(glhqvafh Ravi v. Rural Devetopment Departmi:nt

8. Angisetti Qhandra Shekar, S/o Sriramulu. aqed about 60 vears. Occ. Business, R/o H. No. 1 8-9-44, Kesavagiri, Near Ciandrangutta pdli; -Stat6;, Hyderabad-500 005.

9. Angisetti (qyith.g, W/o Ravi-Kumar, aged about 55 years, Occ. Business, Rt/o H No.18-9-44, Kesavagiri, Near Chaidrangutta p5lice Station, flVALiilOrO_ 500 005. ...RESPONDENTS . ..-;^,.- .* - .'.*.. . -. Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rntr r praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particurarry one i the nature of writ of lVlandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.7 ir non-considering the representation of the petitioner and non-initiating to take he necessary action against the illegal construction of the respondent Nc. ) and 9, who are constructing the ilegar construction on the rahd of the petiti. er, by occupying the part of the land of the petitioner s rand admeasuring to an €) .ent of Ac.0075gts in sy.No.37lA 1/1/1 which is situated at Mohabbath Nagar \ iilage, Maheswaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, during the pendency of rrrj rnction order dated 1810612025 passed in r.A.No.9B of 2023 in o.S.No.19 of 2(23 on the fire of the Junior Civil Judge Court at Maheswaram is highl, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutiona I and violation of principles of Natural Justicr: and also in violation of Articles 14. 21 and 300-4 of the constitution of rndia, a 5 art from vioration of Panchayat Raj Act and consequen y direct the respondent ,1o.7 to consider the representation of the petitioner and to take the necessar) action against the illegal construction of the respondent No.g and g, who are cc rstructing the ilegar construction on the rand of the petitioner, by occupying the p rrt of the rand of the petitioner s rand admeasuring to an extent of Ac.00759tr; in Sy. No.37lA1l.r/1 which is situated at lVrohabbath Nagar Viflage, Maheswar rm lr4andar, Ranga Reddy District, during the pendency of rnjunction order datec 18.06.2025 passed in lA No 98 of 2023 in o S.No.19 of 2023 on the fire of *r Junior civir Judge Court at l\rlaheswaram. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section r 51 cpc praying that in the cir() rmstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High courl nay be preased to direct the respondent No.7 to consider the representation of t re petitioner and to take the necessary action against the iregar construction of, e respondent No.g and 9, who are constructing the ilegar construction on the rzr d of the petitioner, by occupying the part of the rand of the petitioner 's rand rdmeasuring to an extent or Ac 0.075-gts in Sy. No.37lA1/1/'1 which is situated :r. Mohabbath Nagar Village, A,4aheswaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, durirrr the pendency of lnf unction order dated 18.06.202s passed in r.A.No.9B of 2t) :3 in o.s.No.19 ot 2023 on the file of the Junior. civil Judge court at Maheswaram pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1to6: Gp FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.7 : SRI K.pRADEEP REDDY, SC FOR Gp Counsel for the Respondent No.8to9 : -- The Court made the following: ORDER \ \ THT] I{ONOURABI.E SM'I".IUS'I'ICE T. MAI) IAVI DI],VI WItI'I-PETITI ON NO.22 949 0F 2025 ORDt]R ln this writ [)erition. the pc'titioner is aggrieved hr he inaction on the part ol' tlic' .tllciar respo,dents in taking any actio r on ihe iilegal constructio. beirrll car.rierl out by r.espondents No.g ancl ., According to the pctitio.cr, rcsp.rrdcr.rts N..g ancr 9 are making cons ruction i, the petitioncr's land.

2. l-calrrcd Stantline Counsel for respondent No.7 ( run panchayat iras lo.rra'dcd a co,,r oi- the brilding ,crmission dt.2 l.( ( .2023 granred to unolllcial respondt r.tt No.9, i.c., Angisctty Kavitha. \ i//o Angise,tty lLavinder' Ir is subrrirred that in accordance with rrri said building Pe*rissi.r.r' thc urrolrlcilrl iL'spondcnts have cornprcled tr.r constrtrction. 'l'he lcarncd Stancling ( ounscl has also showit the photoL.r rphs reccived by hin.r through Wharsn pp to dernonstratc that the bui t ing has been cornplered.

3. I-earrrecl counscl lirr the petitir_rner seeks liberry rr :hallenge the building perntission qrantcd t<l the unolficial responcicnr N r .9. ) W P No.229,19 of2025 4 With the liberty as prayed for by the petitioner, the Writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. 5 Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Writ petition shall also stand closed /ffRUE COPY// -SD/. SRINIV S TA EDDY TRAR EGIS CTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate. [OP cl 2. fwo CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV, State of Telangana. [OUT] h Court for the

3. One CC to SRI K.PRADEEP REDDY, SC FOR GPPS. [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies. BSK BS G,h& --i:-1 trllttt ';.;; 3 06 i:,2t2[ -t c) -1-S * ),.:.. - --., \l) HIGH COURT DATED:2510912025 ORDER WP.No.22949 of 2025 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS / T- v, \n\t' 44"" *rt-

8. Angisetti Qhandra Shekar, S/o Sriramulu. aqed about 60 vears. Occ. Business, R/o H. No. 1 8-9-44, Kesavagiri, Near Ciandrangutta pdli; -Stat6;, Hyderabad-500 005.

9. Angisetti (qyith.g, W/o Ravi-Kumar, aged about 55 years, Occ. Business, Rt/o H No.18-9-44, Kesavagiri, Near Chaidrangutta p5lice Station, flVALiilOrO_ 500 005. ...RESPONDENTS . ..-;^,.- .* - .'.*.. . -. Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rntr r praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particurarry one i the nature of writ of lVlandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.7 ir non-considering the representation of the petitioner and non-initiating to take he necessary action against the illegal construction of the respondent Nc. ) and 9, who are constructing the ilegar construction on the rahd of the petiti. er, by occupying the part of the land of the petitioner s rand admeasuring to an €) .ent of Ac.0075gts in sy.No.37lA 1/1/1 which is situated at Mohabbath Nagar \ iilage, Maheswaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, during the pendency of rrrj rnction order dated 1810612025 passed in r.A.No.9B of 2023 in o.S.No.19 of 2(23 on the fire of the Junior Civil Judge Court at Maheswaram is highl, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutiona I and violation of principles of Natural Justicr: and also in violation of Articles 14. 21 and 300-4 of the constitution of rndia, a 5 art from vioration of Panchayat Raj Act and consequen y direct the respondent ,1o.7 to consider the representation of the petitioner and to take the necessar) action against the illegal construction of the respondent No.g and g, who are cc rstructing the ilegar construction on the rand of the petitioner, by occupying the p rrt of the rand of the petitioner s rand admeasuring to an extent of Ac.00759tr; in Sy. No.37lA1l.r/1 which is situated at lVrohabbath Nagar Viflage, Maheswar rm lr4andar, Ranga Reddy District, during the pendency of rnjunction order datec 18.06.2025 passed in lA No 98 of 2023 in o S.No.19 of 2023 on the fire of *r Junior civir Judge Court at l\rlaheswaram. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section r 51 cpc praying that in the cir() rmstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High courl nay be preased to direct the respondent No.7 to consider the representation of t re petitioner and to take the necessary action against the iregar construction of, e respondent No.g and 9, who are constructing the ilegar construction on the rzr d of the petitioner, by occupying the part of the rand of the petitioner 's rand rdmeasuring to an extent or Ac 0.075-gts in Sy. No.37lA1/1/'1 which is situated :r. Mohabbath Nagar Village, A,4aheswaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, durirrr the pendency of lnf unction order dated 18.06.202s passed in r.A.No.9B of 2t) :3 in o.s.No.19 ot 2023 on the file of the Junior. civil Judge court at Maheswaram pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1to6: Gp FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.7 : SRI K.pRADEEP REDDY, SC FOR Gp Counsel for the Respondent No.8to9 : -- The Court made the following: ORDER \ \ THT] I{ONOURABI.E SM'I".IUS'I'ICE T. MAI) IAVI DI],VI WItI'I-PETITI ON NO.22 949 0F 2025 ORDt]R ln this writ [)erition. the pc'titioner is aggrieved hr he inaction on the part ol' tlic' .tllciar respo,dents in taking any actio r on ihe iilegal constructio. beirrll car.rierl out by r.espondents No.g ancl ., According to the pctitio.cr, rcsp.rrdcr.rts N..g ancr 9 are making cons ruction i, the petitioncr's land.

2. l-calrrcd Stantline Counsel for respondent No.7 ( run panchayat iras lo.rra'dcd a co,,r oi- the brilding ,crmission dt.2 l.( ( .2023 granred to unolllcial respondt r.tt No.9, i.c., Angisctty Kavitha. \ i//o Angise,tty lLavinder' Ir is subrrirred that in accordance with rrri said building Pe*rissi.r.r' thc urrolrlcilrl iL'spondcnts have cornprcled tr.r constrtrction. 'l'he lcarncd Stancling ( ounscl has also showit the photoL.r rphs reccived by hin.r through Wharsn pp to dernonstratc that the bui t ing has been cornplered.

3. I-earrrecl counscl lirr the petitir_rner seeks liberry rr :hallenge the building perntission qrantcd t<l the unolficial responcicnr N r .9. ) W P No.229,19 of2025 4 With the liberty as prayed for by the petitioner, the Writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. 5 Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Writ petition shall also stand closed /ffRUE COPY// -SD/. SRINIV S TA EDDY TRAR EGIS CTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate. [OP cl 2. fwo CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV, State of Telangana. [OUT] h Court for the

3. One CC to SRI K.PRADEEP REDDY, SC FOR GPPS. [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies. BSK BS G,h& --i:-1 trllttt ';.;; 3 06 i:,2t2[ -t c) -1-S * ),.:.. - --., \l) HIGH COURT DATED:2510912025 ORDER WP.No.22949 of 2025 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS / T- v, \n\t' 44"" *rt-