✦ High Court of India · 07 Aug 2025

V. Rajavardhan rReddy, S/o v. Satyanarayan Reddy, aged

Case Details High Court of India · 07 Aug 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
07 Aug 2025
Length
20,290 words

Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.590 ot 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.287.of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: M. Mallaiah, S,to. Yelleswamy, aged 35 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FORAPPEALS N mr Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.248 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Sreenivasa Chary, S/o. Ranga Swamy, aged 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS S.No.592 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-20'10 passed in O.P.No.292 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Pedda Yellaiah, S/o. Balaiah, aged 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, Fi/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS .No.593 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.288 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: M.Ram Gopal, S/o. Mallaiah, aged 40 years, Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUGlaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counsel forthe Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.594 ot 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.275 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Ramudu, S/o. Nagaiah, aged 51 years, Occ: Agriculture, R,r,r. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift Irrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.595 of 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.303 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Raju, S/o. Rangaswamy, aged 42 years, Occ: Agriculture, RJo. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Counset forthe Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.278 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Golla Kurmanna, S/o China, Aged about 51 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No. 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.282 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: M.Satyanarayana, S/o. Mallaiah, aged 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanapafthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, wanaparthy District' ...RespondenuRespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.228 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Janumpally Rami Reddy, S/o. Kista Reddy, aged about 63 years, Occ: Agriculture, Ri./o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. .RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.600 of 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated Ct3-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.297 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior rSivil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: AND Uppari Kudukuntla Krishnaiah, S/o. Thimmanna; aged 73 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Dy Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, wanaparthy District ...RespondenuRespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Res;pondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.601 of 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.24O of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: G. Radha Krishna, S/o. Pedda Narsimha, aged about 51 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair [\4andal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Ap;rellant: SriV. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Re:;pondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.602 of 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.276 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Golla Mallaiah, S/o. Sherupally Balaiah, aged 55 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenUResponde nt Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.603 of 2O25 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.290 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: tr4.Mallaiah, S/o. Balaiah, aged 60 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair N/andal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... Res pondenURes pondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.604 of 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.289 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Golla Pentamma, Wo. Kistaiah, aged 85 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.605 of 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.296 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Mallaiah, S/o. Barlaiah, aged about 55 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair tVlandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.606 of 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.239 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: G. Venkataiah, S/o. G. Pedda Narsimha, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair l/andal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.{}ollector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy Distri,:t. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.607 ot 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.269 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Madugam Balaswamy, S/o. Krishnaiah, aged 63 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rlio. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.608 of 2O25 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.300 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: K.Mahender, S/o. K.Narayana, aged 37 years, Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.609 of 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.2B3 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Madugani Shanthamma, Wo. Savaraiah, aged 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, Ri/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift Wanaparthy District. lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.610 ot 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated C3-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.294 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Ramudu, S/o.Chinna Yellaiah, aged about 47 years, Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Occ: Agriculture, R/o. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dv.Collector, Rajeev Wanaparthy Disl:rict. Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.611 of 2O25 Appeal undr:r Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.253 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Beechupally Goud, S/o. Sanjeeva Goud, aged 51 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Villagr:, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel forthe Respondent: cp FORAPPEALS ...RespondenURespondent L.A.A.S.No.612 of 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.23B of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: G. Pedda Narasimha, S/o. Pentaiah, aged about 90 years, Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Raieev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.613 of 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.242 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Narasimha Reddy, S/o Kista Reddy, Aged about 63 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.614 of 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.237 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' Between: Ganapuram Narasimha, S/o. Pentaiah, aged about B0 years, Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase- Il, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A,S.No.615 ol 202s Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 13-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.252 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Ravi Chander Goud, S/o. Sanjeeva Goud, aged 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ... AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase- ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS A.S.No.616 ol 2O25 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.244 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Sampath Kumar Reddy, S/o. Salwa Reddy, aged about 43 years, Occ: Agriculture, Na.<yarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme phase- ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS ...RespondenURespondent L.A.A.S. 17 ot 2O25 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.235 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Ganapuram Ashok, S/o. G. Ramulu, aged about 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel forthe Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A. 1 of 2O25 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 17-04-2012 passed in O.P.No.11 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: 1. J. 2. J. 3. J. 4. J. 5. J. 6. J. 7. J. 8. J. 9. J. 10. J. 11.J. 1 2. Smt. Chittemma, D/o. J.S.Chand raiah, age 42 yearc, 1 3. Smt. Bhagyamma, Wo.Dhanaiah, age 39 years, S. Chandraiah, (Claimant No.2) Died per L.Rs Appellants No.9 to 12 Naganna, S/o late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 49 years, Sayanna, Sio late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 44 years, Danaiah (Died) per L.R. Appellants 13 S. Chandraiah, (Claimant No.6) Died per L.Rs Appellants No.9 to 12 Sura Sayanna, S/o.Chandraiah, age 44 years, Naganna, S/o late J. S. Chandraiah aged 49 years, Danaiah (Died) per L.R. Appellants No.13 Naganna, S/o late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 49 years, Sayanna, s/o late J. S. Chandraiah, aged 44 years, Bhagyamma, w/o late J.S. Chandraiah, aged 63 years, R/o. Kanayapally Village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ,Appellants/Claimants 2 to 6 AND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair. Bethesta Prarthana Mandiram, Represented by its President Sri. J. Naganna s/o Jammanna aged 50 years, N. Narsanna, s/o Balaiah, aged 77 years, occupation. Agriculture, N. Premaiah, s/o Narsaiah, aged 49 years, occupation. Agriculture, Hr. Narasimha, s/o Chandraiah, aged 62 years, Gopal, s/o Narsimha, aged 37 years, Suresh, s/o Narsimha, aged 34 years, B. J. Narsimha, s/o Naganna, aged 57 years, 9. Chennamma, w/o Prathap, aged 39 years, 10.J. Laxmi, D/o Narsimha, aged 31 years, 11. J. Alivela, w/o [\/anyam, aged 57 years, 12. J. Narender, s;/o Manyam, aged 33 years, 13.J. Balaswamy, s/o Nouranna, aged 74years, '14.J. Sreenivasulu, s/o Balaswamy, aged 38 years, '1 5. J. Venkataiah, s/o Balaiah, aged 52 years, 16.J. Arjun, s/o Venkataiah, aged 34 years, 17. J. Shanthamma. w/o Savaraiah, aged 72 yearc, 18. Dastagiri, s/o Savaraiah, aged 31 years, 19. Balaiah, s/o Savaraiah, aged 42 years, 20. Narsimha, s/o Savaraiah, aged 38 years, 21.K. Laxmaiah, s/o Naganna, aged 68 years, 22.K. Bheemanna, s/o Naganna, aged 62 years, 23. K. Chinna Ramulu, s/o Giranna, aged 57 years, 24. K. Rajeshwari, w/o Srinu, aged 34 years, 25.K. Dubba Ra,nulu, s/o Mashanna, aged 57 years, 26. H.S. Chandrzriah, s/o Narsimha, aged 72 years, 27.1. Ramanna, s/o Jammanna, aged 82 years, 28.H. Naganna, s/o Buddanna, aged 60 years, 29.H. Chinna N:rganna, s/o Edanna, aged 74 years, 30. J. Anand Babu, s/o Masanna, aged 48 years, 31 .J. Balaiah, s/o Masanna, aged 52 years, 32.R. Baindla Balraju, s/o Madaraiah, aged 48 years, 33. B. Ramulu, s/o Chandraiah, aged 37 years, 34. R. Baindla Dasharatham, s/o Pullaiah, aged 74 years, 35. R. Baindla Srinivasulu, s/o Dasharatham, aged 74 yearc, 36.R. Baindla Lakshmi, w/o Balaswamy, aged 67 years, 37. R. Ramulu, s/o Balaswamy, aged 44 years, 38.R. Shankar, s/o Balaswamy, aged 41 years, 39.R. Ravi Kumar, s/o Balaswamy, aged 40 years, 40.R. Kondalaiah, s/o Balaswamy, aged 38 years, 41. R. B. Balakistamma, w/o Savaraiah, aged 82 years, 42. Kukkanna, s/o Savaraiah, aged 62 years. (The Respondent No.2 to 42 are nol the necessary parties to this appeal). RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellants: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.N 5 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in o.P.No.243 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Salva Reddy, S/o. Bal Reddy, aged about 80 years, Occ: Agriculture, R:/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel forthe Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.621 ot 2025 . Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.241 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Venkat Reddy, S/o. Kista Reddy, aged about 57 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.622 oi 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.246 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Thirupathi Reddy, S/o. Sarva Reddy, aged 65 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, wanaparthy District' RespondenuRespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.623 of 2025 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrjeved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.293 of 200!r on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Kurmaiah, S/o. Chinna Yellaiah, aged 51 year, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. D The Special Dy Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- Il, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS A.A.S.No.624 of 2025 Appeal underr Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act agg"ieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.256 of 2009 on the fite of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Kurmaiah, S/o. Balaiah, aged 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rro. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. D The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase- ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ..Appellanuclaimant RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS 625 ot 2O25 Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.270 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Golla shantharnma, wo Marraiah, Aged about 65 years, occ: Agricurture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counselfor the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS The Court delivered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT I ! .! i I \ -1 THE HON'BLE CE ABHINAND KUMA.IT SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE VAKTTI RAMAKRISF{NA REDDY A.S.Nos. 5;71.572.573.574.575 ,576. s77,578.579, 580, s81. s82- L.A. 583, 594. 585. 5;86., 587. 588, 589, 590, 59't, 592, 593, 59q.595, 596, 597, 5gg, 600, 60'1., 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 672, 6'13. 6L4, 6L5. 6't 6. 517. 618, 620, 62'1 . 622,623.624 AND 525 0F 2025 COMMON ILIDGMENT! (Per [{on'blc Sri f usticc Abhinand Kurnar Shavili) When ttre matters are taken up for hearring, Iearr-red coultsel appearing for tl're appellants hacl informed the Court that the issue involved in tlre present appeals is squarelv c:overec{ bv 1l1s common judgment, dated 29.04.2025, rerrdered t.v tl'ris Court in L.A.A.S.No.57' of 2024 and batch and followins the said juclgrnent, the present aprpeals also deserve to be a[owec{,

2. Learnecl Government Pleader for Appeals appearing for the respondent-Special Deputy Collector did not clispute, the said fact.

3. In view of the same, all these appeals are all,:wed following the common judgment, dated 29.04.2025, rendered :y this Court in L.A.A.s.No.57 of 2024 and batch, and the market value is enhanced by two mor:e times (1+2) than the value fixec[ by the Land Acquisition Officer with all consequential benefits. However, it is e> made clear that the appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period in preferring the aprpeals. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Appticatious, if any, pending in these appeals shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. The Special Deputy Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District.

3. One CC to Mr. V. fi/anohar Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP FOR APPEALS , High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies (Annex a copy of the common judgment, dated 29-04-2025 in LAAS.No.S7 of 2024 and batch) HIGH COURT DATED:0710812025 iLjri: SI4 14 llutl zm5 .C,) COMMON JUDGMENT+S3 DECREE'S i.: + c:1. A.r.- -'....' * L.A.A.S.Nos:571,572 ,57 3,57 4,57 5,57 6,57 7,57 8,57 9.580.s8 1 . 582,583,584.585.586. 587.s88.589.590.591 ,s92,593,594,595,596,597,599.600.601 .602,603.604,605.606. 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 620 621 622 623 624 and 625 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEALS q HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAI{D KUMAR SHAVILI AI{D HON'BI-E', SMT JUSTICE TIRUMAI-A DEVI EADA L.A.A.S.Nos.57, 81 and 124 OF 2024 COMMON IUDGMENT i (Per Hon'bh Jtttice Abbinand Ktnar S haiti) + When the matters are taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the appellants had informed this Court that the issue raised in these Appeals is squarely covered by the iudgment, dated

27.01.2025, passed by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.49 of 2024. Learned counsel had further contended that L.A.A.S.No.49 of 2024 was filed by claimant No.26 in O.P.No.91 of 201,4, dated

03.1,0.201,8 and the appellants herein afe other claimants in O.P.No.91 of 201,4. Therefore, similar order be passed in these appeals also. Learned counsel had furthef contended that LAAS No.49 of 2024 was disposed of by relying on a Division Bench judgment of this Court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 201,5 and batch, dated 27.09.2022, whercby the market value of the land acquired therein was enhanced by trvo mofe times than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer with all consequential benefits, 2 hov'ever, for the delay pedod in preferring the appeals, the claimants are not entitled for any interest.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants had further contended that the judgrnent, dated 27.09.2022 passed in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch was also confirmed by the Apr:x Court in S.L.P.(Civil)No.28925 of 2024, dated 77.09.2024. T'herefore, the present appeals can also be disposed of in terms of the judgment, dated 27 .01.2025 passed in L.A.A.S.No .49 of 2024.

5. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the 1.., respondent-Land Acquisition Officer had contended that the purpose of acquiring lands of appellants is for Rvalampadu Balancing Reservoir under Jawah^r Iift Irrigation Project and Priyadarshi _lurala Project and G.O.Ms.No.234, dared 15.10.1993 and G.O.IVIs.No.291, dated 05.08.1982 are not applicable to the said irrigatic,n projects. Therefore, all the appeals are liable to be dismissed. J

4. Having considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is of the view that the Division Bench of this Court in L.A.A.S.No.2 of 201'6, dated 27.09.2022 and L.A.A.S.No.4 of 201,6, dated 1'5.09.2022 held that the said G.Os. are applicable for all the Irrigation Proiects, and though the said G.Os. were issued specifically for Srisailam Hydro Power Projects. L.A.A.S.No.725 of 2015 and batch, dated 27.09.2022 and L.A.A.S.No.4 of 201.6, dated 15.09.2022 were allowed and the market value was enhanced by two mofe times than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer. Aggrieved by the order, dated

27.09.2022, in L.A.A.S.No.1,25 of 201,5 and batch, the State has caried the matter to the Apex Court by filing S.L.P.(Civil).No. 28925 of 2024 and the Apex Court uide order, dated 17.09.2024, confitmed the order passed by the Division Bench of this couft in L.A.A.S.N o.1,25 of 2015 and batch. Therefore, the Present appeals c^rL also be disposed of in terms of the iudgment, dated 27 .09.2022, passed in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 201'5 and batch. 4

5. Accordingly, all the appeals are allowed by fol-lowing the judgment, dated 27.09.2022, passed in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 201,5 and batch, and the market value is enhanced by two more rimes (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer with all consequential benefits. However, the appellants are nc,t entided for interest for the delay period in preferring the appeals;. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in these, appeals shall stand closed. JUSTICE ABHINAND KUIVI.,{,R SHAVILI JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Dxe:29.04.202,5 Note: Registry to annex copy of the judgment dated 27.C9.2022 In I-AAS No.125 of 201.5. (B.o) rkk/Prat IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD [ 34e0 I THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.571 of 2025 Between: Golla Shanthaiah, s/o. Krishnaiah, aged 60 years, occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Vil lage, Pebbai r [\Iandal, Wanapa rthy District. .AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. . RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.267 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V lVlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as fottows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the lMarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5535 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That th,ere shall be no order as to costs Sd/. SHYLESHI RE9'STRAR JOINT (? SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYI

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam & , - r.1ff:r:ii .i' ..:, . ' ei 'lt' / HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.S71 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ (, IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.572 of 2025 Golla Chandrayudu, S/o Shanthaiah, Aged about 41 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUCtaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.268 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Nlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the [t/arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5535 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 1*4 DECREE LAAS.No.S72 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD i THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.573 ot 2025 Between: V. Rajavardhan Reddy, S/o. V. Satyanarayan Reddy, aged 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, Ri/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.272 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5535 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR (*,, sEcTlo CER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.S7'3 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL "\ r\ t" IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.574 of 2025 Between: Uppari Rangaswamy, S/o. Balaiah, aged 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ..RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.302 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the fi/arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5535 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED i0710812025 DECREE LAAS.No.S74 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.575 ot 2025 Ramudu, S/o. Balaiah, aged 51 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.257 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5535 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /ITRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR d- SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COUR-T DATED:07/0 812025 DECREE LAAS.No.S7S of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ b IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.576 of 2025 Between: G.Bichamma, W/o. Pedda [/unnaiah, aged 90.years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ..RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.245 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the tVlarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5542 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD CoPies Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR o SECTION OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.576 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL t@ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.577 ot 2025 Between: Sanjeeva Goud, S/o.Late Beesamma Goud, Aged 75 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent .AppellanUClaimant Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.251 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed : 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period ol 5542 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SdI SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR & SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED i0710812025 DECREE LAAS.No.S77 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ 1\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.578 of 2025 Ram Reddy, S/o. Kista Reddy, aged 63 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ..RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.247 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Jt/anohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2'S than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5542 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/ Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR o SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COUR]' DATED:0710812025 DECREE LA/AS.No.S78 of 2A25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \r. J 1\ v IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.579 of 2025 Krishna Kumar Goud, S/o. Sanjeeva Goud, aged 49 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District ..RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.254 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5542 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be ho order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies . To, Kam HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.S79 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ \t b IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.580 ot 2025 Between: Golla Venkataiah, s/o. Balaiah, aged 60 years, occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ..RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.277 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V f\Ianohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the f\rlarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5542 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED iO710812025 DECREE LAAS.No.580 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.581 of 2025 Madugani fVlallaiah, S/o. Gattaiah, aged about 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair [Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND ...AppellanUClaimant The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and dbcree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.281 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This ai:peal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V fi/anohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5535 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR o SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COUTIT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.SE1 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ b : l IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L'A'A'S'No'582 of 2025 Golla Pakkiramma, W/o. Kistaiah, aged B0 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanapafthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.291 of 2009 on the file of the Court of tf e Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the [t/arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5542 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR o SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.S82 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL t\ v IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.583 of 2025 G. Shiva, S/o. G. Ramulu, aged about 51 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUCIaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ..RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.236 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Nlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the [\4arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/ Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam *) tF4 HIGH COURT DATED;07 t08t2025 DECREE LfuAS.No.S83 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ \, IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.584 ol 2025 Between: Golla Kurmanna, S/o. Balaswamy, aged 53 years, Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict. Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Wanaparthy District. Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, ...Responde nURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.265 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: . 1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ;

2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies Sd/- SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR o SECTION OFFICER ,q- HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.S84 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL t, IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYPERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No ot 2025 Ganapuram Ramulu, S/o. Pentaiah, aged about 75 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair [/andal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, wanaparthy District ..RespondenuRespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.234 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V N/anohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies Sd/- SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER E* HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.S8S of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL ..I. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKTTI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.586 of 2025 Mamdapuram Balaiah, S/o. Late Krishnaiah, aged 65 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lifi lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.266 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR a SECTION OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:07fi81202s DECREE LAAS.No.586 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ - --,-ir IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKIT] RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.587 of Between: Kudukuntla Narayana, S/o. Ranganna, Aged 60 years, Occ: Agriculture, Fi/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.298 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER I HIGH COURT DATED i07lDgl2025 DECREE LAAS.No.SB7 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL J (, u\ \ '"1t!--i IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE srVerurn DAY oF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.588 of 2025 B. Gattaiah, S/o. Late Balaiah, aged 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. . ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.264 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V [trlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the lMarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// Sd/- SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s HIGH GOUTIT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.S88 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \A r,\,r IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.589 ot 2O25 Between Venkataiah, S/o. Nagaiah, Aged 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, wanaparthy District ...RespondenuRespondent . Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.274 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY//

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DEGREE LAAS.No.S89 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL "r b IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTIGE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.590 ot 2025 M. Mallaiah, S/o- Yelleswamy, aged 35 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.287 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam P I HIGH COURT DATED i0710812A25 DECREE LAAS.No.S9O of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.591 of 2025 Between: ' Sreenivasa Chary, s/o. Ranga Swamy, aged s3 years, occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.248 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the ft/arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY/ To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Sd/- SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED iOT 10812025 DEGREE LAAS.No.S91 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL t" ar\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.592 of 2025 Pedda Yellaiah, S/o. Balaiah, aged 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair [/landal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.292of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam D HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.S92 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \4 J IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.593 of 2025 M.Ram Gopal, S/o. Mallaiah, aged 40 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair [Vlandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.288 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Nr'larket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s HIGH GOURT DATED i0710,812025 DECREE LfuAS.No.S93 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ .l b IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.594 of 2025 Ramudu, S/o. Nagaiah, aged 51 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, wanaparthy District ..RespondenuRespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.275 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5542 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s) d- citr. HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.S94 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL h 9V il", IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST N/VO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.595 of 2O25 Raju, S/o. Rangaswamy, aged 42 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair [tIandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.303 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V lvlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5535 days in prefening the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.595 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL Lr 6N1"r IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRTSHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No. 596 of 2025 Golla Kurmanna, S/o China, Aged about 51 years, Occ: Agriculture, F/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair [Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.278 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V lvlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5535 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR o SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY//

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.596 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \^, \^ \\"( I I j ! i I I j I i IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH.DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.597 ot 2025 lvl.Satyanarayana, S/o. Matlaiah, aged 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUCtaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.2B2 of 2009 on the fite of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the lVlarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5535 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR & SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam {) HIGH COUI1T DATED i07 rc812025 DECREE LAAS.No.597 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL L^' u IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRTSHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.599 of 2025 Between: Janumpally Rami Reddy, s/o. Kista Reddy, aged about 63 years, occ: Agriculture, R,/o. Nagarala village, Pebbair Mandal, wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.228of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Nlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the l/arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. !. I : i Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY//

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s . ,. ..: i1,:r:i i?w71: ffiil,-i* ffi.B':.ii, F4 HIGH COURT DATED i071AA2025 DEGREE LfuAS.No.S99 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.600 ot 2025 Uppari Kudukuntla Krishnaiah, S/o. Thimmanna, aged 73 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, wanaparthy District ...RespondenuRespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-20 10 passed in O.P.No.297 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5535 days in prefening the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. SdL SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR o SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// 1 . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. fwo CD Copies To, Kam g 4E)* HIGH COURT DATED:07/f1812025 DECREE LAAS.No.600 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL & U .1"r IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.601 of 2025 G. Radha Krishna, S/o. Pedda Narsimha, aged about 51 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.240 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V f\/anohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the il/arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shatl be no oider as to cosis. Sd/- SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR a SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY//

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam g HIGH COUFIT DATED i07ltl8l2025 DECREE LAAS.No.601 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.602 ot 2025 Between: Golla fVlallaiah, S/o. Sherupally Balaiah, aged 55 years, Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair [t/andal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparlhy District ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.276 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V fVlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the [Vlarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+Z) tnan the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the detay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam g e- Ut+ HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.602 af 2025 ALLOWINGi THE APPEAL \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.603 of 2025 M.Mallaiah, S/o. Balaiah, aged 60 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.290 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies HIGH CO[-'RT DATED:07'10812025 DECREE LAAS.No.603 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.604 ot 2025 Golla Pentamma, W/o. Kistaiah, aged 85 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.289 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5535 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ,//TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHT JOINT REGISTRAR & SECTION OFFICER 'l . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s HIGH C URT' o DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.604 of 2025 ALLOWING'THE APPEAL \,1 I ! I I I I : ' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.605 of 2025 ftlallaiah, Sio. Bataiah, aged about 55 years, Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair [Vlandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.296 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V N/lanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the fi/arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s F4 HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.605 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL b IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TE AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINANO KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.606 of 2025 G. Venkataiah, S/o. G. Pedda Narsimha, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.239 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (t+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR & SECTION OFFICER HIGH COUR]T DATED:07/0A2A25 DECREE LAAS.No.606 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL q A\. \1( IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.607 of 2025 [/adugam Balaswamy, S/o. Krishnaiah, aged 63 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.269 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 0 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam d l/rpt 4t HIGH COUR-T DATED i07l0tll2025 DECREE LA/AS.No.607 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ i I I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.608 ot 2025 K.Mahender, S/o. K.Narayana, aged 37 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.300 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s HIGH COURT DATED i0710812025 DECREE LAAS.No.608 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY .No.609 of Madugani Shanthamma, W/o. Savaraiah, aged 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.2B3 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5535 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kamg HIGH COURT DATE D :07/0 812025 DECREE LAAS.No.609 of 2025 ALLOWING, THE APPEAL I I I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.610 of 2025 Between: Ramudu, S/o.Chinna Yellaiah, aged about 47 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair [Vlandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURes pondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.294 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5535 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR (e SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies . To, Kam HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.610 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSEAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.61 Between: Beechupally Goud, S/o. Sanjeeva Goud, aged 51 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, wanaparthy District' RespondenuRespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.253 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies F4 HIGH COUR'IT DATED:0710812025 DECREE LAAS.No.61 I of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.612 ot 2025 Between: G. Pedda Narasimha, S/o. Pentaiah, aged about 90 years, Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair [vlandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenUResponde nt Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.238 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the ft/arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with alt consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5542 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/ Sd/- SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s F4 HIGH COURT DATED i0710812025 DECREE LAAS.No.61 2 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL q ..4 b IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.613 of 2025 Narasimha Reddy, S/o Kista Reddy, Aged about 63 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair [Vlandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.242 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with att consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5542 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR GCTION OFFICER SE To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies e14 HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.613 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.614 of 2025 Between: Ganapuram Narasimha, S/o. Pentaiah, aged about 80 years, Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.237 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5542 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam *' HIGH COURT DATED:07/081202s DECREE LfuAS.No.G'fi 4 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ \/ b \"r \rt IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKIT] RAMAKRISHNA REODY Between: L.A.A.S.No.615 ol 2025 Ravi Chander Goud, S/o. Sanjeeva Goud, aged 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.252 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5542 days in prefening the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam g HIGH COURT DATED i07l08,l202s I i i I DECREE LAAS.No.615 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ '\l| IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S 1 of 20 Between: AND Sampath Kumar Reddy, S/o. Salwa Reddy, aged about 43 years, Occ: Agriculture, Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppeltanUClaimant The Special Dy. Collector, Raleev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in o.P.No.244 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5542 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies F4 HIGH GOURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.616 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ b IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.N0.617 of 2025 Between: Ganapuram Ashok, S/o. G. Ramulu, aged about 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.235 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5542 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR @ SECTION OFFICER 1 The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2 Two CD Copies To, Kam s HIGH COURT DATED iOT l08l202s DECREE LAAS.No.617 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \4 t \ ^K rN rHE HrGH couRr Fi$rtff^TirtE oF TELANGANA THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH-DAY OF AUGUST rwo rHousilro nxo TwENTY FlvE PRESENT rHE HoN',BLE sRl JUSrt"i,ff''NAND KUMAR sHAvlLl THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE VIXTTI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A'S'No'618 of 2025 i t i I Between: l.J.S.Chandraiah,(Claimant.No.2)DiedperL'RsAppellantsNo.gtol2 2. J. Nagann":3f i"[ ]'i g.n'ndiaiah' ased 4e vears' 3. J. savannr, ;; ;i; J s' chandraiah' aged 44 years' 4. J. Danaiah iii"Ol, tO'ed) pel L'R' Appeltants 13 5. J. S. Chanoiaiah, (ctaimant n\Ir.ui aiul,iqer !!s Appellants No'9 to 12 6. J.Sura s"yrnnu,'d/o'Cn'ndraiah' age 44 y9lls' 7 . J, Nagannr, s['late J- S_. Chandraiah aged 49 years' B. J. Danaiah ioi"o) per L'R' Appellants No'13 .^ 9. J. Nagann.l slo iate J' S' Chandraiah' aged 49 years' 10.J. Sryanna, s/o late J' S' Ctrandraiah' aged 44 years' 11.J. Anagyamma, w/o late J'S' Chandraiah' aged 63 years' 12.Smt, Chittemma, D/o'J'S'Chandraiah ' age 42 years' 13.Smt. Bhagyamma, W/o'Dhanaiah, age 39 Y!ap' R/o. Kanairrprii, ViUage of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy District' AND

1. The Special Deputy Collector, Rajiv Lift lnigation Scheme-Phase-ll, Pebbair' 2. Bethesta prarthani Mandiram, Represented by its President Sri' J. Naganna "APPellants/Glaimants 2 to 6 s/o Jammanna aged 50 Years,

3. N. Narsanna; s/o Bolaiah, aged 77 years, occupation. Agriculture, 4. N. Premaiah, s/o Narsaiah, aged 49 years, occupation. Agriculture, 5. Hr" Narasimha, s/o Chandraiah, aged 62 years, 6. Gopal, s/o Narsimha, aged 37 Years, 7. Suresh, slo Narsimha, aged 34 years, 8. J. Narsimha, s/o Naganna, aged 57 years, 9. Chennamma, w/o Prathap, aged 39 years, 10.J. Laxmi, D/o Narsimha, aged 31 years, 11.J. Alivela, w/o ftflanyam, aged 57 years, '12.J. Narender, s/o Manyam, aged 33 years, 13.J. Balaswamy, s/o Nouranna, aged 74year's, 14.J. Sreenivasulu, s/o Balaswamy, aged 38 years, 15.J. Venkataiah, s/o Balaiah, aged 52 years, 16.J. Arjun, s/o Venkataiah, aged 34 yeirs, 17.J. Shanthamma, w/o Savaraiah, aged 72years, 18. Dastagiri, slo Savaraiah, aged 31 years, &* HIGH COURT DATED:07101 12025 DECREE LAAS.No.618 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL I I I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REODY 2025 Between: Salva Reddy, S/o. Bal Reddy, aged about 80 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.243 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Kam s i).,;-/ -=-*ffiffi ^- HIGH COUR DATED iOT10812025 DECREE LAAS.No.620 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL L\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.621 of 2025 Between: Venkat Reddy, S/o. Kista Reddy, aged about 57 years, Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair [Vlandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.241 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the tr/arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /ffRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 0 SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Kam *) HIGH COURT DATE i0710812025 D DECREE LAAS.No.621 of 2A25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \^ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.622 of 2025 Between: Thirupathi Reddy, S/o. Sarva Reddy, aged 65 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. Appeat under Section 54 of Land Acquisitio" ;.T"rtfn?[*:',x,"?ff:1i:: and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.246 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/ Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Kam {) I HIGH COUR DATED:0710812025 DECREE LAAS.No.622 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.623 of 2025 Kurmaiah, s/o. chinna Yellaiah, aged 51 year, occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.293 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as foltows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the lVarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5541 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR ,4 SECTION OFFICER /TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Kam x9 HIGH COUR'il' DATED t07l0tll2025 DECREE LAAS.No.623 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ b IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.624 of 2025 Between: Kurmaiah, S/o. Balaiah, aged 53 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.256 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5534 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Kam Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR ..(7 SECTION OFFICER HIGH GOURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.624 of 2A25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ b IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRt JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.625 ot 2025 Between: Golla Shanthamma, Wo Mallaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase- ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act aggrieved by the order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P.No.27O of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellants and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5540 days in preferring the appeal, and

4. That there shall be no ordei as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. SHYLESHI JOINT REGISTRAR o SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Kam E HIGH COURT DATED:07/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.625 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL b

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments