Andhra Pradesh High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
1 The District Collector, Warangal, Warangal District. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Warangal District. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mahaboobabad, Warangal District. 4 T. Nammalwar, S/o. Not Known to the Petitioners, R/o. Kesamudram, Warangal District. 5 Maloth Mangya Naik, S/o. Not Known to the Petitioners, M.P.T.C. Narsingapuram, R/o. Kesamudram, Warangal District. 6 Pyndla Srinivas, S/o. Not Known to the Petitioners, R/o. Kesamudram, Warangal District. 7 Venkata Chary, S/o. Not Known to the Petitioners, R/o. Kesamudram, Warangal District. Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court .....RESPONDENTS
will be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to forthwith initiate action against the unofficial respondent Nos. 4 to 7 dt. 2-6-2004 submitted by the pursuant to the complaint petitioner and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 herein not to entertain the No Confidence Motion to be held on 14-6-2004. For the Petitioner : MR.K.RAM REDDY, Advocate For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: The GP FOR HOME The Court, at the stage of admission, made the following
ORDER:
Operative part
At the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners represents that the petitioners intend to withdraw the petition. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER
28.6.2004 To: 1 The District Collector, Warangal, Warangal District. 2 The Superintendent of Police, Warangal District, Warangal. 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mahaboobabad, Warangal District. 4. Two CCs to Government Pleader for Home, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) 5. Two CD copies. DVS/Kvh
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 28 Jun 2004. The bench was S ANANDA REDDY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.