The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in C.C.No.265 oI 2025 On the file of XVll Additional Chief Judicial f\ilagistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad. ,.'&ry l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: Ankita Das, D,'o Gautam Das, aged 20 years, Occ. Receptionist in Antera Restaurant, R/: H,No.B-3-22910142, Hylam Colony, Gavatri Hills, Hyderbad. N/o Kapasdharrga, Shiptola, Hugly, West Bengal. ...PETITIONER/R2 The State of I'elangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the Slate of Telangana At Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT/ESPONDENT No. 1 Syed Saleem, S/o Syed Jalal, aged 37 years, Occ. Busrness, R/o H.No.B-3- 229|D/4.2;H, l-tylam Colony, Venkatagiri, Yousufguda, Hyderabad, N/o Naginenipally Village, Bommalaramaram l\/andal, Yadadri Bhongir District. ...RESPONDENTS AND 1 2 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the IVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to compound the offences u/s 354 (C), 509 tPC, Sec 67 of ln{orrnation Technology Act. 2000-08 in C.C.No.265 of 2025 On the file of XVll Additional Chief Judiciat Mlagistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under section 359(2) of BNSS praying that irr the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to record the compromise between the respondent No.2 and the petitioner in c.c No 265 of 2025 on the file of XVll Addit,onat chief Judicial lVlagistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri Mohammed Moinuddin, Advocate for the Petitioner, sri Jithender Rao Veeramallu, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of sri syed Hameed, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER ---7 ,} \ THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVIEADA l.A.Nos. nd 3 of 2025 CRIMINAL PET in/and ITION No.987 4 of 2025 COMMON ORD ER: 1. This Criminal petition is filed by the petitioner/accused No.2 under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.265 of 2025 on the file of learned XVII Additional Chief Judicial lVlagistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad, for the offences punishable under: Sections 3Sa(c), 509 of l.p.C. and SeCtion 67 of lnformation Technology Act.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused as weil as respondent No.2/de faclo comprainant that during pendency of the present Criminal petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of

2025. have been filed to record compromise between them and to compound the offences. 3 The learned Assistant public prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions. 4 Perused the affidavits filed by the de facfo complainant in LA.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 which disclose that she t. has willingly t I :l ., \ €' consented for compromise_. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana yrde orders dated 04.08.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report daled 12.08.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2O2S are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.265 of 2025 on the fite of learned XVll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad against the petitioner/accused are hereby quashed subject to the petitioner/accused paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five *.'..tr , 3 Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A./c.No.S2188926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (20070), IFSC Code:S81N0020070, IMICR No.500004057) and Rs.5,0C0/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed- SD/- N. SRIHARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// I To,

1. The XVll Additional Chref Judicial N,4agistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad' 2. The Station House Office, Jubilee Hills Police Station, Hyderabad 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.IOUT]

4. One CC to Sri Mohammed Moinuddin, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Syed Hameed, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies (Along with a joint memo of Compromise) VHA'SL NOTE: Total Amount of Rs. '10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri lr4ohammed Moinuddin. counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble court vide order dated 25.08.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the,,Director, sainik welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only )to the High court Legal sevices committee for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and filed lvlemo as proof of compliance USR No. 104223 ot 2025, dated 20-o9-2025 Elr t-,:,* - .:.- l i.4 1 i'.'1 4e TL tY() $' (- $ tle ll.l ''!/-. HIGH COURT DATED: 2510812025 ,s COMMON ORDER l.A. NO: 2 AND 3 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.9874 ol 2025 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD J..L ] 1 \'- CRL.P.NO. -4 n -\ , OF2025 l{ 7Y Between: Syed Saleem S/o Syed Jalal, aged 37 years, Occ: Business, R/o H. NO.B-3-229 lD I 421H, Hylam Colony, Venkatagiri, Yousufguda, Hyderabad, N/o Naginenipally Village, Bommalaramaram Mandai, Yadadri Bhongir District. 1 2 And The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana At Hyderabad. Ankita Das D/o Gautam Das, eged 20 years, Occ: Receptionist in Antera Restaurant, R/o H. No.B-3- 22910 / 42, Hylam Colony, Gayatri Hills, Hyderbad, N/o Kapasdhanga, Shiptola, Hugly, West Bengal. ... Petitioner JOINT MEMO ...Respondents It is submitted that the petitioner and the respondent No.2 has resolved their issue and entered into an amicable settlement at the intervention of elders and well wishers of both of us and to this effect a separate compromise petition is also filed. Hence this Joint Memo. Hyderabad Date:30-07-2025 , ul Respondent No.2 44J1Idt DqS Counse for Respondent No.2 Petitioner 4= Counsel for Petitioner DISI-RICT: HYDE RABA Ji{ THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE O= TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD CRL,P.NO. oF 2025 JOINT MEMO SYED HAME ED (253 77 Advocate Counsel for Respondent No.Z --.-.--...:..'-.-_ ^"'*'- ': - -__'-- : i-} f; t ]1:: F'itilEf,:{.UT*fr' ,r,ii;.. . I:..r::'' .. :: li.;rii;:liill'+;,:i ,!i1t:l:t''i+lrl 1:... l.'"c oii'i.j r,-;, i Ic'|,:r': : l1 :Etted-bY: ,. .. MOHAMMED MOI 1it:iil*';:l;i:; AdVOCate/S UD I N Counset ror tn€FdtiiiiinlVs'