M. Upender Rao v. District
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 16 Sep 2004
- Bench
- C V RAMULU
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the proceedings No. 02/95 (101)/95-KDD dt. 27-02-1996 as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently set aside the proceedings No. 02/95 (101)/95-KDD dt. 27-2-1996 issued by the 2nd Respondent, and pass such further order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.G.RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondents: MR.V.T.M.PRASAD The Court made the following:
O R D E R: -
Mr.G.Ravi Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ____________ C.V.RAMULU, J ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER Sd/- To 1) The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Nalgonda Region, Nalgonda District. 2) The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Kodad Bus Depot, Nalgonda District. 3) 2CD copies RAR/prk
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 16 Sep 2004. The bench was C V RAMULU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.