Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, Criminal Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
The petitioner/Accused filed this criminal petition under Section 427 Cr.P.C to concurrent both the sentences passed in C.C.No.33 and 34 of 2005 on file of the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad. When the matter was listed on 06.8.2008 at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner it was adjourned by ten days. Thereafter, the matter underwent four adjournments and it did not see the light of the day and again it is listed today
Operative part
before me. From the above, it is clear that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter. Apparently, this case is of the year 2008 and certainly the case must have been heard and disposed of by now. Under the circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition at this stage. Accordingly, Criminal Petition is dismissed. _______________________________ GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA,J 26th April, 2010 Js.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, Criminal Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 427.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.