The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or Order/s or Direction/s more particularly one in the nature of Writ Mandamus declaring the action of the official Respondent No.3 in interfering into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner property i.e., house property bearing municipal No. l2-2-505169, and 701D, in TS. No. 1311 , 1312, 13/3 and 13/4, BIock-K, Ward No.2'1 , admeasuring 70 sq. yds, situated at Gudimalkapur, village, Asif Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad, T.S., as illegal, arbitrary, unauthorized and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the official Respondent No.3, to not to interfere in the Petitioner property i.e., house property bearing municipal No. 12-2-505/69, and 701D, in TS. No. 1311 , 1312, '13/3 and 13/4, Block-K, Ward No.2'l , admeasuring 70 sq. yds, situated at Gudimalkapur, village, Asif Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad, T.S., lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the r in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, ihe High Cour direct the official Respondent No.3, not to interfere in the I and enjoyment of the Petitioner property i.e., house propert No '12-2-505169, and 70lD, in TS. No 13t1 , 13t2, 13/3 and No.21, admeasuring 70 sq. yds, situated at Gudimalkapur, Mandal, Hyderabad, TS.., in any manner without following pending disposal of the Writ petition. 'cumstances stated may be pleased to eaceful possession r bearing municipal 3/4, Block-K. Ward village. Asif Nagar lue process of law Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MIRZA SHAH NAWAZ BAtc Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, ASST. cp ;OR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PE-TITION No.23897 of 2o25 ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is Iiled seeking the following relief: "...to issue an appropiate Writ or Order/ s or Direction/ s more particularlg one in the nature of Wit Mandamus declaing the action of the official Respondent No.3 in interfeing into the peaceful possession and enjogment of the Petitioner propertA i.e., house propertA beaing municipal No.12-2-5O5/69, and 70/D, in TS.No.13/ 1,13/2,13/3 and 13/4, Block-K, Ward No.27, admeasuing 7O sq.gds, situated at Gudimalkapur, uillage, Asif Nagar Manda| Hgderobad, T.5., as illegal, arbitrory, unauthorized and uiolatiue of Articles 14, 21 and 3O0-A of the Constitution of India and consequentlg direct the offtcial Respondent No.3, to not to interfere in the Petitioner property i.e., house property bearing municipal No.12-2-5O5/ 69, and TS.No.13/1,13/2,13/3 and 13/4, Block-K, Ward No.21, admeasuing 7O sq.gds, situated. at Gudimalkapur, uillage, Asif Nagar Manda| Hgderabad, T.5., and pass..." 70/ D,

2. Heard Sri Mirza Shah Nawaz Baig, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistalt Government Pleader for Revenue, for the \*_ respbndents ald perused the record. Page2 of4

3. Learned counsel appearing for the pet.1 oner would submit that the petitioner herein is the absolut : owner and possessor of house property bearing Municrl al No.12-2- 5A5169 and 70lD, in TS.No.13lL, t3/2, 131: and 13 14, Block-K, Ward No.21, admeasuring 7O sq.yards situated at Gudima-lkapur Village, Asif Nagar Maldal, Hyderabad, having purchased the same under the registelr d sale deed bearing document No.7821124, dated )4.12.2024. Subsequent to the purchase of the subject I 'operty, the petitioner paid municipa-l tax. When the name : the vendor of the petitioner is reflecting in the proper petitioner applied to change the name in res y tax, the pect of the subject property. The petitioner also obtainerl permission from GHMC in respect of the subject property alL, t the GHMC has accorded work commencem eot lelter uide etter in file No.O002 18/ GH}L{C / oo t7 4 / IR / Ct2 I 2025, datec

30.05.2025 and the petitioner initiated the construction wor < and he is doing construction strictly as per sanction accorl :d. I I t I Page 3 of4

4. While the matter stood, in the last week of July, 2025, while the petitioner was carrying out the construction work in respect of the subject property, the subordinates of . respondent No.3 tired to interfere with the peaceful possession of the subject property. On 01.0g.2025 at about 4:00 P.M respondent No.3 along with the subordinates visited the subject property and without following due procedure laid down under law tried to interfere and damage the subject property. Aggrieved by the said action, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

5. Learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue would submits that the respondent-authorities will follow due process of law before initiating action on the subject property.

6. Recording the submission made by both the learned counsel and without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to follow due process as Page 4 of4 contemplated under law before initiating ac:. rn on the subject property. There shall be no order as to cc sts. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if a: y, pending, sha1l stald also disPosed of' SDI- I.OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSI ;TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, I 2 J 4 5 6 The Principal Secretary, Th.e State of Telangana, Revert e Department' +;f3t*i.3,S"";lSilii';,!Jlii3:ilr:,ir office at Lakd (a poor, Hvderabad, TS il". rrf,.ildrt, Asif Nagar. Having office at Asif Nagar, ll derabad T S' .i"-" Cc-i" Sit MIRZA-sHAH NAwAZ BAIG, Advoca.te lt )PU-cl. Y;JE 66.i" cp roR nrveruuE, High court for the statr of Telangana. l?ltJ, BN PSK ""0,". HIGH COURT DATED:1911112025 oF TEin ,t _:,. i l-i !L jt," I loI tl- I ^.$ -V- q.' \ ..L. \{ l.illl c' z1-' 7, ORDER WP.No.23897 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ^ o\