✦ High Court of India · 13 Aug 2025

lvlohammed Ahmed Ali v. '1 . The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 13 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
13 Aug 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,059 words

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of I dia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, llre High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction lrore particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF IVIANDAIVUS by declaring the ac on of the respondents, particularly the respondent No. 3 authority in constantli' :alling the petitioner to the PS Gajwel and interfering in peaceful possessio'r and enjoyment of the petitioner in the property to an extent of Ac. 3-06 gts. in Sy. No. 50/AA/1 , to an extent of Ac. O-24 guntas in Sy. No. 50/AA1O, to an exlc t of Ac. 0-03 guntas in Sy. No. 50lAAl2, to an extent of Ac. 1-10 guntas in Sy. \ r. 50/AA3, to an extent of Ac. 0-14 guntas in Sy. No. 50/AA7, to an extent of ,r,c. 0-04 gts in Sy. No. 50lAl5l2, to an extent of Ac. 0-07 gts in Sy.No. 50/46, t:, an extent of Ac. 0-05 guntas in Sy. No. 501A1712, to an extent of Ac. 0-14 gurrias in Sy. No. 50/4/8 of Sangapur Revenue Village, Gajwel ti,4andal, Siddipet District at behest of respondents 6 to 12 herein and pressurizing the petiotrre to settle the matter in respect of the property to an extent of Ac. 3-06 gts orming Sy. No. 50 of Sangapur Revenue Village with Respondents 4 to 10 i' s illegal, arbitrary and u nconstitutiona I and also against the principles of natural justice and against the Record of Rights Act and consequently direct the respc rdents, particularly the respondent No. 3 authority not to call the petitioner ar,l not to interfere in civil drsputes in respect of the property of the petitioner to an €,xtent of Ac. 3-06 gts. in Sy. No. 50iAA/1 , to an extent of Ac. 0-24 guntas in Sy. l'o 50/AA10, to an extent of Ac. 0-03 guntas in Sy. No. 5OlAAl2, to an extent of Ac 1-10 guntas in Sy. No. 50/AA3, to an extent of Ac. 0-14 guntas rn Sy. No. 50/A.\;, to an extent of Ac. 0- 04 gts in Sy. No 50lAl5l2, to an extent of Ac. 0-07 gtr; n Sy.No. 50/46, to an extent of Ac. 0-05 guntas in Sy. No. 50lAl712, to an exto-t of Ac. 0-14 guntas in Sy. No. 50/4/8 of Sangapur Revenue Village with title cle ;d in Khata No. 271 of Gajwel [r1andal, Siddipet District without sanction of lar,t'r,,nd authorization under law- l.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in th,: r;ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cc,.rrl may be pleased to direct the respondents, particularly the respondent No. ::, :uthority not to call the I petitioner and not to interfere in civil disputes in respect of the property of the petitioner to an extent of Ac. 3-06 gts- in Sy. No. 50/AA/1 , to an extent of Ac. O-24 guntas in Sy. No. 50/AA10, to an extentof Ac.0-03 guntas in Sy. No. SOtAAl2,lo an extent of Ac. 1-10 guntas in Sy. No. 50/AA3, to an extent of Ac. 0-14 guntas in Sy. No. 50/AA7. to an extent of Ac. O-04 gts in Sy. No. 50/fu5l2, to an extent of Ac. 0-07 gts in Sy.No. 50/46, to an extent of Ac. 0-05 guntas in Sy. No. SOlAl7t2, to an extent of Ac. 0-14 guntas in Sy. No. 50/A/8 of Sqngapur Rev enue Village with title deed in Khata No. 271 of Gajwel lvtandal. siddipet District without sanction of law and authorization under law. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI M.SALEEM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 10 : - The Court made the following ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRA.VAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 235f3 of 2Or25 ORDER: I When the matter is taken up hearing, le:u-ned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court lo withdraw the Writ Petition with a liberty to pursue the remc.rlies as available under law.

2. Permission as prayed for, is accorded.

3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissr, <. as rvithdrawn. Hou'ever, the petitioner may pursue the remerl es as avaiiable under 1aw, as prayed for. No order as to costs. As a sequei, miscellaneous applications .-,ending in this pelition, if aly, shall stand closed. ,TRUE COPY// SD/.A. PRATHIMA I)EPUTY REGISTRAR 6- SECTION OFFICER \ To SA GJ

1. Two CCs to GP FOR HOIME, High Court for the Stab . f Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

2. One CC to SRI IV.SALEEIM, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies o I t l ,'.- ',all:,_-:\,. ' ... v^ 2" 'i 11 SEP ?[25 HIGH COURT DATED:1310812025 ORDER WP.No.23513 of 2025 1 \. DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. q

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments