Vatte Atchi Reddy v. The State of Telangana

8. Vatle Sridhar Reddy. S/o. Chinna Somi Reddy, Aged about 44 Years, Occ. Software Employee, N/o. Shettipalem Village, Vemlapally Mandal, Nalgonda District. Rl/o. Flat No.C-302, APICA, Gandipet, Range Reddy District.

9. Vatte Andhramma, W/o. Chinna Somi Reddy, Aged about 62 Years, Occ. Senior Citizen, N/o. Shettipalem Village, Vemlapally Mandal, Nalgonda District. Rl/o. Kompally Saidaiah House, Near Saint Hohans School, Chaitanya Nagar, Miryalguda Town and f\rlandal, Nalgonda District.

10. Pedapangu Nagamma, W/o. China Saidulu, Aged about 35 Years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. S.C.Colony, Sheftipalem Village, Vemulapally Mandal, Nalgonda District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affrdavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more partlcularly one in thenatureofWritofMandamusdeclaringtheactionoftheRespondentNos.5 and 6 in interfering into the peaceful life and liberty of the Petitioner and also interfering into the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos T to l0andcallingthePetitionertothePoliceStationandthreateningtohandover thelandofthePetitionertoanextentofAc.,l.2350GtsinSurveyNo,222lUU' which is situated at Shettipalem Village, Vemulapalty Mhndal' Nalgonda District totheRespondentNos'Ttol0duringthependencyofcivilsuitsthroughvide O.S.No.87 oI 2025 by colluding with the Respondent Nos T to 10 is illegal' arbitrary, u nconstitutiona I and violation of Articles 14, 15' 21 and 300-4 of constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondenl Nos 5 and 6 not to interfere into the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos T to 10 and not to threaten the Petitioner to handover his agriculture land to an extent of Ac.1 2350 Gts in Survey No.222lUU, which is situated at Shettipalem Village' Vemulapally Mandal, Nalgonda District to the Respondent Nos T to 10 during the pendency of civil suit. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.5 and 6 not to interfere into the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos.7 to 1O and not to threaten the Petitioner to handover . his agriculture land to an extent of Ac' 1 '235() Gts in Survey No.222lUU, which is situated at shettipalem Village, Venrulapally Mandal, Nalgonda District to the Respondent Nos.7 to 10 during the pendency of civil suit pending disposal of the Writ,Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 6: SRt M.SRINIVAS, AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N'V'SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 23698 of 2025 ORDER This writ petition is filed seeking following Prayer:- 'olling ""intspondent " to issuz an appropiate toit ordtr or direction nnre pnrticularly one 'lulo"dn"'" dcclning thz' nc'hon of the in the nature of Wnt of Resoondtnt Nos.S and 6 in ,ni4rnug into rlw y.itefut life,and liberty ';;Y;';;:;;;;;;na aso interp'angirtto ttw ciuit drsputeskhoeen the ttu' Peti'tioner to tht Ni''t tG rc nna ,ii,li,iii,, Yr'iir"rri ;ii uueofuniig to ]nld ouer tlu land of the Petitloner r'ztso ctiin suru'l:u No 222NU tuhich is situatcd ;';; ;;;;;l;; at Shettipakm Vittog'' V'*'il'ntty rt'aa' Nnlgonda'Distirt to tht L:;;i;; ;;' t ?' rc a'ii's tit pcnderry ol ciuit sui.ts throush ;;il;; ;" i; i zozs av cniliaii'e i'itn il'e"Reipon'lett Nos T to 10 '14' 15' is illegal, arbitrary, 'n.:o"'ii'nnnit 21 and 300A ol Cnn'nt't" o7 i'niin n"a r,rcl uiotttiin ol Principks ol Natural lustice o'a *n*qu/'iy direct llw Respontlett Nos 5 and 6 not to interlere i'o tn" io'it-'iitp'utcs behoun lhe Peti-tioner and 'irrp*i,'.N*'.*!0,"'.,:":r:i,.;:;":';';':Ti;:;-':,:'iYI1T:, his agiculture land to a Stnitipnt" V tage' Vemulapally Mandal, Nalgonda Oi't"t to ti Respondrnt Nos T to -t0 duing the No.222/1JU 'ohi'h " "nt'i'i'nt pendencY of ciail suit'" and t'iolntion of Articles

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petilioner claims to be the owner of the land to an extent of Ac.1.2350 guntas in survey No.222/uU, situated at Shettipalem Vilpge, Vemulapally Mandal' Nalgonda District' wherein the petitioner succeeded the said ProPerty' which has been updated in the revenue records' Respondent Nos'7 to 10 are having lands in Survey Nos'221' 225 and240, situated at Settipalem Village' Vemulapally Mandal' Nalgonda Dishict, and they approached the petitioner to sell his land at cheaper rate' which was denied by the petitioner' and they have intended to grab the land' respondent Nos'7 to 10 colluded and trespassed into and accordinglY 1 2 petitioner's lands, due to which the petitioner filed O.S.No.87 of 2025 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge at Miryalaguda, anel the trial Court by order dated 25.02.2025 in LA.No.44 ot 20'25 in O.S.No 87 of 2025 granted injunction. Thereafter, petitioner approached respondcrrt Nos.5 and 6 and made a complaint requesting to take necessary action against respondent Nos.7 to 10, ancl instead of initiating necessary action against respondent Nos.7 to 10, respondent No.6 called petitioner to thc police station and demanded to hand over his land to respondent Nos.7 to 10. Questioning the same, the present writ petilion is filed.

3. Sri M. Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleatder for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 6 placed instructions of respondent No.6 wherein it is stated.that that the petitioner is involved in 1) Crime No.6/2024, under Sections M7 and 427 r/w 34 IPC, dated 9.1.2024;2) Crime No.7612025, under Sections 329 (3),324 (4) and 351 (2) r/w 3 (5) BNS dated 25.1.2025; and 3) Crime No.74/2025, under Sections 329 (3),324 g) r/w.3 (5) BNS, dated

1.0.4.2025, registered on the file of Vemulapally Police Station, Nalgonda District, and charge sheets have been filed in all the three cases. It is further stated that petitioner also lodged a complaint and based on the same, Crime No.2O/2024, undcr Sections M7, 427 r/ w. 34 IPC, dated. 30.1.2025 was registered against respondents Nos.7 and 8 and it is under investigation. It is further submitted that except conducting investigation in the above cases, respondent No.6 did not interfere in civil disputes and clid not threaten the petitioner to hand over his land to the unofficial respondents. 3

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Horne appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 6. With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal today.

5. Recording the submissions of the learned counsei for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Homc, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent Nos.5 and 6 not to interfere in seftling the issues pending between the petitioner and respondent Nos.7 to 10. It is ieft open to the petitioner and respondent Nos.7 to 10 to pursue their remedies before the trial Court in the pending cases

6. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs To, //TRUE COPY// SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL PUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER 1 The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Tdlangana. The Director General of poti"", Telangana, Hyderabad. The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. The Deputy Superintendent of porice, Miryarguda Division, Nargonda District. The circle lnspector of Porice, furiryarguda Rurar circre, Nargonda District. The station House officer, Vemurapaly porice station, Nargonda District. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate tOpUCl Two CCs to GP FOR HOIVE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies 2 3 4 5 o

7. o. I BSR GJP HIGH COURT DATED:1 210812025 .- i i1E li f.-. /'s. 7 -r' '/ 1-- t:t') \\'ii- 1 2 B AUC 2025 .i.. -i--.---':- - ORDER WP.No.23698 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS ,/ s1