The High Court · 2025

2 Muthina Babu Rao, S/o- Late. Rama Rao, Age. 60 Years, Occ. Household, R/o Jai Jawan Colony, Kapra, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad Rep. by his wife Smt. Muthina Krishnaveni as Power of Attorney/Authorized person Rlo. H.No. '1-1- 265/41, AS Rao Nagar, ECIL, Hyderabad - 82 ...Respondents/Com plainants Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the CC No. 135512023, on the file of ll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Malkajgin, agarnst the Petitioners/Accused 1 and 2. l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings rn CC No.1355/2023, on the file of ll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Matkajgiri, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition. 7 I.A. NO:2OF 2025 Between: Muthina Babu Rao, S/o. Late. Rama Rao, Age. 60 Yca.s, Occ. Household, R/o Jai Jawar Colony, Kapra, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad F ep by his wife Smt. Muthina Krrshnaveni as Power of Attorney/Authorized te,son R/o H.No. 1-1- 255/41. AS Rac Nagar, ECIL, Hyderabad - 82 ... Respondents/De-facto Complainant in l.A.tJos.2 and 3 of 2025 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep Hyderabad, Hyderabad. by its Public Prose:r tor, Hrgh Court of ...RespondenuRespondent in I.A.Nc,s.2 and 3 of 2025

2. Abburi Greeshma. Wo. Sai Praneeth, Age.22 years, O:c Housewrfe R/o H- No. 1-1-269-117, Plot No.1'17, Arul Colony, Kapra, Kust-aiguda

3. Bulusu Sulochana, Wo. Late.Sudhakar, Age. 42 yea-s Occ. Housewife, R/o H-No. 1-1-269-117, Plot No.1 17, Arut Colony, Kapia, Ku:l-arguda . Petitioner/Al & A2 Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that n the circumstances stated in the Petrtion, the High Court may be pleased to pe-nrrt the Complainant to compound the offence in C.C.No. 135512023 for the off?nces under section 341, 448 R/w 34 IPC on the file of the ll Additional Judicral Magrstrate of First Class, at I\,4alkalgiri l.A- NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that rn the circumstances stated in the affidavrt Joint memo Petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to record the compromise, and quash the C.C. No. 1355/2C23 for the offences under section 341 , 448 R/w 34 lPC, on the file of the I Addrtronal Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Malkajgiri. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing .he Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argumi:rLts of Sri AEDULA GOVINDA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sl Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1, and Sri D.Venkataiah, Advocate, for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.10208 of 2025 COMMON ORDER: 1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 in C.C.No.1355 of 2023, on the file of the learned ll Additional Judicial [\4agistrate of First Class, Iilalkajgiri, registered for the offences under Sections 341 and 448 read with 34 of IPC

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos.'l & 2 as well as respondent No.2/de faclo complainant that during pendency of the Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to compound the offences and to record compromise between them-

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the compromise petitions.

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facfo complainant in l.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 which discloses that the defacto complainant 2 ETD,.I CrlP.Na.10208 2025 has willingly consented for compromise. Since the, parties were willing to entei- irito compromise, they were given a :hance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective c;ounsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the Stater of Telangana vlde orders dated 04.09.2025 passed by this Court. -ihe Secretary, High Court .Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued bv this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of 1-elangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 16.09.2025 stating that the, parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coerciorr, entered into com promise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O'.2[i are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and thr: proceedings in C.C.No 1355 of 2O23, on the file of the learned ll Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Malkajgiri, registererd against the petitioners/accused Nos.l & 2, are hereby quashec subject to the petitioners paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Bar Association, r{yderabad and ,,Y 3 ETO,I Crl.P No 10208 2025 Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry 7 . Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed SD/. A SREENIVASA REDDY AS ISTANT REGISTRAR /ffRUE COPY// ECTION OFFIGER To,

1. The ll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkalgiri. 2. The Station House Officer, Kushaiguda Police Station, Rachakonda. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutoi, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad IOUT]

4. One CC to Sri Aedula Govinda Reddy, Advocate [OpUC] 5. One CC to Sri D.Venkataiah, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies f) (Along with copy of joint memo is enclosed herewith) Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand onty ) has been paid by Sri A.Govinda Reddy, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon,ble Court vide order dated 28.08.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand onty ) to the "High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Assocration, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 110246 of 2025. NVB/PSL i I I HIGH COURT DATED:2410912025 COMMON ORDER I.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.10208 ot 2025 )q \ ) .'+ [4 l{CI|J m e > t { a DA TCrr€o- ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AND t.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2025 q $ @&lr\ I I I I I I IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF HYDtrRABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT: HYDERABAD CRL.P. No. of 2O2S Betwee n: l. Atrburi Greeshmar @ Balusu Greeshma, W,/o. Praneeth, D / o. B. Suchakar, Age.. 22 years, C)cc. Student, Arul Colony, Kapra, Kuhaiguda, Hyderabad

2. Bulusu Sulochana, W/o. B. Sudhakar, Age: 42 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o Gopalapuram (V) & (M), Wcst Godavari District of A.P A NTN | . The S t:rt e of Tclangana, Rep. by its' Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad, Hyderabad Petitioners/A1 & A2

2. Muthina Babu Rao, S/o. Late. Ramir Rao, Age: 60 Ycars, Occ. Household, R/o. Jai .la,,van Colony, Kapra, Kushaigr-rda, Hyderabad Rep. by his r,r,ife Smt. Muthina Krishnaveni as Por,ver ol Attorney/Authorized person Ri o. H.No l-l-265 /4),, AS Rao Nagar, ECIL, Hyderabad 82 .. Respondents/ Complainants JOINT MEMO May it Please Your LordshiP,. It is humbiy submitted that the The Respondent No.2 herein filed a 1. complaint before the Kushaiguda Police, against the petitioners herein out of and involving in a family dispute between the Petitioner No.l herein and her husbancl Sai Praneeth, alleging that on lO.lO 2022 he made an agreement with onc house owner by name Gede Venkata Rao at Plot No. I 17, Grouncl F.1oor, Arul colony, A.S. Rao Nagar, as tenant. Thereafter on / .,rqg R -,).,4* / f^ b-;Skru:ll,* qr'- fl% 04.11.2022 rvl-rile thel were shifting the house holcl article:; to the alrove said "4ft35a6rt address A.S. Rao Nagar rvith the help of their relatives b'i names Rahul' and Ram in an Auto ricksharv an<l rvhen the,v reached thr: said address, the person name Ahrtrl Grr:eshma. BuLusu Sr-rlochaianzr and Slulochan's parents and brother. and Olhcrs r,,,-^rc $.rongftllil.' conslraint the lizLhul and llam and .. criminalll' trespas''i irrto their ten:rnt housc ar-rd locked ro their house and saidtharlhehotlsr:uasbelougst()them,ancluponrec':iiringthecomplaint' tlrc Policc, Kushaiguda P.S. registcred a crime as FIR Nr . 1106l2022' :und'er sections341,448R/ll..34ofIPC,and{lleclchargeshctlbeforethel-{on,ble II Addl. Jr-rdki:rl Magistrate ol First Class, at Malkajgiri' and the same has been numbcrccl as Cl(l No. 1355 ctf 2023'

2. It is humblv sutrmitlccl thzrt the I sL petitioner herein iLr'd her husband are Scttleclthcdisputcls.r'iLhthcinterventionoffamilyeldcrl;andwell-wishcrs, and thercafter ihc Pc Li[ioners 7'Accused filed thc above s'rid quash peLltion to quashthcC.C.Nrl.1353l2o.23onthefileoftheHor'r'hleiIAdd1..]udicial Magistrate of First Class, at Nialkalgiri' The 2"d Fespondent and the Petitione rs here in rn t tc'r' of the lamily relations compro'rised the matler oul of court ancl thcretn aglced Lo rvilhc]tarv/ compromise alL cases against ear:h other.

3. It is submitlecl lhat' u'ith the permission of thc lon'ble Court' the Responclent No.2 int':nds t() with{ira\'/compromise the ::rse ' ,/ ,. COUNSEL F THtr PtrTITIONtrRS ? COUN FOR RESi't] NDtrNT NO.2 r,--+ Rg.l-l.-s ec) G" P'TITIONtrRS * l'\ ,1, W Sfult"rva-d RESPONDENT No 2