The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in c. c. No. 40 of 2024 on ihe file of the XXll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition,the High court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner / 2nd respondent / Defacto complainant to compound the offence in c. c. No. 40 of 2024 on the file of XXll Addl. chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad and quash the proceedings by - compounding the offences and pass such other order or orders in the inteiest of justice. l.A. NO: 4 OF 202 5 Between: G. Koti, Sio. G GHMC, Rio. H 8121220'124. Late Mallesh, Aged 38 Years, Occ Ouls,:,urcinq Sweeper in No, 3- 188, Machha Bollarum, Secund,rrabad.-pnruo- ' AND ..PETITIONERY 2"d RESPONDENT/D E FACTO-COMPLAINANT State of_Telangana, Represented.by p^olice Station, Trirulgherry, Secunderabad, Rep bv Public Prosecuior in the High court roiG biate ;rietaisi;; Ai-- ---- Hyderabad Aryan Malve, S/o. Sachin !U"-!yg,.4gqA 21 years Occupation Student, Caste BC Rangrez, ft/o. H. No 1- 8- 21s;,3oi], parft Avenue :,,,lory,-eG nJrol S,"i,.',ir,i colony, Secunderabad. ...RESPONDENT .,. P ETITIONER/ACCUSED Petition under Section 359(2) BNss 2023 rrw 482 -;I crpc praying that in the circumslances stated in the Memorandum of Ground s rrf criminar petition,the High- court may be pleased to compound the offence in c c. No, 40 of 2024 on the file of the XXrr Additionar chief Metroporitan Magisr,'ate at SecunJelbad punishable u/s. 304(A) R/w 34 lpc and allow the :)arties to record the compromise and pass such other order or orders as this -.ronbre court mll oeem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. l.A. NO:2 OF 2025 Petition under section 52g of BNSS praying tha t in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar-petition,the Hign cor.t ,"v be pleased to grant stay of ail further proceedings in c. c. rrlo. 40 o"f zoii in ne file of the XXII Additionar chief Metroporitan Majistrate at s;ecunderabad This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition and upon hearing re sl.gurn6nts of Sri PRABHAKAR PERI ,Advocate for the petitioner and rsri V.Jithender Rao Additional Pubric Prosecutor on beharf of the Resp:rrdent No1. And smt K. Kalpana for ttre Respondent No 2. The Court made the following: ORDER I t HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2 025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.10081 of2025 ORDER It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner_ accused as well as the respondent No.1, that during pendency of the present criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 have been fired to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

2. Vide order dated 07.0g.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the I I Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad for identification and to submit a report. 3 Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 18.08.2025 and the same is placed on record.

4. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in cc No.40 o{ 2024 on the file of XXII Additional tvletropolitan Magistrate 2 F at Secunderabad, against the petitioner-accused a'e hereby quashed subject to the petitioner-accused paying an ar,lount of Rs 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretanr, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the S.a,e of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thous;and Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad, within a periocl of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Regyistry Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, s;h;all stand closed i/TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL, OEPUTY REGISTRAR. @ SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The XXll Additional Chief Metropolitan Mag srrate at Secunderabad

2. The Station House Officer, Police Station Tiimulgherry ,Hyderabad 3. One CC to SRl. PRABHAKAR PERI Advocate [OrUt,;1 4. One CC; to Smt , K.Kalpana Advocate for R-2 [OPtlO] 5. Two CC to SRl. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Advocate [t-)UT] 6. Two CD Copies (Enclosed copy of Joint Memo) AG ' * Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,000^ ( Rupees Ten thousanC r:nly ) has been paid by Sri Peri Prabhakar Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 28.08.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director, Sainik Welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Ruoees Five thousand only ) to the Secretary ,High Court Legal Services Committee, Hig ir Court for the State of Telangana,Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliar,:e USR No. 101333 of 2025 dated 16 09 2025. 2 6 ji-P l0?5 HIGH COURT DATE D : 2 810812025 ORDER lA Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.10081 of 2025 CRLP IS ALLOWED 2Atql?( ,z*=-.--_"- a 1 ,;l :) IN TIIII HIGI{ COTJRT FOR TFIE STATE OF TIrI-ANGANA AT HYDERABAD IA NO. oF 2025 IN CRL P. No.lOOrl o12025 Retu e cr.r C. l.roti. Sio. C. l.rLe Mallesh. Aeed: ifi Ycars, Occ: Or-rtsor-trcing $u'cclter trt CtlNi( . I{,'o. I l,No.i- 13E, Machla Bollanrnr, Scctr.tlctrt[r'tti l'}.N.8]212;::::,./ 2,,,, Resp.rrle.l i r)c..cro co,,rairrrrt And elangana State ol -f Represented by Police Station, Trimulgherry, Secunderabad, 1'hrough Public Prosecutor in the High Court for the State olTelar.rgana At Flyderabad . Respondent / Responclent 2 tu'yan Malve, S/o. Sachin Malve, Aged 2l years; Occupation: Student, Caste: BC Rangrez, R/o. H.No l-8-2151301C, Palk Avenue Colony, PG Road, Sindhi colony, Sectruderabad. ....Pctitioner / Accirsed \t ( >1^ t. q K;TI .IOINT MEMO OF' COMPROI,I ISE May it please ',,our Lordship. l. That dr.rc to the adr ice ol cldels and u'ell s'isht:-:.. botlt the parties have conrc fi, ,,r'a|cl _ttl cort'tPr-o|nisc the lrlatlcr oL]til (l,l ot'Coult. as the case is ll lcd ar.airrst the 2"'l Re sporrrlcnt r'r\ccuscd il r,' to ntistttttlerstartdirtg. I'hirt botir thc partit's hrrr irrs no oblcctiou ilLlr.. ,'rirrirral casc is closctl in ('.(.'.ro.J0 ol l0l l on tlrc lilc ol thc l'.,ill .,\dditional CIrici- N{etropolitan tVlasistlatc at Sccr-rndclabad lol h,r ollcrrccs punishable U/s. 304(,\) ol'IP(

2. Tha. the petitionel has agr.ecd to withdraw r r\r case against the 2"1 responrlent / accr:sed in Cl.C. No.40 of 2024 tt, the flle of the XXll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate ,rl Sccunderabad U/s 304(A) ol IPCI unconditional ly. i. ThaL in vieri, o['thc sett]crnent reached betwe .'r' Lrs no purpose u,ill be servcd in continuing thc pr-occedings in Cl.(.. \,t. 210 of 20?4 on the file ol rhe XXILAdclitionrrl Clrief iVletro rr'litan Magistrate at Secunderabacl iirr thc of'lcnccs tJ/s 304(A)o' I 3 any'ltrrthcr

4. I-iraL 1[g petitioner has no objcctiorr lbl prtrcccciir g to closc thc nrattcr ? )'- - \--^.( 1 I o T T 5' Thar borh the parties have settred the dispute amicably ancl enterecr rnto conrpromise. The peritioner filed an affrcravit in the above pctition to that e I'f'ec t l'hercfirre, b.rir rhc parrics pray this IIon'blc cour-t ,r,y bc preasccr to cornporrncl rlrc .1lc.cc in in C.c. No. 40 ol 2024 on tlre 1l lc ol- tlrc X.\tl Additionrl ('lrie r'r\4.'rr()rrolitan i!{agistr-urc at Sccurrcler.abircl tris. i0.l(.{) ol. lP(l i, the i,rcrcsr .r'.justice ancr pass strch other ordcr- .r orcrcrs as this llon'blc cou.t rnay dcem fit and proper in the circ,rnstarnces .r'the tQ.k"Tr Def'acto Comf,lainant Acc u scd Counsel for WiBN^Wromprainant Counsel ccused