✦ High Court of India · 04 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 04 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
04 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,333 words

6. Smt. Pallavi, Sub lnspector of Police, Filmnagar Police Station, Filmnagar, Hyderabad.

7. Ivli. Prem Raj, Sub lnspector of Police, Filmnagar Police Statjon, Filmnagar, 8. Mi. Saleem, Sub lnspector of Police, Filmnagar Police Station, Filmnagar, 9. Nhrsimha Reddy, S/o Late Pochi Reddy, Aged about 60 years, Occ Retired, R/o H.No.8-'1-136/tu1 , Maruthinagar Colony, Shaikpet, Hyderabad-500 104. Hyderabad. l0.Govardhan Reddy, S/o Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.8- t -136/4/1 , Maruthinagar Colony, Shaikpet, Hyderabad- 500 104.

11.Smt. Archana Reddy, W/o Shesha Reddy, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Housewife, Rl/o H.No.B-1-'136/fu1 , Maruthinagar Colony, Shaikpet, Hvderabad-500 104.

12.S;tish Reddy, S/o Noi Known to the Petitioner, Aged lr.4ajor, Occ. Business, F/o H.No.B-i -1 36/4"/1, Maruthinagar Colony, Shaikpet, Hyderabad-500 1 04. Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate, writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the illegal confrnement and torture to ...RESPONDENTS the petitioner in Film Nagar police station by the resf,ondents 5 to B on 2810712025,3110712025 and on O3l0Bl2O25 and not send ng the petitioner for medical aid for his blood injuries and fire burns caused du€ to the deadly attack on 03lOBl2O25 by the unofficial respondents 8lo 12 as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia anrJ consequen y direct the respondents 1 to 3 to take penal action on the illergal activities of the respondents 5 to B and further to register crime aqarnst the unofficial respondents I to 12 in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 0F 2025 Petition under section 15'l cPC praying that in the (rircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High C;ourt may be pleased to direct the respondent police to register crime against the unofficial respondents I lo 12 fot their deadly attack on the petitioner on 03/08/2025 in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI AKULA ANIL SRINIVAAS Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 8: SRI M.SRINIVAS, AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.9 TO 12:. -- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR W'RIT PETITION No.23465 of 2025 ORDER Tl'ris writ petition is filed sccking follorving praycr:- "to issue ar npstrLtprinh: tprit, order or direction nnrc ynrtittrltrly onL' itt tllc r ltu'e of Writ of Mnndnnuts dcclting tlr illegnl ctttt.fint,nn,trt n d totture to tlr pctitioner in Film Nngnr pLtlitt stntiott lry tht respuulents No.5 to 8 on 28/07/2.025, 37/07/2025 uul ot 03/08/20)5 u not *ntling tlrc petitiorcr for uedicnl riLl fir lis l ood iryttrit,s ruti fre lttutts carsed dna to tlrc deadhl nttnck ttn 03/08/202t lry tln' offcnl respondcnts No.8 to 12 ns trbilranl ilbgnl ntul riol tr ttt ol' Articks 74 ttnd 27 of tlrc Constihttiott of lndin mu7 const,Llttr,tttlry lirtct tlrc resptnrdents Mr.1 io 3 to tnke Ttennl nction on tlr ilbgnl ru'tit,ittt' tl' tlr rcsprtruletts No.5 fo 8 nnd furtlrr to rcgst?r critnt tguitt;t tlu' tLnoffcutl rcsltondents No.9 to 12 it tlu interest of jrtstict."

2. Brief facts of the case arc that on 03-08-2025 at aroun(l 1-00 A.M the u nofficial rcspondents forcefully cntereLl petitiorler's house anrl cl.rmal;ccl the house articles ancl beat tl-re petitioner. After the dcaclly attack, thc pctitiorrr.r riiallcd 100 ancl showed iniuries ancl tolcl about dcaclly attack bv thc r-rnofficial rcsLrondcltts. Instcad of taking action against the attackcrs, thr. policc have arrested the petitioner anrl taken to the police station. It is further submittccl tlra t responclent Nos.5, 6, 7 and 8 have turned totally clcaf against injurios of tl-re petitioncr ancl forcibly confined him in the police station. Aggricvcd by the samc, tl-rc present petition is filcd.

3. Sri M. Srinivas, learned Assistant Governrnent [,lcacler for Home appearing for responclent Nos.1 to B placecl instructions of Sub-[nspcctor of Police, Film Nagar Police Station, whercin it is statecl that trs pc.r thc rccorris, thc petitioner was involved in Crimc No- 430 of 2025 datecl 0(r.07.2025 ior thc offences pur-rishable undcr Sections 727 (7), 118 (1), 32:1 (4) ancl 351 (2) BNS, k-".. I r! \ ) rcgistered on the filc of rcsporldcnt No.5, antl investigation has bcen taken up After finalizatior.r of invcstigation, an appropriate report n'i1l be filecl bcfore the cornpetent court- It is furtl.rer submittec] that responden: No.11 also loclgecl a complaint agair.rst thc Pctitioncr witl-r responclent No.5 orL 31.07.2025, ancl to that cxtcnt, a casc has bcen rcgistcrcd in Crirne No. ,185 of 2025 datecl

37.07 .2025 for thc offenccs purlishable under Sections 351 (2) BNS and investigation has been taken up. During thc coursc of invcstigation, thc pctitioncr carne to tlic Police Station on 28.07.2025,37.07.2025 and 03.08.2025, but cliri not cooperate with the investigating agency. At'tr.r finalization of investigatiorr, ar.r appropri;rtc- rc1-rort will be filecl before the. (ompetent court. It is furthcr subrnittr:cl that the petitioner dialecl 100 call on 03.08.2025, ancl the concernetl staff of responrlcnt No.5 visitecl tl're scene of offe'uct:, u,herein it was revealed that thcrc \ rcrc no olle Lllesent, ancl the petitionr:r started harming himsclf, but l.re was not arrestct{. Thereafter. respondent No.5 scnt the petitioner for medical cxaminatiorr or1 03.0U.2025 and obtaincd the m,rclical rcport. lt is further submitted that the pctitioner tlid not lodge any writlen complaint with respontlcnt No.5, and as ancl when thc petitioncr approachcs lespondent No.5 along witir written complaint, ltcccssary action wilI bc taken .rs per law

4. [,ca rncc{ counsel for thc pctitioncr submits that thc petitioner will approach rcspondent No.5 anrl Iorlges complaint

5. Heafd Mr. Akula Anil Srinivas, learned counscl for lhc petitioner ancl learnec{ Assistar.r t Covernrnent Plcader for Hornc appearir- g for responrlent Nos.1 to 8. With thcir conscrrt, tl-ris writ pctition is bcing takt:r.r up for disposal r' -t -)

6. Recorcling thc subn-rissions of tl.re learncc{ counsel for thc.;-rc.titior.r.'r ancl learnecl Assistant Government Pleacler for Flome, this writ petition is clisposetl of clirecting the responclent authorities to receive the complaint of the petitioncr, if hc approaches, ancl take necessar)' action, strictly in accordance witl-r lart'

7. Misccltancous applications, if any pencling, shall stancl closctl. No ortlcr as to costs SD/. L. VIJAYA LAXMI SI TANT REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER bedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, HYderabad No.'12, Banjara Hills, //TRUE COPY// To 1 2 The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Dr' B Hvderabad. State of Telangana. i6"-on"itor. Ceneral of Police, Telangana State, At The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City' Koao Hvderabad. Hvderabad. Hvderabad. Hvderabad. +. if," o"""priv Commissioner of Police, West Zone' AC Guards' I\4asab Tank' 5. ifr;"C;;b inspector of Police, Filmnagar Police Station' Filmnagar' 6 Siri. i'rlL"ui, Sub lnspector of Police, Filmnagar Police Station' Filmnagar' ? ili. p;;Raj, Sub lnspector of police, Filmnagar police station, Filmnagar, I ili 5;I;;, Sub lnspector of Police, Filmnagar Police Station' Filmnagar' g 6i'i,"bti" sRl AKULA ANIL SRINIVAAS, Advocate [O?lql io.i*" cc.L-ci Fon norrle, High Court for the State of Telangana' at Hvderabad. Hyderabad. Hyderabad. [OUT]

11.Two CD CoPies PSK GJP HIGH COURT DATED:0410912025 ORDER WP.No.23465 of 2025 \. il :|srPM I i',Y l: '\ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ,,( 2br1

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments