The High Court · 2025

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. C.Neelam Reddy, D/o. C.Rameshwar Reddy, Aged about 20 years, Occ. Student, R/o. H.No. 2125, Peddavadugur village and Mandal, Ananth'apur District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner/Accused ...Respondents/Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.24 of 2022 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge-cum-Chief tt/letropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar against the petitioner, in the interest of Justice- l.A. NO: 1OF 2023 Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.24 of 2022 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge- cum-Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, pending disposal of the criminal petition. .rf,E*;;*s..3wz l.A.Nos. 1 AND 2 OF 2025 l.A. NO: 'l OF 2025 Between: C.Neelam Reddy, D/o. C.Rameshwar Reddy, Aged about 20 years, Occ. Student, R/o. H.No. 2125, Peddavadugur village and l\ilandal, Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh. . . . Petitioner/Defacto Complainant No.2 AND 1 Kanne Harsha, Sio. Satyanarayana, Aged about 24 years, Occ. Software Engineer, R/o. H.No. 101 , Vajra Apartments, Manchili Bazar, Hanumakonda, Warangal District.

2. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court foi the State of Telangana at Hyderabad ...Respondents Petition under Section 320(6) of Cr.PC praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/Respondent no.2 to compromise the case by recording the Memorandum of Understanding dated 18.07.2025 in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(8) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and permit the Petitioner and Respondent No.2 to compromise the case in CC.No.24l2022 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge-cum-Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Rangareddy District at LB Nagar by recording the compromise, in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Abhilash Sontake, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Penuballi Ramesh Babu, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER :rt::ti&:.tr':. THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.l and2ot2O25 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.8958 ot 2023 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C by the petitioner/accused No.7 to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.24 of 2022 on the file of learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge-cum-Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Rangareddy District, L.B.Nagar, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420,-4OG and 506 of IPC and Sections 3,4,5 and 6 of Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the I ' offences.

3. Vide order dated 24.07.2025, this Cou( directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report. 2 i

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, .iJ the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 31 .07.2025 and the same is placed on record.

5. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.7 in C.C.No.24 of 2022 on the file of learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge-cum- Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Rangareddy District, L.B.Nagar, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed Sd/- K. SREE RAMA MURTHY DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// kw- IdN oFFICER SECT To, '1 . The Xll Additional tvletropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, Cyberabad 2. The Station House Officer, Madhapur (Guttala) Police Station, Cyberabad 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri Abhilash Sontake, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Penuballi Ramesh Babu, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies ABKrgh Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise :t i HIGH COURT DATED: 0410812025 ..' COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos. 'l AND 2 0F 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.8958 ot ZO23 a-\o t- ( * -il-1E s la r ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AND l.A.Nos.1 AND 2 OF 2025 2o>[- 1l lr: ]li ii' 1r @ MEMORANDUM OF CRL'P'M'P' FILED U/S IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT '", HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA f,sr(&) 0rtst \ -- @bren*c; LA. No. Of 2025 In Criminal Petition No. 8958 of 2O23 Between:- Kanne Harsha S/o. Satyanarayana, aged about 26 years dtc' soitwor" Engineer' rt'/o' H No' 101 Vajra Apartments, Manchili Bazar, Hanumakonda, Warangal District AND .. Petitioney' accused No. 7 1) The State of Telangana Rep by Public Prosccutor, High 6ourt at Hyderabad for the State o'"t'"r:1i".pondent/ Respondent 2) C. Neelam ReddY, S/"' C Rames Aged 28 yeats, Occ. Private iob, I{,/o' Fl Pe-ddavadugur Village and Mandal Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh hwar ReddY No. 2/25 .. Respondent/ Def acto complainant oINTMEMO It is submitted that the Petitioner / accused no'7 herein filed the 1) above Quash Petition seeking to quash the proceedings in C'C' No' 24 of 2022 onthe file of court of the I Adclitional senior Civil Judge-cum-Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Rangarecldy District at LB Nagar' The Respondent No. 2 has lodged the above case against the Petitioner under Section 420, 406,506 IPC anc{ 3, 4 5,6 of P(ize Chits Money Circular Scheme (Banning) Act 1978, wherein the Petitioner is figured as Accused No. 7 and the matter is Pending' It is submittecl that at the instance of elders and well-wishers' all the 2) parties inclucling the De-facto Complainant' have come to a conclusion to settle the clisputes by way of Mernorandum of Compromise dated c-&t."L"^M! lrt" 6s f-L\ t L9 L8.07.2025 enteied both the parties i.e., petitioney' accused no.7 and defacto complainanT 2"d respondent to settle the disputes and to compro_;::;; cases. Further the De_facto Complainant and Accused agreed to settle the matter. As such the co is nor having any obje-ion ro quash,." r..:"1:;::j.'. J:Hl"nt or_2022 pending against rhe Accused ,".r. ur.,n"r;,",: ".)--'-1]t .* deracto comprainant is ,;"" 1,"J;::HI ;:t::l?,ff,;:::::,":: ,,1: IJon'ble Court. Hence this joint memo. Hyderabad, Date t 18.07.2025 Counsel fort e petitioner/ accused no. 7 - A 0r/-tv^'- Counsel-for the responclent no.2 L. Ws["" (Kanne Harsha) o J.-b"r-AeJdg ( C Neelam Reddy)