The High Court · 2025

The state of Telangaq, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High court of r.s. High Court Building, Hyderabad. Mr. Chunchu Lakshmaiah, S/o. Sri. Che R/o H N o 46 -2-226,B a g ath s i n s h rv,J : l'8',.Y;-*: 4,1 f, Jr"f; iii, 3,"& i' frledchal District. u m be r' .Respondent No.1 ...Respondent No. 2/De-facto Com plainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused in S C No. 561 of 2024 pending before the V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Nampally, Hyderabad offence register under section 306 l.P.c by P.s. Borabanda by exercising the inherent jurisdiction of this court under section 528 of BNSS Act. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all the further proceedings including the appearance and the art'est of the petitioner/accused in S C No. 561 of 2024 pending before the V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Nampally, Hyderabad. Offence register under Section 306 l.P.C by P.S. Borabandaby pending disposal of this Quash Petition before this Hon'ble Court. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 BETWEEN: Mr. chunchu Laks_h-maiah, s/o. sri. chandrayyaAge. 53 years, occ. plumber, R/o. H.No. 46-2-226, Bagath Singh Nagar, Cliintal, Quthdbullaour (M), trledchat District. ...Petitioner/Respondent No.2 /De-facto Complainant in l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 20ZS AND 1. 9ri. Rajendla Angudalu, _S1o. sr! A chennaiah, Aged 27 years, occ.GHtr/c contract sc.avenger, . R/o. H.No.8-3-169/1380/365, tGhayatah Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad.

2. Smt. Narsamma. Angudalu, Wo. Sri A. Chennaiah, Aged 56 years, occ.GHtr/tc contract. scavenger, R/o. H.No.g-3-169/1380/565, Ashdyaiah Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad. ...Respondents/Petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 in I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of Z02S 3. The state of relangan?, Bep by its public prosecutor, High court of r.s. High Court Building, Hyderabad. ..RespondenURespondent No.2 in l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2O2S Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of e riminal Petition, the lligh Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to record the compromise statement and euash the proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 in SC.No.561 of 2024 pending before the V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Nampally, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the l-iigh Court may be pleased to record the compromise statement and Quash the proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused No.1 &, 2 in S.C.No.561 of 2024 penriing before the V Additional f\4etropolitan Sessions Judge at Nampally, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T Natraj, ,Advocate for the Petitioners and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri P Naresh, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 in/and N No.1 COMMON ORDER: This criminal petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos'1 and z to quash the proceedings against them in s.c. No.561 of 2024 on the file of learned v Additional Metropolitan sessions Judge at Nampaily, Hyderabad, registered for the offence punishabte under Section 306 of lpC. 2- lt is submitted by tearned counser appearing for the petitioners as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present criminal petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingry, r.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 202s have been filed to record the compromise between them an,J to compound the offence

3. vide order dated 1g.og.2o2s, this court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the secretary, High court Legar services committee, High court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this court, the parties have appeared and the secretary, High court Legar 2 ServicesCommittee,hasidentifiedthepartiesandsubmitteda report, dated 23'Og'2025 and the same is placed on record'

5. ln view of the above' l'A'Nos'1 and 2 of 2025 are allowed' Consequently,thisCriminalPetitionisallowedandthe proceedingsagainstthepetitioners/accusedNos.land2inS.C. No.56lof2O24onthefileoflearnedVAdditionalMetropolitan Sessions Judge at Nampally' Hyderabad' are hereby quashed' Nliscellaneous applications' if any pending' shall stand J#;tJ.';3't+ii'. ,,TRUE COPY,, SECNON OFFICER closed To, iimltll,ln:*$jlf"l*l"rlm,tffi fi#i':?il::;"*' $ii urt*t Tffi::ir?j"'?' ,e,*"I[il ; i r*o "'c;F' ADK'PSL I Alorrg rrith a copl' of Joint memo of cornpromtse' HIGH COURT DATED i2610912025 COMMON ORDER .ttlE r rA l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 ln/and CRLP.No.10070 of 2024 ?-) :t. ) l. 1 B tlfitt tfln 3 J ("trt " ALLOWING THE CRLP AND lA.NOs.1 & 2 OF 2025 (4. @ 3\ ls t{" BEFoRE THE ISTIIE HrGH cgy_Ir FoR THE srArE oF TELANGANA, ar, rrvoER/tBAD I.A.NO. B EE CRLP.NO. loo70 IN oF 202s oF 2024 Mr. Chunchu Lakshmaiah S/o. Sri. Chandrayya---'q'r Age: 53 years, ocJ:'plumber. ""--', S{" T ryo.46_2_226, :3fl.lt Singh Nasar, unrn[al, euthaburllapur (M), Medchal District. .... Petitioner/ Respondent No. 2 -' - Defacto Complaina nt-' AND

1. SRI. RAJENDRA ANGUDALU ?/u. SRI A. Chennaiah, tq.d 27 years, occ: Crinrc co, R/o. H.tvo.8-3_ ? / I 3; ; )*3 ;;r A s haya ia,, Hyd";;;;." q*o r' Yous u fgudri' *.' u ^, r t I'ac t s cave n ge r' .?: ,SMT. NARSAIVIIT{A ANGUDALU Y /". SRI A. Chennaiah, lq.d 56 ycars, occ: Crii,ac con{ R/,o. H. No. 8-3 I L 6s /, s;i;)"a .]j'';t Asha.yaiah Nasa H1'derabad. - r' Yousufguda' t t.Qct scavenger, . The State of Telangana :. I:q U, its putrrtic p.o"."ri,i., - Courrr of .f.S. High C;;;t .1is.h Hyderabad. Respondents / petitioncrs rrccused Nos. 1 and,2 Buikling, Respondent / Respondent No.2 I JOINT It is rcspcctfull_r, subnrittctl Defacto Complainant lodgeci a before Borabanda police Station, Fl Petitioners her.ein. pursualtt rcgisLcred a c..rsc viclc lllR.No.l MO that the Respondcnt No.2 / complaint dated 14.08.2O23 .yclerabad District, against ther the said complaint policc 17 /2023 darect 14.08.2023 2 U/Sec.306IPC,ilgainstthePetitionersands;h<lrvntlremaS Accused' No'1 & 2'

2.ltisrcspectfuliysubmittedthatthedefactoCrlrnplainantis the father o1 rhr: deceased and filed the complaint against the pctitioners' 'l'hc pcLitioncr No'1 is thc husbancl i:nd pctitioncr 'l'hc deceer'sed No.2 is the: mot.hcr-in-lar'r' of thc deccased' "Lavanya" committecl suicide by hanging herself or-r 14 'OB'2023' ThepetitiorrcrNo.lhereinandthedeceasedwite\\ereinlovefor thelast5vearsat.lc]eventuall5lgotmarrieclonl8.03.2023.The dsss2ssd s'rts also a u'orking \voman' 'Ihc pretiLioncr and his dcccascd rvilc sharcd a vcry gooC rclertior-rship'

3.Itisrespectfullysubmittecltktatunfot.tunately,the cleceasedtt,t)nLinLodcpressionbccauscolhcrhczrringproblcm. lnspitco[thcpctiLioncr,Sbcsicflorts,thcd.CC(:aSCdwasstili feeiing infer-ior ancl on 14'O8'2023 committed suicide'

4.Itissubmittedthatafteraperiocloftime'ttrerespondent no.2/Dclactocomplainanthar,crcal.izedthatthepctitioners hereinhavenotcommittedan}'offencepertainingtothe petitionersancltherespondentNo.:2/clefzri:t.ocomplainant complaint and in pursuance of the above :;aid facts' the dccidecl to u'ilhclrar'r' thc above said S'C'No' 56 | ''tf 2024 pending before ttrc l-lon'ble V Addl Nletropcllitan Sessions Judge at Nampallr', I-lyclerabad' and compromise: the rnat[er'

5.Itissubmittedthatclr-ret-<litrtet.r,cntionrlf.eldersandweil- s'ishe rs ihc mattcr has bcct-t sctllccl atniciltrlv betwccn thc parties,arssuchitisjustanclttecessi]'I1/toqtraslrtheabovecase ancltclrccorclthecompromisbstaternentbetrr,e<,nthePetitioners and Respondcnt No'2 / Dcflarcto Complainant' ? -) It is therefore pra.rrecr tr-rat this F{on,bre court may be pleased to record the compromisc statement and Quash thc proceedings against the Respondents/Accused No.1 & 2 in S'c'No' 561 of 2024 pending before the Hon,bre v Addl Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Nampalry, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders may decm fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Hence, this Joint Memo. /O Petitioner / Respondent No.2 / Defacto Complainant %a Counsel for petitioner Respondent No. I Respondent No.2 Date: .O9.2025 Place: Flyderabad Counse Respondents 4 DISTI?ICT :: I'IYDtrRABAD BEFOR,E THE HONBLE HIGH COUR'T FOFI THE STATE OF TELANGANA, A1.: HYDERABAD I.A.No. oF 2025 IN CRLP.ITIo. 1OO7O OF 2024 JOINT MEMO Filcd by: P.NARESH (2O155) Acl',,ocate COUNIJEL FOR PETITIONER F iled b1: T.N.ATRAJ (8847) Acl';crcate COUNSEL F() R RESPON DENT Nos. 1 arnd 2