The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondent No- 5 and his sub-ordinates in interfering and dejnolishing th-e -conrpouqd wall of the petttioner in respect of his Plot No. 168' Block A, in Sy' No 135 part' situated at Block - A, GoMhami Nagar, Edulanagualapally Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, sangareddy District and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his plot, without issuing any notice or without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary, violative or Articles 14, 21 and 300-4 of the constitution of lndia an d consequently direct the respondent No.S and his sub-ordinates not to interfere t with the possession of the petitioner in respect of his plot I o. 168, admeasuring 500 square yards, Block A, in Sy. No. 135 part, situated . t Block A, GoMhami Nagar, Edulanagulapally Village, Ramchandrapuram llandal, Sangareddy District, without following due process of law and without isr;r ing any notice. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r )umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou r may be pleased to direct the respondent No.5 and his sub-ordinates not c interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of his Plot No. 1( 3, admeasuring 500 square yards, Block A, in Sy. No. 135 part, situated at Block A, Gowthami Nagar, Edulanagulapally Village, Ramchandrapuram Mandal, { angareddy District, without following due process of law and without issuing an)' rotice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C.VISWANATH Counsel for the Respondents Nos. 1,3,4 & 5: Smt.S.SRAV/\ {THl, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.2: GP FOR MCPL ADMN 8 URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondents No.6: SRI N.PRAVEEN KUMr\ t, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.28816 of 2O2L Date:15. L2.2025 Between: Sri Desu Anjaneyulu. ...Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, rep. by its Special Chief Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, BRK Bhavan, T.S.Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. ...Respondents ORDER: Heard Sri C. Viswanath, Iearned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt S. Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record.

2. Learned counsel lor the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the present writ petition seeking to declare the action of the respondent No.5 and his subordinates in interfering and demolishing the compound wall of the petitioner in respect of his Plot No.168, Block A in Sy,No.135 Part situated at Gowthami Nagar, Edulanagulapally Village, Ramachandrapurarn Mandal, 2 SK, J W. P. No.288 16 of 202 1 Sangareddy District arrd threatening to disposs,r ss the petitioner from his plot without issuing axy notice or wittL, rut following due process of law as illegal and arbitrary

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further. submits that at the time of admission, this Court has pass: I interim order dated 16.11.2021 directing the official resl) )ndents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner i I respect of the subject property except in accordance with the procedure established by law. However, it is made cl( a_r that if aly construction is made by the petitioner in the subj :ct property, the same sha-ll be subject to the fina,l result of the , ,,rit petition. He submits that in spite of lapse of more than thre: and half years, the respondent authorities did not file counter cr vacate petition denying the averments made by the petitiotr rr 1n the writ affidavit. In view of the same, learned counsel hzr ; requested this Court to allow the vvrit petition by directing he respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of r he petitioner in respect to the subject property without followin5; due process of 1aw.

4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Gove rnment pleader for Revenue submits that if the petitioner is in p,>;session o!!rq SK, J W.P.No.28816 of 2021 3 subject property, the respondents will not interfere with his possession over the subject property without following due process of law and requested this Court to pass appropriate orders.

5. In view of the submissions made on either side, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in Plot No.168, Biock A in Sy.No.135 Part situated at Gowthami Nagar, Edulanagulapally Village, Ramachandrapuraln Mandal, Sangareddy District, without following due procedure of law There shall be no order as to costs.

6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. SD/-A.H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR ISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER I To, 1 The Special Chief Secretary to GoVt, Revenue Department, BRK Bhavan' '' 2. The Principal Secretary to Govt' MA & UD Department' T's Secretariat' f.S. S'ecretariat, HYderabad'. HYderabad.

3. The District Collector, Sangareddy District at Sangareddy' 4.TheRevenueDivisionalofficer'sangareddyDistrictatSangareddy.

5.TheTahsildar,RamchandrapuramMandal,sangareddyDistrict. 6. The commissioner, Tellapur Municipality, Tellapur' sangareddy District' 7. One CC to SRI C'VISWANATH' Advocate [OPUCI 8. Two CCs to GP FoR REVENUE ' High Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad. [OUTI - \

9. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV, t- i rh Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT]

10.One CC to SRI N.PRAVEEN KUMAR, SC FOR MUNI: IPALITY [OPUC] 11.Two CD Copies PMK I HIGH COURT DATED:151121202s .211i :. 1\l S I'Ar I I i t2i J. . .L , - ' :- '/.. '.. .t._ :/ ORDER WP.No.28816 ot 2021 10 * -\-ll DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (