The High Court · 2025

...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS

1. Dasari Uma Maheshwari, D/o. Hanumaiah, Age, 26 years, Occ, Business.R-/ o. H. No.3-1461 4 I 84, Venkatadri Nagar, Chenicherla Villiage, Medipalty Mandl, Medchel Dist.

2. M/s Chandraiah Explosive, Rep by its managing partner Dasri Pdma, Wo. Hanumaiah, Age 45 Years, Occ, Business.

3. M/s. Shivarathri Chandraiah, Rep by its managing partner Dasari Prudhvi Raj, S/o. Hanumaiah, Aged 21 Years, Occ, Business. ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS No. 3 to 5 4. Sri Akula Rajaiah, S/o Narasaiah, Ager.70 yrs, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.'1'l- 176, Santhinagar, Pentacheru, Medak Diskic{.

5. M/s Mack plantations, Rep by its Managing Partner Sri N. Ramkumar, S/o N.J- Reddy, Aged 54 years, Occ.Business, R7o, Punjagutta, Hyderabad. (R-4, 5 not necessary party) ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS No.'l & 2 lA NO: I OF 2021 Petition urrder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders in i.A.No, 141 of 2021 in O.S.No. 313 of 2019, dt.21-Og- 2021 on the file of THE PRINCIPAL DtST & SESSTONS JUDGE: NALGONDA Counsel for the Appellant: Sri G. L. Narasimha Rao Counsel for the Respondents 1,4 and 5: None Appeared Counsel for the Respondents 2 and 3: M/s Aziz Hussain The Court delivered the following JUDGMENT: TIIE IIONOT'RABI.D SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SI'DEA A.S.No. 20 of2O22 JTIDGMENT: Both the counsel Present. 2- This appeal is filed against the order dared 2l'09'2021 passed in I.A.No.l4l of 2021 in O.S.No.313 of 2019 on the file of the leamed Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nalgonda'

3. lnfact, respondents filed an application against appellants vde I.A.No.14l of 2021 in O.S.No.3 13 of 2019 for rejection of plaint and the same was rejected as not maintainable and bared by law of limitation, against which this appeal is preferred by the appellants'

4. This Court vide order dated 10'01'2023 dismissed A'S'Nos'06 and 07 of 2022 confirming the order of the trial Court' It is stated that this appeal is covered by orders in A'S'Nos'06 and 07 of 2022' 5. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed confirming the order of the trial Court. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- M D . RAMANA KRISHNA REGISTRAR U //TRUE COPY// \ E ON OFFICER To, \ 1 The Pflncioal Drstflct and Sessions Judge Nalgonda. (with records, if any) z onl Cc ici srl o L. Narasimha Rao, Advocate [OPUC] g. One CC to M/s Aziz Hussain' Advocate [OPUCI 4. Two CD Copies VI{/gh w ) I HIGH COURT DATED: 07t01l2O2S JUDGMENT +DECREE AS.No.20 ol'2022 1 6 sTAiS O4. $5 \\[s s -b f ) c o DISMISSING THE APPEAL WITHOUT CI)STS \ V / IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURAALE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA APPEAL SUIT NO: 20 OF 2022 Between:

1. Karingu Buggamma, Wo.Pentaiah, Aged 63 Years, Occ, Housewife, 2. Karingu Yadaiah, S/o. Pentaiah, Aged 45 Years, 3. Karingu Krishnaiah, S/o. Pentaiah, Aged 42 Years, 4. Tandarupally Eshwaraiah, S/o. Ramulu, Aged 44 years, 5. Tandarupally buchaiah, S/o. Ramulu, Aged 50 years, 6. Tandarupally Rukkalaiah, S/o. Ramulu, Aged 52 years, 7. Karingu Masaiah, S/o. Peddaiah, Aged 68 years, 8. Korra Beelu, S/o. Nanya, Aged 50 years, Occ, Agriculture ( All are Agriculture R/o. Khudabakshapally Villiage, of Maniguda Mandl, Nalgonda. ) ...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAI NTIFFS AND 1 Dasari Uma Maheshwari, D/o. Hanumaiah, o. H. No.3-1461 4 I 84, Venkatadri Nagar Mandl, Medchel Dist. Age, 26 years, Occ, Business.R/ , Chenicherla Villiage, Medipally

2. M/s Chandraiah Explosive, Rep by its managing partner Dasri Padma, Wo. Hanumaiah, Age 45 Years, Occ, Business.

3. M/s. Shivarathri Chandraiah, Rep by its managing partner Dasari Prudhvi Raj, S/o. Hanumaiah, Aged 21 Yea,s, Occ, Business. ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS No. 3 to 5 4. Sri Akula Rajaiah, S/o Narasaiah, Ager.7O yrs, Occ, Business, R/o H.No.11- 'l 76, Santhinagar, Pentacheru, Nledak District.

5. M/s Mack plantations, Rep by its Managing Partner Sri N. Ramkumar, S/o N.J. Reddy, Aged 54 years, Occ.Business, R/o, Punjagutta, Hyderabad. R4,5 not necessary party ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS No. 1 & 2 Appeal filed under section g6 r/w Order 41 Rule 1 of CpC against the order and decree dated 2110912021 in |.A.No.141 and 142 of 2021 in oS No.313 of 2019, on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge Nalgonda. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G.L. Narasimha Rao, Advocate for the appellant and M/s Aziz Huussain, Advocate for the Respondents. 2 & 3 and none appeared for Respondents. 1, 4 and 5 either in person or by Advocate. This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:

1. That the Appeal be and hereby is dismissed; and 2. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal //TRUE COPY// Sd/. M. RAMANA KRISHNA TY REGISTRAR I S CTION OFFICER

1. The Pgqpal District and Sessions Judge Nalgonda 2. fwo CD Copies To, VH .\ \ HIGH COURT DATED: 0710,,112025 DECREE AS.No.2O of 2022 DISMISS!NG I'HE APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS \ ,).l[ v.y