✦ High Court of India · 06 Aug 2025

1. Vantikommu Satyanarayana Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 06 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
06 Aug 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,610 words

stitution of lndia praying that in the therewith, the High Court may be ore particularly one in the nature of ofthe 9th respondent in rejecting the etitioners for granting of layout in respect of the lands in Sy.No.405/part admeasuring Ac.3.00 gts and Sy.No.406/Part admeasuring Ae.1.05 gts, in total Ac.4.O5 gts situated at Abbayyapalem Village, Maripeda IVlandar, Mahabubabad District, as iilegar, arbitrary, null and void and vioration of Rure 11(2) of rhe (Terangana) Gram Panchayat Land Development (Layout and Building) Rules, 2OOZ and consequently direct the respondents to consider the onrine Apprication No.1423811214 of the petitioners for granting of layout in respect of the above lands. |.A.NO:'l OF 2025 Petition under section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the 9th respondent to reconsrder the online Applrcalion No.14238t1214 of the petitioners for forwarding and granting of rayout by the 5th respondent in respect of the lands in Sy.No.405/part admeasuring Ac.3.00 gts and "Sy No.406/Part admeasuring Ac 1.05 gts, in totar Ac 4.05 gts situated at Abbayyapalem Village, Marrpeda Mandal, Mahabubabad District, pending finalization of lhe writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SENIOR COUNSEL SRI J.KANAKAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI NARENDAR JALLI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 6 7 & 8 : cp FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2, 3 & 5 : G.p FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : G.p FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.9 : SRI K.pRADEEP REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.10 : G.p FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER THB HON'BLE SMT. JUSTIC T. MADHAVI DBVT WRIT PETITIO N No. 32ll o t2025 ORDER: ]'his Writ Petition is fited haltenging the action of respondent No.9 in re-iecting the pe itioners' online aPPlication f a layout in resPect of the No. 14238/l 214 fbr granting approval land to an extent of Acs'3 '00 guntas I Sy.No.405,Part and Ac' l '05 Sy.No.406/Part, total ad easuring Acs.4.05 guntas, guntas tn situated at AbbayyaPalem Vil age, MariPeda Mandal, Mahabubabad District, as illegal and rbitrary. I-earned counsel for the Pe itioners submitted that the 2. application of the petitioners has be n rejected with the remarks: vailable rejected in Grama "land disPute. link document not titioners, however, submitted Sabha". Leamed counsel lor the that the petitioners had enclosed all the relevant documents along with the aPPlication and that the re ection order does not sPecifu pute. The grievance of the the details of the alleged land di petitioners is that their application h been rejected without giving 2 TMDJ wp _23211 _2025 any opportunity to make good the shortfall, if any. fherefore, the present Writ Petition has becn filed

3. Learncd Standing Clounsel for thc (irarn Panchayat, appearing for respondent No.9, is also heard, who relied upon the reasons stated in the onlinc application status f<rr tlre rejection of the application ol' the petitioncrs

4. Having regard to the rival contentions and tlie material on record, this Coult is of thc opinion that the details ol t.l're alleged land dispute have not been rnentioncd nor has the datc o1'thc Glam Sabha resolution been mentioned while reverling thc application of the writ petitioncr. Therelirre, the order o1- revcrsion of online application is set aside, with a direction to thc respondents to follow due process of law as per Rule I I (2) ol thc 'l elangana Gram Panchayat Land I)eveloprnent (l-ayout and Building) Rules. 2002 and to consider the documents submitted by the petitioners as rvell as the explanation, if an1, submitted therealier and to take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law. \ - r: ':!i., TMD] wp_23211_2O25 3

5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE OPYII SD/-A.V.S. PRASAD '/ oEpurY REGISTRAR secloJ*rcen To h 00 4 e e o m n D e p D p t 1 2 3 T I t f h P d L t D cto(a ara ns a e D StI c q o t B u td ns 3 rd 0 a ad Te a nsa n a 5 0 b t o To n and C U n ry h oorS 640 AC G u a R s o na Deputy T t a and R u a d d P a n n ng nT q Hyd d n he Dire t. District he Directorate of Town and Country S t C h b U baba T o u r I e p p em G ta t a e P nn pa Se cre ary P n Th t Te ans an a a H f S re at a J tate t t o U n o rate o To n a nd T o T B P d S F rectot o o D Th own a n D St d P an n ns o c to Mah ab u bab a hT 4 cto o o 5 Th Reg on a Dep U D P a n n ns M ah a uba ba To n a nd b ancha a off M a t 6 The D S r c P v an C a a off ce r t h v P 7 The D S on a v o ( ff ce M a [I a nd a a nch a a P 8 T a n Chava Secre a ry Ab ava b I t P a a b b M a a u h ase M ar e a M a nd p d h d P ( 0 T e S at on ou Se off a t\il H ,| I h T RA HJ A A to (, o R P N C H 1 I T o P F C C S o U vd e ab d a H gh Court for the State of Telangana at t H T a ns a n a a E o R R E N U E t wo C S o G P F C H vd e ra a o Url b d 31 Two C C S G P U R P t ( the Sta e o Te a ns a na a f ou rt o R Ho M o h S o G D d M a ab U abad a abu bab a D S r ct h d a rvl a d a M a a U abad n b m an P t S c C o AJ A D R U RAL D N b d vd ra a o t e S ate of Te a ns a na a rt t I h o u d D o ce S a on M a ab U ba t o U F P o Url t SR NA E N DA R RAD E E P S Advocate [OPUCI - Y. Advocate (OPUC) f CC Hyd fa b o n C C d D fo th 5 ate of D Ab avva a m C 1 4 T o h b b a L A L L J R E D N (- HAY tt UT h hT Str p R P 2 T t S r b d St A K R a E P H F E h h t 1 t E o M NT H s h E L I 6 6 o ne U 1 17.Two CD CoPies SA BS (tr t I 1 'c s rA r6 /1,2ii: l. r,t (r t:\ ?-l 13 r UB 216 t oe, Y\ a HIGH COURT DATED:0610812025 ORDER WP.No.23211 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. ?L 6 \s

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments