✦ High Court of India · 04 Sep 2025

IPC against Sri v. Ittxmipatln Rao only on thc co tplaint of

Case Details High Court of India · 04 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
04 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,259 words

fl [."di'ifl[f tT,?.ffi f;ff i'flffi S?t:r,iB:i,f #??,,,tuB"BT#iBti Sri. Pydipati Varaprasad, S/o. pydipati Balachandra F occuriatiLi''a.iJi[11i"'m9^ H i,6:i _e_I/1 8, ;;;d" i[tE: 6fl,8?,ilrr,,?3H; Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad-500060. sn. Beerakayala Srinivas, S/o. Beerakayala Narsimha, Aged 42 years, n * o tz-aLziiisreii,'"ii"u,.i r.r"asar, Ka';ii, NS,?,Yffi'l'lirf",i:'i33lto#Bu ...PETITIONERS AND I!:r:,t;Eit rrt3irrf*1, Rep. by its prinsipar secretary, Home Deparrment, , 2. The Commissioner of police, Cyberabad, R_anga Reddy District. 3. The Station House officer, ljaijingi iJiiU SirYili)hrng, Reddy District. t rh e s u b- Res i.ii" i, s-,jo:ci-s ;il i'di#, 6; ryfi ;i, -#;; 5' sri' D. Y. Setti' s/o D.N setti, Aged_68 years, occupation. Btrliness. Rl/o Frat :ffi :AaiTiilSUl},iri'H;IIru"rB,-N"fi ;;;il""'' R!.ii 813,?v' Uft "'rT3#XPr""i,ff ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed t erewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more parti ularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the hidh handed action of the respondent No.3 in harassing and pressurizing the petitioners to lsetfle the matter with respondent No'5 in respect of the rand bearing prot Nos. 7.3,7s and 166 totafiy admeasuring 632 Sq. yards covered by Survey No.95, situated at Naknampur Village, Manikonda Municipality, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District by paying huge :Hil:,:;ff:;JI":::J:.:,'ff L,fi ,io"','1"i,'l"lli"1i:,::?,1.; 0 419lPC against sri.v.Laxmipathi Rao only on the complaint of respondent No.4 and al..o confining the petitioners hours together in the police station till the petitioners settle the matter with the respondent No.5 as illegat, arbitrary, high- handed, in violation of Articles 14, 21 oi constitution of tn,Jia, without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondent No.3 not to haras,s the petitioner in any manner including pressuring them to setfle the matter pertaining to land bearing PIot Nos. 73, 75 and 166 admeasuring 632 Sq. yards cov,-rred by Survey No.95, situated at Naknampur Village, Manikonda Municipality, (;endipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District with respondent No.5 by paying huge amount with a further direction to the respondent No.3 not to interfere with personal liberty of the petitioners guaranteed by the constitution of lndia withor.rt following due process of law in the interest of justice. lA NO: 'l OF 2025 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in fl'e circumstances staled in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pteased to direct the respondent No. 3 not to harass or interfere with rhe personal liberty of the petitioners in any manner including pressuring them tc pay huge amount to the respondent No.S in respect of the land bearing plot \os. 73, 75 and .166 of Sy.No.95, situated at situated at Nakkalgutta, Naknampur ,/illage, Rajendrangar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, under the guise of implit;a riJg.them also as an accused in FlR.No.1574 of 2021 dated 30-12-202 1 during pendency of the writ Petition, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI KRISHNA KISHORE KOWURI FOR SRI C.KUMAR Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 3: AGp FOR HOMI: Counsel forthe Respondent,Nos.4 & 5: - The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICT N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR I IRIT PETITION Nq.23835 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking following prayer:- "to issuc order or direction more pnrticltlarly one in the nature of Alrit of Mardamus declaing the high hrntlefl action of the respondent No.3 in hnrassing and pressuizittg tht petitioners to settle the mrttter uith respondent No.S in respect of tlrc lantl beaing Plot Nos.73, 75 and 766 totally ndmensuing 632 Sq yards coreled by Srruey No.95 siluated at Naknampur Village, Manikondn Mfinicipality, Gandipet Mandal, Rangt Rcddy District by pnying huge tmount or else threatening to implicate the petitioners also ns accLtsed in FIR No.1574 of 2027 dated 30.12.2021 regisEred under tctbn 420, 471, 468, 419 IPC against Sri V. Ittxmipatln Rao only on thc co\tplaint of respondent No.4 ond nlso confning the Wtitioners lnurs tdgether in tlrc police station till tlu petitioners ettle the fiutter uith lhe respontlent No.5 as illegal arbitrary highlnnded in ttiol ion of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of lndia ruitlnut juisdiction nnd conpquently direct the respondent No.3 not to hnrnss tht pelitionrr in nnl manner inrluding pressuing them to yttb tht nutter pertaining tQ land bening Plot Nos.73, 75 and 766 admeasrtring 632 Sq yards cotlered by Suney No. 95 stuated at Naknampur Vilinge, Manikantu l4unicipality, Gandiryt Mnndal, Ranga lleddy Distict toith respondetfi No. 5 hy paying huge atnount ruith a ftrrther directiotr to the respon(tt No. 3 not to interfere ruith personal liberty of tlrc petitioners gutfnnteed by tle Constitution of lndia uithout following due process of hu." I .2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioners are bein! harassed and pressurized by respcndent No.3 to settle (he matter with respondent No.5 in respect of plots bearing Nos.73, 75 and 166 totally admeasuring 632 Sq yards covered by Survey No.95 situateC at Naknampur Village, Manikonda Municipality. Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict, by paying huge amount, and also threatening to implicat P the petitioners as accused in FIR No.1574 of 2021 dated 30.12.2021, registered under section 420,471,468,479 IPC, against Sri V. Laxrnipathi Rao basi4g on the complaint of respondent \ No.4. Aggrieved by thc same, the prescnt etition is filed p I I \

3. Sri M. Srinivas, learned Assistant Governrrrent pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 placed instructio:r_s of Sub_Inspector of Police, Narsingi police station, wherein it is stated thai respondent No.3 l-ras dischargecl his duties and conducted investigation e.nrr crid not threaten or interfere with the pctitioners personal life and havc n,rt takcn any coercive steps against the petitioners. It is Iurther submitted that they have only conducted enquiry concerning to FIR No.1574 of 2021 registered against one Sri V. Laxmipathi Rao basing on the complaint of resrprrndent No.4, ancl the investigation is under progress.

4. Hearcl Mr. Krishna Kishore K<tvvuri, learned counscl, representing learned for the petitioners on record and learned ,\ssistant Go'ernment Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. with their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal today. 5 Recording the submissions of thr: learned counsr:l for thc petiti.ners and learned Assistant Government pleader for Home, si:rce it is stated that respondcnt No.3 is not interfering with the petitioners lru|rp.,rl life, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authoritie s n.t t. interfere with thc petitioners iife and liberty or the civil disputes, \^ ithout follora,ing due process of law 6 Miscellaneous applications, if an1. pending, shall strnd closed No order as to costs //TRUE COPYII SD/-T.TIRUMALA DEVI I]EPUTY REGISTRAR , i I I SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Hyderabad, State of 2. The Cimmissioner of Police, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District. Telangana. To G= ( \ J 4 5 The Station House Officer, Narsingi Po ce Station, Ranga Reddy District One CC to SRI C.KUMAR, Advocate I PUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Cou for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies PSK e I ii: , - HIGH COURT DATED:0410912025 ORDER WP.No.23835 of 2025 CC TODAY , I - ,. , ?---::::-=- ?i ,t= si,ill':;,r. ' ,..'l\ o (_) .h I 4 ST? ?!?5 LI r, ti -\. ) . j'l-.91',.1-,,. -t'r{/ J- ',f t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments