High Court · 2025

G u ndeti Be n ny Ab h ishek@ ::['l ?[ B%*"'iJfi':ti,"ofi:*J'1u",";rA, M'andal), Karimnagar ::l"ur*ili8,:#ls#sriffiHel?l?li'ff+i.a'{*r{i,[tln Naoar, KukatPallY. Aadhar n[t"s eacnpaite, Ranga ReddY' ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 1 & 2 I 2 AND 1 2 The State of Telangarla, Through SHO' Tukatamgate PSl Rep by Public Prosecutor, High Qourt at Hyderabao' Chekka Gavathri, D/o Chekka Narashima Aged -?9 Rio 10-4-80/D/1/a26 Adoagufta Ilia Cr'lno1a Shekar Nasar' WC' Secunderabad years' Occ Pvt Employee' ..'RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 OF BNSS pralnp that in the circumstances stated in the Memorand";i i;-";; ot cii*in"t p"iition' the Hiqh court may be oleased to quash sc rtrooirlidialn-tn" file of Snl Sessions Judse FTC for as against ihe petitioners/Accused No 1 Atrocities Asainst Women iii';;;"';;; and 2 l.A. NO: 1 oF 2025 Between: Chekka Gavathri. D/o Chek(s Narashima Aged 29 yeais. Occ. pvt Employee, S"ocJ3;1-,tr#1/a26Addasuttae.alff ano%"sln"e(i,"r,{rs",.wc, AND ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.2/ DE-FAcro coMpLAtNANr in t.A. ruo.-r a z b'r'iiil 1 The State of Telangana, Through SHO, Tukatamgate pls, Rep by public Prosecutor. High Ciurt rt HvO""rrOi'j- RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1 in t.A. NO. 1 & 2 OF 2o2S 2. Gundeti Bennv Abhishek@Benny, S/o G.Shanti Kumar Age 23 years, Caste. No.503 bxoter. Maonapur, cr',or,p,"iJn"o'riviiriJ" lh"o 3. Siriki Divya Jvothi e.D1vya._Wo. S.Satyanaruyana,Aged about 54 years, BC Christian. o"c, pvr:Joo I -CL"nilrlij f,','^"ri,i?;,,Yi,5';)" ial-ire 'srir"i"il"g,.., occ SociaI W6rker, Fro.c6. oiva'tit -S;,#i;; fi ;s ;'. ru i ; ip";ilil'n, o n", 46 Ji;, F[i ffi t i : ?i Sr^?1,"i&. g,;t --" Apts, Bachpaite ilanga Reddy- #,..,Xn X,fl Ac c us E D, ?lilJ31TJ'lBI iig Petition under Section 3s9(6) oF BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds otiriri"IiH"tition, thr; High court mav be pleased to permit the oeririonerto compromise the case i, scrrlolo+i";i;o;:0." the file of Spr' sessions Judge FTC t"l nitr".iti"r #inst women .r at Hyderabad against the Accused trto t a z ov lompouniing tne c,ffence in terms ot comprom ise. "c:,=;"rT l.A. NO:2 oF 2025 Petition under section 359(2) of BNSS praying tnat irr the circumstances stated in the Memorandum^of Grounds ot cr,mir,ll]"tition, the High court mav be pleased to quash sc No. 641 oI 2024 "rlr," rii. "tipr. Sessions Judoe FTi for Attrocities against women. 1 at Hyderaba; ;;;;.;i the Accused No. .r & 2, by -' compounding the offence in terms oi compromis"e. These petitions coming on for hearing, upon perusing flre Memorandum of Grounds of criminar pelition and upon hearing the arguments of sri K. RAJASHEKAR' Advocate for the petitioner in main Lnrp a Rr-.spondent Nos. 1,2 iN I'A. NOS' 1 & 2 Of 2025 ANd SRI JITHENDER RAO VEERAMP.LLA, thE AdditiONAI Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1 in both the cRLp ,i I A Nos. 1 &2 of - 2025 and of Sri KAVALI MANYAM KONDA, Advocate for the Respondent No 2 in the main CRLP & Petitioner in I A. Nos l &2 oI 2025 ' The Gourt made the following: COMMON ORDER I THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.9788 o12025 I : I COMMON OR DER 1. This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in S.C.No.641 of 202.4 on the file of learned special sessions Judge Fast rrack court for Atrocities Against Women 'l at Hyderabad, for the offence punishable under Sections 420,376 and 506 of lpC.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel app,earing for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 as well as respondernt No.2lde facto complainant that during pendency of the present criminar petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordinlly, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 have been filed to record compromisr: between them and to compound the offences.

3. The learned Assistant public prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions. 4 Perused the affidavits filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.1 and 2 oI 2025 which disclose that she has willingly 2 ETD-J Crtp)788 2t)2 5 consented for compromise' Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana v'de orders dated0l.oS.2o2spassedbythisCourt.TheSecretary,HighCourt Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court' the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 12'082025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully and without any coJrqion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise' ln view of the above, l'A Nos'1 and 2 of 2025 are allowed' 6. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings inS.C.No.64lof2024onthefileoflearnedSpecialsessionsJudge Fast Track Court for Atrocities Against Women 1 at Hyderabad' registered against the petitioners/accused Nos'1 and 2' are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners/accused Nos'1 and 2 paying an ----------7' 3 Crlp 9788 )02s amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings tuc.No.52188,926279, State Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (2OO1O), IFSC Code:SB1N0020070, MtCR No.500004057) and Rs.5,,000/_ (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (0:2) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shal stand closed. SD/. MOHD.ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI FFICER To, '1. The XXll Additionar chief Metroporitan Magistrate at securrderabad. 2. The Station House Officer, Tukaramgate pS, Hyderabad. 3. One CC to SRt K RAJASHEKAR Advocate tOpUCl 4. One CC to SRt KAVALT IVANYA|V KONDA Advocate [OPLJC] S Two ccs to PUBLIC pRosECUTOR, High court for the state of rerangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies ry- GR/PSL Note: Total Amount of Rs 10,000r ( Rupees Ten thousand onry ) has been paid by sri K RAJASHEKAR. counser for tie petrrioner ;;i;"i; 6y'inl:f..'ror[:i"rrt vide order dated 22-08-2025 as. Rs. 5 OOO/_ ( Rupees five thoi,sani onfv i" tIin" "Director, sainik Werfare Hyderabad, ano Rs s.odor- i nrp""r-Fr" ti,*ll,1o ii,.',iv r to the Terangana High coudndvocate^s^ Association, iyderabad iiruJ rvuro'r, proof of compliance vide USR No. 91663 of 2025 ;;ted 2g_OB-202s "na HIGH COURT DATED:22 t0B12O2S ) COMMON ORDER \:' _ .j t.; )a (: 0I sEP 2t16 l.A.Nos.1 and 2 ot 2025 ln/and CRLp.No.978g of 2O2S a- !'r. :),. ?. |'.'\'\''.-.?" ,1:i-] \.;, ALLOWING THE t.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2025 and CRLp 1 'lh