High Court · 2025

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO:23102 OF 2025 Between:

1. Polam Saidulu, S/o. Lingaiah Aged about 35 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. 2. Pittala Chandrasekar, S/o. Balaiah Aged about 37 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Mannanoor Village, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. Mannanoor Village, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool District.

3. Pittala Sekhar, S/o. Suraiah Aged about 33 years, Occ Pvt. Employee Fl/o. 4. Pittala Mallesh, S/o. Venkataiah Aged about 38 years, Occ Pvt. Employee MannanoorVillage, Amrabad Mandal, NagarkumooI District. Ri/o. Mannanoor Village, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkumool District.

5. Pittala Hanmanthu, S/o. Balaiah Aged about 29 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Mannanoor Village, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool District.

6. Pittala Anjaneyulu, S/o. Parvathalu Aged about 38 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Mannanoor Village, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool Distriict.

7. Pittala Shiva, S/o. Sailu Aged about 28 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Mannanoor Village, Amrabad lvlandal, Nagarkumool District. AND ,..PETITIONERS

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its. Prl. Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Agency Divisional Officer cum- District Collector, Nagarkurnool District. 3. The Agency Divisional Officer - cum- Revenue Divisional Offrcer, Achampet, Nagarkumool District.

4. The Tahsildar, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. 5. Pittala Suresh, S/o. Parvathalu Aged about 42 years, Occ Pvt. Medical Practitioner Cum- Agriculture. RYo. Mannanoor (V), Amrabad (M), Nagar Kumool Dist

6. Syed. Rasheed, S/o. Khadar Sharif Aged about Major, Occ Retd Ernployee, Fl/o. Mannanoor Village, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool District.

7. Syed Hidaythullah, S/o. Faizullah Aged Malor, Occ Agricu'lture. Rl/o. Mannanoor Village, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkumool District.

8. Syed Kaleemulla, S/o. Khadar Sherif Aged Major, Occ Retd Employee, Rl/o. Mannanoor Village, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool District.

9. Pittala Mallesh, S/o. Venkataiah Aged about 29 years, Occ Pvt. Employee, Fi/o. Mannanoor Village, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool District.

10. Pittla Bodaiah, S/o. Mallaiah Aged about 49 years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o. Mannanoor Village, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool Dstrict. 1 1 . Pittala Naresh, Sio. Parvathalu Aged about 40 years, Occ Pvt. Employee, Rl/o. ,Mannanoor Viflage, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkurnool District. Minnanoor Village, AmrSbad Mandat, Nagarkumool District' Fl/o. Mannanoor Villaqe', Amrabad Niandal, Nagarkumool District' l2.Pittala Renaiah, S/o. Lingaiah Aged about 36 years, gcc Pvt Employee' Ri/o ' ra.peniin Siirar;Bio. H;,*anitu ngeo alout 51 years, ()cc Agriculture, Rl/o. ' -'Minnanoor Villige, Amrabad Manda-|, Nagarkumool District' t+.Anees suttana, Wlb. Sveo knaeettula Ag;d about 61 )'gq's, o9c Housewife' - ' r s. bvlo Akheel. S/o. Sv-ed'Khaleellula Aged about 43 years, Occ Pvt Employee, - 16.Sved Adeel, S/o. Svef khaleellula Aged about 43 year;, Ctcc Pvt' Employee, 17 Sved Shekheet. S/o] Sved. Khaleellula Aged about 49 years' Occ Pvt' Ehployee, Fl/o. Mannan6or Village, Amrabad Mandal, N agarkurnool District' R7o. Mannanoor Villaqe' Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkumool D strict' R7o. Mannanoor Villaqe. Amrabad Mahdal, Nagarkurnocrl D;strict' ,.,RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lnd a p'raying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularl T one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, seeking to declare the action of the Rer;pondent No. 3 in not issue the notices to the petitioners who are the legal representatives of late Pittata Mallamma, late Pittala Lingaiah, late Pittala Peldaiah, Late. Pittala Lachaiah, in Case No. 'l14020/2015 as illegal, improper' arbitrary' uniust' violative of Articles 14, 15, 21, and 300- A of the rlonstitution of lndia consequenfly direct the respondents No. 3 issue the noti:es to the petitioners who are the legal representatives of late Pittala Mallamma, Pitl.ala Lingaiah, Late Pittala Peddaiah, late. Pittala Lachaiah, in Case No. l/4020/2015 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High court rnay be pleased to direct the respondents No. 3 issue the notices to the petitio6er:; who are the legal representatives of late Pittala Mallamma, Pittala Lingaiah, l-ate Pittala Peddaiah, late. Pittala Lachaiah, in Case No. l/4020/2015 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M. RAMESHWAR RAO Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1to4: SRI L. RAVINDER' AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5to14- The Court made the following: ORDER TIIE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSIIMAN WRITPETITIO N No.23102 of2025 ORAL ORDER: Heard learned counsel for th€ petitioners and Mr.L.Ravinder, leamed Assistant Govemment pleader for Revenue.

2. Respondent No.5 has filed a writ petition i.e., W.P.No.14218 of 2021 against the petitioners and respondent Nos.l to 4 challenging the orders vide Memo No.E/AppeaU2\2l,datd22.O2.2O2I on the file of the Agency Divisional Offrcer-cum-District Collector, Nagarkum ool. Vide order dated 16.04.2025, this Court disposed of the said writ petition settrng aside the impugned order dated 22.02.2021 and remanded back the matter to the Agency Divisional Officer_ cum-Revenue Divisional Officer, Achampet, with a direction to decide the appeal filed by respondent No.5 herein dated 2l .01 .2021 under the Telangana Agency Rules, 1924 and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law by putting 2 the petitioner and unofficial respondents therein on notice and affording them an opportunity. This Court also directed respondent No.3 therein to complete the said enquiry within three (3) months from the date of receipt of a ccp1, of the said order.

3. The grievance of the petitioners in th,) present writ petition is that respondent No.3 is conducting enquiry without putting the petitioners on notice and affor,ling them an opportunity, as directed by this Cotrt vide order dated

16.04.2025 in W.P.No.l4218 of 2021.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader frrr Revenue, on instructions, would submit that respondent No 3i has already served notice on petitioners on03.07.2025 itself and afforded an opportunity to the petitioners and unofficial respondents herein in terms of the aforesaid order dated 16.04.2025. Respondent No.3 will decide the said appr:al strictly in accordancc with the procedure laid down under law. - 3

5. In the light of the said submissions, notice to respondent Nos.5 to l7 is dispensed with. This Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to decide the aforesaid appeal in terms of the order dated 16.04.2025 in w.P.No.l42I8 0f 2021, by putting the petitioners and respondent Nos.5 to l7 on notice and affording them an opportunity. However, he shall complete the entire exercise within three (3) months, as directed by this Court in the aforesaid order. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. To, //TRUE COPY// SD/.B. REKHA RANI TANT REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER Nagarkumool District. 1 . The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Agency Divisional Officer cum- District Collector, Nagarkurnool District. 3. The Agency Divisional Officer - cum- Revenue Divisional Ofiicer, Achampet, 4 The Tahsildar, Amrabad Mandal, Nagarkumool District. 5 One CC to SRl. M. RAMESHWAR RAO, Advocate [OPUCI 6 Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at 7. Two CD Copies Hyderabad {OUTI BM Ls (x HIGH COURT DATED:0610812025 ORDER WP.No.23102 of 2025 ,..., ,,,r',. :-t ,\ (),.\ \. .-_ ) 2 5 rrF 2U5 ),. \ t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \0 .ec"a S. tr\{-5