The High Court · 2025

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the natureofWRlToFMANDAMUSdeclaringtheactionofofficialrespondentsinnot issuing the pattadar passbooks as well as mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenuerecordsaSpertheDharaniapplicationNos.25000l2,lg0datedlSlT12025' 2500012260da|ed19-7-2025'2500012167daled18-7-2025,2500012269dated 1g-7 -2025 submitted by the petitioner through TN/-03 Module or online to an extent ofAc.1.00inSy.No.473lAAl2t1'Ac.1-37gtsinSy.No,473tEt2admAc.1-225gtsin Sy.No.473lA/2 adm Ac.0-37 gts in Sy.No.473l2A adm Ac.0_05 gts in SyNo.473lAA/2 adm Ac.0-175 gts in Sy.No.473lAA/2r2 adm Ac.0-06 gts in Sy.No.473lUU1 total Ac.6-04 gts situated at rhimmapur village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, unlaMul and violation of relangana Rights in Land and pattadar Books Act, 2020 - consequently violation of the Telangana Bhu Bharathi (Record of Rights) in Land) Rules, 2025 and violation of Article 3004 of the constitution of lndia, and consequently drrect the official respondents to issue the pattadar passbooks as well as mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records as per the Dharani application name of the petitioner in the revenue records as per the Dharani application 2s0oo12167 dated 18-7-202s, 2soooi2269 dated 1g-7-2o2s submitted by the petitioner through r/-03 Module or online to an extent of Ac.1-00 in sy.No-473/AAr2ri, Ac-1-37 gts in sy.No .473rEt2 adm Ac.1-225 gts in Sy.No.473lA/2 adm Ac.0-37 gts in Sy.No.473l2A adm Ac.0_05 gts in sv.No.473lAA/2 adm Ac.0-175 gts in Sy.No.473lAA/2t2 adm Ac.0-06 gts in Sy.No.473lUU1 total Ac.6-05 gts situated at rhimmapur village, Kandukur lVlandar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 15r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.1 to 4 to not to take any further proceedings in respect of Ac.1-00 in Sv.No.473lAAt2r1. Ac.1-37 gts in sy.No.4r3lEr2 adm Ac..r-225 gts in Sy.No.473lA/2 adm Ac.O-37 Sy.No.473lAAi2 adm Ac.O-115 Sy.No.473lUU1 total Ac.6-04 gts situated at rhimmapur village, Kandukur [/andar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State. gts in Sy.No.473l2A adm Ac.O-05 gts gts in Sy.No.473lAAl2l2 adm Ac.O-06 gts Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt DR. KADIRI KRISHNAIAH Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.23336 OF 2025 ORAL ORDER: Heard Dr. Kadire Krishnaiah, leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr. L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. I to 5.

2. This writ petition is hled to declare the action of respondent No.4 in not issuing pattadar passbooks and mutating the name of the petitioner by considering online application Nos.2500012190, 2500012260, 2500012167 and 2500012269, dated 18.07.2025, 19.07.2025, 18.07.2025 and 19.07.2025, respectively, in respect of subject property, as illegal.

3. Perusal of record would reveal that the petitioner herein and respondcnt No.6 are the partners of M/s.K.K. Projects, a partnership firm, having 507o share each. 'The said firm purchased the land admeasuring Acs. 10.05 guntas, Acs. 1 .34 guntas and Acs.0.35 guntas in Survey Nos.473,473/2. and 473lall, 473/e,12 & 473 e,i3, situated at Thimmapur Village and Grampanchayat, Kandukur Mandal, Rangareddy District, under three registered sale deeds bearing document Nos.2617 of 2018,3465 of 201 8 and 3665 2 KI. J W P No 21116 of2025 of 2018, dated 22.02.20t8.06.03.2018 and Og.O3.2Ot7, respectively. 'l'hereafter. the said Firm represented by the petitioner has submitted online applications vlde I.D. Nos.2500Ol2lg}, 2500012260- 2500012167 and 2500012269, dared 18.07.2025,

19.07 .2025. 18.07 .2025 and, 19.07 .2025 to respondenr No.4 with a request to mutate its name in revenue records and issue e-pattadar passbooks. Vide proceedings dated 26.07.2025, respondent No.5 recommended mutation of the said Firm name in revenue records and issue of e-pattadar passbooks. Even then, respondent No.4 is not procceding further. Thereforc, the pctitioner filed the present writ petition. ft It is apt to nore tha[ Mr. P. Krupaiah, one of the partners of M/s. K.K. Pro.jects. filed the present writ petition. He is seeking mutation of his name in revenue records in respect of his 50% share in the atbresaid lands in terms of Partnership Deed, dated

29.11.2017. As discussed above. M/s. K.K. projects represented by the petitioncr herein and respondent No.6 being partners purchased thc subject property undcr the aforesaid three sale deeds. The said propertv is not partitioned bchveen them. Therefore, the petitioner, one of the partners of M/s. K.K. projects, cannot seek foi- rnatarion of his name in rcspecr ol his 50% sharc in the 3 (L, J W P No2li16 oi202i aforesaid propcrry' As discussed above' IM/s' K'K' Projects represented by the petitioner herein in the capacity of partner of the said firm has submitted the aforesaid online applications seeking mutationfbrissuanceofe-pattadarpassbookinrespectofM/s. K.K. Projects are pending with respondent No'3 ' Respondent No'4 has alreadY submitted his report' f, Therefore, the petitioner is not entitted for mutation of his name in revenue records in respect of 50Vo of the aforesaid property without obtaining partition proceedings in respect of the atbresaid property. tn the tight of the same' respondent No'3 is directed to consider the aforesaid online applications submitted by M/s. K.K. Projects and dispose of the same strictly in accordance with law. Ilowever, the petitioner in his individual capacity cannot mutate his name in revenue records in respect of the subject propcrty belongs to M/s- K'K' Projects ' If the petitioner wants mutation of his name in respect of 50% of the subject properry' he has to get partition of thc subject property' he has to approach the competent authority as mentioned in Schedule 'A' of the Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Rutes' 2025' It is for the competent authority to consider the said request of the pctitioner in I 4 KL, J lv P No 2l:)36 of2o25 accordancc with law. .fherefore. thc petitioner is not entitled for any relief

6. With the aforesaid clarificarion, this writ petition is disposed of, In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. As a scqucl thereto. miscellaneous petil.ions.. if any pending in the writ petition shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/- M. NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Wr- SECTTON OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, The State of Telangana, 2. The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Abids Road, Hyderabad, Hyderabad.

3. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, T.S. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Revenue Division, Ranga Reddy T.G. District, T.S.

5. The Tahsildar, Kandukur Mandal, R.R. District, T.S. 6. One CC to Sri DR. Kadiri Krishnaiah, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

8. Two CD Copies TJ GJP \ To, 1 I i 'i I I HIGH COURT DATED:07 t0Bt2O2S ORDER J \ -., WP.No.23336 of 2O2S ,,ra.\aa (lt -l. ri ZI r') 02 sEP M { rl+ 4ri;lt ={;-- DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS aLqlN