✦ High Court of India · 16 Apr 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 16 Apr 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
16 Apr 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,029 words

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the notice dated 30.08.2023 for conducting of survey to demarcate the land in Sy No.961 situated at Nirmal Shivar, Nirmal Urban Mandal, Nirmal District lA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order vacating the interim stay granted on osto9t2o23 in the above writ petition No.24738 of 2023 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. NARESH REDOy CHTNNOLLA Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.S: SRI S GANESH RAO The Court made the following: ORDER w "\ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY IIIRIT PETITION NO.24738 of 2023 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking to set aside the impugned notice dated 30.O8.2O23 issued by respondent Nos.3 and 4 to conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of land in Survey No.961 situated at Nirmal Shivar, Nirmal Urban Mandal, Nirmai District, as illegal and arbitrary. It is stated that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac,O.3O guntas in Survey No.925/A1 situatecl at Nirmal Shivar, Nirmal Urban Mandal, Nirmal District, having inherited the same from his father and his name has been recorded in the revenue records and pattadar pass book and title deed have also been issued in his favour. It is further stated that respondent No.S herein, who is the owner of the adjacent land in Survey No.961, having converted the said land into plots and sold the same in favour of third parties, taking undue advantage of revenue entries in Dharani portal in his favour, made an application on the hle of respondent Nos.3 and 4 seeking to conduct survey and demarcate the land in Survey No.96l . The grievance of the petitioner is that acting-upon the said application, respondent '/' 7 t: Nos.3 and 4 issued the impugned notice dated 12.07.2023 to the petitioner for conducting survey and demarcation in respect of land in Survey No.96L Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire extent of land in Survey No.961 stood in the name of respondent No.5 has already been converted into house plots and sold the same in favour of third parties; there is no land available in his name in the said survey number; taking advantage of stray entries in the revenue records, respondent No.S is making a false claim over the said land; and as such, in the absence of any document to establish his claim that he is the owner and possessor of the said land, respondent No.5 is not entitled to make any application seeking to conduct survey and demarcation of the said 1and. Learned counsel appearing for rcspondent No.5, on the other hand, submits that even though. respondent No.5 sold some of the plots out of Survey No.961, he is stil1 having some open land admeasuring Ac.O.11 guntas unsold; and as such he is entitled to make an application seeking to conduct survey and demarcation of the said land. J Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record Since it is stated already been converted that the land in Survey No.261 has into non-agricultural purpose, the survey authorities are not conferred with any power or authori$r to conduct survey in respect of non-agricultural land and as such, the impugned notice issuecl by respondent Nos.3 and 4 to conduct survey and demarcation of land deserves to be set aside. ln Survey No.261 Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned notice dated 30.Og.2023 issued by respondent No.3 and 4 is set aside. It is needless to observe that if respondent No.S is having any claim over the land, he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedies before the competent Civil Court, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// SD/.A.SRINIVAS REDDY A ISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Principal Secretary, Revenue Departme nt, s retariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Nirmal District I

3. The Tahsildar, Nirmal Urban Mandal' Nirmal District' 4. The Mandal Surveyor, Nirmal Urban Mandal' Nirmal District' 5. One CC to SRl. NARESH REDDY CHINNOLLA Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to SRI S GANESH RAO Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE 'High Court for the State of Telangana touTl /

8. Two CD CoPies KKS/BSK ,, ? q J o rtE STAI 1 ( ir.o 9^' 2E JUN 20[ O6:sPAT arr' HIGH COURT DATED:1610412025 I \ ORDER WP.No.24738 of 2023 ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 4 ,// I /1r ,/3

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments