025 Committee for the State of Telangana ylde orders dated 20.OB.2O2S passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by thrs Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted report dated 25.08.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercion, entered into compromise. 6, ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in S.C.No.126 of 2020, on the file of Nalgonda ll Town police Station, Nalgonda District, registered against the petitioners, are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners paying an amount of Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Frve Thousand Cnly) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana State Legal Services Authority, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of same before the Registry ,:\.i!ttf . y -- 3 ETD,I Ctl i,-N. tO531 2A25

7. Miscellaneous applications, rf any pending, slrall stand closed SD'. P.PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPYi/ 1 decrroru oFFrcER To, '1. The Special Sessions Judge For Trial of SCs /STs (f ,OA) Act Cases-Cum- llAdditional D strict and Sessions Judge at Nalgonda Nalgonda District.

2. The Station House Officer Nalgonda llTown Police St.tirn, Nalgonda District.

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the Srate of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri S Sudarshan, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri G Sundaresan, Advocate IOPUCI 6. Two CD Copies (Along with Jornt [\/emo ls Enclosed Herewrth) Note: Total Amount of Rs.10,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand 6111v ) has been paid by Sri s.Sudharshan, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed byrhe Hon'ble Court vide order dated 10.09 2023 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thcusand onty ) to the "Director, Sainik Weifare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana State Legal Service Authority, Hyderabad ard filed fVemo as proof of compliance USR No 103338 of 2025 NVB/PS]- E?."-!G.!! 1i_. "\-!i :.= ii,t. j .\, HIGH COURT DATED:1010912025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.10534 ot 2025 3 O B[,7 ?025 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AND l.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2025 q "l?89!*-xrF ---:-..;;r':a # IN ]IID IIICII COURI- [()R THE STA.ITI oF. I.ELANGANA A1'IIYDERABAD CR I p Nq.o fqi / OF 2025 '.rN ( SC No. 126 of 20?,0 of Nalgonda II .Iorvn pS ) ', BIr'I WEEN: I S1'ed Pasha S/o Uikkarr. Age 38 ).cars, Occ. private Employce, 2 Salma Begum (@ Salnra W/o S.r,erl I)asha, Age 34 years, Occ. I lousc holcl. Botl.r are R/o H.No. 8-2-79, Ranralayam Veedhi. Nidamanoor Villagc ancl Mandel. Nirlgonda Disrr icr 3 Zaheda Begum (r! Akthar Begunr W/o Karcern. age 58 years. Occ. Uousc Iloltl. 4 Saleha Begum @ Alcsha S/o ll,t.,,\ Karcem. age 32 years, Occ. Ilouse FIokl 5 Flecna Begum @ Nazi,r a D/o/o N,l.A Ktrrecm, age 32 years, Occ. I{ousc }Iold. All arc r/o H.No. I-2-105. Near..larne Masjic. Nalgonda Tol,n and District. ANI) ..I)etitioners/A I to 5 l. 'Ihe. State of Tclar-rghna rcp.by lrublic l)rosecutor, I Iiglr Courr at Hyderabatl. through SHO lI Tor.vn Nalgoncla. |ialgonda Disrrict. Respondent

2. Goli^Shailaja @) Noushecn W/o Nld. Nazecr.ucldin, Age 36 years, Occ. I Iouse rvife. R/o I.l.No. 8-2-79, Arrslri Cr,lorr.r. OPP. Govt. Hqrs Hospital, Nalgoncla .l-ori n and Distr.ict 3 Goli Yashoda S7o Maraiah, Age about 60 years, Occ. I-Iouservif.e. R/o ll.No. 8-2-79, Ansari Col-rnv. OirP. Govt. Hqr-s Flospitat. Nalgoncla l.ou n ancl Ilistrict I{e spondeni,/Comp la inant iE",l- .,L], .{ . . -,.1-i 2 COMPROMISE MEMO FILED oN BEHALF oF T ]i: PETITJONERS AND RESPONDENTNO.2&i May it please your Lordships:_ It is submi[ted that the respondent no 2 and thr petitioners have come to an understanding to compromise into the matter in viev.. ,, rlrc advicc rendered iry the crucrs Detongtng to their communities as under:_ 1' It is submitted that the respondentno.2 herein unc,rrditionary agrees to withdralv the criminal case based on the statement of her, thc ,, rr cc rcgiste rcd casc in arin-,c No. I l5 of 2019 undcr Seclion 504, 323 IpC & Sccrrr n j ( l ) ( r) ( s) of SCs/Sl.: (l']O:\) Ame,d.rcnt Act against pctitio,ers sho*,r.r ir., ,\ I Lo A.i. .l.hc police alier. i,vcstigatio, charge sheet is fircd undc'Sectio,s.r-+r. r2:r. -j0+. 506 It/u 3:r Ipc. Scctio, 3 (t) (r) (s) of SCs/Sl.s (t,OA) Anre.ihril:r ,\c[ ]015 and the same is ,cnding on rhe firc of the speciar Scs;sions.Iudqc Ii.r r.i.rr c,r.Sas /S l.s ( )roA;Acr cascs cum li Additionar District and Sessions ircrge ,t \argondu. As per the advice of the erders beronging to both the parties i.e, the petitioners herein and the respondent no,2 & 3 herein. 2 It is subnritted that the petitionei's herein undertar ei to restrain themserf frorn interfering with the life and libefi of the respondent n r. 2 in any manner and the respondent no 2 asro undertakes to rer;train herserf frorr interfering with the rite and liberty of the petitioners in any manaer. 3 It is submiited that the respondent no. 2 has agrer:rJ ro voruntarily withdraw the complaint as submitted by her before the respondent Jc. 1 as she is unable to prosecute the sanre as th-e comprainant was never intenorr to register a crime agaisnt the petitionrs herein nor tb implicate the petitioners in the ,.r rne and the conrplainant is made onry intent to prevent the petitioners for interfearencrr rler corecting water. $yr ''(t-4 : ;E=-r - 'r |."., bA 3

4. It is submitted that as per the advice of the elders belonging to the both parties, the both parties hereto i.e, the petitioners and the respondent No. 2 & 3 have agreed to settle the dispute.imong them amicably by pu[ting an end to the dispute in view of their respective peacefull life.

5. It is submitted that it is further agreed that both the perties shall file aFfldavits in Crl. P.No. of 2025 before this Hon'ble cout disclosing they are voluntarrly agreed to the terms of this Memorandunr of compromise more particularly with regard to the withdrawal of the complaint by the respondent No.2 herein. Hence this Compromise Memo is filed PETITIONER No.1,. a PErirloNER No.z $X,rta .be-JtW, PETITIoNERNo' z $& d (6fo PETITIONER No.4 Sdlfu. Lryn PETITIONER No.5 lleen". Loe}vm RESPONDENT NO.2. , L{-i5 RESPONDENT NO.3. Identified and Signed before Counsel petitioners Counsel l dent No.2