The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying .that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 not to make any further construction in respect of the "Stilt Floor", which is meant for parking in the commercial complex known as 'Chandras Commercial Complex' bearing H.No.5-1/1;'in Sy.Nos.94 and 95, situated at Annojiguda Village, Pocharam Municipality, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, thereby leased out the same or creating third party interest whatsoever. pending disposal of the a,bove writ petition. IAN O:ZOF 2025 Petition under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to take urgent steps to stop the ongoing illegal constructions being carried on by the Respondent Nos.S to 7 in the "stilt Floor", which is meant for parking in the commercial complex known as 'Chandras Commercial Complex' bearing H.No.5-1/1 , in Sy.Nos.94'& 95, situated at Annojiguda Village, Pocharam Municipality, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal_ Malkajgiri District, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI ATLA ABHTNANDHAN REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: Gp FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALTTY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 and 4: SRt V. NARSIMHA GOUD, SC FOR HMDA counsel for the Respondent Nos.S to 7: SRr MOHD. MolN AHMED euADRr TITI NO OF 25 p..n..O..geptfri, Wo.Sri Mogiti,srimanth,.agg{qlo_ut 31 years, Occ:Housewife, Rl/o. Vi[a No.6B, Mantri Eriphoria, ruiriindi n-n -Oiitict. ...PETITIONER I D Municipal Administration Saifabad, Hyderabad. Z. l9g!a1ag Municipatity, pocharam Ghatkesar Mandat, Medchat_Matkajgiri 1 . State of Telangana, rep. by its principal Secretarv and Urban DeVelopment Department, Secretariai District, Rep. by its Municipal Commissionei. - --

3. The Station District. House Officer, Ghatkesar police Station, Medchal_Malkajgiri .RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the 2nd respondent and its officiars in interfering with the work of expansion of s feet stair case to the existing stair case of the ground floor being erected by the petitioner over ground floor of commercial property bearing house No.5-1/1 with a total built up area admeasuring 5861 sq. feet (including common area) together common proportionate 600 sq. feet car parking in the cellar in Project named as CHANDRAAS COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, alongwith undivided share of land admeasuring 200 sq. yards out of total area admeasuring 1596 sq. yards, constructed over Plot Nos.1, 2' 3' 12, 13 and 't4, in Sy.Nos.94 and 95, situated at Anojiguda Village, Pocharam Municipality, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, with the help of the 3rd respondent that too without following the procedure as contemplated under law, is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutional, violation of principles of ratural- justice and also contrary to the provisions of the Telangana Municipalities Act. 2019, and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to interfere with the work of expansion of 5 feet stair case to the existing stair case of the ground floor belongs to the petitioner over subject property. :1 OF Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to interfere with the work of expansion of 5 feet stair case to the existing stair case of the ground floor being erected by the petitioner over ground floor of commercial property bearing house No.5-111 with a total built up area admeasuring 5861 sq. feet (including common area)r together common proportionate 600 sq. feet car parking in the cellar in Project named as 'CHANDRAAS COMMERCIAL COMPLEX'; alongwith undivided share of land admeasuring 200 sq. yards out of total area admeasuring 1596 sq. yards, constructed over Plot tl$.1, 2, 3, 12, 13 & 14, in Sy'Nos'94 & 95, situated at Anojiguda Village, pocharam Municipality, Ghatkesar uandil, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, without following the procedure as contemplated under law, pending disposal of the writ Petition. Counsel for the PetitiONET: SRI. A RAJA CHANbRA SHEKER GOUD Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBA1I DEV 4 Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, FOR MUNICIPALITY Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR HOME WRIT PETITION NO: 14390 OF 2025 Between: Q.A.Vinay Vardhan, S/o.late B.Ashok, R/o. H. No.2 4-6-27 I 4, Vishnupuri Colony, aged about 33 years, Occ.Business, Hanumanpet, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER AND

1. State.o.f Telangana,, rep..!y its Principal Secretary MunicipalAdministration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, sairaoJo, Hy;#b;d. Pocharam Municipality, Pocharam, Ghatkesar District, Rep. by its Municipal Commissioner. Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri

3. Pathi Vamshi xlgh$ Fsoov. s/o.p.vasudeva Reddy aged about 40 years, occ.B_usiness, Rr/o.Flat No.6520, sth froor, Btoct+, jrnip;y;M;irop6lia, ' Sanathnagar, Hyderabad-1 8. 4U,f ,',78:fi ii."tfl:,*_E;Xffi ,BT'fi?#E,siI?;?,.!#iiBf ;ili$,jh", Pathi Vamshi Krishna Reddy. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent Jrerein in not taking immediate and necessary action of demolition of illegal const'ruction of entire 5th floor as well as excess unauthorized construction in each ftoor of the building bearing H.No.5-111 named as Chandrahas Commercial Complex constructed over Plot Nos.1, 2, 3, 12, 13 and 14, in sy.Nos.g4 and g5, situated at Anojiguda Village, Pocharam Municipality, &attesar Mandal, Medchal-Malkaigiri District, on the representations of the petitioner dated.28.03.2025 and 19.04.2025, as illeEal, arbitrary and aiso against the provisions under Telangana Municipalities Act, 201g and the made rules made thereunder, and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representations of the petitioner'dated.2g.0 3.2o25and 1 g.04.2025, immediatelY' r,, .11 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to take immediate and necessary action of demolition of illegal construction of entire sth floor as well as excess unauthorized construction in each floor of the building bearing H.No.5-1l1 named as "chandrahas commercial Complex", constructed over Plot Nos.1, 2, 3, 12, 13 and 14, in Sy.Nos.94 and 95' situated at Anojiguda Village, Pocharam Municipality, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal-Malka.lgiri District, on the representations of the petitioner dated.28.03.2025 & 19.O4.2025, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A. RAJA CHANDRA SHEKER GOUD Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALTIY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 and 4: SRI V. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY' WRIT PETITION NO :23420 OF 2025 Between 't. Pathi Vamshi Krishna Reddv,, Sio. Sri Pathi Vasudeva Re-ddy, aged about 37 Years, Occ: Chartered Abcountant, R/o. Villa No.6,0 Wonderful World, Kismathpur, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

2. M/s. VDR Residency LLP,, Office at Flat No.6, H.No.8-2-703A/J/6' Vijay Villa' - CoiO No.12,'Banjai'a Hilis, Hyderabad-34, represent-ed by its Partner' Sri' Pathi Vamshi Krishna Reddy, S/o. Sri Pathi Vasudeva Reddy, ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by-its Principal SecretarY,Munici?1l- Administration and-Urban Development Telangana secretafl at, Hyoeraoao.

2. The Pocharam Municipality,, Pocharam, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri District. Represented by its Commissioner,

3.B.A.VinavVardhan,S/o:LateB.Ashok,agedabout3lYears,Occ:Business' " il" i.ilol.z+:o-z7i+,Viir'nupuri colonv, lianumanpet, Malkajgiri Hvderabad' -fu 3?11fl,'illiglrth:'$3^ff [ShSSi"Xilfi :l,i,t{318ifl",:n53#ifiVo'3;o"o

5. B.A.Deepthi, D/o: Late B.Ashok, aged about 28 Years, Occ: Business, Ryo X.lto.Z+-O-27l4, Vishnupuri'Co-lony, Hanumanpet, Malkajgiri Hyderabad.

6. M/s. SREE WORLD,, Represented by its Proprietor Pillalamani Shresta Minor, represented by her Father Guerdian Pillalamani Vinay Krishna S/o: Ravi Kumar, Agrid about 32 Years, Occ: Business, RUo H.No.38-15-38/1 , New 38-15/100/1 , Neredmet, Sri Veerabhadra Nilayam, Vinoba Nagar, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS . Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondeni No.2 in -. assessing the Property Tax and mutating the name of the-respondent No.s.vide -. PTIN No 1228501583 dated 't6/05/2025 in respect of some extent of Stilt Floor, (wrongly projected by the respondent No.S as 1st Floor to obtain mutation), which is.meant for parking in the commercial complex known as Vhandras Commercial Complex bearing H.No.5-111, in Sy.Nos.94 and 95, situated at Annojiguda Village, Pocharam Municipality, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, and the inaction of the respondent No.2 in considering the representation dated 1810o12025 submitted for cancellation of said mutation proceedings dated 1610512025, as irregal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of rndia apart from being contrary to the provisions of the Terangana Municipalities Act, 2019 and the rures made thereunder besindes being in vioration of the orders dated 1110412025 made in w.p No.,.r2 ss of zots,and consequen*y (i) Set-aside/quash the assessment of property tax/mutation viz. prN No 1228501593 dated 16t05r.2025, (ii)direct the Respondents to remove a, the existing iregar structures in the said stirt Froor or alreged ground froor as craimed by respondent Nos'3 to 6 and not to create any tenancy rights, (iii) Direct the respondents more particularly respondent Nos.3 to o, not'io ,r,,i"'ia*n ,i"ri", the alleged ground floor to Commercial use, so owners to make use of the same exclusively for parking purposes. "n"bt" IANo: o 2 25 ;r" ;;;;, ". to petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the assessment of properly tax/mutation viz. PTIN No: 1228501583 dated: 16/05/2025 issued by respondent No.2, pending disposal of the above writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents more particularly respondent No 3 to 6 not to use the Stilt Floor or alleged ground floor, which is meant for parking in the commercial complex known as chandras commercial complex bearing H No 5-'1/'1 in Sy No 94 and 95 situated at Annojiguda Village, Pocharam Municipality, Ghatkesar Mandal' Medchal-Malkajgiri District for commercial use of for leasing out the same or creatingthirdpartyinterestwhatsoverpendingdisposaloftheabovewritpetition IAN O: 3 OF 2025 Between: B.A.Deepthi, P/9:lale B'Ashok' aged about " Yff:? 3:i;,?nYi'ff"r1?,,0,0' "ni8 il. r.r"5. ii o-izt'+, visnnupuri colonv' l.ilIi,"*.oRESpoN DE Nr No.s AND^-?iiil',;fl,"iffi$i:fr lLtiflf ii','"ffi ,:r*'"ilis:w6ft%"#.'*1: 'il',."**"H1fi?'#fi #$f".tf it.lilld'.+iif i3iry**'?Jr"r"r'1ll'' Fathi Vamshi Krishn .H%?"i11?"?l"I"jxt',3lt1xfiB[,?",sil::"?tn:iH5g.'"",:ff 'YrlHBx' "'PET.'I.NER'/RESP.NDENTS "3fl .il::,-'"ir:Xfl fl i$'is[€,J.J;sf sli€ts;Rmy""'s"'t'ri"no't'Medchar' j'""ifi ,"*tI'R?I1;ll*,Yhitlffi 3:i;li,',9:1,1i:xi:1il'"',i[ . "'i?J'""t "*,8?1"*-::iagfi#V3,+:,[:,hSSii";:fi:'":il'"""?E{,?,?ii.li3liifiVJ3;'*o 'ujt,*ii*:ffi*ii'fit+;"q'lid'f:ikr#1#iJki[[{:..,, New 38-1 5/100/1 , Neredmet, Sri Veerabhadra Nilayam, Vinoba Nagar' Malkajgiri, Hyderabad RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders daled 0710812025 in W.P.NO. 23420 oI 20225 and dismiss the writ petition . Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI ATLA ABHINANDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for'the Respondent No.2i SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDOY, SC FOR GHMC Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.3 to 6: --- WRIT PETITION NO:3688 OF 2022 Between: B.A.Vinay Vardhan, S/o.Late B.Ashok Aged about 31 years, Occ.Business, R/o.H.No.24-6-2714, Vishnupuri Colony, Hanumanpet, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad. 1 . State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 2. Pocharam Municipality, Pocharam, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Rep. by its Municipal Commissioner. ...PETITIONER

3. The Station District. House , Ghatkesar Police Station, Medchal-Malkajgiri RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent and its officials in attempting to demolish the structures by way of interfering with renovation work which is being carried out by the petitioner over ground floor of commercial property of the petitioner bearing house No.5-1/'l with a total built up area admeasuring 5861 sq. feet (including common area) together common proportionate 600 sq. feet car parking in the cellar in 'Project named as CHANDRAAS COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, alongwith undivided share of land admeasuring 200 sq. yards out of total area admeasuring 1596 sq yards, constructed over Plot Nos.1, 2, 3, 12, 13 and 14, in Sy.Nos 94 and 95' situated at Anojiguda Village, Pocharam Municipality, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, which was constructed with valid building permission vide GP No.19/2010- 11 dated.29l01/201 1 , with the help of the 3rd respondent that too without following the procedure as contemplated under law; is highly illegal' arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutional, violation of principles of natural justice and also contrary to the provisions of the Telangana Municipalities Act, 2019, and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to demolish or interfere with the internal renovation work of the petitioner over subject property. NO:'l O Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to demolish or interfere with renovation work of the petitioner over ground floor of commercial property bearing house No.5-111 with a total built up area admeasuring 5861 sq. feet (including corllmon area) together common proportionate 600 sq. feet car parking in the cellar in Project named as CHANDRAAS COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, along with undivided share of land admeasuring 200 sq. yards out of total area admeasuring 1596 sq' yards' constructed over Plot }l os.1 , 2, 3, 12, 13 and '14, in Sy.Nos.94 and 95, situated at Anojiguda Village, Pocharam Municipality, Ghatkesar Marirlal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, which was constructed with valid building permission vide GPNo.19/2010- 1.t dated.29/01/2011, without following the procedure as contemplated under law, pending disposal of the writ petition. F 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court. may be pleased to vacate the order in lA.No. 1 oI 2022 in W.P.No. 3688 of 2O22 dated 2410112022. lA NO:2 OF 2022 Between: '1. Pathi Vamshi Krishna Reddy, S/o: P. Vasudev Reddy, Aged: 36 year, Occ: Chartered Accountant,- Ri/o Villa No.6, poola Criitei Home, Wonderful Word, Near Rock Church, Kismatpur, Hyderabad b00086 2 yqF Re-sidency LtP Represented by its Authorised Signatory R/o Flat No.6, H.No.8-2-703AlJ/6, Vijay Villa Road No. l2, Banjara Hiils, HyAerabad - 34 AND PETITIONERS

1. B.A.Vinay Vardhan, S/o.Late B.Ashok Rl/o.H. No.24-6-271 4, Vishnupuri Colony Aged about 31 years, Occ.Business, , Hanumanpet, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad. RESPONDENTA,VRIT PETITIONER

2. State.oI Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat,-saifabab, Hyderabad. 3. !99!aiag Municipalgy, .Pocharam, Ghatkesar Mandat, Medchat-Matkajgiri District, Rep. by its Municipal Commissioner.

4. The Station House Officer, Ghatkesar Police Station, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. a, ...RESPONDENTS Petition unQer Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioner No. 1 & 2 as respondent Nos. 4& 5 in the above W.p.No. 3688 of 2022. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI A. RAJA CHANDRA SHEKER GOUD Counsel for the Respondent No.l: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRt N. PRAVEEN KUMA, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR HOME WRIT PETITION NO:22485 OF 2023 Between: B.A.Vinay Vardhan, S/o.late B.Ashok Ryo.H.No.24-6-27l4, Vishnupuri Colony aqed about 31 years, Occ-Business, lianumanpet, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER D 1 . State of Telangana, rep- by its Principal Secretary Mu.nicipal Administration and Urban Deielopmeht Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad 2. Pocharam Municipality, Pocharam, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal-Malkaigiri District, Rep. by its Municipal Commissioner.

3. Pathi Vamshi Krishna Reddy, S/o.P.Vasudeva Reddy aged about 38 years, - Oic-Business, Fl/o.Flat trto.6sZO, sth floor, Block-8, Janapriya Metropolis, Sanathringar, Hyderabad- 1 B ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent herein in not taking any action on the complaints/representations of the petitioner dated-'l0.05.2023 and 14.08.2023 made against the illegal and unauthorized construction being carried out by the 3rd respondent in the common ur"" or"f top roof of building bearing H.No.5-1l1 named as CHANDRAAS COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, total area admeasuring 1596 sq. yards, constructed over Plot Nos.l, 2' 3, 12, 13 and 14, in Sy.Nos.94 and 95, situated at Anojiguda Village, Pocharam Municipality' Ghatkesar Mandal.-$iledchal.Malkajgiri District, without obtaining any valid:,*::n permissions from 2nd respondent, as illegal, arbitrary and also against the provisions under Telangana Municipalities Act, 2019 and the made rules made thereunder, and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider the complaints/representationsofthepetitioner..dated-10.05.2023and14.08.2023 made against illegal and unauthorized construction by the 3rd respondent' lA No: 1 oF 2023 .6,^ ^,arrincl that in the circumstances stated in lff ff [lil*ed'lodirec'i of the petitioner ""n,ioer tne complaint./,"p,","ntations ,n""rl,offi Jrf:,,"i:l:lli:ni::L:',"ffi the 2. ,".,pono"n. ." dated-lo.ou.,o,.andl4.oS.2o23madeagainsttneittegalandunauthorized ""*i*DRAAs coMMERcIAL constructionbeingcarriedoutuV-tie3rdrespondentinthecommon-:'"'overtop H.rt".s-rl1 named ". over Plot Nos'1' roof .of buitding COMPLEX" total area admeasuring 2,3, 12,.. ulo, in Sy.Nos.no u 95, situat"o ut enoiiguda Village, Pocharam District' without obtaining any 1596 sq' yards' constructed -u"uring Ghatkesar Mandat, M"o.n"FMalkaigiri RAJA Municipality, validbuildingpermission^fromzoo-,""pondent,pending'disposalofthewrit petition' Counsel for the Petitioner: Sf n,t Counsel for the Respondent No'1: GP FOR MCPL A counser for the Respondent No'2: 3['i;*t'"fi1i##||# Counsel for the Respondent No'3: SRI P' DEVENDER The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER 'HANDRA 'HEKER ,DMN URBAN DEV GouD RAo' , I I : l I ,I I I I I TIIE IIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY ORDER: (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this eourt to withdraw the writ petitions.

2. permission is accorded. 3' Accordingry, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. consequently, the order dated 07.0g.2025 passed by this court in w-P. No.23420 of 2025 stands vacated. There shalr be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applicationl, if any, pending in these writ petitions stand closed. S . PONNA KRISHNA REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER T0' 1' one cc to sri *i:.:'X"lr" 2. One CC to Sri A' Rala Chand sri Atla Abhinandhan Reddy' Advocate toPucl tn"n"r Goud' AdvocateloPucl , i,Y3"?i:"rl38ffP {or Hon o:*: jJ :;",'-J; :*"na' t$"?"coxdl33rt*.' u 7 . one cc to sri Putta Krishna.i":';;' 8. one cc to sri nll"io' Moind Ahmed Quadri' Advoci 9. One CC to SriV' S"ti*ft' eouO' SC for HMDATOPUCI 10.One CC to SriV' Ramakrishnu 11,one CC to Sri N' Praveen ku*u' SC for MunicipalitytOPUCl I :: :: i * : *;::fr$I":::':::?.'n c pa'lY'['Pucl R"OOy' Advocate[OPUC] AdvocatetoPuol

14.Two CD CoPies TJ BS * !: I ,lt HIGH COURT I i I \ \ DATED :24t11t202s , t t COMMON ORDER \ wRlr PETlrloN Nos. 1 1zgg, 1ogs4, 14ggo,2g42o oF 2025 AND 3688 0F 2022 AND 22485 0F 2025 1l{E s 14 (;-, * I I r{0llM ? t I * DISMISSING ALL AS WITHDRAWN ,,. THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT GOSTS .,ri $