High Court · 2025

6. A. Srinivas Mur years, Occ: Rei Balanaqar Manl 7, A. Keshav Muri years, Occ: But Kukaptally Bald (Respondent li No.212022) thv. S/o: Late Avvaoari Satvanaravana Murthy, aged about 65 li16o Emptoyee, Ryoj utc 65/1 KPHB Colony Kukaptallv pal Ranga Reddy District ,hy, S/o: Late Ayyagari Satyanarayana Murthy, aged about 53 biness, R:/o: H.No. 1. 8/6 LIC lV Phase KPHB Colony lnagar Mandal Ranga Reddy District. [os.5 to 7 are imnpleaded as per C.O. dt: 31.01.2025 in l.A ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue ;an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus thereby declaring the action of Respondent No.4 in not passing an Award with regar,J to the land admeasuring Acres 2.20 guntas in survey no. 52, situated at Kandlakoya Village, Medchal lrlandal, IVedchal - t\,4alkajgiri District, Telangapa is arbitrary, illegal, unjudt and in violation of Articles, 14, 19, 300,4 of the Constitution of lndia and provisions of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in [-and Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and the judgment delivered in Writ Petition No. 16736 of 2009 dated 26.10.2009 and issue direction to the Respondent No.4 to forthwith return the land admeasuring Acres 2.20 gunta s in survey no. 52, situated at Kandlakoya \/illage, Ir/edchal Mandal, l\rledchal [,4alkajg iri District. Telangana. IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition unrjer Section 151 CPC praying that in the ctrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be lrleased to direct the Respondents (Authorities) to consider the representations of the petitioner more particularly dated 23.07.2019, 06.12.2019, 20 03.2020, 01 .04.2021, 22.09.2021 , 03.O1.2022 and 13.07.2022,pending dlsposal of tle present writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S. MAYUR MUNDRA Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4: SRI A. SATHWIK REDDy, REPRESENTING FOR SMT. D. MADHAVI Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.5 to 7: SRI D.V. RAO The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JIUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION.No.32O 89 of 2022 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief "...to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus thereby declaring the action of Respondent No_4 in not passing an Award $,ith regard to the land admeasuring Acres 2.20 guntas in surwey No.52 situated at Kandlako-ya Village, Medchal Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, Telangana, is arbitrary, illegal, unjust and in vrolation of Articles 14, 19, 3OOA of the Constitution of India and provisions ol.The Right to Fair Compensatiorl ancl Transparency in Land Acqursition Rehabilitation and Resertlement Act, 2O 13and the judgement deliyered in Writ petition No. 16736 of 2009 dated 26.10.2009 and issue direction to the Respondent No.4 to lorthwith return the land admeasuring Acres 2.20 guntas in survey,No.52 situated at Kandlako-ya Village, Medchal Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri Drstrict, Telangana and to pass... "

2. Heard Sri May'ur Mundra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of writ petitioner, Sri A.Sathwik Reddy, learned counsel representing Smt. D.Madhavi, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 and Sri D.V.Rao, learned counsel for respondent Nos.5 to 7.

3. During the course of hearing, iearned counsel for petitioner confined the relief and requested this Court to t.* direct the respondent No.4 to consider the representation, dated 13.07.2022 submitted by petitioner and pass i I &l v 2 f-) approprizrte orders in accordalce with laur aft er giving notice and opportunity to the petitioner as rvell as the party responden ts

4. Leanred Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 4 has not disputed the same

5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the respective parties, without expressing anv view on the merits ol the case, the respondent No.4 rs dir.ected to consider- the representation submitted b1. the petitioner, dated I.f .O7.2022 . and pass appropriare orrlers, in accordanr:r: v.,ith. law, a-fter givrp-g notice and* opportunit_v to the petiticr-rer as well as unofficial respondents i ncluding personal hearing within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date c,f receipt of a copy of this order.

6. Wittr the above directions, the u,rit per-ition 1S disposecl ,rf. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER

1. The Principat Secretary, The state of Telangana, Municipal Administration and Urban Developmeht Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Metropolitan Commissidner, Hyderabad ltrletropolitan Development Authority, if voR Uccf- Office, Nanakramguda, Hyderabad, Telangana (State)- 500 104. g. ifre pioiect Director, Outer Rinq Road Project, Hyderabad l/etropolitan - Development Authoiity, HIVDA}lGCL offiie, Nanakramguda, Hyderabad, Telangana (State)- 500 1 04. +. ffre S"peciai OepJty Collector, Land Acquisition, Unit-V,Outer Ring R-oad -- ' proieii. Hvdera'bad N,4etropoliian Develcipment Authority, HIMDA HGCL Office' Nariakramlruda. Hvderabdd, Telangana (State)- 500 104. 5. One CC to- M/s. Ivl-ayu r Mundra. Advocate [OPUC,| 6. iffi CCsto GP foril4unicipat Administratioh Urban Development, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 7. One CC to Smt. D. N/;dhavi. Advocate[OPUC] B. One CC to Sri D.V. Rao, Advocate[OPUC] 9. Two CD Copies To, TJ GJP HIGH COUFIT DATED:31 ltt112025 ORDER t, l WP.No.3208i9 of 2022 'i;<l; s14 14: ,4 ,,,:< ."! ; t-. lr f- \\''-t,\3\.. t 2 1 fitrB 2025 Qc SI'A I CH Et) * ot' v z a DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \ ?AV-