Avula Sujatha. @ I\4asini Su-jatha v. Managing Director

.....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the'affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order, orders or direction, more particurarry one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents, more particularly, the 2nd respondent in not providing compassionate appointment to the petitioner under dependent emproyment scheme/compassionate appointment scheme as a legal heir to the 3rd respondent, who had retired from the services under the Medicar rnvaridation Scheme apart trying to appoint the 4th respondent under compassionate appointment treating him as his sc,n, ignoring he is the grand-son to the 3rd respondent, is being arbitrary, illegal perverse, colourable exercise of powers, contrary to the corporation's regulations, besides being violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lrdia and consequently direct the respondent corporation to appoint the letitioner under the compassionate appointment scheme to the suitable post according to her educational qualifications by duly taking into consideration of her representation dated. 16/05/2025, rejecting the claim of the 4th respondent apart initiate disciplinary action as well as criminal action against the 3rc and 4th respondents, who are play fraud and misleading the respondent corporation. l.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High CoLtrt may be pleased to direct the respondent corporation to appoint the petitioner under the compassionate appointment scheme/dependent employm,:nt scheme as she is the legal heir to the 3rd respondent, who got retired undor Medical lnvalidation Scheme by duly taking into consideration her representation dated 1610512025. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI BONDEMPALLY RAMULL Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : SRI C.RAMAN KI,MAR REDDY, LEARNED STANDING COUNSEL FOR SINGARENI COLLIERIES COMPANY LIMITED Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: - The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA I{ARTHIK WRIT PETITIO N No.23437 OF 2025 ORDER: With the consent of the parties, this Wrrt Petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission itself

2. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the lollowing relief: "..,[o r-ssue a tt'nt order, orcTers or clireclton' more parttcularlA one tn lhe n.]ture of tlrc wit of Mandamus, decldring the action of the respondents, ntore pLrttcularla' the 2'd respondenl in not prouiding cor'npass,onate aPPointment to the petitioner under dependent entplogment scheiie/ compassionate appointnent scheme as a legal neir ti ttre 3'd respondent, tpho lrud rettred from the sennces under the lvledical Inrtatidcilwn Scheme aparl trying lo appoint the 4th respondent under contpassionate appoinlitent treafing him os his son' ignoing he is the grand'sott to the 3nt respondenL is beitg arbtrary ' illegal' parra-rt"", colourable exercise of potuers' contrary to-the corporation's 16 and 21 oJ the iigufrrnons. besicles betng uioic.iro" of Article -14' Ct-trtstilutiort of lndra irtd consequentlA dilect the resporLdent coq)oratiotl to aPpoint the petitioner under the cofilpassionate ttppoinlrnent scheme- to tLte suiiable post according to hP'r educationaL qur,Lrficrrtiorts bg dutll takrng ttLto considemtion of her representatrcn aateh tA.oS.ZdzS' ielectt'rg lhe claim of the 4't' respondent oparl nttiate drscipltnlry action is ueLt as cnminal action againsl the 3't anrl 4') r<:spon(1ents, u'ho ore plaA fraud and misleading the respondent corporaliott ancl to pass "

3. Heard Sri B. Ramulu, Iearned counsel for the petitioner aldSriC.RamanKumarRedd-v*,learnedAdditionalStanding counsel for Singareni collieries company Limited appearing for respondent Nos. I and 2' D l,[.. Wr) 13+37 2(lJ5

4. Learned coLrnsei for the petitioner subrr i1s that the petitioner is the l ounger daughter of responcler-rt No.3, u'ho joined in the respondent-Companv as General Mazcloor on

06.02.1988 and retired on 26.05.2021 uncle r Medrcal Invaiidation Scheme. Thereafter, the peti.ioner representations to rcspondcnt Nos. I and 2 or. 16.05.2025 requesting to provide compassionate appointrrent to her However, no action has been taken by respondent Nos.1 and 2 so far. Therefore, learned counsel prays this Court to direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the rep re setrtation s, dated 16.O5.2025, submitted by the petition:r and pass appropriate orders s'ithin a stipulated period of t me

5. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for Siingareni Coilieries Companv Limited appearing for resp rnde nt Nos. I and 2 submits that respondent Nos. I and 2 u ill consider the representations of the petitioner, dated i 6.05.2C 25i, and pass appropriate orders in accordance q'ith lau'

6. Having regard to the submtssions mad,: bv learned cour-rsel for the respective parties and without 51oing into the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of clirecting respondent Nos.1 and 2 to pass appropriatc orclers on the 3 PK,.J wP )143j 2()25 rcpresentations, dated i6.05.2025, submitted by the petitioner, strictlv in accordancc u,ith 1aq', after issuing notice to the aflected parties and providing them an opportunity of h earing. AS expediticusl-r AS pcssible, preferably within a period of six (06 ) u'eeks i-rom the date of receipt of a cop-v of this order Miscellaneou.s Deiitions pcnding, rf an-,", shall stand closed. There shall l-re l'ro c.,rcier as to costs //TRUE COPY// SD/.P. PONNA KRISHNA S TANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFTCER '1. The Chairman and l\rlana ging Director, M/s. Sin ga i Collieries Com pany Limited, Singareni Bhava n, Redhitts, Neilofer Road, Near Lakdi-ka-pul, Khairatabad, H yd erabad - 500 004 , Telangana State. 2. The General Manager, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Manu guru Area, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District - 507 1Oi, Tetangana State. One CC to SR One CC to SR IC.RAMA N KUMAR REDDY, LEAR NED STANDING COUNSEL FOR loPUCl Two CD Copies IBONDEMPALLY RAMULU, Advoca te [OPUC] SINGARENI CO LLIERIES COMPANY LIt\/lTED, Advocate J 4 To SA GJP e? HIGH COURT DATED:1110812025 ORDER WP.No.23437 ot 2025 '. (,' Si ,.' ..\ t' o,', .?rr '\.:.* ll2 sEP 205 ,. .. . .., , :. t, <.. ., -)' DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. s