High Court · 2025

1. Radha Krishna ,Automobile Private Limited, D.No.4-151, NH-5' Prasadampadu, M.jayawada, Andhra Pradesh - 521 108, Represented by its Authorized Representative tVlr. M.V. Srinivas. 2. Mls. Radha Madhav Automobile Private Limited, D.No.4-1 51 , NH-5, Prasadampadu, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh - 521 108, Represented by its Authorized Representative Mr.M.V. Srinivas. 3. Yashoda Krishna Automobile Private Limited, D.No.4-151 , NH-s' Prasadampadu, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh - 521 108, Represented by its Authorized Representative Mr.M.V. Srinivas. 4. Leela Krishna Automobile Private Limited, D.No.4-151, NH-5, Prasadampadu, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh - 521 108, Represented by its Authorized Representative Mr.M.V. Srinivas 5. Maganti Subramanyam, S/o. Venkateshwarlu, Age: 90 yqars,.Occ: P-ug'I,"^q!' Chiirman of M/s.Yishoda Krishna Automobiles Pvt.Ltd. R/o. H.No.40-15-B/2' Brundavan Colony,Babbipeta, Vij ayawada. 6. Maoanti Madhusudhana Sarma, S/o. Subramanyam, Age: 56 years, Occ: Budlness, Director of M/s.Yashoda Krishna Automobiles Pvt.Ltd. F/o. H.No.40- 1 5-8/2, Brundavan. Colony,Babbipeta, Vijayawada. 7. Maganti Venkata Srinivas, S/o. Subramanyam,Age: 60years, Occ: Qusjn-e.s9' Director of M/s.Yashoda Krishna Automobiles Pvt.Ltd. Rl/ o. H.No.40-15-81 2' Brundavan Colony, Babbipeta, Vijayawada B. Maganti Chandrahouli, S/o. Subramanyam, {ge,54years, Occ: .!qs1n^e.sg, Dirdctor of M/s.Yashoda Krishna Automobiles Pvt.Ltd. Fl/ o. H. No.40-15-8/ 2, Brundavan Colony,Babbipeta, Vij ayawada

9. Nethi Shekar, 5/6. Nethi Rama Subba Rao Age: 56 years, Occ: Business, Ryo.H.No.1013/29, Barkatpura, Near Kachiguda Junior College' Barkatpura, Hvderabad'500027' ..pETrroNERs AND

1. The State of TdarBana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department' Secretariat, Hyderabad

2. The Deputy Generdl of Police, Government of Telangana, l-lYderabad 3. Tovota kidbskar Motor Private Limited, Plot No.1, Bidadi lndustrial Area, Rahanagara District, Kamataka - 562109, Rep by its Authorized Represeitativg tVtr,Deepak Rao K R, Working as Company Secretary and Manager - LegglBrd Secretarial Division

4. The Station l-bose Officer (SHO), Uppal' Rachakonda Commissionerate, Hyderabad

5. Kirntham Shekar Reddy, S/o. Mohan Reddy, Age: 34 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No.2-1 77, Brahmanapally, Hayathnagar, Hyderabad

6. Dr. Rajender Reddy Atla, S/o.A.Gopal Reddy, Age: not kr rwn, Occ: Retd.Employee, Rl/ o. 1 1- 10-92 I 2l 2, Chaiiany-apuri, Hvr erabad. 7. Anumula Aswahtama Reddy, Age: 53 years, No. 4-7-10,' 3P, Uppal, 8. lmmaneni Rama Rao, Sio. Late S V Rao, Age: 43 years, ()cc: Advocate, Rl/o. 9. !q1rqd!yThermal Reddy, S/o Penta Reddy, Age: 48yrs, Occ: Farmer, Rl/o 6-1 -306/1, Padmarao Nagar, Secundreabad Raghavend ranagar, Hyderabad. H.No.3-6, Bhrahmanapally, Hayathnagar ManOal, Rachal rnda ...RESPONDENTS Petition under A(icle 226 of the Constitution of lndi;r praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the t igh Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction, more particularly rne in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent ,los.2 and 4 in not quashing the FiRs vide Nos. 53312022, 87512022, BZ6t')- t22. 921t2022 and 92712022 u1s.420,406 of IPC R/w.34 IPC pending before tr r Respondent No.4, filed.by the respondents No.5 to 8 herein, as these caqes ar€ he subject matter of sole arbitrator Mr.Justice R.V.Raveendran, Former Judge of I e Supreme court of lndia, as illegal, arbitrary and consequenfly direct the officii t respondent Nos.2 and 4 not to take any coercive steps including arrest against t re petitioners herein in furtherance in case of issuing any FIR or FlRs against ,t e petitioners as the matter is in civil nature and disputes are pending betv( en petitioners and Respondent No.3 before the Sole Arbitrator appointed by Ie Hon,ble Supreme couil of lndia Mr.Justice R.V.Raveendran, Former Judge of t e supreme court of , lndia, as per the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme,Court. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the ci-( umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cou 1 may be pleased to quash the FlRs vide Nos. 533/2022 , 87st2022, 876t2022, g? t2o22 and 927t2o22 uts. 420, 406 of IPC R/w.34 lPC, pending before the R' pondent No.4, filed against the petitioners herein by the respondents No.5 to 9 pe rding disposal of the main Writ Petition. a IAN :2OF 2023 1, Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay all further proceedings in FrRs vide Nos. 533/2022 , B7st2o22, gr6t2o22, g21t2o22 and 92712022 urs.42o' 406 of rpc Fl/w.34 rpc, pending before the Respondent No.4, filed against the petitioners herein by the respondents No.5 to g including the arrest of the petitioners, disposal of the main Writ petition. iendinS Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI p- N. ARUN KUMAR (Not present) Counsel for the RespondentJrlo. 1,2 & 4: MR. B. SRIOHAR, AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondentl,lo"3: MR. K. RAJIV REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No. 5, 6, 7 & 9: -- Counsel forthe Respondent Nb.8: MR. G. NAGA RAJU ,. : The Court made the following: ORDER t i- ,l,li, ,1 \ THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVI.S RAO WRIT PETITI ON No.2 4827 of202: ORDER: This Wdt Petition has been filed challenginp the action of respondent Nos.2 and 4 in not quashing FIR Nos'533 175' 8'76'921' and 927 of 2022 and for other reliefs' t { 2 There is no representation on behalf of the petit oners' either in physical mode or virtual mode' 3 Mr.K.Rajiv Reddy, learned counsel for respondcr t No'3 present'

4. Mr.B.Sridhar, leamed Assistant Government tl:ader for Home' appearing for respondent Nos'l, 2, and 4' submit; that during the pendency of this writ petition, the tnvestigatin I Officer' after conducting the investigation, has fited final reports in the aforesaid crimes. The concerned Court has taken cognizance rnd numbered the cases as C.C.Nos.3301, 3069, 3020,3022' and 306C of 2024' and the same are Pending consideration'

5. By virtue of the same' the cause in the preserr writ petition does not survive for adjudication' I l l I I I l 2

6. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. However, petitioners are granted liberty to avail the remedies as available under law, if so they are aggrieved. No costs Pending miscellaneous applications, ifany, shall stand closed. SD/.AHMEO ABDULLA KHAN STANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To

1. One CC to SRI P. N. ARUN KUMAR, Advocate IOPUCI 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Cou( for the State of Telangana 3. One CC to SRI K. RAJIV REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI G NAGA RAJU, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies louTl MMT AJ,T HIGH COURT DATED:1710912025 ORDER WP.No.24827 of 2023 iHE S ( o C) * lt 3 ,lili 2ti/ri : )prl.--ct rf -,< a ( c\\' CLOSING OF TTIE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT C@STS .t (' F r\,1 \*\'