M. Ranjeesh Reddy v. Department

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue such appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly, in the nature of a Writ of ft/andamus (i) Declaring the action 'of the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in deleting the entry of the Petitioners land admeasuring Ac- 3- 00gts in Sy No. 69/4 (reflected under By Bo . 69 /AA) of Kamsanpally Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, RR District from Bhu Bharati Portal without conducting any enquiry, without conducting any hearing, without considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 18. 07. 2025 and without passing any orders at the instance of the unofficial Respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust, highhanded and without authority/jurisdiction and against the provisions of The Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of rights in Land) act, 2025 (ii) And consequently, restore/enter the name of the Petitioners land admeasuring Ac- 3- 00gts in Sy No. 69/A of Kamsanpally Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, RR District in Bhu Bharati Portal lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2"'t and 3'd Respondents to not enter the name of 4th Respondent in place of the impugned deleted entry of the Petitioner, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition by this Hon'ble Court IANO:3O 25 Between: Badavat Ramulu, S/o Bhadavath Pandu Aged about 45 years, Occ Govt Employee Rl/o. Pasula Tanda, Kamsanpally Village, Ranga Reddy District. .....PETlTlONER/RESPONDENT No.4 AND

1. M. Rarrjeesh Reddy, S/o. M. Sudharshan Reddy, Aged about 34 years,. Occ Busineis, R/o. H. ho- 8- 1- 16412, Pragathi Colony, Mailardevpally, Village' GHMC Raiendranagar Circle, RR District. ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER 2. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue 3. The Collector, Rangareddy District. 4. The Tahsildar, Faroognagar Mandal, Telangana State. Departrnent, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad' Telangana. ..,RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petitior under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavii filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the inlerim order dated 6.8.2025 passed in WP No.23089 of 2025 and dismiss the atrove writ petition with exemplary costs, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A. VENKATESH SENIOR COUNSEL REP Ms. L. VANI Counsel for ttre Respondent Nos. 1to3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI C. RAGHU REP SRI R. GlRl KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER r' 4tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL NN DATE: 16.12.2025 Between: Mr. M.Ranjeesh Reddy. AND ...Petitioner The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Women Children, Disabled and Senior Citizens Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 3 others. ...Respondents ORDER This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:- "...to issue such appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, i) Declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd Responderit in deleting the entry of the Petitioners land admeasuring Ac.3.00gts., in Sy.No.69lA (reflected under Sy. No.69 /AA) of Kamsanpally Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, R.R.District, from Bhu Bharati Portal without conducting any enquiry without conducting any hearing without considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 18.07.2025 and without passing any orders at the instance of the unofficial Respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, . 2 unjust highhanded and without authority/jurisdiction and against the provisions of The Telangana Bhu Bharati Record of Rights in Land Act 2025 ii) And consequently restore/enter the name of the Petitioners land admeasuring Ac.3.00gts., in Sy.No.6914. of Kamsanpally Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, R.R.District in Bhu Bharati Portal..."

2. H,:ard Mr. A.Venkatesh, learned Senior Counsel representing Smt. L.\/ani, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri C.Raghu, learned counsel representing Sri R.Giri Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.4 anc learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. Perused the recor,l.

3. Leilrned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner is claiming right over the land admeasuring Acs.3.00 guntas in sy-No.69,/A, situated at Kamsanpally village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Rangared,Jy District, on the strength of the registered sale deed bearing ftocument No.22090 of 2019, dated 14.06.2019. His name was also rnutated in the revenue record and latest pattadar passbook- cum-title deed was also issued in his favour. Even then, on the application made by respondent No.4, respondent No.3 has issued notice datcd 04.07.2025 fixing the enquiry on 16.07.2025, on which ?' .7 3 date, the petitioner appeared before respondent No.3 and submitted his explanation along with all the relevant documents. Without considering the same, respondent No.3 has recorded the name of respondent No.4 in the revenue record in respect of the subject property. Basing on the said wrong entry, respondent No.4 is trying to alienate the subject property to third parties and hence, he would seek to pass appropriate orders.

4. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 submits that the petitioner fraudulently got his name mutated in the revenue record in respect of subject property and is suppressing all the material facts before this Court and hence, prays this Court to pass appropriate orders.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits \ that due to the excess extent than the original extent of the subject land in Survey No.69 of Kamsanpally village, the name of the petitioner is I deleted from the online Bhu-Bharati Portal and seeks to pass appropriate orders.

6. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and learned counsel for 4 respondent No.4 and upon perusing the material before this Court, it is seen th;rt no notice has been contemplated on the petitioner while passing the order dated 26.06.2021.

7. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to allow this writ petition and the impugned proceedings in Case No.D Ll39l202l B16337l'.r-019, dated 26.06.2021 has been set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Special Tribunal, Ranga Reddy District to conduct lrroceedings afresh, strictly in accordance with law, by issuing notice to all the concerned and affording sufficient opportunity of hearing, as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs. To, Mi:;cellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/. C.DEEPIKA REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER

1. The Pl'incipal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana. 2. The Collector, Rangareddy District. 3. The Tahsildar, Faroognagar Mandal, Telangana State. 4. One CC to Ms. L. VANI, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at 6. One CC to SRl. R.clRl KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] BM TKS HIGH C,OURT DATED:1611212025 ORDER WP.No.23089 of 2025 1 riE srA () 6 ttB I 6) -\ * :sr-../tjf -& ..{, ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS b