✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court

M/s.Muralikrishna Rice and Flour Mill v. The Court made the following

ANIL R DAVE, R SUBHASH REDDY

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Smt. Alla Anjaneyamma, W/o.A.Suryanarayana, R/o.H.No.7-4-1, Medara Basti, Kothagudem, Khammam Dist ..... APPELLANT(S) AND 1 The State Bank Of Hyderabad, Rep.by its Authorized officer, Kothagudem, Khammam Dist. 2 The Branch Manager, State Bank of Hyderabad, Kothagudem Main Branch, Near Railway Station, (Bhadrachalam Road), Khammam Dist…

Judgment

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI ANIL R. DAVE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 388 of 2008 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 14/02/2008 in WP NO : 21769 OF 2007 on the file of the High Court.) Between:

1.

M/s.Muralikrishna Rice and Flour Mill, Rep. by its Proprietor Alla Muraligopala Rao, R/o.H.No.7-4-1, Medara Basti, Kothagudem, Khammam Dist.

Operative part

2.

Smt. Alla Anjaneyamma, W/o.A.Suryanarayana, R/o.H.No.7-4-1, Medara Basti, Kothagudem, Khammam Dist ..... APPELLANT(S) AND 1 The State Bank Of Hyderabad, Rep.by its Authorized officer, Kothagudem, Khammam Dist. 2 The Branch Manager, State Bank of Hyderabad, Kothagudem Main Branch, Near Railway Station, (Bhadrachalam Road), Khammam Dist .....RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.A.KRISHNAM RAJU The Court made the following : JUDGMENT Per Anil R. Dave, CJ In view of the fact that the challenge in the Writ Petition is only against the show cause notice issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short ‘the Act’), the learned counsel for the appellants seek leave to withdraw the appeal so as to enable the appellants to submit reply to the show cause notice given by the creditor bank. Permission is accorded. The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. The appellants shall submit their reply within a period of two weeks from today. The creditor-bank shall not take any action till reply to the notice is received and considered in accordance with law if no action has been taken so far. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 9th April, 2008 R. SUBHASH REDDY, J

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments