High Court · 2025

13. D.Srinivasa Ra:. Skr Gopaiah, Age 45 years, Occ Secondary Glade Teacher, M.P.P.School :luravaram, Dummugudem Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

14. S.Srinivasa Flr o S/o Bikshmaiah, Age 42 years, Occ Teacher, l\,,1. F'. - P,School, Ramaraopeta, Duhmgudem Kothagudem D srrrct l5.J.Rajeswari D/- Satyanarayana, Age 40 years, Occ Teacher, lv,t.F'. -. D.School, Ramaraopeta, DJmmgudem Kothaguderr [) s,lrict Sercc ndary Grade ll'land;tl, Bhadradri Secondary Grade lVla nd:ll. Bhadradri

16. B.Adinarayana. i/o Sundar Rao, Age Teacher, I\4.P.F' School, Thokabandala, Kothaguden D s t.ict 43 years, Occ Ser;o,tdary Grade Kothagudem lrl a rrdt l, dhadradri

17. B.9rhivas, ri/rr -- rupathi Rao, Age 43 years, Occ Secondary Grade Teacher, M.P.P.School. El C.()olony, Aswaraop'eta, Aswaraopeta Mard,,rl, Bhadradri Kothagudem Dis t -ict tB.B. rBlt{<u_,,. S/o l-rlya, Age 37 years, Occ Secondary Crrale Teacher, M.P.P Schocl, t-- ollergudem, Tekulapally Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

19.A.Rambabu [i,c, Parshya, Age 33 years, Occ Secondary (]r.rde Teacher, M.P.P.Scho:1, -ho,Migudem Colony, Mulakalapally tvianda, Bhadradri Kothagudenr Di; ict

20. M.Bhaskar, S/c . Marrgya, Age 32 years, Occ Secondary Gra le Teacher, Arl.P.P School l4r garalagupp-a, Mulakalapaliy t\/andal, Bhadradri {othagudem District.

21.9..Suresh., S;/c fl lmrirngh, Age Q3 years, Occ Secondary Gra Je Teacher, M.P.P.Schortl. \lukrrampadu Thahda, Tekulapally Man,Jal Bhadradri Kothagudern Di,r r ict.

22. tM.{umkilal, S'c._F ha1;avan, 4Oe aq years, Occ Secondary Gra le Teacher, M.P.P.School, I:1,:ch reddy Pally, S.C.Colony, pinapaka Ir,4andr,l, Bhadradri Kothaguderr Di,; r ict.

23.B.Bhavani Dic _alu, Age 26 years, Occ Secondary Grace Teacher, M.P.U.P.Schoc)l Chinthala Bayyaram, pinapaka lr/ancal, BhadriOri Kothagudem Di:;1r ct. 24 P..Pushpalatha. [)'o tlamulu, Age 34 years, Occ Secondary (]raCe Teacher, M.P.P,School. lJ:rsapuram, Dummugldem Mandal, BhadraOri .{othagudeni District,

25. B.Padma, Dkr lrernla, Age 34 years, Occ Secondary Grar.e M.P.P.School. l(oyanarsapuram,- Dummugudem N4Lnd;rl, Kothagudem Distr ct. Teacher, Bhadradri

26.Ch.Nangaial- li r Ch nna Veeraswamy, Age 43 years, Occ Seco rdary Grade Teacher, [r,/.P I, :ichcol. Chinna Kimalapuram, Dummu,;trde.m irtanOii, Bhadradri Kc tlra ;. dern District.

27. B. ,Chandulal, S/,) Laxman, Ag^e. 3g years, Occ Secondary Gracie Teacher, M.P.P.Schoot, T_.kulabanjara,-Chandiugonda Mandat, etri<iraarif,:otnagute;i District. 28.ANagamani, tll: Bhadru, Age 2J. years, Occ Secondary Grar;e Teacher, tM.P.P.Schoot, Ir4tkundapurair, einapita vinaiL ehriir,:i -i,otnrllri!?ri District. .,.PETITIONERS AUP ' I!ir: t3:"":J,:;:Tg&?"Tr"&obY its Principa I Secretary, Schoor Ed ucation ' Uirr"r:[Tl;:3*o'#t Director or School Education, Govr. or rerensana, 3. The District Educational Officer, Khammam District, Khammam. 4. The District Educationat Officer, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, Kothagudem ...RESPONDENTS petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to decrare the action of the Respondents in not awarding entirement points to petitioners for service rendered in their respective previous praces prior to 30'05'20'15 by which date they were temporariry adjusted to the present prace as per G o Ms'No'130 Generar Administration (sR) Dept., dated 19.03.2015 in the ensuing transfer counseling is illegal arbitrary, discriminatory and violation of Articre 'r4 and 16 0f the constitution of the rndia and consequentiary decrare that the petitioners are entired to benefit of awarding the entiaement points respective service render in previous places prior to 30.05.20i5. IA NO: 10F 2A18 Petition under Section '151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to award entitlement points to the petitioners for service rendered in their respective previous praces prior to 30.05.2015 in the ensuing transfer counseling pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner: SRt. N. RAMU Counsel forthe Respondents: Gp FOR SERVICES-I The Court made the foilowing: ORDER THE H.CIN'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK W.P.No.21469 of 2Ol8 ORDER: Today, vrhe r tL e matter is taken up for hearinrr, Mr. Ramu, representing the l,r rrr ed counsel for the petitioner subrnit s that the cause in the vr r 1 petition does not survive and it hzLs become infructuous. In vieu, of r h: e.bove, the writ petition is dismisse,d as having become infruc"-r-Lo r r ;. r\s a sequel thereto, miscellaneous apolications, if aly, pending irr -}'ri,; writ petition stand closed. Therc seall be no order as to costs; //TRUE COPY// i5 uH;,#Jilftl;,loJ"Y 3L' t3,l -] [(:)r-- pr ie :. To, 1 2 n One CC to Two CCs ttr Hvderabad Two CD Crl TJ GJP cl\v A SD/ .T JAYASREE ISt*T REGISTRAR $ecrtott oFFtcER st*e of r e' a n']a na' at "" HIGH COURT DATED:0410212025 ORDER WP.No.2146!t of2018 :--.-:\ 1HE l;14 7 \:, <. 30 l,4A] 2125 k < ) c o ('( > 7 C .r\ t D4 -_- DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION INFRUCTUOI.JS WITHOUT COSTS o{-.-u