✦ High Court of India · 12 Nov 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 12 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
12 Nov 2025
Length
2,408 words

Acts & Sections

Defendant 4 to I I Represented by their Power of Attomey holder Mohammed Ghaloor, S/o Mohammed Osrnan, Aged 30 Years, Occ: Business, R/o I'I.No.20-3- I2l, Shibligunj, Hyderabad

12. Mohamrlcd AkheelQuresh r S/o Late Mohammed Me htabQureshi Aged about 48 years, occ. Business PJo H.No. 19-2-382, outsidc Doodhbowli, Palarr Road, I-lyderabad 500064 I 3. Mrs, Bilquiesjahan, Wo Asil Ali Qureshi Aged about 45 years, Occ: Houservife fu'o H.no. l9-2-382, DoodhBorvli, Hyderabad T.S l4 Mr. Mohammed Mudabbir Khan S/o Late Yalrya Khan, Aged about 29 yeals Occ. Business, rio FIat No.l6 Sardar Pridc, Chowk, Beed By pass Road Aurangabad 43 I 001 I 5. Anees Begum Wo Mohammed Hafeez Aged about 46 years, occ. Housewife R/o H.no. I -4-4781 | lC, BerbanGalli Bholakpur, Musheerabad, Hyderabad T.S.

16. Mohamrnedllyas S/o BabuMiyan, Aged about J5 years. Occ. Business. tuo H.No. 20-3-3313/A, SanarrGalli HussainiAlarn, Bahadurpura, I lyderabad I I

17. Hameeda Banu W/o Mohammed llyas, Aged Househotd, R/o H.No. 2O-3-33t31i, Sanim Bahadurpura, Hyderabad. abc ut Galli, 28 years, Hussaini Occ: Alam, "lB.Shaik Kareem S/o shaik Mehboob, Aged about 30 year;. occ. Business, Fi,/o H.No. 18-7-425196, Bhawani Nagar, TSlabKatta, Hyd'erakad. --- ---' 19.Syed Adam S/o Syed Jahan^gir, Aged about 34 years, Or;c. Business, R/o 20- 7-365/366, Fathe Danrraza, dalipJr4 iyOuirbrt, f.S

20. Mohammed Riyaz Business, R/o 1-9-2-435/80/4, Misrigunj, GutJn-innig"r, HyrJerabadl TS. ' - .SJo,^Mohammed younus, Aged about 29 years, occ. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the'l-ligh court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction more specificarly in the nature of Mandamus by decraring the inaction on the part of the officiars Respondents in considering the representation on behalf of the petitioners dated 2g.12.2017 as arbitrary, illegal, colourable exercise of power and violative of Article 14 and 300(4) of constitution of rndia and consequenfly direct the olficial Respondents not to Register any kind of documents executed by Unofficial Respondents or their henchmen with regard to the premises bearing No. 20-3-25 ar-rd 26 situated at Doodhbowli admeasuring 1695 sq. yards. lA NO: 't OF 2019 Petition under sectron 151 cpc praying that in the circu rstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the official respondents not to register any kind of documen: executed by the unofficial respondent or their henchmen with regard to the premises bearing No.20-3-25 and 26 situated at Doodhbowri admeasuring 'r,6E5 sq. yards and consequently direct them to enter the said property, in prohib itcry List pending disposal of this Writ Petition. I a lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Bctlvcen: I ) Mohaurrncd Akheel Qureshi, S/o. I-ate Mohamrned Mchtab Qureshi, Agcd about 4B years, Occ: Busincss, R/o- H.No. l9-2-382, outside Doodhbowli, Palam Road, I{yderabad 500064. 2). .Mrs. Bilquiesjahan, Wo. Asif Ati Qureshi, aged about 45 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. H.No. I 9-2-982, I)oodhbowti, I lyderabad. 3). M1'. Moharnrned Mudabbir Khan, S/o. Late Yahya Khan, Aecd about 29 ycars, Occ: Business, R./o. Flat No. 16, Sardar Pride, Clhowk, Beed By pass Road, Aurangabad- 4). Anees Begum, W/o. Moharnn)ed I lafeez, aged about 46 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o.H.No.1-4- 478/I/C, Berban Galli, Bholakpur, Musheerabad, Hyderabad -'f.S. 5). Moharnmed ilyas, S/o. BabLr Miyan, aged about 35 years, Occ: Business, R/o. II.No.20-3-3313/A, Sanam Galli, [{r.rssaini Alam,Bahadurpura, Hyderabad. 6). Hameeda Banu, Wo. Mohanrrncd llyas, aged about 28 years, Occ: I-lousehold, R/o. Il.No.20-3- 33/3/A, Sanam Galli, I Iussaini Alarn, Bahadurputa, Hyderabad. 7). Shaik Kareenr, S/o. Shaik Mchboob, aged abour 30 years, Occ: Business. IVo. I l.No. l8-7 425/96, Ilhawani Nagar, alabkatta, Flyde labad. -f PaPe 8 of 11 8)- S1,ed Adant, Sio Sr cd .lrharrgir, :rged abour j4 years, Occ. Btrsiness, R/o. II.No.20_1_365i366, Fathe l)arwaza, (]azipr"rra, Hydcrabad l'.S. 9). Moharnmed Riyaz. S/o. Molrarnrlred younus, aged about 29 years. Uce : Busirrcss, IV_o. H.No. l9_ 2-43 5 I 80 / 4, Misrigurr.l, Ciulshannagar, I.Iyderabad. t I .: \ 1).Mohd. Sadiq Alr, Plaintiffs No.9 ro li. Petitioners I -9ll le sponden ts l2-20 ANt) (Sincc rlicd pcr L.l{'s) 2). Mohd. Amecr Ali Amjad, S/o. Mohd_ Abdul Ali, Aged 56 ycar-s, Occ; Business, R/o. Chicago, IL, USA. 3). Mohd. Abdul Muqtadar, S/o. I\,lohd. aged about 5l years, Occ: Doctor. R/o IL, USA. z\bclul Ali, . Chicago, 4). Smt. ZeenaLh Sultana. D/o aged about 65 year.s. Occ: Chicago, IL, {JSA Mohd. Abdut Ali, Ilorrsclrold. R/o. 5). Smt. Saleha Sultar.ra, D/o. Mohd. Abdut AIi, Wo. Syed S. Khan, aged abotrt 64 ycars. Occ: Doctor, Rio. Chicago. IL. USA. 6). Smt. . Sadal Sultana, D/o. Mohcl. Abclul Wo. Dr. Mohd. Kialeeluddin, agccl abciut years, Occ: Household, R/o. Chicago, II_, LISA. Ali, 62 7). Sm_t. Siraj Sultana, t)/o. Ivlohd. Abtlul Ali, aged about 58 years. Occ: Cardiographics, Rio. (.hicalgo, IL, USA 8). Smt. Atiya Strltana, I)/o. Mohd. Abttul Ati Wo. Ata-ur-Rahntan, aged about .50 1,ears, Occ Physician, R/o. Chicago. lL. USn 9). Nishat Farima. W/o. aged about 50 ycar-s, Occ IL, USA,2 l-atc Moltl. Sad iq Ali, Household. [t/o. [)eoria, Page 9 oF 11 r= roi tt"1",.u oi,l,i:^:1" ::: Y-:11",:,1ilt f,l aqcd about 16 Yeat s' C"heveland, Ohio' USA' ll). Sameeha latirna' D/o' Latc Mohd Sadiq AIi' on.d ,Uor, 25 Years' Occ: Studcrtt ,"],. *ono. Maaz Ali' S/o' Latc Mohtl Sadiq Ali' ,r"a nOor' 23 Years' Occ: Studeltt ,l', ,ond. Saad Ali' S/o l ate Mohd Sadiq Ali' aged about 3l {:":'',9'lillil}l"ria rr , USA Petitioners No'l I to lj are xttt -':": '"':'l^::.;;'- r'v GPA Mrthd Sadequddin i;il";;;;i'a *)o.t .r,"'ft'f nna' Karccrnuddin' aged abotrt 60 years' OI", Srri""tt, lll tt' l1 - l - 11 1/25' Madan napet' Hyderabad)' l4) State of Tclrngana Renrescntcd by Principal i"l;;;;; lRevenuel' Secretar iat' Hvde'abad I5). lnspector Ueneral ol'Stnlrrps and l(egistration' ilj-'irif"*"-'.,*ii"" Bhavan' 4tlr & 5th- llloor' *r^--'t^nltit Road' Osmangunj' M J Market' . ".Respondents 1- 13/writ Petitioners l-13 Hyderabad-50000I ' I6). S.R-O Channinar' (llranninar' Ilyclerabad' hd. Ghouse Mohiuddin QLradri Sharfi' S/o' 17). Mo prtf* Quadti, aged about 64 years' S. I{uss "i"i ,rrt""*,- iio Il uo' r 8-1 -47514]2lG' Occ: Bhavani Nagar, HYderaba d t t 18). Lateefunnisa Taheruddh Kl.ran, Ilousehold. l9). Mohammed Taheruddin Khan, Private Service, Begum, W/o. Aged about 5t) Late years, Md. Occ: Hyderuddin, AgPd abottt S/o. I-ate 37 years, Md. (J oc: t I i}.,,.ir :i,:;jxi',.,*lll:3'ii.,l1j:' ""]:,!,i:: l #* #lf#*[T?:: ir :. rl; ]":t: #j: }1[#ii11{;._,H:T::jiT j?,J"r#LHi:"J" '^'.J: Khan, S/o. Lare out .]j years, Occ It,/o S H.No.t 7- j antoshnagar, *;;;1ffi ;*.ii:*,1:Tj,".:#i i;t^ !t^{:,:ffi..,:: li.#:: ";Ji'",:i::i,:#i' #i frfl;l;f No. I8 to 24 are re p Moha Power of Attomey holder S/o. Mohar Business, Hyderabad nmed Osrnan aged about 30 years R/o. FI resented by their mmed Ghafbor , Occ Shibligurrj, (Respondents .No.20_3_t 2 ) I Respondents l4_24lResponden Petition under Se ction 151 CpC praying the affidavit filed in support of the petition vacate the interim O rder dt: 14.11.2O1g W.P.No.24S2B of 2019 ts l-l I that in the circ umstances stated in the High Court rray be pleased to granted in l.A.llo. 1 of 2019 in Counsel for the petitionr counser ror the Respon;"T::xf[Ttf,v,yAR FoR I I counse'|',.$^ffi "#a1,1*Ir'r*'-:t.#ffi *fr;*#*ir*., The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADTIAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.24528 OF 2Or9 ORDER In this Writ Petition, the petitioners are seeking a declaration that the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering their representation dated 29.12.2017, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct. the official respondents not to register any kind of documents executed by unofficial respondents or their henchmen with regard to subject property and to pass such other order or orders.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for respondent Nos.l to 3 and Mr.Md.Ajmal Ahmed, learned counsel represented by learned senior counsel Mr.Vedula Venkataramana, appearing for respondents No.4 to 2O.

3. This Court vide order dated 14. ll.2ol9 in I.A.No. 1 of 2019 had observed that there is a suit in O.S.No. 1040 of 2Ol7 pending on the hle of XXV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and there is an ex-parte injunction in favour of the petitioners in I.A.No.1909 of 2Ol7 restraining the respondents therein from alienating the petition schedule \ \ 2 properties either by way of creating any document of sale, lease, mortgage, gift, exchange or otherwise and the said jnterim order was extended from time to time. Taking the seme into consideration, this Court has also directed the Srrb-Registrar, Charminar not to entertain deeds of conveyance rresented by the defendants to the suit in respect of subject properff pending disposal of the suit.

4. Respondents have now hled a stay vacate p':tition and the petitioners have also frled reply affidavit to the sarnr:'

5. Learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioners have hled this wrrt petition only for consideration of their representation and thal- the suit itself is not maintainable before the trial Court and a1s;o that original sale certihcate in C.S.No.14l1958 has not been fi:ed.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on ttre other hand, referred to the copy of the docket order in I.A.No 1'58 of 2O19 in O.S.No. 1O40 of 2Ol7 wherein the Sub Registrar, rlharminar has been arrayed as respondent No.18 and an intcrim order has been granted directing him not to register artv document in respect of the suit schedule property, pending 'lisposal of the I I 3 suit. He also submitted that this order is subsisting even on this day.

7. Learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that on the ground that this Court has granted interim direction on 14.1 l.2ol9 in I.A.No.1 of 2019, the trial Court is not taking up the suit and therefore, prejudice is being caused to the resPondents.

8. Having regard to the rival contentions and material on record, this Court hnds that the petitioners have filed O.S.No. 104O of 2Ol7 and ad-interim injunction has been granted against the respondents as well as Sub-Registrar, Charminar and the said interim injunction order is in force as on today, therefore, the same shall be honored until vacated or modified by the trial Court or higher forum. Therefore, this Court without going into the merits and the issues or the points raised by the respondents about maintainability of the suit or about the documents filed by the petitioners along with reply aJhdavit, deem it ht and proper to direct the trial Court to dispose of the suit expeditiously, u'ithout being influenced by the interim order granted by this Court on 14' 11'2019 in I.A.No.1 of 2019. The other legal points raised by the 4 respondents are left open for them to raise the s:rme before the .l trial Court in appropriate proceedings. g. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed r f There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applicirtions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. \ To Sd/.C.DEEPIKA AS,SISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// Secretary (Revenue), State of lerlangana' Secretariat' 1 The PrinciPal Hyderabad. 2 The lnspector General of Stamps and Registrati-o r' 5-3-953' Registration ' Bh;r;;,";rt"rnJ-s'E Root l'i-2"[i snini R"oad' o;rrangunj' M J Market' Hyderabad 500001.

3. The S.R O. Charminar (Sub Registrar), Charminar' H yclerabad 4 One CC to SRI SUNIL B GANU, Advocate [OPUC] 5 Two CCs to GP for Stamps and Registration' Hig I Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad. [OUT] 6 one CC to SRI MD. AJMAL AHMED, Advocate [oPL Cl 7. Two CD CoPies MP PMK HIGH COURT DATED:1211112025 + -) J o ,i \ oB l rlE S t;.1 t I tou 29tr tr.( : (, -.1r Crl ORDER WP.No.24528 of 2019 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (+ \D 1,\

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments