✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 15 Jul 2004

M/s G.N. Products Pvt.Ltd (Kotari Mills) v. The Union of India

G ROHINI2 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
15 Jul 2004
Bench
G ROHINI

Judgment

HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 18309 of 2003 Between: M/s G.N. Products Pvt. Ltd (Kotari Mills) Aluru Road, Adoni, represented by its Managing Director G. Nagabhushana Rao AND ..... PETITIONER

1.

The Union of India rep. By its Secretary Minister of law, Sastri Bhavan, R.P.Road, New Delhi.

2.

Sree Mahayogi Lakshmamma Co.op. Bank Limited, No.72, Flower Bajar, Adoni Kurnool District, rep. By its Manager. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue order or orders or a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the Securitisation & Reconstruction of Financial Assets & Enforcement of Security interest Act,2002, more particularly Section 13(2) and 13(4) as invalid and violative of the rights of the petitioner guaranteed under the Constitution of India and consequently declare the notice under Ref. No. SML BANK: AND: 3-4-:77 dated 24-6-2003 issued by the 2nd respondent under Section 132 (2) of the Act as arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and Article 14,19(1) (g) and 300A of Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper. For the Petitioner : MR.K.V.SESHAGIRI RAO, Advocate. For the Respondent No1.: MR.A.RAJASEKHAR REDDY, SC for CG. For the respondent No.2 : Dr.P.B.Vijaya Kumar, Advocate. The Court Made the Following: ORAL ORDER: …. ( Per Hon’ble The Chief Justice ) In view of the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Transfer Case (Civil) No. 92-95 of 2002, dated 8th April, 2004 (MARDIA CHEMICALS LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS), challenge to the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, is not tenable and for that reason, the relief prayed for cannot be granted. Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs. ____________________ DEVINDER GUPTA. C.J., ____________ G. ROHINI. J., Dated: 15.07.2004. VRK. To

1. The Secretary, Ministry of Law, The Union of India, Sastri Bhavan, R.P.Road, New Delhi.

2. The Manager, Sree Mahayogi Lakshmamma Coop. Bank Limited, No.72, Flower Bazar, Adoni, Kurnool Dist.

3.

2 CD copies. HON’BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI. W.P.NO. 18309 OF 2003. ( Order of the Bench delivered by Hon’ble The Chief Justice ) Dt: 15.07.2004.

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — arts. 14, 19(1)(g), 226, 300A; Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 15 Jul 2004. The bench was G ROHINI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments