The High Court · 2025

2. The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District. 3. The Joint Collector, Sanga Reddy District. 4. Revenue Divisional Officer, Zaheerabad,Sanga Reddy District. 5. The Tahsildar, Raikode Mandal, Sanga Reddy District. 6. Sri. M. Amarnath Reddy, Sio. Shiva Reddy, R/ o. Singitham Village, Raikode 7 . G. Aadya Rbddy, , D/o. Ashwin Reddy, R/ o. Singitham Village, Mandal, Sanga Reddy District. RaikodeMandal' sanga Reddv District ...RES'.NDENTS Petition under Nlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order, or direction more particularly ond in the nature of writ Mandamus declaring the action of the 2 and 3 in not taking any action on the representation dated 271O712020, Application No.22OO172672, daled 2411212022 and 311O712023, Dharani Application No.2200172672, daled 2411212022 and Prajavani Complaint 311O712023 as highly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice, apart from violation of Article 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia, consequently direct the respondents to take action on the petitioners representation daled 271O712020, Application No.22O017 267 2, dated 2411212022 and 3110712023, Dharani Application N:.22OO172672, daled 2411212022 and Prajavani Complaint 3110712023 by deleting the names of the respondents 6 and 7 in respect oI Ac.3-17 Gts. (Ac.1.2850 Gts. in Sy.No. 1911A212 in the name of the 6th respondent and Ac.1.2850 Gts. in Sy.No. 1g1tA2l1 it respondent) and thereby to enter the name of the petitioner. he name of the 7th IA NO: 10F 2023 Petition under section '151 cpc praying that in the ci 1 Jmstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents to take action forthwith on the petitioners r 3presentation dated 27/0712020, Apptication No.2200172672; dated 24/12tZV_.t and 31/0t 2023, Dharani Apprication No 2200172672, dared 24.12.2022 and )rajavani compraint 3110712023 by deleting the names of the respondents 6 and ; in respect of Ac.3_ 17 Gts. (Ac.1.2850 Gts. in Sy.No. .191/A2l2 in the name of thrr 3th respondenl and Ac.1.2850 Gts. in Sy.No 1gilA2/1in the name of the Zth to enter the name of rhe peritioner, pending disposat ,r",.:t;']l:tffl ;:,1T'ut, ", Counsel for the petitioner: SRI SHANKAR POLASA counset ror the Respond"nllo_11 ro:;;hiffi;CtNDER, .c 3p FoR REVENUE FOR GP FOR REVENJi, ;iIKffi'R"iLIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: _ The Court made the following: ORDER , &" THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL trIRIT PETITION No.25O3L of 2o23 ORDER: The writ petition is frled by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of lndia seeking issuance of writ of Mandamus declanng the action of thc Respondent No.2 & 3 in not taking any action on the representation dated

27.O7.2O2O, Dharani Application No.22OO172672, dated 24.12.2022 & Prajavani Complaint dated 3 t.07.2023 as highly il1egal, arbitrary and ir.r violation ol principles of natural justice, apa-rt from violation of Articlc 3O0-A o[ the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to take action on the petitioner's representation dated 27.O7.2O2O, Dharani Application No.22OO172672, daLed 24.12.2O22 & Praj avani Complaint 31.O7.2023 by deleting the narnes of the respondents 6 & 7 in respect of Ac.3 17 Gts. (Ac.1.2850 Gts. in Sy.No. 191/A2/2 in the name of the 6'h respondent and Ac.1.285O Gts. in Sy.No. 19l I A2 / I in the name of the 7,h respondent) and thereby to enter the name of thc petrtroncr. I

2. Heard Sri Shankar Polasa, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of Iearned Goyernment Pleader for Revenue Sri K.Mura-lidhar Reddy. Since the present writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the conscnt of both sides, the notice to the respondent Nos.6 and 7 is dispensed with. \ t I I I t I I I !--I \ -'H't 2

3. The lcarned counsel lor the petiLioner submit: hat the petitioner is the sole and absolute olr'r-rer of agricultural land admeasur r g A<:.3 17 guntas in Sy.No.l91/A2, situated at Singrtham Village, Ra.ikode Ntr ndal, Sanga Reddy District, having inherited the same from his fattrer, I rte Sangappa. Thb petitioner's father was the absolute owner o[Ac. 1l-17 gunt: s in 51'No-191/A, out of which Ac.8 OO t'untas were sold to Vijai Electronicals ,td., vide Sa.le Deed No.76O of 2O04. IIis father held Pattedar passbook and t t e dt:ed for the total extent o[ Ac. 1 1 17 guntas under Patta No.539. After the srL] :, the petitioner was issued pattedar passbook and title deed for the remainirl Ac.3 17 guntas in Sy.No 191 lA2,vrde pattedar parssbook No.T0920029088O ar r lth:rt.a No.1216. The fathcr's narne of thc petitioner appears in Adangal Pahani l Ltcd 30.O6.2017 and the petitioner's name is reflected in the 1 B ROR Certihcate rl tcd 07.03-2018- The petitioncr has been in peaceful possession and enjoyment of t re said land ernd has I been a beneficiary under the Rythu Bandhu Scheme and 'M Kisal Yojana till 2O2O, as evidenccd by bank statements. ln 2O2O, the p3ti,i )ner discovered that the 6,r, respondent obtained pattcdar passbooks for Ac.8 3 ) guntas purchased trom Vrj ai Electronicals Ltd., and mutations were frauclule )tly recorded in the names o[ the 6r\ rrnd 7,f respondcnts in respect of the petitro rer's Iand of Ac.3,17 guntas (subdividccl as Sy.No. 19llA2l2, Ac.1.2850 guntrLr each), vide Khata Nos.6OO96 and 6O682. Upon discovering the same, the ]x titioner irnrnediately submitted a represcntation to the 3.d respondent on '7.O7.2O2O, seeking correclion and orrlinc recording of his name, but no acti I r was taken despite 3 repeated follow ups. The petitioner further filed an application through the Dharani Portal for passbook data correction (Application No.22OO172672, dated

24.72.20221, which remains pending. Additionally, the petitioner lodged a complaint via Prajavani to the 2"d respondent (Receipt No.8836, dated 3L.O7 .2023), which has not been acted upon. The petitioner submits that Lhe inaction of respondents 2 and 3, despite repeated representations and complaints, indicates negligence or collusion wittt respondents 6 and 7. As a result, despite being in lau'ful possession, the petiLioner is being deprived of benefits under govemment schemes. Therefore, the petitioner is constrained to approach this Court for appropriate relief.

4. The learrred Assistant Gove rnment Pleadcr, representing learned Government Pleadcr for Revenue would submit that the allegations of unauthorized mutation and collusion raised by the petitioner involve disputed questions of fact and require verification of revenue records, which cannot be adjudicated rn writ proceedings. It is further submitted that the revenuc authorities are seized of the petitioner's representations ald applications, I \ including those submitted through the Dharani Portal and other channels arld appropriate action will be taken in due course afler due verification and in I I accordzrnce with law. Hence, it is prayed that the Honble Court may dispose o[ the writ pctition with a direction to the competent authorities to consider the petitioner's representations and pass orders in a timely martner, without grantrng arry interim or substartive relief at this stage. :' !l 4

5. On a careful consideration of the submissionr made by both sides and upon pemsztl of the record, this Court without makir 1 an1. obsenations on the merits and demerits o[ the case ald a]so the aspe(.t of possession of the petitioner over thc schedule property, deems it approprizll,i to direct the ofhcial responcients to cause enquiry into the matter strictl_v adh: ing to the procedure contemplated by duly issuing notices to all the effected pzu.tr :s and opportunity of being heard and pass appropriate orders within 60 days fror the date of receipt of copy of this order.

6. Witlr the above directions, the present writ lr tition is disposed of. No order as to thc costs. Miscellaleous applications, if arrr pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// i I i!! i: i:[ i :?s I"ITJ,;TEI i l' " rne Urstric^t Collector, Sanda Reddy District. I he Joint _Co ector, Sanga"Reddvbl.tri"i.-' D e p a rr m e n r, s ""\t,, ifi"#i j{f t:flfi ffi ,aldsn[:d'm",n*:r. rwoccsiocp;di'nEi/iNtrl4.,fd#:l"f,Slpf"%?1, Hyderabad. IOUT] Two CD Copies .JAWAHAR REDDY ;TANT REGISTRAR xd/-[f'' '$ecrroru oFFtcER €:Buildings, ,' i: trict. r lf Telangana, at To 2 3 4 6 7. I PSK. PMKtu HIGH COURT DATED:2711012025 ORDER WP.No.25031 of 2023 r t[6 (;) .>, * o. -\ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS l \ \ e'l \,\vr