High Court · 2025

2. Bhimutamm e wh1 c^ e ir^L- , ':1.-i '.,- -,.ipal, ag^e_ 55 yrs- Claimant No. 2 .r. ruanesn. S/O [\rlallan,|. A i,_t, , . ' : .- j'*,-vr,d, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 3 .+. rualalah, S/o Balan ,. r L,^__ , . ...- -e,sppq, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 4 .r. rrareesn. S/o Karro p- o. srirtt",'vill"ffiHTillthu' ase 35 vrs- claimant No. E I txiffi#*ilffi #:,:x11:l':';,7:#jtlr1'* -" ;. r. ro nrrii"ri'rjij".iTTl'* ,se 65 vrs- ctaimant No. 17 fi.p."..[""iil. 5i;;:fT:Syuru, ase 33 yrs_ ctaimant No. 1B l S ll*t;t?:,jii#{!.*Tt ,;:;,,j#"#u i:n: }i#r,' , u. I r rcrr un, J/o MLlkundam r +. vaoamml,"viid VJfl,i| _1s" r s. sr,rrit ro.s*ift,i, d"-i{#n1:fflllisrn,,ase 50 yrs- ctaimant No. 28 47 c,^1.L. ^. _. ....._,,-,q, age 33 yrs_ Claimant No. 30 r , . oeKnar, \i/o Chenna p- ta o"r"rrii'o;'K;#ifl'11 age 43 vrs- claimant No. 31 rs.r;n,i, dlJK:^Xllllli: rye s^5-vrs-craimant No. 32 -.1_,rvyurr.l, age 35 yrs_ Claimant No. 34 ""i.. "1,f;llifli:.ao_e 34 vrs- cla imant No. 24 47-yrs_ craimant No. 26 t.

20.Laxma Reddy, S/c \/enkat Reddy, age 3g yrs- Claimant No. 35 21.Narmada, Dio r/erkatanna, age'33 yrs_ Cliimant No. aZ 22.Govindammer, \Vic \/enkatanna, age 40 yrs_ Claimant No, 3g 23.Malla Reddy, S/o t/tanyapu Reddy, age 55 yrs_ Claimant No. .19 24.Kistaiah, Sio Nagi Reddy, age 4S-yrslClaimant No. 41 25.Geethamma @ Ge,etha, D/o Gund-anna, age 33 yrs_ Claimant No. 42 26.Achamma, V\,/o Sr nu, age 47 yrs_ Claima;t No. 43 27. Mogulai, S/o Ni;zarr pasha, agL 34 yrs_ Claimant No. 44 28.Sreekanth, S./o Surlhakar, age Se yis_ Claimant No. 46 29.M. Laxmi, D/o [r,1. Nlarayana, age 3-6 yrs- Claimant No. 5.1 M. lVothi, D/o Nar;ryana, age 35 yrs_ Claimant No. 52 -30 31.N. Ram Mohern. S/,r N Nalla Redby, age S+ yrs_btaimant No. 5ll 32.Gayathri, D/o B. Clrarndrudu, age S-a yi_ Ctaimani tto. S+ 33. Raghu, S/o Narrryana, age 35 yrs_ Claimant No. 55 34 Sayanna, S/o Krathrlappa, age 43 yrs- Claimant No. 57 35.Chinna Keshavulu, S;/o Rajanna, age 33 yrs_ Claimant No. 59 36. Kurva Kathalappa, S/o Sayanna, age +O yrs_ Claimant No. 6.1 37. Sawaranna, S;/o Thinrmanna, age 40 yrs_ Claimant No. 65 38. D. Surender, lj/o S;lvaranna, age 33 yrs_ Claimant No. 66 39. Rakesh, S/o Siarvararrna, age 3i yrs_ 6taimant tto. OZ 40. Prathusha, D/c [javrerranna, age 33 yrs_ Claimant No. 6g !1.\an4a, D/o Nar;ryana, age 35 yrs_ Claimant ruo. it 42.Dharma Reddy, S/c I'lalla Reddy, 4g yrs_ Claimant No. 73 43.Anasuya, D/o Nalta Fleddy, age i7 yrs_ Claimani No. 7+ 44.Thulasi, D/o Nalla Fleddy, age 36 yrs_ Claimant f.lo. ZS 45. Raju, Sio Yelka tJarrrranth RedOy, age S+ yrs_ Ctaimant No. 7ti 46. Hareesh, S/o'/elka Flanmanth nLaO-y, age'Sa yrs_ Claimant No. 79 47.K. Raghavendra S/: K. Ramulu, age +e"yrs_ Ciaimant No. Bl 48.Pedda Ananthantma, Wo Narsimh-ulr, ,je OO yrs_ Claimant No. 87 49.Munemma, Wb \arsimhulu, age 63 yir_tt"lr'rn1 ruo. Aa 50.Jayamma, W/o Bhe,:rn Reddy,ige S6 Vrr_ Cfiirrnt No. 89 !1 lamu, S/o Narsirnh,ru, age 4b yrs_ Cfaimant No. SO 52. Srilatha, D/o Venkat Fleddy, age 33 yrs_ Claimant-No. 92 53.Venkatamma, W,b \/e,ma Reddy, age Sa yrs- Ctaimant No. 93 54.Anasuya, Wo Nargi Reddy, age40-yrs_ Ciaimanitto. g+ ga y* Ciuimant No. 9t, 55. Nagendramma, t)/o Venkat Reddy, 56.Pashula Srinivasutu, S)/o Ramulu, agjas y,t_ Claimant No. 10j "gu 57. B. Anand, S/o ,{sharrra, 36 yrs_ Claimant 58. Narayanamma, V//o Bal Reddy, age 35 yrs_ Claimant No. 105 59. Pedda Anjaney,utr.r, Siirr c. ttanmaithu, ige SS t;--Ctaimant Nc,.10( 60. Nalta Reddy, S/o Bh :r..m Reddy, ug" iS ;r.-cfiimant No. 107 6l.Venkatamma, \M/: Sekhar Reddy,ige SS yo_ Cfrir"nt No. 11i: 62.Shrva Reddy @) shiva S/o Hanmanilru, ,g! asJ;_ ctaimant Nrr.11 ] 99 lrry, S/o_ Batat .str:nr a, age 48 yrs- Ctaimi'nt f.fol r r S 64. P. Ravi, Sio parigi n rnsi ReOoy, ugu iS yr;_ Ctuimant No. 1 1 B 65.P. Sateesh, S/c riala rrLaoy, age si G_a;i;;iirro. rrs 66.P, Satyamma, \V/,r parigi Nigi ReOOV, ag" St'yl_'Cfriranr No.12.l 67. Thirupathaiah, ljkr Arrarithaia-h, age i4 yir-_ et;;r;t No. .128 68.Sujatha, D/o Kurumarna, age 35 yrs- Ci"*rnif.fo. iSf 69. Vijetha, D/o Kurunrarna, age S+ Vis- Cfairnani f.fo. f SZ 'ruo. f Oi ^nano,

70. Ramulu, S/o penfanna 7i r,^-t.-, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 134 ,i i:;,[:'r,i; "'./,?fi?,'l] :9: 34 Ip: ili',"""i ii"'r so ,ilo lj iI^:1,"^I".lkataiah, age 3i yrs_ cd;;;;i N; , .r. s/o Yerranna o .ge 19Jrs - Claimant No. 142 .,E -L - / o. lrnagya, D/o yerranna /6. Balesha, D/o Thrnn,r.^19^e l! v:- claimant wo. i+s zz.naiesill, t; ffi:::r:::'i9: ll vo - craimant No r47 pgi,11q1gril#rrh;;;""mmfi;,ir"' o r . onKanth, S/O Anianevr rfi r . fi ;;;iill"o!;iffi,#:h,X,i,3,.,ffi ;;fii,ii]il$i;,,,i1,,"0,, (Respondents 2 to g1 are not necessary parties) ...RESPONDENT/CLAIMANTS Counsel for the Appeltants: SRI G. PURUSHOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: G.p. FOR APPEALS The Court delivered the foltowing: JUDGMENT -l I i I l THE HON'BLiE S;III IUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR IJ]IAVILI AND THE HONI'III,E SMT.IUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA L.A.A.S.No.56 OF 2024 TUDGMENTI (I'er !{on'ble Sri f ustice Abhinand Kumar Shaviti) \A/hen the mirtter is taken up for hearing, learned c,rrrnsel for the appellants; tLas informed the Court that the issue raised in the present appeal is :;quarely covered by the conrrlon jrdgment, dated 27.09.2(12')-, re:ndered by this Court in L.A. A.S.N o 2 of 2016 and batch, wtreret'r. this Court has enhanced the marker: value of the land acqujre,d therein by two more times (1+2) tlran the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer with all conse{uential benefits as sti'rtria:erd under the amended Land Accuisition Act, by following the tLdgment, dated 75.09.2022, rendererl by this Court in L.A..,\.ti,lJrt.4 of 2076. Learned counsel had crxrtended that aggrieveci trv tl're very same direction given in oth<,r similar batch of appeals,, the Special Deputy Collector (L.A.) carried the matter to lhr: Honourable Supreme Court b filing S.L.P.(Civil).Nr..28!t!15 of 2024 and the Honourable )rrpreme 2 AXS,J & ETD.J L.A.A.S.No.56 ot2O24 Court was pleased to dismiss the same aide order, dated. 17.09.2024. In view of the same, the presenr appeal is also liable to be disposed of by enhancing the market varue of the subject Iand by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer with all consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act.

2. Further, learned counsel for the appellants had fairly conceded that the appeal is filed with a delay and therefore, the appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period in preferring the appeal. Therefore, appropriate orders be passed in the appeal to that effect.

3. Learned Government pleader for Appeals appearing for the respondent-Land Acquisition officer did not dispute the said fact, but, however, sought time to get instructions.

4. This Court, having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, is of the considered view that the f, J \I:S,J & ETD,J l, A.A. ;.I1o.56 of2024 issue raised in the present appeal is squarely co!'er€rf by the couunon iudgment, dated' 27'09'2022, rendered by this (lourt in L.A.A.S.No.2 cf 2:.016 and batch, whereby this C'rurt has enhanced the nrarket value of the land acquired therein by two more times (.t+2) than the value fixed by the t'ancl 'Arrluisition Officer with alt consequential benefits as stipulated rurder the amended Lar,d A':quisition Act' Further, similar direclion given in other batch t>l' lppeals was also confirmed by tht: I{'.rnourable Supreme Court. in S.L.P.(Civil)'No'28925 of 2024' dated 17.09.2024. '[trer3]:ore, this Court is inclined to dispos,e of the f present app,:al irr terms of the common judgment' dated

27.Og.2022, rtrnd,:rr:d by this Court in L'A'A'S'No'il- ol ">-01'6 batch.

5. Accord.nglr', the appeal is disposed of {oll<'vring the common judgrnent, dated 27.09'2022, rcndered by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.2:. cf 2076 and batch by enhancing the rrarker; value of the subject lernd l>rz two more times (1+2) than the'vahre'fixed by 4 AKS L-A-A.S-No. ,J & ETD,J 56 oI 2024 the Land Acquisition officer with a, consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act. However, it is made clear that the appellants are not entitled to claim interest for the delay period in preferring the appeal. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Applications, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. /ITRUE COPY/I SD/. K SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR EGTION OFFICER To, 1 2 3 4. Two CD CoPies The Senior Civil Judg e at Gadwal. (with records if a One CC to Sri G. Purushotham ReddY, Advocate IOPUC] Two CCs to G.P. for APpeals, High Cou rt for the State of Telangana. [OUTI (Alono with a copy of the common iudgment dated 27 'O9 '2022 io l.n-.n]s.uo.z of 2b16 and batch) HIGH COUR.T DATED:27 t01IZO2S JUDGMENT+.DEiCREE LAAS.No.56 of ZO24 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL. WITHOUT COSTS. t. (2 drafts) 1 $L SI.A; \\ =\'q I rY 13 Il.IN 2[,7 t DES r1( C "r ''- '-.,. 2 Ci v z c) A' THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G. PRTYADARSINI L.A.A.S. Nos. 2 8 10 12 to 18 It2 t2a L64 t66 167.170,172, 173. 174, 176. 177,178. 180, 182. rE3, 147. I 88. 190. 191. 192. 193. 194. 195. 199.207. 209. 2to.2t,- 215.216. 214.220. 222.223. 224.225. 226. 230.232.233 234,235 237,239.242 ,2+4 245,246 247 249 250 254 256 257 259 26L 264 266 271 272,273 274,2AL. 245.307. 309.310. 311.313. 314, 315 3la 319 320 32L 322 326 327 324 329 330 331 332 333 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 344 345 346 34a 349 35() 356 357 358 360 361 362 363. 364. 368.370. 372.373. 374.387. 388.390- 391. 396 399 404 407 438 440 441 443 479 480 444 488 449 490 491 509 510 513 515 516 519 52L 522 523 s27 52A 533 54O & 542 of2Ol 6 L.A.A.S.Nos,5 lo 23 27 36 37 +o 4t 42 4a 50 55 60 74 75 81 to 97 99 to !24 127 to 16l 164 165 166 167 r68 r69 171 to 188 192 201 207 209 2ta 219 233 556 557 560 561 562 578 58() 582 583 585 602 6()3 613 621 & 63() of2Ol7 L.A.A.S.Nos.55 56 60 61 62 64 65 66 67 68 69 84.85 101. 103 IO4. 107 1()8, 1()9 110, 112 tt4, 116 tt7 118 119 120 t2L 122 124 t2s 129 137 2 L62. t64-]A5, 166. 179. 180. 183. 184. 185. 19O' I94, 197. 198-1 9 9, 2OO. zot. 2O2. 2O5. 20,6. 2O7. 229, it32, 240 24L -215, 247, 24A. 249, 25.2. 25,4. 255, 256. J\SZ- 2167., 296 308 309 312 & 3r4 of 2OL 8 L.A.A.S.Nos.37 of 2Ol9 L.A.A.S.Nos.33 34 3s. 36. 391 39. aO. !L,,+2.43.44.45,47.4a.49.5L.52. 53 & 64 of 2O2L COMMONILTJ-pIQIIENt (per Justice G. Sn Deu! The ii; in this batch of Appeals, preferred. by the claimants, pertain to common acquisition proceedi.r.gs and therefore, they are heard together al<l b,:ing disposed of try this common judgment.

2. H.eard learned counsel for the claimants anc Sri D.Kiran, le.rrned Assistant Government Pleader for the respor:.dt-'r.t

3. Eioth ':he counsel submit that the prerst:nt acquisition rvas for the purpose of Rajeev Lift Irriga tion Scherr.e, Fhzise-Il, Pebbair, which is ancillary pro-ie,:l of Priyadarsh.rLi Joorala Project and that similar mittter 3 has already been decided by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 and therefore, these appeals can also be disposed of in similar lines. This Court uide jtdgment, dated 15.09.2022 has already elaborately alalysed the evidence and considered the identical issue raised in these appeals in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016. Both the counsel have not disputed the factum of commonalitSr of the evidence and the issue in these appeals and in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2076, wherein this Court has allowed the appeal enhancing the market value by two more times (l+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O. with ait other consequential benefits as slipulated under the amended Act.

4. Therefore, following the judgment passed by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016, dated 15.O9.2022 and. for the reasons stated therein, all these appeals stand disposed of by enhalcing the market value of the acquired land by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the L.A.O. w.ith all other consequential 4 benefits a.r; stipulated under the amended ''\r:t' Howevr:r. it :.s made clear that the claimalt(s) is7 are not entitlec to claim interest for the delay pe'riotl in preferring th,e appeal as specifrcally ordered by 'tllis Court .vlLile <:ondoning the delay. No order zrs to cor';ts. M.iscellzrneous petitions, if any, shall st lrd closed. JUSTICE G. SRI [)E;\II JUSTICE M.G. PRIYADARS]:NI

27.O9.ito22t, gkv/tsr Note: O[fir:e t: append a coPY of ttre iudgrnent in L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2016 with the present judgrnent. I)7 o 5;kv/ tsr IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENry SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVIL] AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Between: LAND ACQUISITION APPEA L SUIT NO: 56 OF 2024

1. Kurva Lingamma, Wo Karre Hanmanthu, age 65 yrs - Claimant No. 1. 2. Nagaraju, S/o Mallesh, age 43 yrs- Claimant No. 6 3. Mallesh, S/o Mallesh, age 38 yrs- Claimant No. 7 4. Malleshwaramma @ Kurva Malleshwaramma, W/o Mallesh @ late Kurva 5. Yellamma @ Kurva Yellamma, Wo Karrenna, age B0 yrs- Claimant No. 9 Mallesh age 63 yrs- Claimant No. B (Died) Per LR Claimant No. 85

6. Vamshi, S/o B. Bal Ram, age 34 yrs- Claimant No. ,10 7. Shailaja, D/o B. Bal Ram, age 33 yrs- Claimant No. 11 8. B. Laximinarayana, S/o Venkatanna, age 50 yrs- Claimant No. 13 9. Thirupathamma, W/o Narsimhulu, age 45 yrs- Claimant No. 16 10.B. Mukundam, S/o Ramulu, age 57 yrs - Claimant No. 19 11. Bramhaiah, S/o Ramulu, age 33 yrs- Claimant No. 21 '12. Narsamma, Wo Manohar, age 47 yrs- Claimant No. 23 13.8. Ramu, S/o Ramulu, age 50 yrs- Claimant No. 25 14. Ravi, S/o Ramulu, age 38 yrs- Claimant No. 27 l5.Hanmanthu @ Boya Hanmanth, S/o Karenna @ Boya Karrenna,.age 67 yrs- Claimant No. 29 (Died) per LRs Claimant Nos. 86 to Bg

16.Anand, S/o Anjaneyulu, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 33 17.Kurva Venkatanna, S/o Chinna Narsappa, age 55 yrs- Claimant No. 36 18.Nooka Pedda Venkat Reddy, S/o Sakeeranna, age 57 yrs - Claimant No. 40 19.Nooka Narayana Reddy, S/o Chinna Venkat Reddy, age 33 yrs- Claimant No. 45

20. Raju, S/o Pedda Anjanna, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 47 21. Raju, S/o Chennappa, age 38 yrs- Claimant No. 48 22. Krishnaiah, S/o Kistanna, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 49 23. M. Narayana, S/o Nagaiah, age 65 yrs- Claimant No. 50 24.Kurva Chinna Balappa @ Kishtampalli Balappa, S/o Narsappa, age 75 yrs- Claimant No. 56 (Died) Per LRs Claimant Nos. 90 to 92 25. Rajanna, S/o Chinna Balappa, age 55 yrs- Claimant No. 58 26.Pedda Narsimhulu, S/o Chinna Balappa, age 50 yrs- Claimant No.60 27.Chinna Narsimhulu, S/o Chinna Balappa, age 45 yrs- Claimant No. 62 28. Parvathamma, W/o Narayana, age 60 yrs- Claimant No. 63 29. Maheswari, W/o Sawaranna, age 50 yrs- Claimant No. 64 30. Sujatha, D/o Narayana, age 40 yrs- Claimant No. 69 31 . Yashoda, Dio l,lzrrayana, age 37 yrs- Claimant No' 70 32. Munemm a, W/r> Nalla Reddy, age 65 yrs- Claimant No 72 33.Nalla Recdy', S/c Sayanna, age 70 yrs- Claimant No 76 34. Ramalaxmimnr:r @-Govindamma, W/o Yelka Hanmanth Retldy' age 50 yrs- Claimant No. Z7

35.Chandraiah S/o Laxmaiah, age 45 yrs- Claimant No' 80 36.Venkatesh, S/c Ohinna Anjanna, age 47 yrs- Claimant No 82 37.Ashok, Sro llatnulu, age 33 yrs- Claimant No' 83 38.Anjamma, t)/o Pedda Ananthaiah, age 35 yrs- Claimant No B'1 39.G. Hanmrln'.htr ll/o Gangaiah, 73 yrs- Claimant No' 85 40.Nooka lvluni ReCdy, Sio Hanmanth @ Hanmi Reddy, age €5 yrs- Claimant No. 86 41 . Nooka Vt;nliat Reddy, S/o Hanmanth, age 60 yrs- Claimant No' 91 42.Bhagya,l)/o Crinna Narsimhulu, age 40 yrs- Claimant Nc 96 43.Mune-endra Dro Nadipi Hanmi Reddy, age 33 yrs- Claimant No 97 44.Chinna Nar'simhulu, S/o Muni Swamy, age 40 yrs- Claimant No 98 45. Narsimhulu, S/o Balaswamy, age 33 yrs- Claimant No' 99 46.Badda Ctritlerrma, W/o Budda Hanmanna, age 35 yrs- Claim;int No' 100 47. Sarojanamrna, W/o Nalla Reddy, age 55 yrs- Claimant No' 10 l 48.Gaddala Ki:;tatnma, W/o G. Bheem Reddy, age 55 yrs- C aim;'rrLt No 104 4g.Shanthamnra, V1//o Narayana Reddy, 53 yrs- Claimant No 1Oi:i 50. Ramulu, S/rt Burida Hanmanna, age 35 yrs- Claimant No 109 51. P. Vinod, S/o l{anmi Reddy, age 36 yrs- Claimant No 1 10 52.Rakesh, S/rt Rarr Reddy, age 50 yrs- Claimant No. 1'1 1 53. Poojitha, Dio l,njaneyulu, age 43 yrs- Claimant No. 1 14 54.Anitha, D/o Ranrulu, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 116 55.Parigi Nagi Red'Jy, S/o. Muneppa, age 65 yrs- Claimant l'1o 11 z 56.P. S;khar, S/o F'arigi Nagi Reddy, age 38 yrs- Claimant No 120 57. Parigi Anji fiecldy, S/o. Nagi Reddy, age 50 yrs- Claimant No 1 22 58. Parigi Saiy:rmrna, Wo Nagi Reddy, age 55 yrs- Claimant No l 23 59. Venkatarrn;1, S,/o Sawaranna, age 53 yrs- Claimant No. 1 :24 60. Ramulu, S/o Sawaranna, age 53 yrs- Claimant No. 125 61 . Satyamma W/o Thirupathaiah, age 45 yrs- Claimant No. 126 62.Ananthaiah, S/c Polanna, age 63 yrs- Claimant No. 127 63.Bathkestra, Dic Ananthaiah, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. '129 64.8. Kuruntartna, S/o Polanna, age 61 yrs- Claimant No. 13i0 65.Chnennamma,\y'y'lo Pentanna, age 56 yrs- Claimant No. 133 66. Satyamnra W/c, Ramulu, age 53 yrs- Claimant No. '1 35 67. Polerammzr, V//c Vishnu, age 50 yrs- Claimant No. 137 68.Laxmi Devi, \\ /<l Venkataiah, age 55 yrs- Claimant No. '1:19 69.Yerrannil, li/o Eialappa, age 61 yrs- Claimant No. 14.1 T0.Krishnaiah S/c Yerranna, age 30 yrs- Claimant No. 144 71 . Padmanrma, \V/o Kurumanna, age 53 yrs- Claimant No. 145 T2.Thuppalanra, S,/o Balappa, age 58 yrs- Claimant No. 146 73.Gopal, S/o Kis,tanna, age 36 yrs- Claimant No. 149 74.Raju, Sio Flist;lnna, age 50 yrs- Claimant No. '150 75. Ramulu, Sro l..istinna, age 53 yrs- Claimant No. 152 76. Shiva Shanka', S/o Govindu, age 40 yrs- Claimant No. 1r55 77. Santhos 1, S/o \/enkatanna, age 33 yrs- Claimant No. 1 56 78.Anesh, Si/o A.r janeyulu, age 40 yrs- Claimant No. 157

79. Narmada, D/o Ramanna, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 15g 80.Ashok, S/o Laxmanna, age 25 yrs- Claimant No. 159 81. Hareeh, S/o Venkatanna, age 36 yrs- Claimant No. .l60 82. Yashoda, D/o Manyam, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 161 83.Ashwini, D/o Kurva Srinu, age 33 yrs- Claimant No. 162 84.Chinna Anjanna, S/o Hanmanth, age SO yrs- Claimant No. 163 85. Malleshwaramma @ Kurva Malleshwaramma, Wo Mallesh @ late Kurva 86. Boya Venkateshwaramma, W/o Boya Hanmanthu, age 57 yrs 87. Boya Kavitha, W/o Boya Srinivasulu, age 42 yrs 88. Boya Kishore, S/o late Boya Srinivasulu, age 23 yrs 89. Boya Kiran, S/o late Boya Srinivasulu, age 26 yrs 90.Pedda Narsimhulu, S/o Kurva Chinna Balappa @ Kishtampalli Balappa, age Mallesh, age 63 yrs 44 yrs

91.Chinna Narsimhulu, S/o Kurva Chinna Balappa @ Kishtampalli Balappa, age 39 yrs

92.Rajanna, S/o Kurva Chinna Balappa @ Kishtampalli Balappa, age 54 yrs All are Occ: Agriculture, Rfo Kistampally Village of Narva Mandil, Naiayanpet District. AND ...APPELLANTS/CLAIMANTS

1. The Land Acquisition Officer- cum- Special Deputy Collector, LA Unit PJP, Gadwal ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

2. Bhimulamma, Wo Gopal, age 55 yrs- Claimant No. 2 3. Mahesh, S/o Mallappa, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 3 4. Mallaiah, S/o Balappa, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 4 5. Hareesh, S/o Kane Hanmanthu, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 5 6. Sujatha, Wo Karunakar, age 53 yrs- Claimant No. 12 7. Maheshwaramma, Wo Govindu, age 45 yrs- Claimant No. 14 B. Lalitha, Wo Laxman, age 40 yrs- Claimant No. 15 9. Adivemma, Wo Laxmaiah, age 65 yrs- Claimant No. 17 'l0.Ramadevi, D/o Chenna Rayulu, age 33 yrs- Claimant No. 1g 1'1 . Prashanth, S/o Mukundam, age 33 yrs- Claimant No. 20 12.Thirupathaiah, S/o Dasthagiri, age 45 yrs- Claimant No.22 1 3. Tharun, S/o Mukundam , age 34 yrs- Claimant No. 24 14.Yadamma, W/o Venkatesh, age 4Z yrs- Claimant No. 26 '15. Shanthanna, S/o Dashthagiri, age 50 yrs- Claimant No. 28 16.Swathi, D/o Hanmanthu, age 33 yrs- Claimant No. 30 '17. Sekhar, S/o Chenna Rayulu, age 43 yrs- Claimant No. 31 18. Devanna, D/o Kurmanna, age 55 yrs- Claimant No. 32 19.Laxmi, D/o K. Anjaneyulu, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 34 20.Laxma Reddy, S/o Venkat Reddy, age 38 yrs- Claimant No. 35 21 . Narmada, D/o Venkatanna, age 33 yrs- Claimant No. 37 22.Govindamma, W/o Venkatanna, age 40 yrs- Claimant No. 3B 23.Malla Reddy, S/o Manyapu Reddy, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 39 24.Kistaiah, S/o Nagi Reddy, age 45 yrs- Claimant No. 41 25.Geethamma @ Geetha, Dio Gundanna, age 33 yrs- Claimant No. 42

26.Achammzr, \V/c !)rinu, age 47 yrs- Claimant No. 43 27. Mogulai, li/o Niz,am Pasha, age 34 yrs- Claimant No 44 28.Sreekanttr, li/o Sudhakar, age 33 yrs- Claimant No' 46 29.M. Laxmi. D/o lvl, Narayana, age 36 yrs- Claimant No 51 30.M. Jyothi, D/o l,larayana, age 35 yrs- Claimant No-. 52 31. N. Rim t\{ohan, S/o N. Nalla Reddy, age 34 yrs- Claimant No 53 32.Gayathri, Dro E,. Chandrudu, age 33 yrs- Claimant No 54 33. Raghu, S/o Na'aryana, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 55 34. Sayanna, S/o l'(erthalappa, age 43 yrs- Claimant No' 57 35.Chinna Keshavulu, S/o Rajanna, age 33 yrs- Claimant No 59 36. Kurva Kathalagrp,a, S/o Sayanna, age 40 yrs- Claimant No 61 37. Sawarantta Si c Thimmanna, age 40 yrs- Claimant No- 65' 38. D. Surende', S/o Sawaranna, age 33 yrs- Claimant No. 66 39. Rakesh, lik) Sirwaranna, age 33 yrs- Claimant No. 67 40. Prathusha, D/c Sawaranna, age 33 yrs- Claimant No 68 41 .Vanala, [)/o Nzrr'ayana, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 71 42. Dharma [?eCcl5', S/o Nalla Reddy, 48 yrs- Claimant No 73 43.Anasuya, D/o l,l;rlla Reddy, age 37 yrs- Claimant No. 74 44.Thulasi, t)/o Nrrlla Reddy, age 36 yrs- Claimant No. 75 45. Raju, S/o Yelk;r Hanmanth Reddy, age 34 yrs- Claimant t\Jo 7 3 46. Haieesh, S,'o Yelka Hanmanth Reddy, age 33 yrs- Claim€rnt No 79 47.K. Raghavenrl-a, S/o K. Ramulu, age 48 yrs- Claimant Nc'' B1 48. Pedda Anarlth,trnma, Wo Narsimhulu, age 60 yrs- Claimant Nlo' 87 49. Munemnra, Wto Narsimhulu, age 63 yrs- Claimant No. BB 50.Jayamma, \ffk, lJheem Reddy, age 50 yrs- Claimant No. {19 51. Ramu, S,b Nalsimhuu, age 40 yrs- Claimant No. 90 52. Srilatha, D/,: Verkat Reddy, age 33 yrs- Claimant No. 92 53.Venkatamnra, V1/io Vema Reddy, age 53 yrs- Claimant No 93 54.Anasuya, V//o Nagi Reddy, age 40 yrs- Claimant No. 94 55. Nagendrrnrmzr, D/o Venkat Reddy, age 33 yrs- Claimant No. iXi 56. Pashula Sr nivarsulu, S/o Ramulu, age 35 yrs- Claimant No 101 57. B. Ananc, [i/o Ashanna, 36 yrs- Claimant No. 102 58. Narayanirnrmer, Wo Bal Reddy, age 35 yrs- Claimant No' 105 59.Pedd-a Aajzrneyttlu, S/o G. Hanmanthu, age 55 yrs- Claimant lrlo 106 60. Nalla ReCdy, {i/c Bheem Reddy, age 33 yrs- Claimant Nc'. 10'z 61 . Venkatarnnra, \y'//o Sekhar Reddy, age 55 yrs- Claimant No. 1'1 2 62.Shiva Redcly () Shiva, S/o Hanmanthu, age 45 yrs- Claimant No 113 63. Raju, S/o Balakstanna, age 48 yrs- Claimant No. 115 64. P. Ravi, S/rr Parigi Ranga Reddy, age 35 yrs- Claimant No 1'' € 65. P. Sateesh, Sro Nalla Reddy, age 34 yrs- Claimant No 1 1g 66. P. Satyamrna, W/o Parigi Nagi Reddy, age 55 yrs- Claimi:nt I'Jc 121 67.Thirupatha ah S/o Ananthaiah, age 34 yrs- Claimant No. 128 68. Sujatha, D/o f.urumanna, age 35 yrs- Claimant No- 131 69.Vijetha, l)/o Krtrumanna, age 34 yrs- Claimant No. 132 70. Ramulu, Sro F'entanna, age 35 yrs- Claimant No. 134 71 . Venkatesh S/c Ramulu, age 34 yrs- Claimant No. 1 36 72. Rajitha, f/o t/ shnu, age 34 yrs- Claimant No. 138 73.Suri, S/o V:nl ataiah,age34 yrs- Claimant No. 140 74.Anand, [i/c Yerrranna, age 19 yrs - Claimant No. 142 75. Bhagya, Dro Yerranna, age 35 yrs - Claimant No. 143

76.Balesha, D/o Thuppalanna, age 35 yrs _ Claimant No. 147 11 T"j.r_h., D/o Thuppalanna, age 33 yrs - Claimant No. 1€ ]8 Anji, S/o Chennappa, age 43 yrs - Ctaimant lrto. t St 79. Gajjalamma, Wo Anji, age 4O yrs - Claimant No. 153 80. Laxmi, D/o Kurumanna, age 36 yrs - Claimant No. 154 81 .Srikanth, S/o Anjaneyulu, age 33 yrs. - Claimant No. 164 All are Occ: Agriculture, R/o Kistampally Village of Narva Mandal (Respondents 2 to 81 are not necessary parties) ... RESPOND E NT/CI.AI MANTS Appeal filed under section 54 of Land Acquisition Act against the Judgment and decree dated 12.03.2010 passed in o.p.No.72 of 2009 (Award No. 12 of 2oo9 Dt.13.07.2009) on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Gadwal. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appear, the Judgment and Decree of the court berow and the materiar papers in the appear and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G. purushotham Reddy, Advocate for the Appellants and G.p. for Appeals for the Respondent No.1 This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the Land Acquisition Appear suit be and hereby is disposed in terms of the common judgment, dated 22.09.2022, rendered by this Court in L.A.A.s'No.2 of 2016 and batch by enhancing the market varue of the subject land by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer with all consequential benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act;

2. That how€rv('r. t is made clear that the appellants are not ertitled to claim interest for tlre c elay period in preferring the appeal; and

3. That there shall be no order as to msts in this appeal' //TRUE COPY// SD/- K SFIII{IVASA RAO . JOINT REGISTRAR "$EC'ilON OFFICER To, 1 . The Senior {)ivil 'Judge at Gadwal. 2. Two CCs to G.P for Appeals, High Courtforthe state of Telarg;rna [OUT] 3. Two CD OoPier; (2 drafts) HIGH COURT DATED:2710112025 DECREE LAAS.No.56 o{'2024 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL. WITHOUT CCISTS.