The High Court · 2025

Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No. Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P. No.107 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Sarojamma, Wo. Ranga Reddy, Aged 74 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.648 ot 2O25 Appeal filed trnder Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P. No.66 ot 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Balaswamy Goud, S/o. Chandraiah Goud, Aged 79 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.649 ot 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P. No.59 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. M.Sudershan, S/o. Late Kistanna, Aged 54 years 2. M.Narayana, S/o. Late Kistanna, Aged 74 years 3. Bhagya Rekha, D/o. Sudershan, Aged 35 years AII are Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimants AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS .N Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in o.P. No.63 ot 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: K.Srinivasulu, S/o. Sawari, Aged 52 years, Occ. Agriculture, R:/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant -) AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS 5 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P.No.72 of 2O11 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: 'l . G.Balaswamy, S/o. Late Venkataiah, Aged 54 years 2. G.Kiran Kumar, S/o. Balaswamy, Aged 33 years Both are Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND ...Appel lants/Claimants The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P.No.S7 of 201'l on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Betvveen: 1 2 Ashoji Cheenaiah, S/o. Late Balaiah, Aged 61 years A.Shekharaiah, S/o. Chennaiah, Aged 34 years Appellant Nos.1 & 2 are Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparty District. AND

1. The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, phase-ll, pebbair, Appellants/Claimants Wanaparthy District.

2. A.Krishnaiah, S/o. Late Balaiah, Aged 52 years 3. A.Kurmaiah, S/o. Balaiah, Aged 59 years Respondent No's.2 & 3 Not Necessary Parties. Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparty District. counsel for the Appelrant: sri v. Manohar Rao "'Respondents/Respondents Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR APPEALS Counsel for the Respondents No.2 & 3: None Appeared L.A.A.S.No.653 of 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P.No.61 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: M.Venkatswamy, S/o. Late Chennaiah, Aged 76 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.654 of 2O25 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P.No.64 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: K.Padmamma, Wo. Varadha Rajulu, Aged 46 years, Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lifi lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counset for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L zlzti, Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P.No.60 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Janamma, Wo. Late Balaiah, Aged 69 years 2. Suresh, S/o. Late Balaiah, Aged 39 years Both are Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o. Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND ...Appel lants/Claimants The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS No.656 of Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated O7-O4-2O11 passed in O.P.No.65 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

1. Boya Balaiah, S/o. Late Laxmaiah, Aged 69 years 2. K.Bhagavanthu, S/o. Balaiah, Aged 44years 3. K.Anjaneyulu, S/o. Balaiah, Aged 22 years All are Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P.No.58 of 201 1 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. M.Saroja, Wo. Late Kistanna, Aged 74 years 2. M.Narayana, S/o. Late Kistanna, Aged 56 years 3. M.Sudarshan, S/o. Late Kistanna, Aged 54 years All are Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Glaimants D The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.658 ot 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-05-2011 passed in O.P.No.150 of 201l on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. M.Krishna Reddy, S/o. Mannepu Reddy, Aged 59 years 2. M.Govindu Reddy, S/o. Mannepu Reddy, Aged 49 years Both are Occ. Agriculture, Ri/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. o The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, wanaparthy District RespondenuRespondent ...Appellants/Claimants Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L. Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-05-201 1 passed in O.P.No.159 of 2011 on thefile of the Courtof the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. AND Between:

1. Kawali Sayamma @ Thulashamma, Wo. Late Ramanna, Aged 42 years 2. K. Varada Rajulu, S/o Balaiah, Aged 52 years, Both are Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o. Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..Appellants/Claimants The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FORAPPEALS S.No.660 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-201 1 passed in O.P.No.104 ol 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Venkataiah, S/o. Kistanna, Aged 59 years 2. Uppari Satyanna, S/o. Venkataiah, Aged 44 years 3. Rangaswamy, S/o. Venkataiah, Aged 39 years 4. Kurmanna, S/o. Venkataiah, Aged 33 years All are Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appel lants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.66 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.94 ot 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Golla Mogulaiah, S/o. Masanna, Aged 86 years 2. Bokkalaiah, S/o. Mogulaiah, Aged 45 years 3. Pedda Chittemma, D/o. Mogulaiah, Aged 50 years 4. Krishnaiah, S/o. Mogulaiah, Aged 46 years -1

5. Swamulu, S/o. Mogulaiah, Aged 39 years All are Occ: Agriculture, Fl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants D The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FOR L.A.A.S.No.662 ot 2O25 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.120 ot 2011 on the file of the Cou( of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Boya Kurmaiah, S/o. Chinthalaiah, Aged 50 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant D The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...Res Gounsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS 25 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-201 1 passed in O.P.No.85 ot 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at WanaParthY. Between: 1.7 2.7 3.7 4.r 5.7 6.7 7.7 8.7 .Devi Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged T4years .Raghava Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged 67 years .Santhosh Kumar Reddy, S/o. Raghava Reddy, Aged 42 years .Ugandher Reddy, S/o. Devi Reddy, Aged 46 years .Rajendher Reddy, S/o. Devi Reddy, Aged 30 years .Raghavender Reddy, S/o. Sudershan Reddy, Aged 23 years .Ashok Kumar Reddy, S/o. Thirupathi Reddy, Aged 19 years .Madhavi, D/o. Sudershan Reddy, Aged 24 years All are Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants -) AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll; Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.664 of 2O25 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-201 1 passed in O.P.No.79 of 201 1 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Yaparla Krishna Reddy, S/o. Siva Reddy, Aged 74 years 2. Vanajamma, Wo. Venkat Reddy, Aged 44 years 3. Rajitha, W/o. Rajavardhan, Aged 38 years All are Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.665 ol 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-201 1 passed in O.P.No.95 of 201 1 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 1 2 3 Golla Balakstaiah, S/o. Balaiah, Aged years Golla Kurmanna, S/o. Balakistaiah, Aged years Golla Chandrayudu, S/o. Balakistaiah, Aged years All are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent .Appellants/Claimants Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.99 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: 1 2 3 4 5 T.Krisha Reddy, Sio. Laxmi Reddy, Aged 85 years T.Devi Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged 76 years Sudershan Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged 66 years Megha Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged 56 years Thirupathi Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged 58 years All are Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants D The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L. . Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.B0 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Venkatamma, Wo. Late Mannepu. Reddy, Aged 76 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rt/o. Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURes Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. ManoharRao Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.668 ol 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 3'l-03-201 1 passed in O.P.No.86 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. T.Sai Reddy, S/o. Laxmi Reddy, Aged 86 years 2. T.Thirupathi Reddy, S/o. Sai Reddy, Aged 52 years 3. T.Satya Reddy, S/o. Sai Reddy, Aged 48 years All are Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent ...Appellants/Claimants Counsel forthe Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.669 of Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.87 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. T.Narsimha Reddy, S/o. Laxmi Reddy, Aged 70 years 2. Ranjith Kumar Reddy, S/o. T.Narsimha Reddy, Aged 46 years All are Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent ...Appellants/Claimants Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.670 ot 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.82 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Vangoor Anasuyamma, Wo. Late Laxmi Reddy, Aged 84 years 2. V.Muthyal Reddy, S/o. Laxmi Reddy, Aged 66 years 3. V.Bhasker Reddy, S/o. Laxmi Reddy, Aged 61 years All are Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND

1. The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, ...Appellants/Claimants Wanaparthy District.

2. V.Bala Krishna Reddy, S/o. Laxmi Reddy, 3. V.Ragahava Reddy, S/o. Balakrishna Reddy RR-2 and 3 Not Necessary Parties. Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. counsel for the Appellant: sri V. Manohar Rao "'Respondents/Respondents Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A. Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.154 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Komari Ammani, Wo. Peddaddula Balaiah, Aged 70 years 2. M.Laxmidevamma, Wo. Bal Ram, Aged 59 years 3. M.Anjaneyulu, S/o. Bal Ram, Aged 36 years All are Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A. of 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.10B of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. --) Between:

1. Golla Sayamma, S/o. Buchanna, Aged 79 years 2. M.Bokkalaiah, S/o. Buchanna, Aged 59 years Both are Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village Wanaparthy District. .Appellants/Claimants D The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.673 of 2O25 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-05-2011 passed in O.P.No.163 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy.

1. B.Manemma, Wo. Late Raghava Reddy, Aged 69 years 2. B.Hanmanth Reddy, S/o. Raghava Reddy, Aged 54 years 3. B.Ravinder Reddy, S/o. Raghava Reddy, Aged 49 years 4. B.Narasimha Reddy, Sio. Raghava Reddy, Aged 47 years 5. B.Anand Reddy, S/o. Raghava Reddy, Aged 45 years All are Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants D 1. The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District.

2. B.Gopal Reddy, S/o. Ranga Reddy, Aged 74 years R-2 Not Necessary Party Gounsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counse! forthe Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.674 ot 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.109 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Laxmi Devamma, Wo. Late Ranga Swamy, Aged 69 years 2. Yadla Anandamma, Wo. Balaiah, Aged 74 years 3. Vadla Srinivasa Chary, Wo. Ranga Swamy, Aged 51 years All are Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.675 ol 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-05-2011 passed in O.P.No.162 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. G.Prabhakar Reddy, S/o. Srinivas Reddy, Aged 59 years, Occ. Agriculture, Ri"/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. Jagadeeshwar Reddy, S/o. Srinivas Reddy, Aged 52 years Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Counsel forthe Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-201 1 passed in O.P.No.76 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: Venkat Reddy, S/o. Late Narayan Reddy, Aged 59 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L. Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P.No.7't of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Madugani Sailu, S/o. Chinna Gattaiah, Aged 64 years 2. M.Ramulu, S/o. Sayulu, Aged 39 years Both are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. D The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy Diskict. RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao ...Appellants/Claimants Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A,A.S.No.678 of 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated O7-O4-2O11 passed in O.P.No.68 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between:

1. Telugu Balamma, Wo. Late Ramudu, Aged 69 years 2. Telugu Poshanna, S/o. Late Ramudu, Aged 56 years Both are Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent ...Appellants/Claimants Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S.No.682 of 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decreedated 17-04-2012 passedinO.P.No.l3of 2O12 onthefileof theCourtof the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. ) Between:

1. Boya Bakka Pentaiah, s/o Munaiah, aged 75 years 2. Govardhan, S/o Pentaiah, aged 37 years, Occ. Agriculture and labour, Ri/o Kanayapally village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy district. ...AppettanUClaimant 28 & 29 AND

1. The Spl. Dy. Collector (LA), RLl.S. Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District 2. Alivelamma, W/o Gokaraiah, aged 33 years 3. Nakkalatelugu Dhulamma, W/o Naganna aged 55 years 4. Pedda Giranna, S/o Naganna aged 30 years 5. Chinna Giranna, S/o Naganna aged 28 years 6. Baja Boya Giranna, S/o Masanna aged 65 years 7. Bqa Boya Ramulamma, Wo Masanna aged 65 years 8. Baja Bandenna, S/o Kistanna aged 55 years 9. Chennamma, W/o Jamanna aged 75 years 10. Boya thokala Pentanna, S/o Naganna aged 50 years 'l l.Thokala Manyam, S/o Chinna Naganna aged 45 year l2.Thokala Chandramma, W/o Kurmanna aged 60 years l3.Shanthaiah, S/o Pedda Laxmanna aged 70 years 14.Satyamma, W/o Narayana aged 43 years 15.Yellamma, S/o Buchanna aged 70 years 16.Boya Giramma, Wo Shanthanna aged 30 years '1 7. Thokala Krishnaiah, S/o Masanna aged 65 years lS.Thokala Pentaiah, S/o Naganna aged 50 years 19. Thokala Munenna, S/o Giranna aged 70 years 20.Thokala Nadipanna, S/o Balaiah aged 65 years 21 .Boya Thokala Munenna, S/o Giranna aged 70 years 22.f hokala Boya Ramulu, S/o Munenna aged 37 years 23. Thokala Boya Venkataiah, S/o Bhagavanth aged 37 years 24.Thokala Boya Srinu, S/o Bhagavanth aged 45 years 25.Bakka Giranna, S/o Hanumanth aged 35 years 26.Bakka Laxmaiah, S/o Hanumanth aged 40 years 27.Bakka Giranna, S/o Hanumanth aged 35 years 28.Bakka Laxmaiah, S/o Hanumanth aged 40 years (R.2 to R.28 are not necessary parties) ...RespondenUClaimants Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS L.A.A.S. 2025 Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 20-03-2013 passed in O.P.No.406 ol 2012 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. ) Between: Daramoni Chityala Ramulu, s/o Subani, aged 35 years, Occupation. agricultural, Rl/O Kanayapally village of Kothakota Mandal Mahabubnagar District. AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 17-04-2012 passed in O.P.No.14 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. Between: '1. Boya Masamma, Wo Chandraiah aged 70 years 2. Yadagiri Telugu Laxmaiah, S/o Kistanna aged 43 years 3. Yadagiri Sriramulu, S/o Kistanna aged 46 years 4. Sree Ramulu, s/o Kistanna aged 47 years 5. T. Chinna Savaraiah, S/o Kotha Naganna aged 67 years 6. K. Sreedhar, s/o Chinna Savaraiah aged 35 years 7. k.Shivaiah, s/o Chinna Savaraiah aged 31 years 8. Boya E Gokaraiah, S/o Mashanna aged 47 years 9. Boya E.Venkataiah, S/o Mashanna aged 35 years 10.Boya E.Ravikumar, S/o Shanthanna aged 28 years 11. Nakka Golla Venkatanna, s/o Chandraiah aged 75 years '12. G. Shekar Goud, S/o G. Bichanna Goud aged 40 years 13.G. Ediga Sarojamma, Wo Buchanna Goud aged 80 years 14.Shekar Goud, S/o Buchanna Goud aged 40 years 15. Radha, Wo Shekar Goud aged 33 years Occ. Agriculture and labour, Kanayapally village of Kothakota Mandal, Mahaboobnagar district. ...AppellanUClaimant No.1 to 3,5,7,10&11,18 to 20,26 to 30 AND

1. The Special Deputy Collector (LA), Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase ll Pebbair, Mahaboobnagar District.

2. Yatagiri Jamanna, S/o Thirupathaiah aged 50 years 3. Y. Chinna Naganna, s/o Dastagiri aged 65 years 4. T. Pedda Sawaraiah, s/o Naganna aged Tlyears 5. Kothapedda Kurmaiah, S/o Kistaiah aged 70 years 6. K.Narasimha, Vo Chinna Savaraiah aged 37 years 7. R.Ramakrishnareddy, S/o,Venkatreddy aged 65 years 8. R.Venkatrangareddy, S/o Venkatreddy aged 67 years 9. Ravula Sudharshanreddy, S/o Venkatreddyaged 61 years 10. R.Chandrashekar Reddy, S/o Venkatreddy aged 61 years 11. R.Yugenderreddy, S/o Venkatreddy aged 56 years -)

12. Nakka Shanthaiah, Sio Peddaswamy aged 45 years 1 3. Yerukali Balakistamma, W/o Late Y. Ramulu aged 55 years l4.Yerukali Giranna, S/o Late Yerukali Ramulu aged 35 years 15. Enigla Sree Ramulu, S/o Chinna Swamy aged 53 years 16.Nakka Karremma, W/o Chandraiah aged 70 years ...Respondents/Claimants ( R.2 to R.16 are not necessary parties ) Counsel forthe Appellant: Sri V. Manohar Rao Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR APPEALS The Court delivered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT I \ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE I{ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITT RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S. Nos.626 - 627. 62a. 629, 630,631. 632.633- 634- 635. 636, 6?2: 64/9. 64L:642,. 643. 644,645. 646. 647. 6!8. 649. 650 660 661 662.663- 664- 665. 666- 667. 668. 669. 670.67L.672- 673. 674- 675. 676. 677- 678. 6A2.683 and 684 OF 2O2S 656 657 652 653 1 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per ttLe I lorr'ble Sn Juslrce AbttirLartd Klttutr Slnuiti) When the matters are taken up for hearing, learned counscl appearing for the appellants had informed the Courl that the issue involved in the present Appeals is squarely covered by the common judgment, dated

29.04.2025, rendered by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.57 oi 2024 &, batch and following the said conlmon .judgment, Lhe prcsent Appeals aiso deserves to be allowed.

2. Learned Government Pleader for Appeals appearing for the respondent-Special Deputy Collector did not dispute the said fact.

3. In view of the same, all these appeals are allowed following the common judgmenL, dated 29.O4.2025, rendered by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.57 ol 2024 & batch, r) arld the' market varue is enhanced by t,uvo more times (r+2) ttrein t'e 'arue fixed by the Land Acquisition orficer w,ith all conscquentiar rrcnefirs. I{owevcr-, it is nradc clear that thc appcilants are not cr-rtitreci to interest tor thc deray period in preferrir-rg the appeals. Therc shall be no order as to costs. Miscelianeous petitior-rs, i[ any, pending sha, stand clcsed. //TRUE COPYII Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6SECTION OFFICER I

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. (with records, if any) 2. One CC to Sri V. Manohar Rao, Advocate IOPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP FOR APPEALS ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies To, HIGH COURT DATED:1910812025 iHE S .J Z 0 ti[u ?025 *- COMMON JUDGMENT+ 54 DECREE'S LAAS. Nos: 626. 627. 628. 629. 630. 63 . 632. 633. 634. 635. 636. 639- 640. 641 tE 657 6F1T I'Fd] 646 647 6rp) 661 683 and 684of2O25 67 1 67 LLOWING THE APPEALS HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINANID KUMAR SHAVTLI AI\D HON'BI E SMTJUSTICE TIRUMAI-ADEVI EADA L.A.A.S.Nos.57, 81 and 124 OF 2024 COMMON JUDGMENT i (Per Hon'bb Jwtiee Abbinand Ktnar Shatit) When the matters afe taken up for hearing, learned counsel appeartng for the appellants had informed this Court that the issue raised in these Appeals is squarely covered by the iudgment, dated

27.01,.2025, passed by this Court in L.A.A.S.No.49 of 2024. Learned counsel had further contended that L.A.A.S.No.49 of 2024 was filed by claimant No.26 in O.P.No.91 of 201'4, dated

03.10.2018 and the appellants herein other claimants in ^re O.P.No.91 of 201,4. Therefore, similar order be passed in these appeals also. Learned counsel had further contended that I-AAS No.49 of 2024 was disposed of by relying on a Division Bench judgment of this Court in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 201,5 and batch, dated 27.09.2022, whercby the market value of the land acquired therein was enhanced by two more times than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer with all consequential benefits, 2 however, for the delay period in preferring the appeals, the claimants are riot entided for any interest.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants had further contended that the judgment, dated 27.09.2022 passed in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 201,5 and batch was also confirmed by the Apex Court in S.L.P.(Civil)No.28925 of 2024, dated 17.09.2024. Therefore, the present appeals can also be disposed of in terms of the judgment, dated 27 .01,.2025 passed in L.A.A.S.No.49 of 2024.

5. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the 1..' respondent-Land Acquisition Officer had contended that the purpose of acquiring lands of appellants is for Ryalampadu Balancing Reservoir under Jawahar Lift Irrigation Project and Priyadarshi Jurala Project and G.O.Ms.No.234, dated 15.10.1993 and G.O.Ms.No.291, dated 05.08.1982 arc not applicable to the said irrigation projects. Therefore, all the appeals are liable to be dismissed. 3

4. Having considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is of the view that the Division Bench of this Court in L.A.A.S.No.2 of 201,6, dated 27 .09.2022 and L.A.A.S.No.4 of 201.6, dated 1.5.A9.2022 held that the said G.Os. are applicable for all the Irrigation Projects, and though the said G.Os. were issued specifically for Srisailam Hydro Power Projects. L.4.4.S.No.1.25 of 201,5 and batch, dated 27.09.2022 and L.A.A.S.No.4 of 2076, dated 15.09.2022 werc allowed and the market value was enhanced by nvo more times than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer. Aggrieved by the order, dated

27.09.2022, in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 201.5 and batch, the State has carried the matter to the Apex Court by filing S.L.P.(Civil).No. 28925 of 2024 and the Apex Court uide order, dated 17.09.2024, confirmed the order passed by the Division Bench of this court in L.A.A.S.No.1,25 of 201,5 and batch. Therefore, the present appeals can also be disposed of in tems of the judgment, dated 27 .09.2022, passed in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 2015 and batch. 4

5. Accordingly, all the appeals are allowed by following the judgment, dated 27.09.2022, passed in L.A.A.S.No.125 of 201'5 and batch, and the market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer with all consequential benefits. However, the appellants are not entided for interest for the delay period in preferring the appeals. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in these appeals shall stand closed. JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Date:29.04.2025 Note: R.gr.try to annex copy of the iudgment dated 27 .09.2022 In LAAS No.125 of 2015. (B.o) rkk/Pnr t'--' j [ 34e0 ] IN TI-IE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.626 of 2025 Between: Golla Naganna, S/o. Gattaiah, aged 57 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURes pondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.ACt, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P. No.263 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP forAppeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5540 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To,

1. The Senior CivilJudge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR o SECTION OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:1 9/0 812025 DECREE LA/AS.No.626 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ ,a'l{'t1i r :ri:li- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD [ 34e0 I TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.N0.627 ot 2O25 Between: Chakali Naramma, W/o. Late Krishnaiah, aged 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ..AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P. No.258 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value 3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. period of 5540 days in preferring the appeal; and //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies Kam Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED i1910812025 DECREE LAAS.No.627 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ .! , ,f{Eti-:r,.'Sv IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD [ 34e0 J TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No of 2O25 Between: K.Dharmendhar, s/o. Narayana, Aged 40 years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Villag e, Pebba ir fr/ancJal, Wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURes pondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P. No.299 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2- That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+z) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits; 3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. period of 5540 days in preferring the appeal; and //TRUE COPYII Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies To, Kamg HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.628 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL -A IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD [ 34eo I TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.629 of 2025 Between: Golla Laxmi Devamma, W/o. Nagaiah, aged 67 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rio. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P. No.273 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5540 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPYII Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies Kam w HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.629 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL ,t\ ..*]L. .' 65:-"- ^ '. .1" IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD [ 34e0 I TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.630 of 2025 Between: Niranjan, S/o. Narasimha, aged 52 years, Occ: Agriculture, R!/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P. No.259 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior CivilJudge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V [Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5540 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:1910812025 DECREE LAAS.No.630 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD [ 34e0 I TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L. A.A.S.No.631 of 2025 Golla Pedda Yellaiah, S/o Balaiah, Aged about 70 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. . ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P. No.279 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior CivilJudge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5540 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRARc SECTION OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.631 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL J\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TE A AT HYDERABAD [ 34901 TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.632 ot 2025 Between: K.Ganga Sagar, S/o. K. Narayana, aged 34 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenuRespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P. No.301 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V l\4anohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Marftet value is enhanced by two more times (1 +2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5540 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /ffRUE COPY// SdI R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.632 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD t 34e01 TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.633 Chakali Kashamma, Wo. Yellaiah, aged about 83 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict ...Appe I la n UCla im a nt AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, phase- , pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in o.P. No.230 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entifled to interest for the delay period of 5540 days in prefening the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /ffRUE COPY// Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, Kam '1 . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies .: HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.633 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ \\ [ 34901 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.634 ot2O25 Between: Radhamma, D/o. Ranganna, aged 33 years, Occ: Agriculture, FVo. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ... Appe lla nUC lai m ant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...Res pondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P. No.305 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 552() days in prefening the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to @sts. /,TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER 1 . The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Karn *> HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.634 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL J IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD [ 3490 ] TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRt JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.635 ot 2025 Between: V. Satyanarayana Reddy, S/o. Ratna Reddy, aged 70 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-2010 passed in O.P. No.271 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5540 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR a SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.635 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ -I [ 34e0 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.636 oI 2025 Between: Chakali Galanna, S/o. Gattaiah, aged about 95 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appe llanUClaim a nt AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 03-03-201O passed in O.P. No.229 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. Thal the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1 +2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5536 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Karn v HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.636 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ J ( IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD [ 34e0 ] TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRTSHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.639 of 2025 Between: G. Ratnamma, W/o. Narayan Reddy, Aged 74 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P. No.7B of 2O11 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the l\rlarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.639 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL t\ $ , |,. .,.,; 1,,--- :-- 4 'q IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD [ 34e0 l TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.640 of 2025 Between:

1. Yaparla Krishna Reddy, S/o. Siva Reddy, Aged 74 years 2. Vanajamma,Wlo. Venkat Reddy, Aged 44 years 3. Rajitha, W/o. Rajavardhan, Aged 38 years AII are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimants AND The Special Dy.Collector. Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P. No.77 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.640 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ [ 34e0 l IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.641 ot 2025 Between: Bala Kistanna, S/o. Ashanna, Aged 64 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppeilanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 3'l-03-2011 passed in O.P. No.'103 ot 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the . value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 51 50 days in prefening the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To, Karn

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.641 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL J. IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.642 of 2025 Between: Golla Balamma, W/o. Ashanna, Aged 74 years, Occ: Agrficulture, R/o.Nagarala Vitlage of Pebbair [/andal, Wanaparthy District. AND \' "'APPellanUClaimant The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. - Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P. No.105 of 2O11 on the file the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. pondent the Order and Court of \ ...Res This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the [t/larket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6- SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:1 910812025 DECREE LAAS.No.642 ot 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL ,,,---._.-.-':Fr1.-^f IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No of 2O25 Between:

1. T.Krisha Reddy, S/o.Laxmi Reddy, Aged 85 years 2. T.Devi Reddy, S/o.Krishna Reddy, Aged 62 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimants AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P. No.98 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the fi{arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies -Iq,;:- HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.643 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE N{NETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.N0.644 of 2025 Between: Venkataiah, S/o. Ashanna, Aged 54 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o, Nagarala Village of Pebbair fi/andal, Wanaparthy. District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P. No.102 of 2O11 on the file'of the Courtof the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This C-ourt doth Order and Decree as fotlows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR a SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam 9 HIGH COURT DATED i19l0Bl2025 DECREE LAAS.No.644 of 2025 ALLOWING TH,E APPEAL J [ 34e0 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.645 of 2025 Between:

1. B.Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. Janardhan Reddy, Aged 59 years 2. B.Surya Kala, W/o. B.Bhasker Reddy, Aged 52 years 3. V.Shyam Sunder Reddy, Sio. Ram Reddy, Aged 36 years 4. B.Venkateshwaramma, D/o. B.Bhasker Reddy, Aged 39 years 5. B.Sumalatha, D/o. B.Bhasker Reddy, Aged 35 years All are Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P. No.97 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the [Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits; -,u Frlr-.*-=;' ,//,/ ,/ =Zd

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// , Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies

9. !-,: 4,€ HIGH COURT DATED:1910812025 DECREE LAAS.No.645 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ l [ 34e01 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKR]SHNA REDDY A.S.No.646 ol 2O25 Rameshwararnma, Wo. Nagaraju, Aged 51 years, Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o. Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P. No.62 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5145 days in preferring the appeal; and 'rT

4. That there shalt be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER Kam v *,iii,B* '..-t.:.! - . t T": "7 HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.646 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL t^ i I i i I i I I i i I I i I I : i i I I . ..,..:, ".._.:*a [ 34e0 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.647 of 2025 Sarojamma, Wo. Ranga Reddy, Aged 74 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair ft/andal, Wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...Res pondenUResponde nt Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P. No.107 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5158 days in preferring the appeal; and - i:.aii-; .U,t'7

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPYII Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam P : I .l d ..ji1ryhF,,,,,,,,,,,,,. :6* tu HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/202s DECREE LAAS.No.647 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [ 34e0 I i PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.648 ot 2025 Between: Balaswamy Goud, S/o. Chandraiah Goud, Aged 79 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarata Village of Pebbair firlandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUGlaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated O7-O4-2O11 passed in O.P. No.66 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Mlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the \, value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5145 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/ Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.648 of 2A25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ J IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVTLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No. 649 of 2025 Between:

1. ft/.Sudershan, S/o. Late Kistanna, Aged 54 years 2. [t/.Narayana, S/o. Late Kistanna, Aged 74 years 3. Bhagya Rekha, D/o. Sudershan, Aged 35 years All are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..AppellanUClaimants AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P. No.59 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5145 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam v lEr €5 HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.649 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL $ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.650 ot 2025 Between: K.Srinivasulu, S/o. Sawari, Aged 52 years, Occ. Agriculture, RL/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P. No.63 ol 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: '1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5145 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies 5>- HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No,650 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ J IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.651 ot 2025 Between:

1. G.Balaswamy, S/o. Late Venkataiah, Aged 54 years 2. G.Kiran Kumar, S/o. Balaswamy, Aged 33 years Both are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair [Vlandal, Wanaparthy District ..Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev l-ift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. Appeat filed under section 54 ofthe 1.A.A",, ,;#i""r::"ffifl58i:?i"*' decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P.No.72 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2J than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5148 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies u, d' HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LA/4S.No.651 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL ..1\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY,OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY TIVF,

1. Ashoji Cheenaiah, S/o. Late Balaiah, Aged 61 years 2. A.Shekharaiah, S/o. Chennaiah, Aged 34 years Appellant Nos.1 & 2 are Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparty District. ...Appellants/Claimant5 AND

1. The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District.

2. A.Krishnaiah, S/o. Late Balaiah, Aged 52 years 3. A.Kurmaiah, S/o. Balaiah, Aged 59 years Respondent No's.2 & 3 Not Necessary Parties. Ri/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparty District. Appear rired under Section 54 or the ..^.^":i:;H::T"l["'#::1: decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P.No.S7 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent No.1 and Nbne Appeared for Respondents No.2 & 3. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. period of 5145 days in preferring the appeal; and //TRUE COPYII To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies - Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER ist -i :.-'/ . ' :- , :. F* HIGH GOURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LA/AS.No.652 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL U\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.653 of 2025 Between: M.Venkatswamy, S/o. Late Chennaiah, Aged 76 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, wanaparthy District ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L,A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated Ol-O4-2011 passed in O.P.No.61 of 2011 on the fite of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at WanaParthY. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V lvlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the tviarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2\ than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5145 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. I/TRUE COPY/ Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.653 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ {\ ,K IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.654 ot 2025 Between: K.Padmamma, Wo. Varadha Rajulu, Aged 46 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P.No.64 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5145 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies -< HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.654 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY .No.655 Between:

1. Janamma, Wo. Late Balaiah, Aged 69 years 2. Suresh, S/o. Late Balaiah, Aged 39 years Both are Occ: Agriculture, R|/o. Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ,..Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy.Collector, Raieev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. '..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in o.P.No.60 of 2011 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. v Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5145 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no orderas to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR & SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD CoPies HIGH COURT DATED:1 9/08/2025 -F-. DECREE LAAS.No.655 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ J. T IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.656 ot 2025 Between:

1. Boya Balaiah, S/o. Late Laxmaiah, Aged 69 years 2. K.Bhagavanthu, S/o. Balaiah, Aged 44 years 3. K.Anjaneyulu, S/o. Balaiah, Aged 22 years All are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Clai mants AND The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P.No.65 of 2O11 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5145 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR6 SECTION OFFIGER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam g *4 HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.656 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE I i ; PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.657 of 2025 Between:

1. [Vl.Saroja, W/o. Late Kistanna, Aged 74 years 2. M.Narayana, S/o. Late Kistanna, Aged 56 years 3. M.Sudarshan, S/o. Late Kistanna, Aged 54 years All are Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-l!, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P.No.SB of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior CivilJudge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V fvlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5145 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies 9-d HIGH COURT DATED:1 9/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.657 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL .A IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY : i l Between:

1. M.Krishna Reddy, S/o. Mannepu Reddy, Aged 59 years 2. M.Govindu Reddy, S/o. Mannepu Reddy, Aged 49 years Both are Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-05-2011 passed in O.P.No.150 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5091 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be noorderasto costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R, KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:1 9/08/2025 DECREE LtuAS.No.658 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.659 of 2025 Between:

1. Kawali Sayamma @ Thulashamma, Wo. Late Ramanna, Aged 42 years 2. K. Varada Rajulu, S/o Balaiah, Aged 52 years, Both are Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appel lants/Claim ants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-05-2011 passed in O.P.No.159 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2'1than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with atl consequential benefits; 3. fnaiG appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delav 4. That there shall be no order as to costs' period of SOgt days in preferring the appeal; and //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRARo SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanapafthy' 2. Two CD CoPies To, Kamg e1 HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.GS9 of ZOZ1 ALLOWING THE APPEAL t\ ,rf \ 1\ \ I I : i i I ) l IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.660 of 2025 Between:

1. Venkataiah, S/o. Kistanna, Aged 59 years 2. Uppari Satyanna, S/o. Venkataiah, Aged 44 years 3. Rangaswamy, S/o. Venkataiah, Aged 39 years 4. Kurmanna, S/o. Venkataiah, Aged 33 years All are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenUResponde nt Appeal fited under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-201 1 passed in O.P.No.104 of 2O11 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferr,ing the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR .a (-/ SECTION OFFTCER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s *a HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LA/4S.No.660 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKIT] RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.661 of 2O25 Between:

1. Golla Mogulaiah, S/o. Masanna, Aged 86 years 2. Bokkalaiah, S/o. Mogulaiah, Aged 45 years 3. Pedda Chittemma, D/o. Mogulaiah, Aged 50 years 4. Krishnaiah, S/o. Mogulaiah, Aged 46 years 5. Swamulu, S/o. Mogulaiah, Aged 39 years All are Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-201 1 passed in O.P.No.94 of 2011 on the file of the Courtof the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. ,/TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.661 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINANO KUMAR SHAVILI D THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY .No.662 25 Boya Kurmaiah, S/o. Chinthalaiah, Aged 50 R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal' Wanaparthy years, Occ. Agriculture, District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenUResPondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2ol 1 passed in O.P.No.120 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 1 . That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the valuefixedbytheLandAcquisitionofficer,withallconsequential benefits;

3.Thattheappellantbeandherebyisnotentitledtointerestforthedelay period of 51 52 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /ITRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy' 2. Two CD CoPies HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.662 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ I ; : I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.663 of 2025 Between:

1. T.Devi Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged T4years 2. T.Raghava Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged 67 years 3. T.Santhosh Kumar Reddy, S/o. Raghava Reddy, Aged 42years 4. T.Ugandher Reddy, S/o. Devi Reddy, Aged 46 years 5. T.Rajendher Reddy, S/o. Devi Reddy, Aged 30 years 6. T.Raghavender Reddy, S/o. Sudershan Reddy, Aged 23 years 7. T.Ashok Kumar Reddy, S/o. Thirupathi Reddy, Aged 19 years 8. T.Madhavi, D/o. Sudershan Reddy, Aged 24 years All are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... Res pondenURes pondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.8S of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits; .rr.7

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. 'That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER i 5* HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.663 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL h IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.664 of 2025 Between: 1 . Yaparla Krishna Reddy, S/o. Siva Reddy, Aged 74 years 2. Vanajamma, W/o. Venkat Reddy, Aged 44 years 3. Rajitha, W/o. Rajavardhan, Aged 38 years All are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..APPellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.79 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. I This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Gourt doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. 'That there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies J : -ri.rirr,!,st. .. .f1:'r HIGH COURT DATE D: 1 910812025 DECREE LfuAS.No.664 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUST]CE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.665 of 2025 Between: 'l . Golla Balakstaiah, S/o. Balaiah, Aged years 2. Golla Kurmanna, S/o. Balakistaiah, Aged years 3. Golla Chandrayudu, S/o. Balakistaiah, Aged years All are Occ. Agriculture, Fl/o.Nagarala Village Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.9S of 201 1 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam $y i.::'qtr.{E**.,, :i r. e{. .rF-ii:r --t f:'' ' i , HIGH COURT DATED i1910812025 DECREE LAAS.No.665 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ .r( IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.666 ot 2025

1. T.Krisha Reddy, S/o. Laxmi Reddy, Aged 85 years 2. T.Devi Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged 76 years 3. Sudershan Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged 66 years 4. Megha Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged 56 years 5. Thirupathi Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged 58 years All are Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-201 1 passed in O.P.No.99 ot 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 't. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits; appellant be and hereby is not entifled to interest for the delay 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and : shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Tlvo CD Copies To, Kam w I HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.666 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL J IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.667 of 2025 Venkatamma, w/o. Late fi/annepu. Reddy, Aged 76 years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... Res pondenUResponde nt Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 3'1-03-201 1 passed in O.P.No.80 of 2011 on the file oi the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal,-the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V [Vlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay 4. That there shall be no order as to costs. period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and //TRUE COPY/ Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR & SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DEGREE LAAS.No.667 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL L\ J IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHTNAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.668 of 2025

1. T.Sai Reddy, S/o. Laxmi Reddy, Aged 86 years 2. T.Thirupathi Reddy, S/o. Sai Reddy, Aged 52 years 3. T.Satya Reddy, S/o. Sai Reddy, Aged 48 years All are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair fr/andal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appe I lants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.86 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V fvlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+z) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with alr consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/ Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s 't $ :. ir .,,:r:i a'#.'1# 'i:i, '!t ,.I ,l HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.668 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL $ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No. 669 of 2025

1. T.Narsimha Reddy, S/o. Laxmi Reddy, Aged 70 years 2. Ranjith Kumar Reddy, S/o. T.Narsimha Reddy, Aged 46 years All are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Speciat Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieveci by the Order and decree dated 31-03-201 1 passed in O.P.No .87 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. \r' This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the lt/arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and ':: iil:,.1 l4-:+:;'g

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam & ' " - i.: 'i;+ltEltilgn. r;i -ri' _:...'1T..'' " . , ]]:, : : | /-.'; HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.669 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.670 of 2025 Between:

1. Vangoor Anasuyamma, Wo. Late Laxmi Reddy, Aged 84 years 2. V.Muthyal Reddy, S/o. Laxmi Reddy, Aged 66 years 3. V.Bhasker Reddy, S/o. Laxmi Reddy, Aged 61 years All are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair lt/andal, Wanaparthy District. ..Appellants/Claimants AND

1. The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District.

2. V.Bala Krishna Reddy, S/o. Laxmi Reddy, 3. V.Ragahava Reddy, S/o. Balakrishna Reddy RR-2 and 3 Not Necessary Parties. R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District Appear rired under section 54 or the L.A.A",;'i??L?::T'{["=ffi::'*T decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.82 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the tVlarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+z) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. /TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam $y 'l HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.670 of 2025 ALLOWING THE AP D IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.671 ot 2025 Between:

1. Komari Ammani, Wo. Peddaddula Balaiah, Aged 70 years 2. M.Laxmidevamma, Wo. Bal Ram, Aged 59 years 3. M.Anjaneyulu, S/o. Bal Ram, Aged 36 years All are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy Diskict. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.154 ot 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for ApBeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows: 'l . That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5152 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam & .,i-+t,i,,ia :,r HIGH COURT DATED:1 9/08/2025 DECREE LA/AS.No.671 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL r1 J r\ {' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITT RAMAKRTSHNA REDDY L'A'A's'No'672 of 2025 Between:

1. Golla Sayamma, S/o. Buchanna, Aged 7g years 2. M.Bokkalaiah, S/o. Buchanna, Aged 59 years Both are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Clai m ants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-tl, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.108 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5152 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LA,/AS.No.672 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL t\ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No. 673 of 2025 Between:

1. B.fManemma, Wo. Late Raghava Reddy, Aged 69 years 2. B.Hanmanth Reddy, S/o. Raghava Reddy, Aged 54 years 3. B.Ravinder Reddy, S/o. Raghava Reddy, Aged 4g years 4. B.Narasimha Reddy, S/o. Raghava Reddy, Aged 4l years 5. B.Anand Reddy, Sio. Raghava Reddy, Aged 45 years All are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ..Appellants/Claimants AND

1. The Special Dy.Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District.

2. B.Gopal Reddy, S/o. Ranga Reddy, Aged 14years R-2 Not Necessary Party Appear rired under section 54 or the L.A A.,: '[??ffi:jTJ"l["'d,.l:1"Jnt; decree dated 31-05-2011 passed in O.P.No.163 of 2011 onthe file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5091 days in preferring the appeal; and .. . i' -:,.: {d . 44-rFy/ / ,,,/ -

4. That there shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam V 'Tq i..a '?" . --11 2* i: HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 DECREE LAAS.No.673 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ ..rt I i I i I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.674 of 2025 Between:

1. Laxmi Devamma, Wo. Late Ranga Swamy, Aged 69 years 2. Vadla Anandamma, Wo. Balaiah, Aged T4 years 3. Vadla Srinivasa Chary, Wo. Ranga Swamy, Aged 51 years All are Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...Appellants/Claimants AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-lt, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-2011 passed in O.P.No.109 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Mlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5152 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPYII To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR C SECTION OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 E,-. DECREE LAAS.No.674 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL r\ rN rHE H|GH couTfSI"rJl="BlTE oF TELANGANA TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.675 of 2025 Between:

1. G.Prabhakar Reddy, S/o. Srinivas Reddy, Aged 59 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

2. Jagadeeshwar Reddy, S/o. Srinivas Reddy, Aged 52 years Occ. Agriculture, FVo.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, ...Appellants/Claimants Wanaparthy District. ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the C)rder and decree dated 31-05-2011 passed in O.P.No.162of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal corning on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appetlant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more tirnes (1+2\ than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the detay period of 5091 days in preferring the appeat; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s +rr !.:.i:r..r:,,i.,+r:rilrlE+:rl. . HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 PE DECREE LAAS.No.675 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAI. \A IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD ; TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.676 of 2025 venkat Reddy, s/o. Late Narayan Reddy, Aged 5g years, occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of Pebbair Mandal, wanaparthy District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lnigation Scheme, Phase-lt, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ...RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 31-03-201 1 passed in O.P.No.76 of 2A11 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for: the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as foilows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5150 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam s HIGH COURT DATED t1910812025 DECREE LAAS.No.676 of 2O25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE VAKTTI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.677 of 2025 Between AND

1. Madugani Sailu, S/o. Chinna Gattaiah, Aged 64 years 2. [M.Ramulu, S/o. Sayulu, Aged 3g years Both are Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village Wanaparthy District. of Pebbair [Vlandal, ...Appellants/Claimants The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-tl, pebbair, Wanaparthy District ... RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Oider and decree dated 07-04-2011 passed in O.P.No.71 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V Manohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+Z) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5145 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY/ To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER &e HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.677 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL J -"te!...t- --' t -.- i ..-: .-:---t.;re o IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITT RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between L.A.A.S.No.678 of 2025 Telugu Balamma, W/o. Late Ramudu, Aged 6g years Telugu Poshanna, S/o. Late Ramudu, Aged 56 years Both are occ. Agriculture, R/o.Nagarala Village of pebbair [Vlandal, Wanaparthy District ..Appellants/Claimants 1 2 AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. Appeal fited under section 54 of the L.A.Act, ,;$;""::"ffifl56[:li"# decree dated 07'04-2011 passed in O.P.No.6B of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment,and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V lvlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appetlant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as foilows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appeltant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 5145 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER Are 4 HIGH GOURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LAAS.No.678 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ ,l IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGTJST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.682 of 2025 Between:

1. Boya Bakka Pentaiah, s/o Munaiah, aged 75 years 2. Govardhan, S/o Pentaiah, aged 37 years, Occ. Agriculture and labour, R/o Kanayapally village of Kothakota Mandal, Wanaparthy district. ...AppellanUClaimant 28 & 29 AND

1. The Spl. Dy. Collector(LA), RLl.S. Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District 2. ,Alivelamma, Wo Gokaraiah, aged 33 years 3. Nakkalatelugu Dhulamma, W/o Naganna aged 55 years 4. Pedda Giranna, S/o Naganna aged 30 years 5. Chinna Giranna, S/o Naganna aged 28 years 6. Baja Boya Giranna, S/o [Vlasanna aged 65 years 7. Baja Boya Ramulamma, W/o fi/asanna aged 65 years 8. Baja Bandenna, S/o Kistanna aged 55 years 9. Chennamma, Wo Jamanna aged 75 years 10. Boya thokala Pentanna, Sio Naganna aged 50 years l l.Thokala Manyam, S/o Chinna Naganna aged 45 year l2.Thokala Chandramma, W/o Kurmanna aged 60 years 13. Shanthaiah, S/o Pedda Laxmanna aged 70 years 14. Satyamma, Wo Narayana aged 43 years 15.Yellamma, S/o Buchanna aged 70 years 16. Boya Giramma, W/o Shanthanna aged 30 years lT,Thokala Krishnaiah, S/o Masanna aged 65 years lS.Thokala Pentaiah, S/o Naganna aged 50 years l9.Thokala Munenna, S/o Giranna aged 70 years 20.Thokala Nadipanna, S/o Balaiah iged 65years 21.Boya Thokala Munenna, S/o Giranna aged 70 years 22.Thokala Boya Ramulu, S/o Munenna aged 37 years 23.Thokala Boya Venkataiah, S/o Bhagavanth aged 37 years 24.Thokala Boya Srinu, S/o Bhagavanth aged 45 years 25. Bakka Giranna, S/o Hanumanth aged 35 years 26. Bakka Laxmaiah, S/o Hanumanth aged 40 years 27.Bakka Giranna, S/o Hanumanth aged 35 years 28. Bakka Laxmaiah, S/o Hanumanth aged 40 years (R:2 to R.28 are not necessary parties) ... RespondenUGlaimants Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 17-04-2012 passed in O.P.No.13 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V fvlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the Market value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 2075 days in prefering the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies Sd/- R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6- SECTION OFFICER HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2025 F* DECREE LfuAS.No.682 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ :l j : IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Between: L.A.A.S.No.683 of 2025 Daramoni Chityala Ramulu, s/o Subani, aged 35 years, Occupation. agricultural, R/O Kanayapally village of Kothakota Mandal tVlahabubnagar District. ...AppellanUClaimant AND The Special Dy. Collector, Rajeev Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District ..RespondenURespondent Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 20-03-2013 passed in O.P.No.406 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V ltrlanohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the [\Iarket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 1271days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To, Kam

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2A25 FE DECREE LAAS.No.683 of 2A25 ALLOWING THE APPEAL \ J 1qry?3{'ir:'P:'. r IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY L.A.A.S.No.684 6f 2025 Between:

1. Boya Masamma, Wo Chandraiah aged 70 years 2. Yadagiri Telugu Laxmaiah, S/o Kistanna aged 43 years 3. Yadagiri Sriramulu, S/o Kistanna aged 46 years 4. Sree Ramulu, s/o Kistanna aged 47 years 5. T. Chinna Savaraiah, S/o Kotha Naganna aged G7 years 6. K. Sreedhar, s/o Chinna Savaraiah aged 35 years 7. k.Shivaiah, s/o Chinna Savaraiah aged 31 years 8. Boya E Gokaraiah, S/o Mashanna aged 47 years 9. Boya E.Venkataiah, S/o Mashanna aged 35 years 10. Boya E.Ravikumar, S/o Shanthanna aged 28 years 11. Nakka Golla Venkatanna, s/o Chandraiah aged 75 years 12.G. Shekar Goud, S/o G. Bichanna Goud aged 40 years 13.G. Ediga Sarojamma, Wo Buchanna Goud aged 80 years 14. Shekar Goud, S/o Buchanna Goud aged 40 years 15. Radha, Wo Shekar Goud aged 33 years Occ. Agriculture and labour, Kanayapally village of Kothakota f\Iandal, Mahaboobnagar district. ...AppellanUGlaimant No.1 to 3,5,7,10&11,18 to 20,2G to 30 AND

1. The Special Deputy Collector (LA), Rajiv Lift lrrigation Scheme, Phase lt Pebbai r, It/lahaboobnagar District.

2. Yatagiri Jamanna, S/oThirupathaiah aged 50 years 3. Y. Chinna Naganna, s/o Dastagiri aged 65 years 4. T. Pedda Sawaraiah, s/o Naganna aged Tlyears 5. Kothapedda Kurmaiah, S/o Kistaiah aged 70 years 6. K.Narasimha, s/o Chinna Savaraiah aged 37 years 7. R.Ramakrishnareddy, S/o,Venkatreddy aged 65 years 8. R.Venkatrangareddy, S/o Venkatreddy aged 67 years 9. Ravula Sudharshanreddy, S/o Venkatreddy aged 61 years 10. R.Chandrashekar Reddy, S/o Venkatreddy aged 61 years 11. R.Yugenderreddy, S/o Venkatreddy aged 56 years 12. Nakka Shanthaiah, S/o Peddaswamy aged 45 years l3.Yerukali Balakistamma, Wo Late Y. Ramulu aged 55 years l4.Yerukali Giranna, S/o Late Yerukali Ramulu aged 35 years 15. Enigla Sree Ramulu, S/o Chinna Swamy aged 53 years 16. Nakka Karremma, Wo Chandraiah aged 70 years :--i:1-:---: - <: ( R.2 to R.16 are not necessary parties ) ... Respondents/Claim ants Appeal filed under Section 54 of the L.A.Act, aggrieved by the Order and decree dated 17-04-2012 passed in O.P.No.14 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri. V fManohar Rao, Advocate for the appellant and GP for Appeals for the Respondent. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the appeal be and hereby is allowed ; 2. That the l/arket value is enhanced by two more times (1+2) than the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, with all consequential benefits;

3. That the appellant be and hereby is not entitled to interest for the delay period of 1599 days in preferring the appeal; and

4. That there shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. R. KARTHIKEYAN JOINT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy 2. Two CD Copies To, Kam v HIGH COURT DATED:19/0812025 DECREE LA/AS.No.684 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPEAL K