R Damodar Reddy s/o R Narayan Reddy v. 1. The State of Telangana

9. Sriv-klya Beeravolu w/o B Shekar Reddy ag_ed 35 years, Occ: municipal couniillor r/o house opposite PACS office Seetarampuram, Suryapet town Suryapet mandal, Nalgonda district

10. Kumbbm Rajitha w/o K Naga Raju aged 25 years, Occ: municipal councillor r/o Yerukalawada, Jammigidda Suryapet town, Suryapet mandal Nalgronda district l l.Anoirekula Raiasri w/o A Naqariuna, Occ: municipal councillor r/o Krishna nadar, Suryap'et town Suryafet mandal, Nalgonda district t Z. tUo-nd. Shaheen Begurn w7o Amjad, Occ: municipal councillor r/o JJ nagar, Suryapet town Suryapet mandal, Nalgonda diskict (reipbndents no. i 1 and 12 are proforma parties and no relief is sought against them) 1 3. S-uryapet Municipality, Nalgonda district represented by its Commissioner Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndi: circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the pleased to issue a writ or order/s more particularly one in Certiorari to call for records and declaring the order t respondenl dated 06-09-2014 in proceedings no Election/21 complaint dated 15-07-2014 filed by the petitioner for I respondents no. 4 to 10 for disobedience of party whip or National Congress party, as being illegal' arbitrary and consequently hold that the respondents no' 4 to 10 have irr' for disobedience of whip and be pleased to pass such othel court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the c I ...RESPONDENTS praying that in the -1igh Court maY be he nature of Writ of assed bY the third 7l 2014 rejecting the squalif ication of the behalf of the lndian r nconstitutional, and urred disqualification rrder/s as this honble ;e. LA. NOI 10F 014(WP MP. NO:3811 90F 20141 Petition under Section 15't CPC praying that in the oi cumstances stated in the affidavit filed ln support of the petition' the High CotLt may be pleased To issue inlerim directions restraining the respondents no 4 t) 10 from attending the meetingsoftherespondentno.l3municipality,pendin]disposa|oftheWrit Petition; and be pleased to pass such other order/s as t ris hon'blo court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SIDDHARTH Representing SRI VIVEK JAIN Counsel for the Respondent No'1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN'l IRBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No' 2: SC FOR ELECTION C ( TMMISSION Counsel for the Respondent No'3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No' 4, 5, 6 & 8: DR' J' VIJAYT ' LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No'7 lo 12: -' Counsel for the Respondent No'l3: SRI PUTTTA KRISHI{ \ REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER THI HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No.3O49l of 2Ol4 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for the following relief; ".....to isste a uit or order/ s r",cre pru.rticularlg one in the nature of Wit of C.ertiorai to call for recxtrd-s and d-ecl/ring the order passeZ b_g _fo third. respctdent dated 06-09-2014 in proceedin4s No.Election/ 277/ 2014 rejecting the complaint dated. tS-Z-2014 frt;d. bg tlrc petitbner for disqualification of the respond.ent Nos.4 to jO for disobdienre of Wrtg uthip on behntf of tle Indian National Congress Partg, as being illegal, arbitrary and. unconstitutbnal and. a nseqtentlg hold that the respondent Nos.4 to lO haue irttned disqualifiution for disobedience oJ u-thip; and be pleased. to pass suchother order/ s as this hon'ble Court maA deem fit ond proper in the ctanmstances of the case."

2. Sri Siddharth, learned counsel representing Sri Vivek Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner on record and Sri putta Krishna Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No. l3 are present.

3. learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous.

4. Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- S.MALLIKARJUNA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (-?' SECTION OFFICER --r/ To, Telangana. [OUT]

1. One CC to SRI VIVEK JAIN, Advocate [OPUCI 2. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADIVIN-URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of 3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State o[Tetangana. 4. One CC to SC FOR ELECTION COMI\4ISStON, Advocate tOpUCl 5. One CC to DR. J. VIJAY LAKSHM|. Advocate tOpUCl 6. One CC to SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, (SC FoR MUNtCtpALtTtES), 7. Two CD Copies Advocate {OPUCI TOUT 46- MMT HIGH COURT DATED:2510912025 ORDER WP.No.30491 of 2014 \) ( () I .. ) l .TH .s14 i JAN 2t2il TC DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOURS WITHOUT COSTS 0n'' 't -). r{ \?